Supreme Court nominee Jackson doesn’t ‘quite remember the basis’ for Dred Scott decision

Choose Ketanji Brown Jackson, who President Biden nominated to the Supreme Courtroom to grow to be the primary ever Black feminine justice, admitted Tuesday that she couldn’t recall the idea for the notorious Dred Scott resolution, which in 1857 stated {that a} Black particular person whose ancestors had been slaves couldn’t be an American citizen.

The case got here up throughout Jackson’s affirmation listening to on Tuesday, when she confronted questioning from Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. Cornyn introduced up the idea of substantive due course of, a authorized doctrine utilized to develop the Structure’s due course of clause to guard varied rights not enumerated within the Structure.

LIVE UPDATES: BIDEN’S SUPREME COURT PICK KETANJI BROWN JACKSON TESTIFIES FOR SECOND DAY

“Why is not substantive due course of simply one other means for judges to cover their coverage making underneath the guise of deciphering the Structure,” Cornyn stated, criticizing the doctrine.

Earlier, Cornyn referenced the Scott case as having been cited as “a product of substantive due course of.” The case was introduced by Dred Scott, a slave who left Missouri and went to Illinois, the place slavery was unlawful. Upon returning to Missouri, Scott sued claiming that he had been freed by transferring to a state the place he couldn’t be a slave. The Supreme Courtroom dominated in opposition to him, stating that he didn’t have standing to convey the case within the first place, but additionally that permitting Scott to be free would deprive his proprietor of property – Scott himself – with out due course of.

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY IN SPOTLIGHT AS REPUBLICANS DEMAND MORE FROM SUPREME COURT NOMINEE

Responding to Cornyn’s query about substantive due course of, Jackson described the doctrine itself, noting that justices “have interpreted that to imply not simply procedural rights relative to authorities motion, but additionally the safety of sure private rights associated to intimacy and autonomy.”

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, questions Supreme Courtroom nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson throughout a Senate Judiciary Committee affirmation listening to on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 22, 2022.
(AP Photograph/Andrew Harnik)

Jackson famous that this has included rights to rear kids, journey, marry, marry a special race, get an abortion and use contraception.

“Treating slaves as chattel property,” Cornyn interjected, citing the Scott case.

“I do not fairly keep in mind the idea for the Dred Scott opinion,” Jackson stated, stating that she trusted Cornyn’s tackle it.

Whereas substantive due course of was the idea for the court docket’s reasoning that they may not deprive a slave proprietor of property by deeming the slave to be free, the idea of the choice was that even former slaves couldn’t sue in federal court docket as a result of they may not be U.S. residents.

The Scott case was successfully nullified with the ratification of the Fourteenth Modification, which said that each one individuals born or naturalized within the U.S. are residents.