Connect with us

Rhode Island

Democrats assail federal budget bill, but what will it really mean for RI? What we know.

Published

on

Democrats assail federal budget bill, but what will it really mean for RI? What we know.


play

  • A sweeping federal budget bill passed by Congress includes major changes to taxation and social programs, with some effects taking place immediately and others delayed until 2028.
  • The bill includes tax cuts for businesses and individuals, restrictions on public benefits, and spending cuts to Medicaid and SNAP food assistance.
  • Rhode Island’s Democratic leaders oppose the bill, citing concerns about reduced access to food assistance and health care, while Republicans praise the tax cuts and spending reductions.
  • The bill’s impact on Rhode Island’s budget is uncertain, and state agencies are analyzing potential effects on health care, taxes and federal grants.

The sweeping federal budget bill passed by Congress and expected to be signed by President Donald Trump on July 4 calls for major changes to taxation and social programs, but the impact on Rhode Island could take years to determine.

The bill’s tax cuts for businesses and individuals will, in general, take effect imminently, including an increase in the standard deduction, no taxes on tips and an increase in deductions for state and local tax payments.

Advertisement

New restrictions on public benefits − including work requirements for food stamps and health insurance − phase in this year and next.

And spending cuts feared by state officials in both red and blue states − including reductions in federal Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) − will not take effect until 2028, after the 2026 elections.

Will a special fall session of the General Assembly be needed?

In debate about the just-enacted $14.3 billion Rhode Island budget, General Assembly leaders said they might be forced to hold a special fall session to respond to any federal cuts or policy changes that would throw state plans out of whack.

The delayed effective dates for the Medicaid and SNAP cuts make a special session less likely, but Assembly leaders on July 3 would not rule anything out and said they would need “a thoughtful review and formal information-sharing on the possible short- and long-term impacts of federal government action.”

Advertisement

RI’s Democratic leaders assail reduced access to food assistance, Medicaid

All four members of Rhode Island’s all-Democratic congressional delegation voted against the bill, and the ruling State House triumvirate of governor, speaker and Senate president all opposed the GOP bill.

“For many of our neighbors, this budget reduces access to supports like SNAP food assistance. It puts health insurance for thousands of Rhode Islanders in jeopardy, breaking President Trump’s empty promise to protect Medicaid,” Gov. Dan McKee said in a video.

House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi and Senate President Valarie Lawson said in a joint statement that they would work to pass policies that “protect access to health care like we did in this year’s state budget.”

“We believe it is cruel for Republicans in Washington to pay for large tax breaks for billionaires by stripping Medicaid from vulnerable residents, which will potentially destabilize health care systems at the state level,” Shekarchi and Lawson’s statement said.

Advertisement

RI GOP: Bill delivers ‘massive tax relief,’ cuts to ‘reckless’ spending

Rhode Island Republicans, on the other hand, hailed the new budget bill.

“This bill delivers exactly what President Trump and Republicans promised, massive tax relief for the middle class, real border security to protect our communities, and deep cuts to reckless Washington spending,” state GOP Chairman Joe Powers said. “Democrats in both chambers had the chance to stand with working Americans, and instead, they stood in lockstep with their radical base. Make no mistake – Rhode Islanders won’t forget who fought for them, and who sold them out.”

The just-passed state budget requires the McKee administration to convene a series of advisory groups to analyze the state impacts of the new federal budget. Separate reports from these groups are due to the legislature by Oct. 31 on potential changes to federal grants, state tax revenue and Medicaid.

Biggest impact on RI: Health care

Provisions in the bill expected to sock the state budget include a reduction in “State Directed” payments to hospitals and forced reductions to health care provider taxes that states charge hospitals to leverage additional federal Medicaid dollars.

McKee spokeswoman Laura Hart said state agencies “have been meeting bi-weekly since February to review potential impacts of the various versions of the budget bill” and are currently identifying people to be on the different working groups required by the Assembly.

Advertisement

The budget bill also targets the state’s Affordable Care Act-created health benefits exchange by shortening the enrollment period, narrowing subsidy eligibility, and requiring additional paperwork to enroll or renew.

Loss of enrollment due to the changes is projected to result in premium increases across health insurance plans on the exchange due to a smaller covered population.

“Simply put, the bill makes health coverage harder to get, more difficult to keep and far too expensive to afford,” HealthSource RI Director Lindsay Lang said in a news release. “The effects of the bill will compound each year, likely resulting in significant rate increases for anyone still left in the market.”

Reactions from RI’s congressional delegation

The Rhode Island congressional delegation weighed in with a range of criticism of the budget bill.

Sen. Jack Reed said, “Republicans structured the bill so the ultra-wealthy can cash out right away while the little guy and average taxpayers will get stuck paying the bill for years to come.”

Advertisement

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse said, “Trump’s Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires Bill” was “cooked in back rooms” and “saddles our children and grandchildren with trillions and trillions of dollars in debt.”

U.S. Rep. Seth Magaziner said the bill “represents the largest transfer of wealth from working people to the ultra-wealthy in U.S. history.”

And U.S. Rep. Gabe Amo said the bill will make Americans “poorer, sicker, hungrier, and further away from economic opportunity.”



Source link

Advertisement

Rhode Island

Pulled funding creates a bike path to nowhere. Let’s hope RI fixes it.

Published

on

Pulled funding creates a bike path to nowhere. Let’s hope RI fixes it.


play

I’ve long thought bike paths are among Rhode Island’s premier attractions, up there with the beaches, the mansions and the bay.

We like to knock government, but credit where it’s due, the state has done an amazing job building out an incredible pedaling network.

Advertisement

It’s clearly a priority.

At least I thought it was.

But they’ve just dropped the ball on what should have been a beautiful new stretch.

The plan was to finish a mile-long connector from the East Providence end of the Henderson Bridge all the way to the East Bay Bike Path.

There was even $25 million set aside to get it done.

Advertisement

Except WPRI recently reported that it’s now been canceled.

The main fault lies with the Trump administration, which is no friend of bike paths, and moved to kill that $25 million.

But it gets complicated, as government funding always does.

To try to rescue that money, the state DOT reportedly worked with the administration to refunnel it into a road project. Specifically, the $25 million will now be spent helping upgrade the mile-long highway between the Henderson Bridge and North Broadway in East Providence, turning it into a more pleasant boulevard.

Advertisement

That totally sounds worthy.

But it’s insane to throw away the bike path plan.

Especially for a particular reason in this case.

They’d already put a ton of money into starting it.

When state planners designed the new Henderson Bridge between the East Side and East Providence, they included a bike path.

Advertisement

It’s a beauty – well protected from traffic by a barrier, a great asset for safely riding over the Seekonk River.

The plan was to continue it another mile or so along East Providence’s Waterfront Drive, ultimately connecting with the East Bay Bike Path, which runs all the way to Bristol. Which, by the way, is one of the nicest bike paths you’ll find anywhere.

But alas, that connector plan has been canceled.

Advertisement

So the expensive stretch over the Henderson Bridge to East Providence is now a bike path to nowhere. Once the bridge ends, the path on it continues a few hundred yards or so and then, just … ends.

Too bad.

We were so close.

Most of the stories on the issue have been about the complex negotiation to rescue the $25 million by rerouting it to that nearby highway-to-boulevard project. But I don’t want to get lost in the weeds of that bureaucratic process here because it loses sight of the heart of this story.

Which is that an amazing new addition to one of the nation’s best state bike path systems has just been scrapped.

Advertisement

You can knock the Rhode Island government for blowing a lot of things.

The PawSox.

The Washington Bridge.

But they’ve done great with bike paths.

And especially, linking many of them together.

Advertisement

Example: not too many years ago, Providence bikers had to risk dicey traffic on the East Side to get to the more pleasant paths in India Point Park and on the 195 bridge to the East Bay Path.

But the state fixed that by adding an amazing connector that starts behind the Salvation Army building and beautifully winds along the water of the Seekonk River for a mile or so.

That makes a huge difference – and no doubt has avoided some bike-car accidents.

We were close to a comparable stretch on the other side of the river – that’s what the $25 million would have done.

But it’s now apparently dead.

Advertisement

Online commenters aren’t happy about it.

On a Reddit string, “Toadscoper” accused the state of being “complicit” with the feds in rerouting the money from bikes to cars.

And there was this fascinating post from FineLobster 5322, who apparently is a disappointed planner who worked on the project: “Mind you money has already been spent on phase one so rejecting it at this point is wasting money and also against the public interest … but what do I know? I only worked on the project as an engineer … I didn’t get into this to build more highways. I do it … to give back to communities and give them more access to their environment.”

Wow. One can imagine the state planning team is devastated. That’s not a small consideration. Good people go into government to make life better in Rhode Island, and it’s a bad play to take the spirit out of the job by first assigning a great human-scale project and then, after a ton of work, trashing it.

A poster named Homosapiens simply said, “We just accept this?”

Advertisement

Hopefully not.

The first stretch of the path over the Henderson Bridge is done, money already sunk.

What a shame to leave that as a path to nowhere.

It doesn’t have to happen.

Between Governor McKee and our Washington delegation, there’s got to be a way to get this done.

Advertisement

There’s got to be.

mpatinki@providencejournal.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick

Published

on

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick


WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.

Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.

According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.

The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.

Advertisement

The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.

A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.

State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.

The investigation remains ongoing.

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Advertisement

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Follow us on social media:

 

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information

Published

on

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information


A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.

Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.

Advertisement

McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.

“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.

Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”

“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”

The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.

Advertisement

The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.

The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.

At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.

The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending