Connect with us

Politics

Nonstop attacks about Trump, Biden's mental acuity loom over the first presidential debate

Published

on

Nonstop attacks about Trump, Biden's mental acuity loom over the first presidential debate

For those with questions about the leading 2024 presidential candidates’ mental acuity, or those involved in stoking the increasingly heated spin online around such questions, Saturday night was a bonanza.

President Biden appeared to “freeze up,” as the New York Post put it, as he walked offstage at a downtown Los Angeles fundraising appearance with former President Obama and late-night host Jimmy Kimmel.

“A scene right out of ‘Weekend at Bernie’s,’” Chris LaCivita, senior Trump campaign advisor and chief operating officer of the Republican National Committee, told The Times.

The Biden campaign and its allies accused the Post and others who circulated the “freeze” meme of misrepresenting the footage. In other cases they went further, attacking media outlets and Republicans for sharing doctored video of the president.

“Rupert Murdoch’s sad little Super Pac, the New York Post, is back to disrespecting its readers and itself once again by pretending the President taking in an applauding crowd for a few seconds is somehow wrong,” White House spokesperson Andrew Bates said on X.

Advertisement

The same evening, former President Trump called for his 2024 rival to take a “cognitive test,” claiming he himself had “aced” one while in office — then botched the name of the doctor who administered it. “Ronny Johnson. Does everybody know Ronny Johnson?” Trump said, meaning Dr. Ronny Jackson, who is now a Texas congressman.

Next week’s debate, which will be broadcast by CNN and simulcast on other networks, will be one of the few moments for the public to view the candidates side-by-side, unfiltered, for an extended period of time. Voters will be able to judge for themselves each man’s vitality, energy and mental acuity.

Peter Reed, director of the Sanford Center for Aging at the University of Nevada Reno, said it’s not possible to know a person’s mental acuity based on video snippets. Cognitive and physical capabilities vary from person to person — and there’s no way to tell just by watching a five-second clip, he added.

“It would be extremely difficult for me as a professional to watch either of the presidential candidates on TV, or see something that was posted on social media, and make an accurate assessment of their abilities. I just don’t think that that’s possible,” Reed said. “And frankly, any nonprofessionals that are armchair diagnosing either of these folks are off base.”

President Biden arrives onstage at Saturday night’s Los Angeles fundraiser with former President Obama.

Advertisement

(Alex Brandon / Associated Press)

This potential inflection point in the campaign — one of two scheduled debates between the men — comes as the candidates and their allies grab hold of video moments of alleged or apparent slippage, circulating them for maximum outrage on TikTok, X and Instagram. In a race between an 81-year-old incumbent and a 78-year-old challenger, age has been fully weaponized.

Just days before the L.A. fundraiser, critics claimed video showed Biden wandering off during a G-7 summit. (“Meanderer in chief,” the New York Post said.) In fact, he was walking over to greet some French paratroopers.

The political combat via video images further draws attention to the fact that the majority of the Americans say they are dissatisfied with the major parties’ candidates for president — in part because they’re both so old.

Advertisement

A February ABC News/Ipsos poll found that 59% of Americans think both Biden and Trump are too old to serve. Biden consistently fares worse on the age question than Trump — 63% of voters said they were not very or not at all confident in his mental capability to serve as president, compared with 57% who thought the same of Trump, according to a March poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

At the debate, “Biden has to be direct and frank and take it in a way that Trump can’t, which is to acknowledge it,” Democratic strategist Doug Herman said in an interview. “Trump won’t acknowledge his age. Biden can and should. He should make light of it. He should refer to it in ways that are humorous and not defensive, and if he does that he’ll win this debate hands down.”

Amy Pason, an associate professor of communication studies at the University of Nevada Reno, said that assessing candidates’ faculties in the context of age is not new in a presidential election. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was scrutinized in 2016 for coughing. Trump countered by releasing a physician’s note declaring him “the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.”

In the 1940s, President Franklin Roosevelt projected a healthy persona, usually appearing seated behind tables to obscure the fact he used a wheelchair as a result of polio. In the first televised debate in 1960 between Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy, many who watched thought the young, suave and freshly made-up Kennedy won, while those who listened on the radio believed the strongly worded, decisive-sounding Nixon did.

“All of these kinds of images and portraying yourself as someone who is healthy, vigorous, able to do the things that we think that you need to do as a president are always … a place for campaigns to naturally go to as an attack on their opponent,” Pason said.

Advertisement

Democrats have been quick to pounce on Trump’s repeated verbal miscues and what they say is his relative incoherence when it comes to talking policy. They’ve highlighted Trump confusing former President Jimmy Carter with tennis legend Jimmy Connors.

Progressive activist Brian Tyler Cohen invoked the mantra of former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, who told a journalist: “The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with s—.”

Former President Trump at last week's rally in Detroit.

Former President Trump at last week’s rally in Detroit.

(Carlos Osorio / Associated Press)

Cohen’s point is that Democrats shouldn’t stand by as Republicans disseminate misleading clips of Biden, whom Cohen has interviewed on his YouTube channel. Cohen’s social media feeds are full of videos of Trump appearing addled or needing help walking off stage, though from another angle, it’s clear that Trump is shaking the hand of one of his sons. For his part, Cohen says Democrats need to fight fire with fire.

Advertisement

“Here is a photo of Trump having to hold someone’s hand to guide him off stage,” Cohen wrote on X. “I’m sure this will get just as much coverage as the daily [“Biden old”] story gets.”

Cohen attended the Los Angeles fundraiser and posted forceful denunciations of the New York Post and others who said Biden froze. He’s said it’s important that Democrats not “cede any ground” when it comes to a conversation about the candidates’ mental fitness.

“The Republican Party has a mandate to make this election a referendum on age as a distraction from anything else that is more important,” Cohen said in an interview.

He said that “Republicans know” that stories about Biden’s achievements are not going “to stand up to the sexiness of some story about a purported physical gaffe on stage.”

The Biden campaign has accounts on TikTok, Instagram and X, where staffers highlight videos of Trump sounding incoherent or bungling basics about policy.

Advertisement

The accounts have featured videos of Trump saying that if he were elected “it will be a bloodbath,” and regularly highlighted Trump’s unwillingness to protect NATO allies, among other topics. The Republican National Committee runs similar accounts, which have surfaced videos of Biden falling onstage at an event at the Air Force Academy and walking gingerly to Marine One.

Voters can expect these accounts to be steadily pushing out content during the debate and right after.

Both candidates have been prepping. Biden has been at Camp David with his former chief of staff, Ron Klain, and others. The New York Times reported last week that Trump had been meeting with staffers and certain Republican senators for policy sessions in advance of next week’s showdown.

“This debate is going to be a great opportunity for President Trump to highlight his strength vs. Joe Biden’s weakness,” Trump press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Newsmax on Thursday.

Jim Demers, a New Hampshire-based Democratic strategist, said the debate will be a great moment for Biden to highlight the extent of Trump’s legal troubles and how he doesn’t have voters’ best interests in mind.

Advertisement

“Donald Trump couldn’t get a job working for almost any company in America because he couldn’t pass the background check,” Demers said.

“There are people who would have liked to have seen two younger candidates, but that isn’t the case. This race really has now taken full shape and voters are going to have to make up their mind based upon reality, and the reality is that we have two candidates who are older.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Republicans declare Biden 'unfit for office' following 'disastrous' debate performance

Published

on

Republicans declare Biden 'unfit for office' following 'disastrous' debate performance

Republicans were in full celebratory mode following Thursday’s debate between former President Trump and President Biden.

Multiple elected officials took to social media following the debate to celebrate what they described as a “resounding victory” for Trump, and a “disastrous” performance by Biden.

“Three things are clear: America was and is better under a Trump Administration, Biden is unfit to be in office and the people in his orbit should be ashamed of propping him up, Trump dominated. There can’t possibly be a second debate,” South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, who is widely believed to be a frontrunner on Trump’s VP shortlist, wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter. 

BIDEN RIPPED FOR ‘OLD’ APPEARANCE, ‘WEAK’ VOICE DURING FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE: ‘DEEPLY ALARMING’

Alabama Sen. Katie Britt wrote, “Congratulations to President Trump on his resounding victory in tonight’s Presidential Debate. The Biden-Harris experiment has failed. It’s time to return strength to the White House,” while North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, another possible VP pick, wrote Biden “offered no answers” on the major problems facing Americans.

Advertisement

“President Trump was clear, and he’s got the record to back it up! This debate was a knockout for Donald Trump,” he added.

Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Whatley called Trump’s debate performance “dominant,” and said Biden “couldn’t even understand the questions.”

TRUMP VOWS HE ‘WILL NOT BLOCK’ ABORTION PILLS OR MEDICATION IF ELECTED, SAYS HE BELIEVES IN ‘EXCEPTIONS’

Another account linked to the RNC poked fun at Biden’s closing statement, writing, “Biden ends his disastrous and humiliating debate performance just as he began — rambling incoherently. He’s not only not playing with a full deck — he can’t even find the deck. SAD!” 

Advertisement

Republican Arizona Senate candidate Kari Lake, Republican South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott and Republican Alabama Sen. Katie Britt. (Getty Images)

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., claimed Trump “proved” he is the only candidate who can save the U.S., while Republican conservative firebrand and Arizona Senate candidate Kari Lake said “[Biden] is clearly unfit for this job. I think it’s time we bring back the President that coined the phrase, YOU’RE FIRED!”

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump's answer to foreign policy woes: Never would have happened

Published

on

Trump's answer to foreign policy woes: Never would have happened

In the presidential debate former President Trump insisted repeatedly that if he had still been in the White House, Russia would not have invaded Ukraine and Hamas would not have invaded Israel.

Both claims are unprovable. But Trump repeated the assertion again and again in his debate Thursday night with President Biden.

It is true, foreign policy analysts have said, that Trump might have been able to discourage Putin from invading Ukraine — but, they’ve asked, at what cost?

Trump, a vocal admirer of Russian President Vladimir Putin, might have made concessions to Moscow — such as sacrificing Ukrainian territory — that many in the West would find unpalatable.

Advertisement

After the Russian invasion in 2022, Biden was able to rally and fortify NATO in the face of Russian aggression against Ukraine. It seems unlikely Trump would have had that influence, given that the largest of NATO countries were generally contemptuous of Trump during his administration.

Trump’s claim that Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, both militant groups backed by Iran, became emboldened because Biden’s policies built up Iran are also not completely true. The Obama administration did unfreeze some Iranian assets in foreign banks as part of the landmark Iran nuclear deal in 2015, which curbed Iran’s nuclear aspirations.

It was Trump’s decision in 2018, however, to abandon the nuclear deal — he said it didn’t go far enough — that sent Iran on a major quest to enrich uranium, which has now brought the Islamic Republic closer than ever to being able to produce a nuclear bomb.

Trump, whose support for Israel essentially eliminated Palestinian statehood aspirations from the picture, took a swipe at Biden in the debate for what he described as failing to supply Israel with the weapons it needs to fight Hamas. Biden said that is not true. The Biden administration held up a single shipment of 2,000-pound bombs to prevent them from being used in the overly crowded Gazan city of Rafah during an offensive earlier this month.

Robust weapons shipments have continued, the Pentagon says. Trump attacked Biden for his bungled handling of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. To be sure, it was a chaotic disaster that killed 13 American service members and dozens of Afghans.

Advertisement

It was one of the darkest stains on Biden’s foreign policy record. However, he was fulfilling the agreement that Trump executed — in rare negotiations with the Taliban — before leaving office.

Trump also revived a lie he told in the months leading up to his first impeachment over attempts to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to dig up dirt on the Biden family. He said Biden, as vice president, had sought to get fired a Ukrainian attorney general who was targeting his son Hunter Biden.

In fact, the prosecutor was blacklisted by the European Union, the U.S. and other groups because of his refusal to tackle corruption, which international entities had established as a task for Kyiv before it could be considered for EU membership and other benefits.

On the Ukraine war, Trump said he would be able to “get it settled fast” before he even took office on Jan. 21. In other venues, he has also said he could get Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich freed from Russian authorities who arrested him on what the U.S. says are trumped-up espionage charges. In both cases, Trump is making claims impossible to test.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Read Judge Cannon’s Ruling

Published

on

Read Judge Cannon’s Ruling

Case 9:23-cr-80101-AMC Document 655 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2024 Page 2 of 11
CASE NO. 23-80101-CR-CANNON
showing” that the affidavit in support of the Mar-a-Lago search warrant contains any material false
statements or omissions. The balance of the Motion cannot be resolved on the current record,
however, because of pertinent factual disputes, and thus the Court RESERVES RULING on those
issues as stated below, pending an evidentiary suppression hearing to be scheduled by separate
order.
DISCUSSION
A. LEGAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING A FRANKS HEARING
The Supreme Court has expressed “a strong preference” for searches conducted pursuant
to a warrant and has directed courts to accord “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination of
probable cause. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 914 (1984) (internal quotation marks
omitted); id. at 922 (“[A] warrant issued by a magistrate normally suffices to establish that a law
enforcement officer has acted in good faith in conducting the search.”) (internal quotation marks
omitted). To this end, affidavits supporting warrants are presumptively valid, Franks v. Delaware,
438 U.S. 154, 171 (1978), and courts should not invalidate warrants by interpreting affidavits in a
“hypertechnical, rather than . . . commonsense, manner,” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236,
(1983) (internal quotation marks omitted).
As enunciated in Franks, however, deference to a magistrate’s determination of probable
cause “does not preclude inquiry into the knowing or reckless falsity of the affidavit on which that
determination was based.” Leon, 468 U.S. at 914. This derives from the root assumption that,
when the Fourth Amendment requires probable cause for the issuance of a warrant, the showing
of probable cause will be “truthful.” Franks, 438 U.S. at 164–65. “Truthful” in this context does
not mean, however, “that every fact recited in the warrant affidavit is necessarily correct, for
probable cause may be founded upon hearsay and upon information received from informants, as
well as upon information within the affiant’s own knowledge that sometimes must be garnered
2

Continue Reading

Trending