Connect with us

Politics

Experts weigh in on Biden’s response to classified documents scandal: White House has ‘lost control’

Published

on

Experts weigh in on Biden’s response to classified documents scandal: White House has ‘lost control’

Communications specialists say the Biden administration has “misplaced management of the narrative” after current revelations that President Biden had labeled paperwork in a number of unsecured places.

White Home press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has continued to dodge questions on the matter, main some to criticize the Biden administration for lack of readability on the scenario.

President Biden “does certainly take labeled data critically, he does certainly take labeled paperwork critically. I am simply not going to transcend that,” Jean-Pierre stated in a Friday press briefing – a line the press secretary has echoed on the podium because the scandal surfaced. 

Communications specialists weighing in on the White Home’s response since information of Biden’s labeled paperwork got here to gentle in early January say that the administration’s response has been lackluster.  

“Whether or not by means of intent or incompetence, the White Home has been behind the curve all through this whole scandal,” stated Marc Lotter, former director of strategic communications for Trump-Pence 2020. “They’ve misplaced management of the narrative. Merely wishing it could simply go away whereas deflecting clearly isn’t working.”

Advertisement

BIDEN SLAMMED FOR SAYING HE HAS ‘NO REGRETS’ ABOUT CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS: ‘WHITE HOUSE KEEPS STONEWALLING’

President Biden listens to a query throughout a information convention within the East Room of the White Home in Washington, Jan. 19, 2022. 
(Susan Walsh)

In current weeks, revelations that Biden had Obama-era labeled paperwork in his private possessions got here to gentle. Categorised supplies have been first revealed to be saved in Biden’s workplace on the Penn Biden middle in Washington, D.C. Three days later, the general public realized of a second set of recordsdata that existed within the storage of Biden’s Wilmington, Delaware, residence. A 3rd set of labeled paperwork have been additionally uncovered in one other location in his Wilmington residence.

“President Biden is coping with a ‘drip’ controversy that has no finish in sight and every new revelation makes his criticisms of former President Trump seem ever extra hypocritical,” stated Giancarlo Sopo, a Republican media strategist. 

“In terms of authorized points, the White Home needs to be very cautious to not intervene politically in this sort of investigation. However on the identical time, you may’t ignore the difficulty. There is a high-quality line that Biden and the White Home must stroll on,” says Jose Aristimuño, former deputy press secretary to the Democratic Nationwide Committee and Host of Americano Media.

Advertisement

Alex Conant, former communications director to Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla, believes the White Home must be in full on disaster mode, suggesting they assign a devoted communicator on the difficulty to get the details straight, mobilize assets and keep forward of the story. 

“Disaster communications 101 is to get all of the details out as quickly as doable. The White Home has performed the alternative of that, letting information drip out day after day. The President ought to have addressed this straight days in the past,” Conant advised Fox Information Digital. “Ready till Thursday after which giving a really lawyerly assertion solely feeds the scandal.”

Although Republicans and Democrats have criticized the White Home response on the difficulty, many on the left have counseled the Biden administration’s cooperation with authorities. Christy Seltzer, a former spokesperson to quite a few Democratic leaders, stated the story on steadiness “is not a foul one.”

“Biden’s workforce did all the things proper by flagging that they’d discovered paperwork after which giving them again,” Seltzer stated. “Sometimes, in conditions like these, the communications technique should observe the authorized technique, so the attorneys are doubtless driving what White Home communications can and might’t say.”

BIDEN, HUNTER MAKE PRESIDENTIAL HISTORY AS FIRST FATHER-SON DUO UNDER SEPARATE INVESTIGATIONS

Advertisement

A former Trump White Home official supported Seltzer’s sentiment, sympathizing that White Home press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre is probably going solely receiving partial details. On the identical time, Jean-Pierre’s repeated referrals to the White Home Counsel’s workplace appear to be a scapegoat to keep away from robust questioning, in keeping with the supply who says the counsel’s workplace will historically defer to the White Home Press Secretary for official statements.  

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre faced numerous questions related to Biden's classified documents during Friday's daily press briefing.

White Home press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre confronted quite a few questions associated to Biden’s labeled paperwork throughout Friday’s day by day press briefing.
(Mandel Ngan/AFP)

“Democrat spokespeople usually stay a charmed existence,” stated Matt Gorman stated, a former communications director to the Nationwide Republican Congressional Committee. “When the mainstream media dare to query them on something their response wavers between betrayal and outright confusion. That is what you see right here.”

Many questions stay unanswered on the precise whereabouts of the labeled recordsdata, once they have been positioned amongst Biden’s possessions and who may need had entry, exterior of Biden’s household and employees. 

The Division of Justice has launched an inquiry into the paperwork, appointing Robert Hur, a former Maryland U.S. legal professional, to function particular counsel overseeing the method.

Advertisement

Politics

Popular Republican and Trump running mate contender makes first Senate endorsement in 2024 races

Published

on

Popular Republican and Trump running mate contender makes first Senate endorsement in 2024 races

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

EXCLUSIVE – Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, who’s under consideration as former President Donald Trump’s running mate, is weighing in on the GOP Senate primary in a key battleground state.

Scott on Wednesday endorsed former Rep. Mike Rogers of Michigan, a former House Intelligence Committee chair who is the front-runner in the August Republican primary in the fight to succeed longtime Sen. Debbie Stabenow, a Democrat who is not seeking re-election this year.

Advertisement

The seat is one of a handful that Republicans are aiming to flip from blue to red in the autumn elections as they push to regain the Senate majority they lost in the 2020 cycle.

“Mike Rogers’ commitment to service has always been about putting the American people first. When Mike and I served together, he was a leader who delivered results and fought to expand opportunities for working families and those pursuing their American Dream,” Scott said in a statement. “I’m proud to endorse him to be Michigan’s next U.S. Senator because I know Mike will bring his servant leadership to the U.S. Senate.”

WHAT THE REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CHAIR TOLD FOX NEWS ABOUT WINNING BACK THE MAJORITY

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump looks to Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., during a Fox News Channel town hall Tuesday, Feb. 20, 2024, in Greenville, S.C. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson) (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)

Scott’s backing of Rogers, which was shared first with Fox News, is his first formal endorsement in a Senate race this election cycle, although he’s helped other Republican candidates raise money.

Advertisement

Rogers, an Army veteran and a former FBI special agent before serving in Congress, enjoys the backing of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), which is the campaign arm of the Senate GOP. And in March, Rogers landed the endorsement of Trump, the party’s presumptive presidential nominee.

6 KEY SENATE SEATS REPUBLICANS AIM TO FLIP IN NOVEMBER 

“Senator Scott has been a tremendous champion for conservative values in the U.S. Senate and I’m honored to receive his endorsement,” Rogers said in a statement. “Together in the Senate we will work with President Trump to help Michigan families, lower the cost of gas and groceries, and secure the southern border.”

Rogers has also been endorsed in recent months by seven other Republican senators, as well as Mike Pompeo, who served as Secretary of State and CIA director in the Trump administration. He’s also been endorsed by former Detroit police chief James Craig, who backed Rogers after ending his own Republican Senate nomination bid earlier this year.

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump listens as Michigan Senate candidate former Rep. Mike Rogers speaks at a campaign rally in Freeland, Mich., Wednesday, May 1, 2024. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump listens as Michigan Senate candidate former Rep. Mike Rogers speaks at a campaign rally in Freeland, Mich., Wednesday, May 1, 2024. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya) (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

As they work to win a Senate election in Michigan for the first time in three decades, Republicans were hoping to avoid a potentially costly and combustible primary.

Advertisement

But Rogers doesn’t have the field to himself.

The primary race also includes wealthy businessman and investor Sandy Pensler, who’s making his second run for office and has been spending big bucks to run ads targeting Rogers. Former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy endorsed Pensler.

Among the others running for the GOP nomination are former Rep. Justin Amash, who as an independent House member joined Democrats in voting to impeach then-President Trump in his first impeachment trial in 2019.

The state primary in Michigan will be held on August 6.

Advertisement

Scott, the only Black Republican in the Senate, ran unsuccessfully for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination but remains a very popular and influential figure in the party.

The senator, who was known for his ferocious fundraising as he cruised to a Senate re-election in 2022, has strong ties with many leading figures in the GOP donor class. The money raised two years ago served as a down payment for his 2024 national run.

Besides raising money for himself, Scott has also been very active in helping fellow Republicans running for office.

In the 2022 cycle, the senator raised nearly $1 million for other candidates and donated more than $1 million to down ballot races. And two outside groups aligned with Scott spent $13 million on top Senate and House races, while also transferring $5 million to the top super PAC supporting Senate Republicans.

A super PAC allied with Scott announced earlier this month it would spend $14 million to help Republicans grow support among Black voters.

Advertisement

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.

Continue Reading

Politics

Cost of bringing clean drinking water to California communities estimated at $11.5 billion

Published

on

Cost of bringing clean drinking water to California communities estimated at $11.5 billion

California has made significant progress helping small communities address problems of contaminated drinking water, but the costs of bringing safe tap water to hundreds of communities over the next five years will run more than $11.5 billion, according to a new state estimate.

In a newly released report, the staff of the State Water Resources Control Board estimated that at the start of this year approximately 913,000 Californians depended on public water systems that are failing to comply with drinking water regulations, while an additional 1.5 million people depended on water systems that are determined to be “at-risk.”

Officials carried out the assessment nearly five years after the state established the Safe and Affordable Funding for Equity and Resilience, or SAFER, drinking water program. They said in the report that under the program, the state water board has since 2019 given more than $831 million in grants for drinking water projects in disadvantaged communities, and that about 250 failing water systems serving more than 2 million people have come into compliance with drinking water standards.

“What our analysis has shown time and again is that the common denominator is size,” said Joaquin Esquivel, chair of the state water board. “Small systems struggle, especially in communities that have experienced discrimination and disinvestment, and their challenges will be amplified as weather grows more extreme, new contaminants emerge and costs increase.”

Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.

Advertisement

California declared access to clean, safe and affordable water a human right in 2012, but the state has faced significant challenges in developing policies and securing adequate funding to bring solutions for communities where people live with contaminated tap water.

In small rural communities across the state, the water pumped from wells contains harmful levels of contaminants including naturally occurring arsenic, bacteria from sewage leaks, nitrate from animal manure, fertilizers or other sources, and carcinogenic chemicals.

Not all systems that are deemed to be failing deliver water that is contaminated, but many of them have at least one contaminant at levels that violate safe drinking water standards.

Advertisement

According to state data, about 56% of the 385 failing water systems supply disadvantaged communities, and 67% of them supply majority communities of color.

“All of our current failing water systems are on track to come off the failing list,” said Kristyn Abhold, senior environmental scientist for the state water board. “They are working on long-term solutions, and our staff and funding resources are being targeted to the ones that are in most need.”

State water regulators have found that the vast majority of the failing water systems serve a small number of residents, while 98% of the state’s population receives water from sources and suppliers that meet drinking water standards.

For a water system to come into compliance with regulations, it takes not only funding but also planning, engineering work and permits, Abhold said.

State officials have assessed other communities that are at risk by analyzing the potential for water quality violations or water shortages, among other factors.

Advertisement

The number of people affected has fluctuated in recent months as some water systems have come off the list and others have been added. The state’s latest estimates show that 738,000 people currently receive water from failing systems, while more than 1.8 million people depend on 548 systems with drinking water supplies determined to be at risk.

The state’s report includes estimated costs for infrastructure solutions such as installing treatment systems, drilling a new well, or consolidating by connecting one water system to another.

The estimated costs of solutions in the latest report were substantially higher than previous state estimates. In a 2021 report, the state water board included a range of estimated costs up to $9.1 billion. Officials said they used new methods and improved data this time, including more water systems and risks in their analysis.

According to the report, the estimated costs of long-term solutions for failing and at-risk public water systems total $6.6 billion over five years, while the costs of solutions for “high-risk” small water systems and domestic wells total $4.9 billion.

Those combined costs, totaling more than $11.5 billion, would be significantly higher if loan repayment costs and operations and maintenance costs are included, the report said, pushing the total estimated cost of “achieving the human right to water” to $15.9 billion.

Advertisement

Officials projected that $2 billion in state grant funds will be available over five years, as well as $1.5 billion in state loans, leaving a substantial gap in available funding. Officials said a large portion of the money to address the problems may need to come from “local cost share” funds collected through rates, fees and taxes.

The report’s higher cost estimates were released amid discussions about budget cuts in Sacramento.

Citing recent cuts, more than 180 organizations, including environmental groups and other organizations, wrote to state leaders urging them to approve placing a $10 billion bond on the November ballot to provide “direct and meaningful investments in the California communities and natural resources most impacted by climate change.”

As part of that ballot measure, they called for including $1 billion for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure for communities and tribes.

Leaders of the groups wrote that “recent and proposed cuts to funding for such programs have prompted consensus that additional bond funding is necessary to ensure priority programs continue beyond this year.”

Advertisement

Jennifer Clary, California director for the group Clean Water Action, said: ”drinking water infrastructure isn’t a luxury item. Without these projects, thousands of Californians will continue to lack access to safe and clean drinking water.”

Clean water advocates have also voiced concerns as state officials have reviewed the costs of a program that provides household tanks and hauls water by truck to thousands of low-income families whose wells have gone dry.

More than 3,000 domestic wells have run dry throughout California since 2020, according to reports submitted to the state. Those with dry wells have started relying on water delivered by tanker trucks to fill their tanks, while also receiving bottled water.

Leaders of the nonprofit group Self-Help Enterprises, which manages the water-hauling effort, recently urged Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state leaders to reject proposals that would take away critical funding for the program. They wrote in a June 11 letter that taking away $17.5 million would “cut off access to water for more than 20,000 people who are still awaiting a permanent solution.”

The letter, which was first reported by the news site SJV Water, was also signed by leaders of other organizations, including the Community Water Center and Union of Concerned Scientists.

Advertisement

“The reversions of these funds will cut off access to water for more than 20,000 people who are still awaiting a permanent solution,” the groups said. “Cutting funding for such a crucial program would have devastating effects on rural and disadvantaged communities by immediately cutting them off from their sole source of water supply, and doing so with no warning.”

Leaders of some groups said later that the funding for the program has been restored.

Continue Reading

Politics

Mike Kennedy advances past crowded GOP primary to secure nomination for open Utah House seat

Published

on

Mike Kennedy advances past crowded GOP primary to secure nomination for open Utah House seat

Mike Kennedy on Tuesday won the Republican nomination for Utah’s 3rd Congressional District to replace outgoing Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, becoming the immediate favorite to win the seat in November.

Kennedy beat fellow Republicans JR Bird, John Dougall, Case Lawrence and Stewart Peay in a packed primary pool for the district. Curtis is vacating his seat to run for U.S. Senate to replace outgoing Sen. Mitt Romney.

Kennedy, a state senator, had won the party’s nomination for the seat in April but faced challenges from other candidates who gathered signatures to be on the ballot. Peay had won the endorsement of Romney, who is also Peay’s wife’s uncle. Kennedy had won the endorsement of Sen. Mike Lee, who said he was needed to “fight against the Uniparty and help get this country back on track.”

‘SQUAD’ MEMBER FACES OUSTER FROM CONGRESS AS NEW YORK, COLORADO AND UTAH HOLD PRIMARIES ON TUESDAY

From left, JR Bird, John Dougall, Mike Kennedy, Case Lawrence and Stewart Peay, candidates in the Republican primary for Utah’s 3rd Congressional District, take part in a debate at the Eccles Broadcast Center in Salt Lake City on June 12, 2024. (Spenser Heaps/Deseret News via AP/Pool)

Advertisement

Bird, a mayor, emphasized his experience of running a small town as well as the importance of the energy sector and agriculture, according to the Deseret News.

Dougall, the state auditor, had run as an anti-MAGA candidate and had slammed some GOP legislation, including what he saw as an overly aggressive bill that tasks him with enforcing a ban on transgender-identifying individuals using restrooms that are inconsistent with their sex.

WATCH: THIS HOUSE PRIMARY IS MOST EXPENSIVE IN CONGRESSIONAL HISTORY

He has also been deeply critical of former President Trump. On Tuesday on X, he also questioned the “cavalier manner” of any official who swears to uphold the Constitution “then endorses Trump following January 6th.” He has advertised himself as “mainstream, not MAGA.”

At a debate this month, candidates split on the question of military funding to Ukraine as well as whether the federal government should explicitly ban abortion. Peay, Dougall and Case Lawrence – a trampoline park entrepreneur – had called on Congress to keep sending weapons to Ukraine to help it fend off the ongoing Russian invasion.

Advertisement

Bird and Kennedy disagreed, arguing that it was not beneficial to the U.S. to keep funding the Ukrainians, with the two calling for stronger sanctions and the seizure of Russian assets.

HEAD HERE FOR LATEST FOX NEWS REPORTING FROM THE PRIMARY CAMPAIGN TRAIL

Republican Utah Sen. Mitt Romney

Sen. Mitt Romney (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Kennedy will go on to face Democrat Glenn Wright in the November election, but the Republican is favored to win comfortably in a district that has voted Republican since 1997.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX NEWS APP

Elsewhere in the state, Republican Gov. Spencer Cox, a major GOP Trump critic, held off a primary challenge from Phil Lyman, another 2020 election denier who easily won the state party convention.

Advertisement

The Associated Press and Fox News’ Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending