Connect with us

Vermont

Q&A with Vermont’s 2024 Lieutenant Governor candidates: John Rodgers and David Zuckerman

Published

on

Q&A with Vermont’s 2024 Lieutenant Governor candidates: John Rodgers and David Zuckerman


VERMONT — Incumbent Lt. Gov. David Zuckerman faces a challenge this November from John Rodgers, a former state senator.

Both candidates are farmers — Zuckerman of meat and produce in Hinesburg, and Rodgers of hemp in Glover. They share similar concerns about Vermont’s affordability but differ in their approaches to solutions.

Rodgers, a former Democrat turned Republican, has the endorsement of Gov. Phil Scott, who is also up for re-election. Zuckerman has the backing of several climate, education and labor advocacy groups.

Advertisement

To help readers get to know the candidates, the Messenger asked each the same five questions.

Q: How will you bring Vermonters’ voices to the statehouse?

RODGERS: I will bring Vermonters’ voices to Montpelier in the same way that I did during the 16 years that I served as a senator and state representative. Unlike my opponent, a man of extreme wealth and considerable privilege, I will represent my constituents—all of us impacted by his out-of–control spending schemes. I can represent working Vermonters because I am one. I started with nothing, and I’ve worked six and seven days a week most of my life to get to where I am today. I am open and honest and want to make sure that Vermonters know how the policies moving through the state house will affect them. I will fight against policies that are unaffordable for working Vermonters.

ZUCKERMAN: I have a long track record of bringing a wide range of voices to the statehouse. Whether it is welcoming folks to regular coffee hours during the legislative session or welcoming smaller groups to the Lt. Gov. office to help answer any questions about the process or how to get their voice heard. I have also had community coffee’s across the state to try to bring the statehouse discussion to people in their towns. Additionally, I try to connect with as many folks as I can: at the gas station, convenience store, the farmers market, grain store and every other place I go. I welcome folks to reach out with concerns, ideas, criticisms, questions, or whatever is on their mind. As an elected public servant, I have always felt it is my duty to listen to and help people no matter their party or issue. I work to help them navigate the system.

Q: What is your message to older adults on fixed incomes worried about Vermont’s affordability?

RODGERS: As I travel around the state, everyone that I speak to is tired of crushing rents, spiraling property, taxes, and unaffordable heat and electric bills. It is affecting everyone, but is definitely affecting older adults on a fixed income much more. The policies of my opponent and the Super Majority are regressive, and many of them need to be repealed or dramatically changed. For instance, the renewable energy standard that the legislator just passed will add somewhere around $100 million a year to Vermont’s electric bills. This will affect poor and working class Vermonters and especially older Vermonters on fixed income, and most of the proceeds will go to millionaires in the energy development business. Older Vermonters on a fixed income should also get a break on their education property tax.

ZUCKERMAN: Our biggest affordability issues for seniors are housing, property taxes, social security taxes and everyday groceries. I am the only candidate to support $70,000,000 annually for 10 years to build thousands of affordable housing units (owned and rental). I am the only candidate with specific plans to reduce the burden on working class families. This includes a $30-$40 million shift by making high income people pay the same rate as those on fixed incomes. Right now, they pay less. My proposal also includes a progressive tax on second homes that could raise $58,000,000 in tax relief for everyday Vermonters. Additionally the administration has added over $500,000,000 to working Vermonters property taxes through mental health costs that in other states are covered by the general fund in the Agency of Human Services. I would work to reduce those costs in the education fund.

Advertisement

Q: What should be done, if anything, to help first time homebuyers enter the real estate market?

RODGERS: The first thing we need to do for first time homebuyers is address the outrageous cost of property taxes and energy. The cost of purchasing a house is only the first part of home ownership and you must be able to pay the ongoing property taxes and utility bills. I do not believe Vermont has enough resources to give outright monetary grants to first time homebuyers, but dealing with the excessive cost of owning a home is something that the legislature and state government can do. We must end the regressive energy policies of the Super Majority and build renewable energy that actually addresses climate change and is at market electricity rates. It would be great if at some point, we had enough money to give first time homebuyers (based on income and a commitment to live and work in Vermont) some type of property tax relief for a year or two. The sentiment that I’m hearing from everyone around the state Iis we’re all working too hard for two little in a state that costs too much to live in. I agree with my fellow Vermonters.

ZUCKERMAN: We know that it costs approximately $400,000 in labor, materials, and land to build a modest house in Vermont. This is out of range for many. Buying a house is similar. We have to invest state funds to create affordable housing for young couples and families or they won’t be able to afford to live here. Vermont is a desirable place to live and many can sell elsewhere for a lot more than it costs to buy here. The Vermont House passed a comprehensive affordable housing bill last year that would generate $70,000,000/year for 10 years by adding a top tax rate of 3% to incomes over $500,000/yr. The free market will not solve the affordable housing crisis. The investment must be made to keep our seniors, youth and workforce in Vermont.

Q: What qualities will you look for in selecting committee chairs?

RODGERS: Committee chairs should be knowledgeable in the subject matter of the committee. They should be open minded, fair, and willing to listen to everyone. They must be able to maintain decorum in the committee, as well as a respect for everyone who comes before the committee. Committee chairs need to have the ability to move legislation that is important for Vermonters and not waste time on frivolous policy matters.

ZUCKERMAN: The most important qualities are making sure they will run a committee in a fair and open way to allow all ideas to be presented. The committee chair should take time to allow the committee members to digest new ideas/perspectives even when those ideas may not have started out with the majority viewpoints. They must be good communicators and open to criticism. I have also always advocated to make sure a wide range of perspectives are included on every committee.

Q: Who are you voting for U.S. President?

RODGERS: Much to the chagrin of many Republicans, I have stated publicly many times that I did not like Donald Trump before he ran for office and would consider myself a “Never Trumper.” Though I’ve been advised by some to say that I will vote for Kamala Harris, as we all know that it is likely she will be called the Vermont winner shortly after 7 o’clock, I cannot tell a lie. As I’ve stated before, I am an open and honest guy. Though I do believe she is much more presidential than her opponent, I strongly disagree with some of her policy positions—like support for fracking and war in the Middle East. I wish we had a candidate that was a moderate to choose from, in both major parties. I will likely make my final decision in the voting booth on Election Day, whether to vote for Vice-President Harris or a third-party candidate. I still need to finish researching them.

Advertisement

ZUCKERMAN: Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump is a threat to democracy and we must do everything we can to elect Kamala Harris and stop Trump. I am the only candidate in this race supporting Vice President Harris and Governor Walz.





Source link

Vermont

Vermont postal worker allegedly threw away mail she was supposed to deliver for months

Published

on

Vermont postal worker allegedly threw away mail she was supposed to deliver for months


Crime

During a search of a dumpster where the worker allegedly discarded the mail, police found several packages and holiday cards.

A Vermont postal worker was cited and suspended for allegedly throwing away mail that was supposed to be delivered to other people, according to police.

Natasha Morisseau, 34, of North Troy, was cited on nine counts of petty larceny and five counts of unlawful mischief, Vermont State Police said in a statement. She works as a mail carrier for the town’s United States Postal Service (USPS) office.

Advertisement

Officers were first alerted to the discarded mail on the afternoon of Jan. 23, according to police. Upon finding the mail in a dumpster on Elm Street in North Troy, they determined that none of it was for that address.

Police identified Morisseau as a person of interest and learned that she was a postal employee. They confirmed that she had regularly been throwing away a small amount of mail under her care since at least October 2025, according to the statement.

After searching the dumpster and Morisseau’s mail vehicle, officers found opened and unopened packages, along with several holiday cards, one of which contained money. Morisseau was later cited Feb. 14 and is due to appear March 17 in Vermont Superior Court, police said.

Since Jan. 23, Morisseau has been suspended by USPS, and all recovered mail has been given back to them for delivery, according to the statement. The case has been forwarded to the USPS’ Inspector General for further review.

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Air National Guard joins Iran campaign – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Vermont Air National Guard joins Iran campaign – The Boston Globe


On a typical day, some of the 20 stealth fighter jets based in South Burlington, Vt., take off from tiny Burlington International Airport for training runs near the northern border. In recent months, they’ve flown much farther afield.

The Vermont Air National Guard’s 158th Fighter Wing was deployed in December to the Caribbean, where it took part in the US campaign to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Shortly thereafter, the squadron joined a military buildup in and around the Middle East to prepare for US and Israeli airstrikes against Iran.

Though both deployments had been widely reported, the military remained mum about the whereabouts of Vermont’s F-35A Lightning II jets. Even Governor Phil Scott, technically the commander of the Vermont Guard, said he only knew what he’d read in the news, given that US military leaders were directing the missions.

On Monday, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed the deployments at a Pentagon press conference about the war on Iran. Caine praised National Guard members from Vermont, Wisconsin, and elsewhere.

Advertisement

“In the case of the Vermont Air National Guard and the 158th Fighter Wing, they were mobilized for Operation Absolute Resolve,” Caine said, referring to the Venezuela campaign. “And then were tasked to take their F-35As across the Atlantic instead of going home, to be prepared to support this operation” in the Middle East.

Much remains unknown about the Vermont Guard’s recent missions, including the precise role they played in Venezuela and Iran, where the jets are currently based, and how long they’ll remain.

The Guard did not immediately respond to requests for comment., Its recently elected leader, General Henry “Hank” Harder, said in a statement that the force was “proud of the dedicated and professional service of our Airmen” and pledged to support their families in the meantime.

“We will continue to carry out our commitment to these Vermont Service Members until, and long after, they return from this mission,” Harder said.

Vermont’s three-member congressional delegation, meanwhile, has praised Vermont Guard members for their service in Venezuela but has criticized President Trump’s campaigns there and in Iran, particularly absent congressional authorization.

Advertisement

“The people of our country, no matter what their political persuasion, do not want endless war,” said Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, echoing similar remarks from Senator Peter Welch and Representative Becca Balint, both Democrats. “We must not allow Trump to force us into another senseless war. No war with Iran.”


Paul Heintz can be reached at paul.heintz@globe.com. Follow him on X @paulheintz.





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

In Vermont, small town meetings grapple with debate on big issues

Published

on

In Vermont, small town meetings grapple with debate on big issues


Tuesday is town meeting day in Vermont. Municipalities in New England and elsewhere are increasingly grappling with major national and international issues at the local level.

JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images

If you haven’t lived in certain New England towns, it can be hard to fathom their centuries-old direct democracy-style Town Meetings, where everyday residents vote on mundane town business such as funding for schools, snow plows and road repairs.

These days, voters are also being asked to weigh in on national and international issues, for example, demanding the de-funding of ICE, and condemning “the unprovoked attack and start of an illegal and immoral war against Iran.” It’s all fueling a separate – and fierce– debate on what towns ought to be debating.

Advertisement

“When you have people sleepwalking into an authoritarian regime, it’s up to us to sound the alarm,” insists Dan Dewalt, an activist in Newfane, Vermont, one of several communities where residents scrambled to draft a resolution against the Iran war in time for their annual Town Meeting on Tuesday.

Local resolutions are a uniquely effective tactic, activists and experts say, and they’re being used increasingly around New England and beyond, especially as national politics have become so polarized.

“People feel isolated, helpless and hopeless. And when you hear about other people who are just like you taking a stand and representing something that you believe, that gives you not only hope, but it gives you power,” said Dewalt.

Several other Vermont towns will be considering resolutions Tuesday calling for the removal of the president and vice president “for crimes against the U.S. Constitution,” while many others will vote on a pledge to ” to end all support of Israel’s apartheid policies, settler colonialism, and military occupation and aggression.”

A similar divestment resolution passed 46 -15 in Newfane last year, following hours of heated argument over the plight of Palestinians, the security of Israelis, the “inflammatory” language of the resolution – and whether such problems half-a-world away even belong on the agenda of the tiny town of just about 1,650.

Advertisement

“It’s a Town Meeting for town issues,” Newfane resident Walter Hagadorn declared at a recent Select Board meeting, where residents pressed board members to block any future resolutions not directly related to town business.

“You shouldn’t be subject to hours and hours of people virtue signaling” and trying to “hijack Town Meeting,” Hagadorn said.

Others agreed, suggesting activists host a debate on their issues at another time and place, or stage a rally or protest instead.

But Select Board member Katy Johnson-Aplin pushed back, saying that would not have the same impact.

“It doesn’t work the same way,” Johnson-Aplin said. It’s only when the issue is formally taken up at a Town Meeting that “it goes in the newspaper and it’s recorded that the town of Newfane has agreed to have this conversation.”

Advertisement

University of Pennsylvania political science professor Daniel Hopkins has been watching the growing movement of local communities taking a stand on issues far beyond town lines.

“This is a trend we’re seeing increasingly across the 50 states and in a variety of ways but I think it has taken on a new and potentially more concerning edge,” Hopkins said. “I worry that we are in an attention-grabbing, sensation-rewarding media environment in which the kinds of issues that engage us at a national level may further polarize states and localities and make it harder for them to build meaningful coalitions on other issues.”

Indeed, in Newfane, the resolution regarding Israel became so divisive that some residents decided not to even come to last year’s Town Meeting, according to Select Board vice-chair Marion Dowling.

In Burlington, where a similar resolution was proposed, City Council President Ben Traverse says things got so heated, he and his family were getting harassing phone calls and even death threats. Burlington city councilors voted in January to block the question from going to a popular vote.Vermont has a history of “big issue” resolutions, from the push for a Nuclear Arms Freeze in the 1980’s, to calls to ban genetically modified foods in 2003. Dewalt, the Newfane activist, was behind several of them, including calls to impeach then-president George W. Bush in 2006, which got him invited to talk about it on network TV shows, and quoted in The New York Times.

“I can guarantee you if I stood up on my soap box and made a declaration of the exact same wording, I wouldn’t have had anybody asking me questions about it, he said. “We’re not pie-in-the-sky here about the power of our Newfane Town Meetings, but our actions have consistently had an impact.”

Advertisement

But opponents say activists overstate the impact of their resolutions, and their victory. They say it’s disingenuous, for example, to claim the town of Newfane supported the resolution against Israel, when the winning majority of 46 people was less than 3% of town residents.

“I feel like they’re using the town as a vehicle for their personal messages and that bothers me,” says Newfane resident Cris White. “It’s so junior high.”

Traverse, the Burlington City Council president, also takes issue with what he calls the “inflammatory” language of that resolution.

“The question, as presented, approaches this issue in a one-sided and leading way,” Traverse says.

In Vermont, any registered voter can get a resolution on the Town Meeting agenda by collecting signatures from 5% of their town’s voters. While elected city or town officials have the authority to allow or block the resolution, there is no process in place to vet or edit language.

Advertisement

Traverse says it would behoove city leaders and voters to require an official review to ensure that language is fair and neutral, just as many states do with ballot questions. Traverse says he’s not opposed to contentious, big issue resolutions being put to local voters, but the language must be clear and even-handed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending