Vermont
In Vermont, a call to end logging in the Green Mountain National Forest – The Boston Globe
Ayers, 65, was one in all scores of local weather activists who just lately trooped as much as the world to protest logging within the nationwide forest, the place federal officers in recent times have authorised the harvesting of timber throughout 43,000 acres, and just lately unveiled a controversial plan to permit timber to be faraway from a further 11,000 acres.
Environmental teams have lengthy battled the timber business over the sanctity of nationwide forests, however the stakes in these perennial battles have risen in recent times. As international temperatures attain harmful ranges and end in extra local weather catastrophes, giant, mature forests are more and more acknowledged as enjoying a vital position in sequestering the carbon dioxide that has precipitated a lot of that warming.
Final 12 months, america and greater than 140 international locations agreed on the worldwide local weather summit in Glasgow to halt international deforestation by the top of the last decade, which might cut back international carbon emissions by a 3rd.
President Biden pledged billions of {dollars} to assist restore at the least 500 million acres of forests and different ecosystems around the globe and mentioned america would “lead by our instance.”
On Earth Day final April, he issued an government order to guard mature forests on federal lands. “We will and should take motion to preserve, restore, reforest, and handle our magnificent forests right here at residence,” Biden wrote within the order.
The order requires federal regulators to establish all of the nation’s mature and old-growth forests inside a 12 months, and “institutionalize climate-smart administration” insurance policies to guard them. There are not any current federal guidelines to solely defend these older forests.
However with the US Forest Service now planning to considerably improve logging within the Inexperienced Mountain Nationwide Forest — throughout areas that quantity to greater than 10 % of the federally managed land — native local weather activists have been staging protests, arguing the company is defying Biden’s government order and performing hypocritically.
At a rally on an unusually balmy day this month in Rochester, greater than 100 local weather activists gathered in entrance of the Forest Service’s native ranger station, carrying indicators corresponding to “Cease the Chop” and “Clearcuts Gasoline Local weather Chaos.”
They urged the company to halt clearcutting within the nationwide forest, the place most of the timber within the focused areas at the moment are nearing a century previous. Older timber usually take in extra carbon than youthful timber, however their bigger measurement additionally makes them extra priceless as lumber.
“The US is begging for forest safety in different nations whereas leveling mature and old-growth timber on our personal nationwide forests,” mentioned Zack Porter, government director of Standing Timber, an environmental advocacy group in Vermont. “The Forest Service is willfully flouting the intent of the president’s government order, recklessly promoting off our kids and grandchildren’s future.”
Forest Service officers say such logging within the nationwide forest is important to assist the native financial system and regenerate ecosystems that depend on younger forests.
“There are trade-offs in managing for a lot of totally different values and desires,” mentioned Christopher Mattrick, a district ranger for the Forest Service in Rochester, who’s overseeing logging plans within the Inexperienced Mountain Nationwide Forest. “Resolution-making might be complicated … however it’s based mostly in science.”
Restricted quantities of logging within the nationwide forest, he added, allow clear-cut areas to get replaced with a extra various vary of timber. That creates extra appropriate habitat for a wider vary of wildlife, whereas permitting the forests to be extra resilient to the impacts of local weather change, such because the elevated threat of fireside, drought, and the unfold of invasive pests, he mentioned.
As to Biden’s directive, Mattrick mentioned the Forest Service is “working collectively with our colleagues on the Division of Inside to each decide definitions and full a listing of old-growth and mature forests.”
The areas the place logging has been authorised signify a comparatively small fraction of the 416,000 acres of the Inexperienced Mountain Nationwide Forest, Mattrick mentioned, and the place it has been licensed, the clearcutting usually happens on only a portion of that land. For instance, in locations the place logging was authorised this 12 months, nearly one third of these areas had been harvested, he mentioned.
The proposal to permit logging in a further 11,000 acres of the nationwide forest, in an space referred to as the Phone Hole, “doesn’t signify a choice to vary the tempo or scale of this administration,” he mentioned.
However Mattrick acknowledged that the quantity of logging has been rising, and that over the subsequent 5 years, loggers are scheduled to reap as a lot as 62 million board toes of lumber from the nationwide forest — greater than double the quantity prior to now 5 years.
Representatives of the logging business argue the Forest Service ought to permit much more logging within the Inexperienced Mountains.
As a surge in rates of interest has harm the housing market, the worth of lumber has plummeted, lowering the provision of timber from non-public lands, they mentioned. Non-public landowners have a tendency to carry off harvesting their stands when lumber costs are low, usually leaving the timber business to rely on public land to proceed working.
“For the survival of the forest merchandise business, the timber from these public forests might be what helps us survive,” mentioned Kenneth Johnson, co-owner and common supervisor of A. Johnson, a Bristol-based mill that has equipped lumber to the area for greater than a century.
He in contrast the wooden from the nationwide forest to “a safety valve,” saying it’s important to moderating the unstable worth of lumber and sustaining jobs when residence constructing and different growth declines.
With the timber business using some 9,100 individuals and producing $1.4 billion in gross sales in Vermont, he and others mentioned it was important to reap within the nationwide forest to guard the financial system.
“We all know it doesn’t look good while you minimize timber, and folks have an emotional response to that,” Johnson mentioned. “However we’re supporting the households of Vermont, and so far as I’m involved, that’s a part of the operate of the general public forests.”
Whereas acknowledging the financial advantages of harvesting the nationwide forest, local weather advocates pointed to a spread of research displaying older forests are extra resilient to local weather change, retailer extra carbon, produce cleaner water, and are higher at lowering the floods and droughts anticipated to extend with local weather change.
Additionally they disputed a logging business competition that much less chopping in public forests would result in extra harvesting on non-public land or extra lumber being introduced from faraway, noting that a lot of Vermont’s timber is exported. Furthermore, they counter business arguments that harvested timber proceed to retailer carbon, pointing to research displaying that a lot carbon is misplaced within the processing of timber into lumber.
“The cessation of logging of public lands, and particularly of old-growth, mature forest, is an important and readily enacted first step towards recognizing and performing upon the well-established have to reverse insurance policies which might be inflicting and exacerbating local weather change,” mentioned Wealthy Holschuh, chair of the Vermont Fee on Native American Affairs and a frontrunner of the state’s indigenous Elnu Abenaki tribe, who was among the many protestors.
He known as plans to log extra of the nationwide forest “short-term human financial acquire over everybody and every part else.”
Others pointed to a current report by a bunch that features Harvard College’s Harvard Forest division that discovered defending New England’s older forests might make a considerable affect in lowering the area’s emissions.
The report estimated that timber in New England already take in about 27 million tons of greenhouse gases yearly, amounting to about 14 % of the area’s total carbon emissions in 2020. Further protections to permit extra of the area’s forests to get older might improve that to about 21 %, or the emissions of roughly 1.3 million properties, the report estimated.
The report really useful lowering growth to guard woodlands and a number of different measures, however it didn’t deal with harvesting timber within the area’s nationwide forests and different public lands.
David Foster, a coauthor and director emeritus of Harvard Forest, mentioned, “We ought to be involved with logging all over the place.”
However he wasn’t ready to name for a ban on harvesting within the Inexperienced Mountain Nationwide Forest or different federal lands, noting that they had been put aside, partially, for logging functions, and that chopping there tends to be executed extra rigorously, with extra protections for the surroundings.
That mentioned, Foster known as for a extra complete strategy to guard the area’s older forests, one that might do much more to maintain non-public lands wild.
“We should stability environmental considerations with producing pure assets,” he mentioned. “It doesn’t should be environmentally harmful.”
As he clambered up the shorn hillside within the nationwide forest, Glen Ayers wasn’t keen to simply accept that clearcutting had any upsides.
Most vital, he mentioned, as an alternative of serving as a carbon sink, it was doubtless now a supply of carbon dioxide emissions. Research have proven, he famous, that clearcutting loosens the soil in forests, leading to extra carbon being launched into the ambiance.
“This isn’t proper,” he mentioned. “It’s an abuse.”
David Abel might be reached at dabel@globe.com. Observe him on Twitter @davabel.
Vermont
Former UVM President Thomas P. Salmon Dies at 92
Born in Cleveland, Ohio, in1932, Salmon was raised in…
Vermont
‘The Sex Lives of College Girls’ is set at a fictional Vermont college. Where is it filmed?
The most anticipated TV shows of 2025
USA TODAY TV critic Kelly Lawler shares her top 5 TV shows she is most excited for this year
It’s time to hit the books: one of Vermont’s most popular colleges may be one that doesn’t exist.
The Jan. 15 New York Times mini crossword game hinted at a fictional Vermont college that’s used as the setting of the show “The Sex Lives of College Girls.”
The show, which was co-created by New Englander Mindy Kaling, follows a group of women in college as they navigate relationships, school and adulthood.
“The Sex Lives of College Girls” first premiered on Max, formerly HBO Max, in 2021. Its third season was released in November 2024.
Here’s what to know about the show’s fictional setting.
What is the fictional college in ‘The Sex Lives of College Girls’?
“The Sex Lives of College Girls” takes place at a fictional prestigious college in Vermont called Essex College.
According to Vulture, Essex College was developed by the show’s co-creators, Kaling and Justin Noble, based on real colleges like their respective alma maters, Dartmouth College and Yale University.
“Right before COVID hit, we planned a research trip to the East Coast and set meetings with all these different groups of young women at these colleges and chatted about what their experiences were,” Noble told the outlet in 2021.
Kaling also said in an interview with Parade that she and Noble ventured to their alma maters because they “both, in some ways, fit this East Coast story” that is depicted in the show.
Where is ‘The Sex Lives of College Girls’ filmed?
Although “The Sex Lives of College Girls” features a New England college, the show wasn’t filmed in the area.
The show’s first season was filmed in Los Angeles, while some of the campus scenes were shot at Vassar College in Poughkeepsie, New York. The second season was partially filmed at the University of Washington in Seattle, Washington.
Vermont
Tom Salmon, governor behind ‘the biggest political upset in Vermont history,’ dies at 92 – VTDigger
When Vermont Democrats lacked a gubernatorial candidate the afternoon of the primary deadline in August 1972, Rockingham lawyer Tom Salmon, in the most last-minute of Hail Mary passes, threw his hat in the ring.
“There could be a whale of a big surprise,” Salmon was quoted as saying by skeptical reporters who knew the former local legislator had been soundly beached in his first try for state office two years earlier.
Then a Moby Dick of a shock came on Election Day, spurring the Burlington Free Press to deem Salmon’s Nov. 7, 1972, victory over the now late Republican businessman Luther “Fred” Hackett “the biggest political upset in Vermont history.”
Salmon, who served two terms as governor, continued to defy the odds in subsequent decades, be it by overcoming a losing 1976 U.S. Senate bid to become president of the University of Vermont, or by entering a Brattleboro convalescent home in 2022, only to confound doctors by living nearly three more years until his death Tuesday.
Salmon, surrounded by family, died just before sundown at the Pine Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation at age 92, his children announced shortly after.
“Your man Winston Churchill always said, ‘Never, never, never, never give up,” Salmon’s son, former state Auditor Thomas M. Salmon, recalled telling his father in his last days, “and Dad, you’ve demonstrated that.”
Born in the Midwest and raised in Massachusetts, Thomas P. Salmon graduated from Boston College Law School before moving to Rockingham in 1958 to work as an attorney, a municipal judge from 1963 to 1965, and a state representative from 1965 to 1971.
Salmon capped his legislative tenure as House minority leader. But his political career hit a wall in 1970 when he lost a race for attorney general by 17 points to incumbent Jim Jeffords, the now late maverick Republican who’d go on to serve in the U.S. House and Senate before his seismic 2001 party switch.
Vermont had made national news in 1962 when the now late Philip Hoff became the first Democrat to win popular election as governor since the founding of the Republican Party in 1854. But the GOP had a vise-grip on the rest of the ballot, held two-thirds of all seats in the Legislature and took back the executive chamber when the now deceased insurance executive Deane Davis won after Hoff stepped down in 1968.
As Republican President Richard Nixon campaigned for reelection in 1972, Democrats were split over whether to support former Vice President Hubert Humphrey or U.S. senators George McGovern or Edmund Muskie. The Vermont party was so divided, it couldn’t field a full slate of aspirants to run for state office.
“The reason that we can’t get candidates this year is that people don’t want to get caught in the struggle,” Hoff told reporters at the time. “The right kind of Democrat could have a good chance for the governorship this year, but we have yet to see him.”
Enter Salmon. Two years after his trouncing, he had every reason not to run again. Then he attended the Miami presidential convention that nominated McGovern.
“I listened to the leadership of the Democratic Party committed to tilting at windmills against what seemed to be the almost certain reelection of President Nixon,” Salmon recalled in a 1989 PBS interview with journalist Chris Graff. “That very night I made up my mind I was going to make the effort despite the odds.”
Before Vermont moved its primaries to August in 2010, party voting took place in September. That’s why Salmon could wait until hours before the Aug. 2, 1972, filing deadline to place his name on the ballot.
“Most Democratic leaders conceded that Salmon’s chances of nailing down the state’s top job are quite dim,” wrote the Rutland Herald and Times Argus, reporting that Salmon was favored by no more than 18% of those surveyed.
(Gov. Davis’ preferred successor, Hackett, was the front-runner. A then-unknown Liberty Union Party candidate — Bernie Sanders — rounded out the race.)
“We agreed that there was no chance of our winning the election unless the campaign stood for something,” Salmon said in his 1989 PBS interview. “Namely, addressed real issues that people in Vermont cared about.”
Salmon proposed to support average residents by reforming the property tax and restricting unplanned development, offering the motto “Vermont is not for sale.” In contrast, his Republican opponent called for repealing the state’s then-new litter-decreasing bottle-deposit law, while a Rutland County representative to the GOP’s National Committee, Roland Seward, told reporters, “What are we saving the environment for, the animals?”
As Republicans crowded into a Montpelier ballroom on election night, Salmon stayed home in the Rockingham village of Bellows Falls — the better to watch his then 9-year-old namesake son join a dozen friends in breaking a garage window during an impromptu football game, the press would report.
At 10:20 p.m., CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite interrupted news of a Nixon landslide to announce, “It looks like there’s an upset in the making in Vermont.”
The Rutland Herald and Times Argus summed up Salmon’s “winning combination” (he scored 56% of the vote) as “the image of an underdog fighting ‘the machine’” and “an appeal to the pocketbook on taxes and electric power.”
Outgoing Gov. Davis would later write in his autobiography that the Democrat was “an extremely intelligent, articulate, handsome individual with loads of charm.”
“Salmon accepted a challenge which several other Democrats had turned down,” the Free Press added in an unusual front-page editorial of congratulations. “He then accomplished what almost all observers saw as a virtual impossibility.”
As governor, Salmon pushed for the prohibition of phosphates in state waters and the formation of the Agency of Transportation. Stepping down after four years to run for U.S. Senate in 1976, he was defeated by incumbent Republican Robert Stafford, the now late namesake of the Stafford federal guaranteed student loan program.
Salmon went on to serve as president of the University of Vermont and chair of the board of Green Mountain Power. In his 1977 gubernatorial farewell address, he summed up his challenges — and said he had no regrets.
“A friend asked me the other day if it was all worth it,” Salmon said. “Wasn’t I owed more than I received with the energy crisis, Watergate, inflation, recession, natural disasters, no money, no snow, a tax revolt, and the anxiety of our people over government’s capacity to respond to their needs? My answer was this: I came to this state in 1958 with barely enough money in my pocket to pay for an overnight room. In 14 short years I became governor. The people of Vermont owe me nothing. I owe them everything for the privilege of serving two terms in the highest office Vermont can confer on one of its citizens.”
-
Technology7 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science4 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’ Review: Thai Oscar Entry Is a Disarmingly Sentimental Tear-Jerker
-
Health1 week ago
Michael J. Fox honored with Presidential Medal of Freedom for Parkinson’s research efforts
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: Millennials try to buy-in or opt-out of the “American Meltdown”
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood
-
World1 week ago
Trial Starts for Nicolas Sarkozy in Libya Election Case