Connect with us

Vermont

In Vermont, ballots are Australian, and in some towns they’re replacing town meetings

Published

on

In Vermont, ballots are Australian, and in some towns they’re replacing town meetings


It’s that time of year again when my colleagues and I are calling town clerks to get the details for town meeting, coming up in early March. At our own morning meeting, the talk turned to Australian ballots, the term town clerks inevitably use to describe elections held in conjunction with town meeting. Not just “ballots.” Not “paper ballots.” No, it’s “Australian ballots.” Why?

Rather than Google an answer, I decided to call one of my favorite town clerks, Kristin Beers in Milton, who told me she didn’t know why it’s called Australian ballot, but that I could probably just Google it, or call the Secretary of State’s Office. Kristin did have some interesting insights into the Australian ballot, however, which has replaced the town meeting in Milton entirely. No votes from the floor.

“We are 100% Australian ballot, that’s how we vote for everything,” Kristin said. “Some towns do both, discuss and vote in person and also vote by Australian ballot. Some don’t use ballots at all.”

Advertisement

Kristin said she’s heard her fellow town clerks voice opinions strongly both ways − in favor of Australian ballots and against them. She has been at meetings where some clerks would question whether voters can really understand what the articles they’re voting on mean without a thorough, in-person discussion at town meeting. Those same clerks admit, however, that it’s hard to find a day and time when everyone will come out and participate in that discussion.

Milton offers an informational meeting the night before the election, where voters can ask questions about what’s going to be on the Australian ballot they use to vote the next day. Seems like a good compromise. But I still needed to know, why “Australian” ballot?

Former Free Press reporter wrote the definitive treatment of the Australian ballot

I could have Googled, as Kristin suggested, or I could have called the secretary of state. But instead, I checked our archives where I found a master’s thesis on the Australian ballot by my former colleague, Tim Johnson. It must be close to 3,000 words. I remember Tim as a somewhat grumpy, but very good and very thorough reporter, and his story on the Australian ballot from 2014 bore that memory out.

Tim explained the Australian ballot has two key features: It’s uniformly printed in advance of the election, by an electoral or governmental authority, and voters cast it in secret. That’s an Australian innovation, which debuted in the 1850s, then made its way to Europe, New Zealand and the United Kingdom in the 1860s and 1870s, finally reaching the United States in the late 1880s.

Advertisement

Kentucky and Massachusetts were the first states to enact Australian ballot laws, in 1888, followed by most other states over the next decade, including Vermont. Before the Aussies came up with their electoral innovation, Tim explained, elections were “BYOB,” bring your own ballot.

Tim quoted a former state archivist, who described the process. Political parties printed their own ballots, with only their candidates listed, and passed them out to voters.

“Partisan ballots were sometimes printed on paper of distinctive color, or most notoriously, in St. Johnsbury, on paper with zebra stripes,” Tim wrote. “If you were a worker in a factory whose owner favored the zebra-stripe candidates and you were spotted on Election Day casting a different kind of ballot, woe to you.”

Whoa, bring on the Australian ballot.

Advertisement

Tim also learned that newspapers “had contracts with the parties they supported and published their ballots for readers to clip out.” As an example, the Burlington Free Press, staunchly Republican in 1890, printed the Republican ticket in the left-hand column on Page 4 in the Aug. 29, 1890 edition.

Deadly to town meetings? Some people really don’t like the Australian ballot.

That debate Kristin mentioned between town clerks who favor floor votes at town meetings over secret ballots at elections has been going on for a long time. Tim quotes a UVM professor of political science who wrote in 1964, “While the use of the Australian ballot in general elections is wise, it is another matter to use it in Town Meeting. Its use destroys the chief characteristic of the gathering, the necessity for everyone interested to be there to vote in person on specific issues…”

Fifty years later, Tim notes, another renowned UVM political scientist, Frank Bryan, called the Australian ballot “deadly” to the tradition of town meetings.

Advertisement

“Understand. The Australian ballot takes away your right to legislate − to be part of the lawmaking process − and it doesn’t even replace it with a deliberative body that represents you,” Bryan said. “It simply allows you to vote up or down, yes or no, on an issue prepared by the selectboard or in many cases by a small group of private citizens with a special interest.”

As with so many other things in Vermont, Tim points out we seem to be the only ones holding on to a term or tradition. Maine doesn’t reference the “Australian ballot.” Neither does Connecticut or New Hampshire or Massachusetts. Even the Aussies have stopped talking about the Australian ballot, according to Tim, who interviewed a Vermont state official who was originally from Australia. He had never heard of the Australian ballot, until he came to Vermont.

“Somehow, everyone came to accept it, learned to live with it, and stopped talking about it − except around here,” Tim wrote.

Contact Dan D’Ambrosio at 660-1841 or ddambrosi@gannett.com. Follow him on X @DanDambrosioVT.



Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

WCAX Investigates: Police participation in border program draws scrutiny

Published

on

WCAX Investigates: Police participation in border program draws scrutiny


BURLINGTON, Vt. (WCAX) – Vermont police officers are working overtime shifts along the Canadian border under a federal program that critics say could violate the state’s anti-bias policing laws.

“Up here, we’re so small we rely on our partner agencies,” said Swanton Village Police Chief Matthew Sullivan.

On a recent frosty Friday, Sullivan was patrolling along the Canadian border as part of Homeland Security’s Operation Stonegarden. The chief and other local officers work overtime shifts for the U.S. Border Patrol.

“It acts as a force multiplier because we’re able to put more officers out in these rural areas in Vermont,” Sullivan said.

Advertisement

During an exclusive ride-along, Sullivan showed us a field where, as recently as last fall, migrants were smuggled across the border. “These people are really being taken advantage of,” he said.

From 2022 to 2023, U.S. Border Patrol encountered just shy of 7,000 people entering the country illegally in the region, more than the previous 11 years combined.

In several instances, police say cars have tried to crash through a gate in Swanton along the border. Others enter from Canada on foot and get picked up by cars with out-of-state plates.

The chief says the illegal crossings strike fear among local parents. “They didn’t feel safe allowing their kids outside to play, which is extremely unfortunate,” Sullivan said.

Through Operation Stonegarden — which was created in the wake of 9/11 — Sullivan and his officers get overtime pay from the feds. “We’re kind of another set of eyes and ears for border patrol,” Sullivan said. His department also gets equipment and training.

Advertisement

Six agencies in Vermont participate in Stonegarden: The Vermont State Police, Chittenden County Sheriff’s Department, Essex County Sheriff’s Department, Orleans County Sheriff’s Department, Newport City Police Department, and the Swanton Village Police Department. Some three dozen across New England participate in Stonegarden. These agencies collect relatively small amounts from the feds — $760,000 in Vermont, $190,000 in New Hampshire, and $1 million in Maine.

But amid the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, Stonegarden is under scrutiny.

“This has become quite relevant to a lot of people once again,” said Paul Heintz, a longtime Vermont journalist who now writes for the Boston Globe. “These three states have dramatically different policies when it comes to local law enforcement working with federal law enforcement.”

Vermont has some of the strictest rules about police assisting federal immigration officials. The Fair and Impartial Policing Policy limits cooperation with the feds and says immigration status, language, and proximity to the border cannot be the basis of an investigation.

“Vermonters have made clear through their elected representatives that they want state and local law enforcement to be focusing on state and local issues,” said Lia Ernst with the ACLU of Vermont. She says Stonegarden is crossing the line. “They don’t want their police to be a cog in the mass deportation machinery of any administration but particularly the Trump administration,” Ernst said.

Advertisement

The ACLU and other critics are concerned that Stonegarden creates a cozy relationship between local police and immigration officials that can be used to enforce the president’s immigration crackdown.

Heintz says the distinction between civil and criminal immigration enforcement can be fluid. In most civil cases in which the feds seek to deport, Vermont law enforcement can’t play a role because it’s against the law. In criminal cases, which local police can enforce, immigrants can be detained and charged.

“An operation may start out appearing to focus on a federal criminal immigration issue and may turn into a civil one over the course of that investigation,” Heintz said.

“There is a lot of nuance to it,” admitted Sullivan. He insists his department is not the long arm of federal law enforcement and is instead focused on crime, including guns, drugs, and human trafficking. However, if someone is caught in the act of crossing the border illegally, that constitutes a crime, and the chief said he calls for federal backup. Though he said that rarely happens.

“It’s a criminal violation to cross the border outside of a port of entry, and technically, we could take action on that. But again, we’re not here to enforce civil immigration while working Stonegarden,” Sullivan said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Catholic Church receives bankruptcy court’s OK to sell Rutland property – VTDigger

Published

on

Vermont Catholic Church receives bankruptcy court’s OK to sell Rutland property – VTDigger


Rutland’s former Loretto Home senior living facility, as pictured in recent advertisements offering it for sale. Pomerleau Real Estate photo

Vermont’s Roman Catholic Diocese, now seeking to reorganize its depleting finances in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, has received permission to sell its former Loretto Home senior living facility in Rutland.

In a ruling this week, Judge Heather Cooper said she’d allow the state’s largest religious denomination to accept a $1 million offer from Rutland’s nonprofit Cornerstone Housing Partners, which wants to transform the Meadow Street building into transitional and long-term affordable apartments.

“The proposed sale represents the highest and best offer for the property,” church lawyers argued in court papers, “and the proceeds of the sale will assist the diocese in funding the administration of this bankruptcy case and ultimately paying creditors.”

Cornerstone said it had a $3.9 million commitment from the state Agency of Human Services to help it buy and rehabilitate the 20,000-square-foot facility.

Advertisement

The nonprofit could immediately launch its first-phase plan for 16 units of emergency family housing under a new state law that expands locations for shelters. But the $1 million sale is contingent on receiving a Rutland zoning permit for a second-phase plan for at least 20 long-term apartments.

“We’re not going to purchase the building if we can’t create affordable apartments there,” Mary Cohen, the nonprofit’s chief executive officer, told VTDigger. “The goal is to create permanent housing.”

Cornerstone already has heard questions from neighbors as it seeks a zoning permit from Rutland’s Development Review Board.

“I think it’s a lack of understanding,” Cohen said. “We’re good landlords. We house people and take good care of our property. The application process will allow a public conversation about what our plans are.”

The Vermont Catholic Church filed for Chapter 11 protection a year ago after a series of clergy misconduct settlements reduced its assets by half, to about $35 million. Since then, 119 people have submitted new child sexual abuse allegations — almost double that of an earlier 67 accusers who previously settled cases over the past two decades.

Advertisement

To raise money, the diocese enlisted Pomerleau Real Estate to market the Loretto Home after the facility closed in 2023. The property, under the control of the church since 1904, was initially listed at $2.25 million before being reduced to $1.95 million and, by this year, $1.3 million, court records show. The diocese received an unspecified number of offers before accepting Cornerstone’s $1 million bid this summer.

Under the Chapter 11 process, the Vermont church must receive court approval for all major purchases and sales until a judge decides on its call for a reorganization plan.





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont soccer’s Rob Dow reportedly eyeing move to Big Ten program

Published

on

Vermont soccer’s Rob Dow reportedly eyeing move to Big Ten program


Vermont soccer head coach Rob Dow appears to be headed to a bigger conference.

The longtime Catamounts head coach who guided Vermont to the 2024 NCAA championship in historic fashion is reportedly set to be hired by Penn State, according to Jon Sauber of Centre Daily Times. Shortly before Sauber’s online report on Wednesday, Dec. 11, WCAX-TV’s Jack Fitzsimmons and Michael Dugan broke news that Dow and the Nittany Lions were in “deep negotiations.”

UVM athletics officials declined to comment until there is an official announcement. 

Advertisement

Dow’s ninth season at Vermont ended with an upset loss to Hofstra in the second round of the NCAA Tournament at Virtue Field. The Catamounts had entered this year’s tournament unbeaten and as the top overall seed. They also started 2025 as the top-ranked team in the nation in the United Soccer Coaches preseason poll.

Under Dow, the Catamounts have advanced to the NCAA Tournament in five straight seasons (2021-2025). They reached the NCAA quarterfinals in 2022, the third round in 2023 and then last year’s unseeded run to capture their first national championship with an overtime victory over Marshall at the College Cup in Cary, North Carolina.

Through his nine seasons at Vermont, Dow has gone 109-41-21 with four America East tournament crowns and three conference regular-season titles. His 11 NCAA Tournament wins are a program record. He stands five wins shy of matching Cormier and Ron McEachen for most victories in program history.

Dow spent five seasons as an assistant coach at Vermont before earning a promotion to head coach in 2017 following the departure of Jesse Cormier.

According to UVM’s salary records online, Dow’s current base salary is $200,000. In 2017, in his first year at the helm, it was $80,000.

Advertisement

If hired, Dow would be taking over at Penn State following Jeff Cook’s exit. Cook stepped down in November after an eight-year run and three NCAA Tournament appearances. The Nittany Lions went 5-8-4 this past season.

Penn State’s operating budget for the 2024 fiscal year for men’s soccer was 10th in the country at $2,099,653, according to data collected by Matt Brown of Extra Points. Vermont was slotted 28th in Brown’s story.

Rob Dow: Season-by-season record with Vermont soccer

2025: 14-1-5 (NCAA second round)

2024: 16-2-6 (national champions)

Advertisement

2023: 13-6-2 (NCAA third round)

2022: 16-4-2 (NCAA quarterfinals)

2021: 13-5-2 (NCAA first round)

2020-21: 5-2-1 (America East final)

2019: 11-6-1 (America East semifinals)

Advertisement

2018: 11-7-1 (America East quarterfinals)

2017: 10-8-1 (America East semifinals)

Total: 109-41-21

Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter: @aabrami5.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending