Connect with us

Politics

Newsom seeks to restrict students' cellphone use in schools: 'Harming the mental health of our youth'

Published

on

Newsom seeks to restrict students' cellphone use in schools: 'Harming the mental health of our youth'

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, announced Tuesday his pledge to restrict students’ smartphone use during the school day, pointing to statements from the Biden administration that social media harms the mental health of children.

The decision comes after U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy urged Congress to require warning labels on social media platforms about their impact on young people, similar to the warning labels on cigarettes and alcohol about their impacts on a person’s health, according to POLITICO, which first reported Newsom’s announcement.

Newsom and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, have warned for years about the harm of social media to children, saying tech companies have been blocking efforts to protect young people.

Last year, Newsom called on NetChoice to drop a lawsuit against the children’s online safety law, the Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, that he signed in 2022. NetChoice, whose members include tech giants like Meta, Amazon and Google, is a trade association that advocates for free expression and free enterprise on the internet.

STATE LAWMAKERS PUSH FOR BAN ON PHONES IN SCHOOL

Advertisement

California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Tuesday his pledge to restrict students’ smartphone use during the school day. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

The governor said Tuesday he plans to build on a law he signed in 2019 that gave school districts the power to limit or ban students’ use of smartphones during school hours. He said he would work with his Democratic-controlled Legislature during the current session to pass a measure to restrict smartphone use in schools.

“As the Surgeon General affirmed, social media is harming the mental health of our youth,” Newsom said in a statement. “Building on legislation I signed in 2019, I look forward to working with the Legislature to restrict the use of smartphones during the school day. When children and teens are in school, they should be focused on their studies — not their screens.”

The California School Boards Association said school districts should be making decisions on whether to regulate smartphone use in schools, rather than the state.

“We support legislation which empowers school leaders to make policy decisions at a local level that reflect their community’s concerns and what’s necessary to support their students,” California School Boards Association spokesperson Troy Flint told The Associated Press.

Advertisement

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGIST URGES PARENTS TO KEEP SMARTPHONES AWAY FROM KIDS TO ‘PROTECT’ THEIR MENTAL HEALTH

Surgeon General Vivek Murthy

U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy urged Congress to require warning labels on social media platforms about their impact on children. (REUTERS/Tom Brenner)

The Los Angeles Unified School District board voted Tuesday for the district to establish policies prohibiting students’ smartphone use during the school day, with some exceptions. Board Member Nick Melvoin noted how “students are glued to their cell phones, not unlike adults.”

“When I talk to teachers and students and parents and principals, I also hear the same, which is that more and more time is being spent on policing student phone use,” he said at the meeting. “There’s not coherent enforcement, and they’re looking for some support from the board and from the district.”

Newsom’s announcement is noteworthy as California’s Silicon Valley is where many tech companies are located.

The decision also puts the California governor on the same side of the debate as Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, who earlier this year signed one of the most restrictive bans in the country on children’s social media use.

Advertisement

In recent years, a California proposal to fine social media platforms for addicting children has failed to become law. However, Democrat state Sen. Nancy Skinner’s bill to ban platforms from providing addictive feeds to children passed the state Senate in May.

Social media apps

Gov. Newsom said he plans to build on a law he signed in 2019 that gave school districts the power to limit or ban students’ use of smartphones during school. (Getty Images)

“A warning label is important, but we also need to provide parents with tools to protect their kids from preventable harms,” Skinner told POLITICO, saying her bill would complement Murthy’s proposal.

State Sen. Henry Stern, a Democrat, introduced a bill earlier this year to expand school districts’ power to restrict social media use for students during school. He said he would be open to pulling his bill, which already passed the Senate, if Newsom and the Legislature can find a better alternative.

“It’s just too hard for every teacher, every school, or every parent to have to figure this out on their own,” Stern told The Associated Press. “There’s some times where government just has to step in and make some bigger rules of the road.”

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Israel strikes Beirut suburb as conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon intensifies

Published

on

Israel strikes Beirut suburb as conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon intensifies

With the danger of a wider Middle East war looming, Israel on Friday bombarded part of the Lebanese capital, killing at least 14 people and wounding 66 others, Lebanese authorities said.

The attack hit a seven-story residential building in Beirut, causing it to collapse. Crowds milled in front of the blast site, walking gingerly over a carpet of shattered glass, crushed masonry and downed power lines. Many were grimly waiting for news of loved ones trapped under the wreckage.

“My friend is trapped in the rubble of the central building,” said Mahmoud, a 23-year-old who gave only his first name. “I hope he’s martyred. He would be happier with that than being wounded.”

Almost four hours after the blast, ambulances were still coming in as crews worked to extricate those trapped inside. Exterior walls of one nearby residential building were blown off, revealing the rooms inside as if a dollhouse.

Advertisement

Some took to social media to post pictures of missing family members.

The strike came just days after thousands of sabotaged electronic devices exploded across Lebanon, killing 30 and wounding thousands, an action widely attributed to Israel.

Ahead of Friday’s Israeli strike, Hezbollah had pounded northern Israel on Thursday night with rockets. The group’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, vowed revenge for the spate of bombings in Lebanon through pagers and walkie-talkies widely blamed on Israel.

Friday’s attack targeted and killed several commanders in the Radwan Force, Hezbollah’s special forces, said Israeli army spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari.

Among them was Ibrahim Aqil, whom Hagari described as a senior military commander who is close to Nasrallah and had been planning a large-scale attack in the Galilee region of northern Israel. The U.S. previously accused Aqil of responsibility for the deadly bombings of U.S. Marines in Lebanon in the 1980s.

Advertisement

Hezbollah confirmed Aqil’s death late Friday.

The strike occurred in Dahieh, a southern suburb of Beirut where Hezbollah is headquartered. It is a densely populated area with a vibrant commercial sector, shops and markets.

The Lebanese civil defense said at least two apartment buildings had collapsed.

Residents were told to evacuate the area. Families appeared by the barricade, looking dazed as they carried duffel bags, suitcases and pet carriers.

At one point, an older official took a megaphone, asking the crowd to disperse and let rescue crews do their job. He exhorted the crowd to show their defiance against Israel, shouting, “We are at your service, Nasrallah.”

Advertisement

Israel and Hezbollah renewed their clashes in October, when the Iran-backed militant group stepped up cross-border attacks in what it said was solidarity with Hamas and Palestinians fighting Israel in the Gaza Strip.

In recent days, Israel has repeatedly telegraphed a more aggressive stance toward Hezbollah. On Thursday, the Israeli military said its chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi, had recently approved new plans for the northern conflict zone. A day earlier, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant declared that the conflict was entering a “new phase.”

The escalation comes even as U.S. officials crisscross the region imploring leaders to avoid inflaming tensions — a plea evidently ignored. Biden administration officials, who have been unsuccessful in securing a cease-fire in Gaza that could ease the regional conflict, were quick to insist the U.S. had nothing to do with Friday’s attack, a similar disclaimer made following the explosions of pagers and walkie-talkies.

“Our intensive diplomacy efforts continue,” White House national security spokesman John F. Kirby said Friday. “We believe, continue to believe, that a diplomatic solution is the best way forward. … War is not inevitable.”

Bulos reported from Beirut and Wilkinson from Washington. Times staff writer Laura King in Tel Aviv contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Secret Service protection bill passes House unanimously after Trump assassination attempts

Published

on

Secret Service protection bill passes House unanimously after Trump assassination attempts

The House of Representatives has passed a bipartisan bill increasing U.S. Secret Service (USSS) protections for major presidential and vice presidential candidates after two foiled assassination attempts against former President Donald Trump.

It passed with an overwhelming unanimous 405 to 0 vote, a rare show of bipartisanship in Congress.

The legislation was introduced by Reps. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., and Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., in response to the July 13 shooting at a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

A 20-year-old gunman was able to open fire on the rally from a rooftop just outside the rally perimeter, killing one attendee and injuring Trump and two others.

WATCH ON FOX NATION: THE ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATIONS OF DONALD TRUMP

Advertisement

Former President Donald Trump was injured during an assassination attempt at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, 2024, and a second attempt occurred weeks later. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Weeks later, USSS agents arrested a man near Trump’s West Palm Beach golf course who had been waiting for the ex-president during a game on Sunday with an SKS rifle.

If passed by the Senate and signed into law by President Biden, the bill would mandate a comprehensive review of USSS protective standards and impose uniform standards for the security of presidents, vice presidents and major White House candidates.

“Regardless of how every American feels, regardless of how every American intends to vote, it is the right of the American people to determine the outcome of this election. The idea that our election could be decided by an assassin’s bullet should shake the conscience of our nation, and it requires swift action by the federal government,” Lawler said during debate on the bill Thursday.

TRUMP BLAMES BIDEN-HARRIS ‘RHETORIC’ FOR LATEST ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT, SAYS HE WILL ‘SAVE THE COUNTRY’

Advertisement
Lawler on Capitol Hill

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., is the lead Republican on the bill. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

“It is shocking that it took a second assassination attempt for Donald Trump to get the same level of protective detail from the Secret Service as the president of the United States.”

Progressive Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said he is backing the bill but argued it would be meaningless without stronger firearm laws.

“I support this legislation because the Secret Service must be able to protect our highest elected officials and candidates. But this legislation will do nothing to make the rest of us any safer, or change the fact that gun violence continues to take the lives of more than 100 Americans every single day,” Nadler said.

NEW WHISTLEBLOWER CLAIMS ON FIRST TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT ‘HIGHLY DAMAGING’ TO SECRET SERVICE: HAWLEY

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, pushed back on Nadler’s comments and accused him of painting the assassination attempts as “Republicans’ fault.”

Advertisement

“Next thing they’re going to say is, oh, some crazy guy on the left tries to assassinate President Trump, and it’s President Trump’s fault. Oh, wait a minute. They said that too. This is ridiculous,” Jordan said.

Ritchie Torres, NY Democrat, in closeup shot

Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., is leading the bill on the Democratic side. (Getty)

It is not immediately clear how the bill would classify “major” candidates.

Following the first attempt against Trump, Biden extended heightened USSS protection to the ex-president, who he was still running against at the time before dropping out of the race.

He also granted a request by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., then running as a third-party candidate, for USSS protection.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

Supreme Court turns down appeal to put Green Party on Nevada presidential ballot

Published

on

Supreme Court turns down appeal to put Green Party on Nevada presidential ballot

The Supreme Court on Friday turned down an appeal from the Nevada Green Party, keeping the progressive party off the state’s November presidential ballot.

The justices refused to intervene and overturn the state supreme court, which ruled two weeks ago the Green Party used the wrong form when gathering signatures. There were no dissents.

Washington attorney Jay Sekulow, who represented former President Trump during his first impeachment trial, filed an emergency appeal last week on behalf of the Green Party. It urged justices to put the name of Jill Stein, the Green Party presidential candidate, on the state’s ballots.

Sekulow said the Green Party candidates had been “wrongly ripped from the ballot and Nevadans who would vote for them in this election are robbed of their opportunity to do so.” He said the state court’s decision violated the U.S. Constitution and its guarantee of due process of law.

Advertisement

Democrats have been worried that Stein and the Green Party could draw the support of thousands of left-leaning voters, and potentially tip the outcome in favor of Trump in states where the two major parties are closely divided.

Sekulow’s involvement in the case suggests conservatives agree.

Stein’s campaign said she will be on the ballot in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona.

In June, Nevada Democrats sued and said the Green Party failed to comply with the state’s rules for minor parties seeking a spot on the ballot. While the Green Party organizers submitted nearly 30,000 signatures — far more than required — they used a form that did not require the signers to attest they were registered voters in their county.

In response, Green Party officials said they had relied on an email from a state election official that included a form for petition drives that did not require signers to attest they were registered voters.

Advertisement

In August, a state judge ruled against the Democrats and said the Green Party was “in substantial compliance” with the law.

But the Nevada Supreme Court disagreed in a 5-2 decision and ruled on Sept. 6 the Green Party had failed to qualify for the ballot. The majority said the disputed email was “an unfortunate mistake” but noted the state employee had directed the Green Party to the “Minor Party Qualification Guide,” which set out the required forms for gathering signatures.

Nevada’s Secretary of State Francisco V. Aguilar told the court it was too late to add the Green Party candidates.

“Mail ballots for the nearly 2 million active registered Nevada voters have already gone to print, and any changes ordered at this time would, at a minimum, require: redesign, repreparation, and re-proof across all of Nevada’s 17 counties,” he said.

With the election approaching, courts are being asked to weigh in on last-minute disputes.

Advertisement

Last month, the Republican National Committee urged the justices to block 40,000 Arizona voters from casting a ballot because they had registered using a federal form that did not require displaying a birth certificate or other proof of their U.S. citizenship.

They lost over the dissents of Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito and Neil M. Gorsuch.

But the court by a 5-4 vote said the state may require proof of citizenship from its newly registered voters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending