Connect with us

Rhode Island

‘Granny cam’ bill allowing cameras in nursing home rooms one step closer to law in RI.

Published

on

‘Granny cam’ bill allowing cameras in nursing home rooms one step closer to law in RI.


Legislation that would allow families to install surveillance cameras in nursing-home residents’ rooms unanimously cleared the Senate on Tuesday.

S 2263, sponsored by Sen. Dawn Euer, D-Newport, would allow family members to install their own cameras in loved one’s rooms and remotely monitor their treatment. The resident would have to consent, unless their doctor determined they are incapable of doing so.

The bill would also apply to assisted living facilities. It now goes to the House of Representatives, where a companion bill has been introduced by Rep. Jason Knight, D-Barrington.

The debate: Empowering or Orwellian?

The legislation has faced opposition from organizations representing long-term care facilities, who say that allowing cameras would be Orwellian and go against their goal of creating a home-like environment.

Advertisement

Additionally, opponents argue, anyone who would actually abuse an elderly person would disable the camera first.

Critics also say that surveillance would be insulting to nursing home staff. But SEIU 1199 New England, which represents workers at unionized nursing homes, came out in favor of the legislation and said that it could help protect workers from false accusations.

Proponents argue that the goal is to empower some of the state’s most vulnerable residents, and they note that nursing homes often have cameras in common areas.

More: What hundreds of pages of records reveal about nursing home resident-on-resident violence

Advertisement

Lawmakers hear harrowing stories

Speaking before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March, James Delisle said that his mother was sexually assaulted by a CNA at a nursing home in Warwick. That man ultimately had his license reinstated and “is working in the state of Rhode Island as a CNA, and as a predator,” he said.

“I don’t quite understand what happened,” Delisle testified said. “But ultimately, the ‘he said, she said’ part of this would not be even in question if we were to have this bill here.”

Ginny Lee, a member of Advocates for Better Care in Rhode Island and volunteer with the state Long-Term Care Ombudsman’s Office, described a disturbing case from several months ago: A resident was admitted to the hospital and placed in a room with electronic monitoring, and a hospital staffer “witnessed a person climbing in the person’s bed and starting to engage in sexual activity.”

“The chilling part of the story is the person was a CNA from the long-term facility where the patient lives,” Lee said.

In a statement on Tuesday, Euer said that in-room cameras “can provide a means of contact, oversight and protection” for residents and families that want it.

Advertisement

“This does not impose an additional cost on the nursing home, as the devices would be paid for by the resident or their family,” she said. Additionally, “it would not constitute an invasion of privacy, as cameras would only be installed at the request of the resident and with the consent of any and all roommates.”

Learn more about nursing home violence and abuse

The Providence Journal recently reviewed hundreds of pages of records documenting resident-on-resident violence and abuse in nursing homes and created an online database tracking those incidents.

In numerous instances, police reports indicated that an alleged assault couldn’t be substantiated because it occurred in a resident’s private room, or because the only potential witnesses suffered from memory-loss disorders.



Source link

Advertisement

Rhode Island

ACLU of RI sues McKee alleging denial of access to regularly used State House rally area | ABC6

Published

on

ACLU of RI sues McKee alleging denial of access to regularly used State House rally area | ABC6


PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WLNE) — Attorneys for the ACLU of Rhode Island have filed a lawsuit against RI Governor Dan McKee, alleging the governor’s office explicitly told state and capitol police to bar protesters from accessing the State House rotunda and upper floors.

The rally was planned to take place in the rotunda an hour before McKee’s January 2025 State of the State address.

The event was to be attended by local groups including Rhode Island Homeless Advocacy Project and by activist Harrison Tuttle.

Tuttle was the President of the now dissolved Rhode Island Black Lives Matter PAC at the time.

Advertisement

The suit claims that Tuttle and fellow protesters arrived to be told that McKee’s office instructed police from letting them enter.

Tuttle was told by police that he in particular was not allowed to enter the areas, according to the suit.

The suit also claims that other people were allowed to access those areas of the State House.

The suit states that the rotunda is commonly used by protesters, and that its entrance was blocked off by capitol and state police.

A sign accompanied the officers that said the rotunda was reserved from 4:30-10 p.m., and the governor’s office didn’t reserve the area until 4:39 p.m., according to records cited by the ACLU of RI.

Advertisement

The protesters were directed by police to the “Bell Room” for their event, which is a less visible area in the back of the State House’s first floor, according to the suit.

The ACLU of RI statement reads in part:

In any event, despite being ‘reserved,’ the rotunda was not used for any purpose during that timeframe. The lawsuit argues that the Governor’s reservation of the space and the Capitol and State Police’s actions were undertaken to stifle the protesters’ exercise of their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.

Executive director of the Rhode Island Homeless Advocacy Project Eric Hirsch, a participant in the suit stated:

I’ve been advocating for an end to homelessness in Rhode Island for a long time. I was shocked to see the Rotunda at the Statehouse roped off when I arrived for the People’s State of the State rally. I had attended dozens of rallies there over the years. To make matters worse, we were also prevented from getting anywhere near the Governor’s address. We were confined to a lower floor of the Statehouse. This is unacceptable. We have a right to express our view of the Governor’s policies toward people experiencing homelessness.

ABC6 has reached out to the office of Governor Dan McKee for comment in this matter but has not yet heard back.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

RI GOP asking for resident input for upcoming Washington Bridge oversight hearing | ABC6

Published

on

RI GOP asking for resident input for upcoming Washington Bridge oversight hearing | ABC6


PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WLNE) — Rhode Island Republican leaders are asking for public input ahead of an upcoming oversight hearing on the Washington Bridge forensic report.

The report, recently revealed to have been withheld by Governor Dan McKee at attorneys’ advice, will be the subject of the planned November 13 oversight hearing.

McKee stated that he knew that repairs were needed on the bridge for two years before its December 11, 2023 westbound side closure, but was confident that work was underway.

McKee said that once he was aware the bridge deficiencies were irreparable, he approved the closure.

Advertisement

Rhode Island House Minority Leader Michael Chippendale said in a statement, in part:

Now that the Speaker and Senate President have committed to ‘a thorough and rigorous examination’ of the Washington Bridge failure and have empowered the Joint Oversight Committee to take testimony under oath, Rhode Islanders deserve answers without delay on this on-going administrative disaster.

Residents can contribute questions to the hearing process via email at rigopcaucus@gmail.com.

 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Smithfield’s response to anti-Semitic hazing incident is ‘egregious,’ Jewish Alliance says

Published

on

Smithfield’s response to anti-Semitic hazing incident is ‘egregious,’ Jewish Alliance says


play

The mother of a Jewish football player told the Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island that five Smithfield football players, all seniors, trapped her son in a bathroom and sprayed him with Lysol while yelling anti-Jewish slurs, according to a representative of the alliance.

The Alliance staff member, Stephanie Hague, says the woman told her the entrapment involved a chair pushed against a door, but it wasn’t clear from the woman’s comments if her son was trapped in a bathroom, or in a particular area of a bathroom.

Advertisement

Hague said she could not further clarify the specific circumstances of the Lysol-spraying but as she understood it, the player was exposed to the spray during the entrapment and other hazing.

Did the Smithfield football players use anti-Semitic slurs?

“The reason I am not sharing the slurs is because they are, one, not suitable for print, but also because there is some dispute of exactly the phrasing,” said the Alliance’s president, Adam Greenman.

“But we do know that they were anti-Jewish, anti-Semitic slurs and the incident was witnessed by 20 other football players,” Greenman added.

Hague said that Greenman’s comment is “correct.” She emphasized that she is not a lawyer or police investigator, but as part of her job at the Alliance, she responds to matters of antisemitism.

Advertisement

Greenman said the organization has talked to the student’s mother and to others who witnessed what took place.

“We feel fairly confident that we understand the details of what happened,” he said.

Alliance putting public focus on district’s response to the incident

Hague and Greenman made those comments on Monday, Oct. 27 as the student’s mother and the Jewish Alliance made plans to bring attention to the situation at an anticipated meeting of Smithfield’s school committee.

Both the Alliance and the Sandra Bornstein Holocaust Education Center have condemned the school district’s handling of the incident, asserting that five seniors were initially kicked off the team but were then reinstated to the team on Wednesday, Oct. 22.

Advertisement

The players’ return to the team was in time to participate in Friday night’s game against Exeter-West Greenwich/Prout, which the team won 16-6.

On Thursday, Oct. 23, the school district’s Superintendent Dawn Bartz, gave a one-sentence statement in an email seeking comment on the situation: “The disciplinary process has concluded, and we will not be discussing details involving students.”

“The fact that the school district has reversed course on consequences for the students is just egregious,” Greenman said.

“We all know that if a consequence is taken away for something like this, it encourages that behavior moving forward,” he said. “We’re very concerned that the students involved were reinstated. We’re very concerned that it seems like the school district is not taking this seriously.”

Meeting canceled hours after Jewish Alliance encourages public attendance

Later on Monday, it became clear that Smithfield Town Council had canceled its Tuesday, Oct. 28, joint session with the School Committee.

Advertisement

An executive assistant to the town manager in Smithfield confirmed that the meeting had been canceled, noting that there are plans to reschedule the meeting, but no date has been set at this time.

The town clerk later said that based on the volume of queries from members the public and news media, the town determined it needed to move the joint meeting from the Town Council’s chambers to a larger venue, according to Donna Corrao, who is an executive assistant for Town Manager Robert W. Seltzer.

The cancellation came hours after the Alliance sent a press release encouraging the public to attend the meeting to “express your outrage and desire to act” after a “horrific antisemitic hazing incident at Smithfield High School.”

The Alliance had encouraged people to:

  • Attend in support and solidarity
  • Share brief testimony if you have a strong connection to Smithfield or a compelling personal experience to contribute
  • Hold signs and wear pins, which would have been available at the meeting.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending