Former President Joe Biden, when he served as a Delaware senator, railed against foreign narco-terrorists flooding the U.S. with highly addictive substances, calling for an “international strike force” against the drug traffickers in a fiery 1989 speech. 

“Let’s go after the drug lords where they live with an international strike force. There must be no safe haven for these narco-terrorists and they must know it,” then-Sen. Biden said in an 1989 video speech addressing then-President George H.W. Bush’s efforts to combat the narcotics flooding U.S. streets. 

The remarks have resurfaced on social media as the Trump administration currently faces outrage from Democrats over its strikes on suspected drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean. 

Biden’s address was billed as the Democrat Party’s official response to then-President H.W. Bush’s Sept. 5, 1989, address on his administration’s efforts to tackle the crack cocaine epidemic and rampant use of cocaine, C-SPAN footage reported. Bush had announced that the administration would double federal assistance to state and local law enforcement to tackle the drug problem, $65 million emergency assistance to nations such as Colombia to “fight against the cocaine cartels,” an overall $1.5 billion increase in drug-related federal spending on law enforcement and other initiatives. 

EXPERT REVEALS WHAT IT WOULD TAKE FOR TRUMP TO DEPLOY TROOPS TO VENEZUELA: ‘POSSIBILITY OF ESCALATION’

Biden, in the Democrat Party’s response, called for “another D-Day” to end the war on drugs. 

“The president says he wants to wage a war on drugs, but if that’s true, what we need is another D-Day, not another Vietnam, not another limited war fought on the cheap and destined for stalemate and human tragedy,” Biden said in his response. 

Biden railed that the H.W. Bush administration was failing to take stronger actions on drugs at a time when cocaine from Colombia flooded the nation and U.S. cities were rocked by the crack epidemic that persisted through the 1980s and early 1990s, when crystal meth and heroin became the drugs of choice. 

“We speak with great concern about the drug problem in America today, but we fail to appreciate or address it for what it really is, the number one threat to our national security,” Biden said during his 1989 address on the war on drugs. “It affects the readiness of our army, the productivity of our workers and the achievement of our students and the very health and safety of our families.”

“America is under attack, literally under attack by an enemy who is well financed, well supplied and well armed and fully capable of declaring total war against a nation and its people, as we’ve seen in Colombia. Here in America, the enemy is already ashore, and for the first time, we are fighting and losing the war on our own soil,” Biden continued before arguing the U.S. should “go after the drug lords where they live.”

CAPITOL HILL REVOLT THREATENS TRUMP’S VENEZUELA PLAYBOOK AMID CARIBBEAN STRIKE OVERSIGHT

Fox News Digital reached out to Biden’s office Friday inquiring if he stands by his 1989 address or has any additional comment to include, but did not immediately receive a response. 

In recent weeks, the Trump administration has come under fire for carrying out a series of military strikes on boats suspected of trafficking narcotics from Venezuela in the waters off of Central and South America. The administration has carried out at least 22 fatal strikes on the boats since September, killing dozens of suspected drug traffickers. 

The administration has defended the strikes, saying the U.S. is engaged in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels after the groups evolved into transnational terror organizations.

Trump has said the strikes are part of an effort to curb drugs flooding into the U.S., while experts have weighed in that the pressure on Venezuela is likely also to force Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s ouster and end his regime in the country. 

US CARRIES OUT 22ND STRIKE ON ALLEGED DRUG VESSEL OPERATED BY A DESIGNATED TERRORIST ORGANIZATION

Democrats have taken issue with a pair of strikes on Sept. 2 against an alleged drug boat from Venezuela. The White House confirmed the military carried out an initial strike on the boat before firing off a second that killed two suspected traffickers, sparking Democrats to claim the administration committed potential war crimes. 

“If the reports are true, Pete Hegseth likely committed a war crime when he gave an illegal order that led to the killing of incapacitated survivors of the U.S. strike in the Caribbean,” Nevada Democratic Sen. Sen. Jacky Rosen said in a statement earlier in December. 

RAND PAUL JOINS DEMS ON ‘WAR POWERS RESOLUTION’ CLAIMING TRUMP ADMIN COULD SOON STRIKE VENEZUELAN TERRITORY

Several Republican members of the House Armed Services Committee and House Foreign Affairs Committee told Fox News Digital that the Trump administration has been well within its rights to act against Maduro’s regime. They added that they’re eager for more information after several strikes against alleged Venezuelan drug boats and Trump’s heightened rhetoric targeting Maduro.

Trump campaigned on ending the flow of narcotics flowing across U.S. borders in 2024, vowing after his election win to deploy the Navy to assist in the effort. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“To stop the deadly drugs that are poisoning our people, I will deploy the U.S. Navy to impose a full fentanyl blockade on the waters of our region.…The drug cartels are waging war on America, and we will destroy those cartels!” Trump wrote on Truth Social a day before his inauguration.

 Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report. 

WASHINGTON — A renewed push by the Trump administration to settle Russia’s war in Ukraine is jolting European governments that are fearful Washington is laying the groundwork for an ultimatum to Kyiv on Moscow’s terms.

The flurry of diplomatic engagements has left Ukrainian and European diplomats alarmed that President Trump and his team have accepted Russia’s rationale for the war, which Vladimir Putin launched in 2022 in order to conquer Ukraine and destroy its democratic government, precipitating the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II.

It is the latest seesaw movement in Trump’s policy on Ukraine since retaking office. The president has repeatedly flared anger and frustration with Ukraine over its insistence on defending itself, only to reverse course days or weeks later, temporarily embracing European partnerships, the NATO alliance and Kyiv’s prospects for victory.

The administration seemed to settle on a long-term course this week, publishing a National Security Strategy document Friday asserting that Europe has “unrealistic expectations” for the outcome of the war and suggesting it would work to cultivate political “resistance” to Europe’s “current trajectory.”

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, in perception and practice, should not be seen as an expanding alliance, the document reads, a nod to a long-standing Russian argument justifying its military posture on the continent.

Americans overwhelmingly oppose Trump’s current approach by a 2-to-1 margin — which would coerce Ukraine to give up its sovereign territory, including land that Russia has failed to secure on the battlefield despite suffering more than a million casualties. A recent Gallup poll found that Republicans disapprove of Trump’s policy on Ukraine more than any other issue.

Still, the president’s advisors seem to be warming to a plan that would force Ukraine to concede territory in exchange for nonbinding commitments to secure what remains of the country going forward.

Steve Witkoff, a former real estate developer, and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law who negotiated the Abraham Accords among Middle East countries during Trump’s first term, are leading the current effort, shuttling between Moscow and Florida, where they have hosted Ukrainian diplomats, to work out a peace plan. The current framework is based on a 28-point document drafted by the Americans with consultation from the Russians.

A phone conversation between Witkoff and his Russian counterpart, a transcript of which leaked last month, revealed Witkoff offering tips to Moscow on how to win over Trump’s sympathies. Russian officials have also expressed confidence to the local press that Trump’s team understands their demands.

“There is a possibility that the U.S. will betray Ukraine on the issue of territory without clarity on security guarantees,” Emmanuel Macron, France’s president, said on a call among European leaders this week, according to a transcript obtained by Der Spiegel.

“They are playing games,” Friedrich Merz, chancellor of Germany, said of the Americans on the same call, “both with you and with us.”

In Ukraine, prominent analysts have questioned whether a peace plan that cedes territory would even be upheld by soldiers and generals on the battlefield. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has insisted to Trump that the country’s territorial integrity, as well as future security guarantees, must be the cornerstones of a viable peace agreement.

But Trump could endanger Ukraine’s ability to fight on if he ultimately loses patience, experts said.

“The U.S. still provides intelligence assistance, which is important, and has so far been willing to sell weapons to European countries to transfer to NATO,” said Brian Taylor, director of the Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs at Syracuse University.

The United States has already halted direct aid to Ukraine’s war effort, instead agreeing to a NATO arrangement that sells weapons and equipment to Europe that are, in turn, provided to Kyiv.

“If the U.S. stops even doing that — and it would be quite a radical policy change if the U.S. is unwilling even to sell weapons to European countries — then Europe will have to continue on the path it is already on, which is to bolster its own defense production capacity,” Taylor said.

Macron, Merz and other European allies, including British Prime Minister Kier Starmer and the king of England, have implored the president to remain steadfast in support of Ukraine — and to increase the strain on Moscow that they insist could ultimately change Putin’s calculus over time.

European leaders are debating whether to deploy a portion of $220 billion in Russian assets, frozen in European banks since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, to Kyiv in the form of assistance, or whether to hold on to the funds as a point of future negotiations.

“If the Trump administration and the Europeans are willing to do so, there is real pressure that can be brought to bear on a Russian military and economy that is under increasing strain,” said Kyle Balzer, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. “Russia’s economic growth has taken a heavy hit due to lower energy prices and Russia’s growing defense burden. And the Russian army is taking casualties that the Russian people won’t be able to ignore forever.”

Speaking with reporters this week, Trump said that roughly 7,000 Russian soldiers are dying on the battlefield on a weekly basis — a staggering number in modern warfare. Comparatively, over eight years of the U.S. war in Iraq, fewer than 4,500 American soldiers died.

“Such pressure will only have a decisive impact if the Trump administration stops giving Putin hope that Russia can secure a favorable agreement in return for deals that benefit American businesses,” Balzer added. “The West must attack Russia’s resolve and convince Putin that he cannot achieve his goals. Continuing to give Putin hope makes that an unlikely prospect.”