Connect with us

Vermont

In Vermont, ballots are Australian, and in some towns they’re replacing town meetings

Published

on

In Vermont, ballots are Australian, and in some towns they’re replacing town meetings


It’s that time of year again when my colleagues and I are calling town clerks to get the details for town meeting, coming up in early March. At our own morning meeting, the talk turned to Australian ballots, the term town clerks inevitably use to describe elections held in conjunction with town meeting. Not just “ballots.” Not “paper ballots.” No, it’s “Australian ballots.” Why?

Rather than Google an answer, I decided to call one of my favorite town clerks, Kristin Beers in Milton, who told me she didn’t know why it’s called Australian ballot, but that I could probably just Google it, or call the Secretary of State’s Office. Kristin did have some interesting insights into the Australian ballot, however, which has replaced the town meeting in Milton entirely. No votes from the floor.

“We are 100% Australian ballot, that’s how we vote for everything,” Kristin said. “Some towns do both, discuss and vote in person and also vote by Australian ballot. Some don’t use ballots at all.”

Advertisement

Kristin said she’s heard her fellow town clerks voice opinions strongly both ways − in favor of Australian ballots and against them. She has been at meetings where some clerks would question whether voters can really understand what the articles they’re voting on mean without a thorough, in-person discussion at town meeting. Those same clerks admit, however, that it’s hard to find a day and time when everyone will come out and participate in that discussion.

Milton offers an informational meeting the night before the election, where voters can ask questions about what’s going to be on the Australian ballot they use to vote the next day. Seems like a good compromise. But I still needed to know, why “Australian” ballot?

Former Free Press reporter wrote the definitive treatment of the Australian ballot

I could have Googled, as Kristin suggested, or I could have called the secretary of state. But instead, I checked our archives where I found a master’s thesis on the Australian ballot by my former colleague, Tim Johnson. It must be close to 3,000 words. I remember Tim as a somewhat grumpy, but very good and very thorough reporter, and his story on the Australian ballot from 2014 bore that memory out.

Tim explained the Australian ballot has two key features: It’s uniformly printed in advance of the election, by an electoral or governmental authority, and voters cast it in secret. That’s an Australian innovation, which debuted in the 1850s, then made its way to Europe, New Zealand and the United Kingdom in the 1860s and 1870s, finally reaching the United States in the late 1880s.

Advertisement

Kentucky and Massachusetts were the first states to enact Australian ballot laws, in 1888, followed by most other states over the next decade, including Vermont. Before the Aussies came up with their electoral innovation, Tim explained, elections were “BYOB,” bring your own ballot.

Tim quoted a former state archivist, who described the process. Political parties printed their own ballots, with only their candidates listed, and passed them out to voters.

“Partisan ballots were sometimes printed on paper of distinctive color, or most notoriously, in St. Johnsbury, on paper with zebra stripes,” Tim wrote. “If you were a worker in a factory whose owner favored the zebra-stripe candidates and you were spotted on Election Day casting a different kind of ballot, woe to you.”

Whoa, bring on the Australian ballot.

Advertisement

Tim also learned that newspapers “had contracts with the parties they supported and published their ballots for readers to clip out.” As an example, the Burlington Free Press, staunchly Republican in 1890, printed the Republican ticket in the left-hand column on Page 4 in the Aug. 29, 1890 edition.

Deadly to town meetings? Some people really don’t like the Australian ballot.

That debate Kristin mentioned between town clerks who favor floor votes at town meetings over secret ballots at elections has been going on for a long time. Tim quotes a UVM professor of political science who wrote in 1964, “While the use of the Australian ballot in general elections is wise, it is another matter to use it in Town Meeting. Its use destroys the chief characteristic of the gathering, the necessity for everyone interested to be there to vote in person on specific issues…”

Fifty years later, Tim notes, another renowned UVM political scientist, Frank Bryan, called the Australian ballot “deadly” to the tradition of town meetings.

Advertisement

“Understand. The Australian ballot takes away your right to legislate − to be part of the lawmaking process − and it doesn’t even replace it with a deliberative body that represents you,” Bryan said. “It simply allows you to vote up or down, yes or no, on an issue prepared by the selectboard or in many cases by a small group of private citizens with a special interest.”

As with so many other things in Vermont, Tim points out we seem to be the only ones holding on to a term or tradition. Maine doesn’t reference the “Australian ballot.” Neither does Connecticut or New Hampshire or Massachusetts. Even the Aussies have stopped talking about the Australian ballot, according to Tim, who interviewed a Vermont state official who was originally from Australia. He had never heard of the Australian ballot, until he came to Vermont.

“Somehow, everyone came to accept it, learned to live with it, and stopped talking about it − except around here,” Tim wrote.

Contact Dan D’Ambrosio at 660-1841 or ddambrosi@gannett.com. Follow him on X @DanDambrosioVT.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Opinion — Steven Berbeco: You belong here

Published

on

Opinion — Steven Berbeco: You belong here


This commentary is by Steven Berbeco of Winooski. He is editor of the 802 Ed, a biweekly newsletter about education policy and practice in Vermont.

A Latin teacher from junior high school once told me that the word trivia comes from roots meaning “three roads.” The idea was that people would come together where roads meet to  exchange small pieces of information — trivia. 

Here in Vermont we certainly swap news on street corners, and I’ve had my share of half-shouted updates between open car windows. The flow of information also happens in grocery stores, coffee shops and waiting for pickup at the end of the school day. 

Recently I found another spot for “hot tea,” as the kids like to call gossip these days. I was sitting  in my gym’s sauna and struck up a conversation with someone who is a school leader. 

I learned that the post-election anxiety many Vermonters are feeling is also showing up in  schools among students, many of whom are worried about being deported as part of what’s  been promised to be the “largest deportation program in American history.” 

And to clarify, these aren’t kids worrying about whether they will be able to go to Ikea in Montreal.  The federal government claims that it can stop and question people within 100 miles of a border.  For anyone doing the math, the distance from Highgate Springs to Middlebury clocks in at less  than 75 miles, for example. 

Advertisement

School leaders have so many responsibilities: to their students, the staff, the community. Now,  add to the list that schools have historically been swept up in immigration enforcement efforts. Despite this, Education Week recently pointed out that there hasn’t been much in the way of  public statements from school leaders. Or, ahem, state government.

There are levers that can be pulled within the state to help protect our vulnerable students. As the Legislature gets ready for session in January, elected representatives can prioritize this issue so schools can focus on teaching and learning. 

My gym’s motto is, “you belong here.” It’s time for Vermont’s education system to adopt a similar  mission statement.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont soccer crushes Iona to race into second round of the NCAA Tournament

Published

on

Vermont soccer crushes Iona to race into second round of the NCAA Tournament


Vermont soccer: 2024 America East championship celebration

Vermont men’s soccer defeats Bryant 2-1 in Sunday’s America East title game at soldout Virtue Field.

David Ismail fired in a brilliant goal from distance in the 18th minute. Yaniv Banzini led the second-half offensive outburst with a pair of how-did-he-do-that finishes. And Sydney Wathuta played the setup man once again.

The result was clear: Vermont men’s soccer knows how to win NCAA Tournament games. And the Catamounts claimed another one on Thursday night.

Advertisement

Behind Ismail’s opening strike, Banzini’s brace and Wathuta’s two assists, Vermont cruised past Iona 5-0 in the first round of the NCAA Tournament in front of 2,035 at Virtue Field.

The America East champion Catamounts (12-2-5) will play Hofstra in a second-round matchup at 5 p.m. Sunday on ESPN+. The Catamounts will seek their third straight trip to the Round of 16; two years ago, they reached the quarterfinals, one win shy of the College Cup semifinals; last year, they were ousted after advancing through the first two rounds.

The Catamounts now have six NCAA tourney wins since 2022. They had four in their program history prior to that.

In Thursday’s match, defender Zach Barrett dribbled down the right sideline and found Ismail on the edge of the box. The junior forward turned and, given too much space by Iona defenders, uncorked a lefty blast from 20 yards out that a leaping Iona goalie Loukas Georgiou could not reach.

Advertisement

Ahead 1-0 at the break, Bazini doubled the advantage 19 seconds into the second half. Bazini received a short pass following an Iona turnover 40 yards away from goal, and the dynamic senior forward weaved through multiple defenders before unleashing a blast from the top of the 18 that skipped in front of Georgiou and inside the right post.

In the 55th minute, Barrett heaved a long throw-in into the box for Max Murray, who nodded toward Bazini. With a crowd around him, Bazini beat the Iona defense with a crafty backheel for a 3-0 margin. It was Bazini’s team-leading 10th goal this fall.

To polish off the high-scoring performance for an America East school in an NCAA Tournament game, Wathuta set up Ryan Zellefrow in the 70th minute and Maximilian Kissel in the 85th minute, the latter giving Wathuta a single-season team record of 14 assists. Kissel also has nine goals this season, all as a substitute.

Niklas Herceg made three saves in net for his fourth clean sheet of 2024.

Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter: @aabrami5.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont lacks dental providers, efficient treatments, new report finds – VTDigger

Published

on

Vermont lacks dental providers, efficient treatments, new report finds – VTDigger


The Lamoille Health Partners mobile dental unit in use at the Waterville Elementary School in mid-October. The unit is meant to bring dental services to more rural parts of Lamoille County. Photo by Gordon Miller/News & Citizen

Many Vermonters have insufficient or nonexistent access to dental care, and the state is losing dental providers, according to a new report released Thursday. 

The Vermont Oral Health Equity Landscape Report, published by the nonprofit Voices for Vermont’s Children, found that, over roughly the past half-decade, Vermont has lost dentists at a faster rate than almost every other state and seen a decline in its children’s dental health.

The state has also been slow to roll out new dental procedures — non-invasive methods that could easily and cheaply improve oral health for many Vermonters, according to the report. 

“It’s very clear that oral health is a key component of overall systemic well being,” Michelle Fay, the executive director of Voices for Vermont’s Children, said in an interview. “And the system that we have set up isn’t working.”

Advertisement

According to national data from the American Dental Association cited in the report, Vermont had nearly 60 dentists per 100,000 residents in 2019, roughly the national rate.

The state reached that figure “after many years of robust recruitment and policy incentives meant to bolster the dental workforce,” the report reads. But the Covid-19 pandemic erased those gains: As of 2023, Vermont had only 53 dentists per 100,000 residents, the second-steepest decline in the country, per the report. 

From 2015 to 2021, the number of dental hygienists practicing in the state also declined by about 4%, according to data cited by the report. The number of public health dental hygienists — hygienists employed by the Vermont Department of Health — dropped from five prior to Covid-19 to one currently, the report reads. 

The state has also struggled to add dental therapists, professionals who perform routine dental care, to the ranks of practitioners. Last year, the Vermont state auditor found that Vermont State University had failed to stand up a dental therapy program, even after seven years and a $2.6 million investment of public funds. 

One bright spot noted in the report is Vermont Medicaid’s coverage of dental care. As a whole, Vermont dentists see more Medicaid patients than any other state, although its Medicaid reimbursement rates for dental care were mixed: adult reimbursement rates were relatively high, while rates for children’s dental care were in the middle of the pack nationally. 

Advertisement

Still, Fay said, accessing dental care as a Medicaid patient is not easy. Some dentists may think, “in theory, I’ll take a Medicaid patient,” Fay said, “but only if I haven’t filled all my slots with either private pay or insurance with a higher reimbursement.”

The report also notes that Vermont providers have been slow to adopt new, inexpensive and minimally invasive dental procedures. The report names two specifically: silver diamine fluoride and silver modified atraumatic restorative technique, methods in which protective materials are applied to the outside of teeth. 

Those procedures could have a significant impact on Vermonters’ dental health at low cost, the report says. 

Voices for Vermont’s Children recommends that the state invest in low-cost dental facilities and procedures across the state, including the integration of dental facilities with primary care facilities. The state’s health department should also consider a public education campaign focused on oral health, the report says. 

“The top line is really just the need to think differently about integrating oral health into overall health,” Fay said, “and using all available treatment models to meet the needs of these communities.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending