Connect with us

Pennsylvania

How did Pennsylvania counties spend opioid settlement money?

Published

on

How did Pennsylvania counties spend opioid settlement money?


Spotlight PA is an independent, nonpartisan, and nonprofit newsroom producing investigative and public-service journalism that holds power to account and drives positive change in Pennsylvania. Sign up for our free newsletters.

HARRISBURG — Records obtained by Spotlight PA and WESA offer the most comprehensive public accounting to date of how counties across the state have used tens of millions of dollars they received in opioid settlement money.

The state’s billion-dollar opioid windfall has brought hope to a state where thousands of people each year die from drug overdoses. It’s also brought conflict about the best way to use the money.

The spending reports — which Spotlight PA and WESA are still analyzing — show a wide range of strategies. They offer insight into the wide reach of the opioid epidemic, highlighting the impact on neighborhoods, jails, child welfare programs, and a variety of local agencies.

Advertisement

In central Pennsylvania, Cumberland and Perry County officials both indicated in their reports that their spending decisions are influenced by the threat of litigation.

Their reports said that “due to recent lawsuits county jails are now faced with a new unfunded mandate to provide access to all three” federally approved medications for opioid use disorder. Cumberland County’s total amount spent or committed for that treatment program was about $586,000, while rural Perry County’s was $105,000.

Philadelphia reported spending or committing $7.5 million to support residents in the Kensington area of the city, where the report said people “live in a state of constant trauma due to 24 hour open-air drug market.” The city’s report said this trauma “significantly increases Kensington residents’ risks related to development of substance use disorder.”

As part of the program, funds were dedicated to improvements in local schools and parks, as well as home repair, rent relief, and eviction prevention, according to the report. The city made the case that its Kensington plans most closely match the broad settlement strategy of “Prevent Misuse of Opioids.”

In the Philly suburbs, Chester County officials reported spending or committing the funds to a variety of programs. A relatively small amount of the county’s allotment — about $1,800 — was committed to Project Sticker Shock, which uses stickers to warn people that it’s illegal to provide alcohol to anyone under age 21. In response to questions from Spotlight PA and WESA, the county defended using opioid settlement money for that purpose by saying, “underage drinking is a gateway to opiate use.”

Advertisement

Shane Dunlap / Tribune-Review

Meanwhile, some counties reported spending no opioid money by the end of 2023, including rural Greene County in southwestern Pennsylvania. The county reported receiving about $288,000.

“We just have not found a project yet to expend those dollars,” Betsy McClure, vice chair of the county’s three-member Board of Commissioners, told WESA and Spotlight PA.

The news organizations obtained the records by filing requests under the state’s Right-to-Know Law with all 67 counties in the state, as well as 10 county district attorney offices that were eligible to receive the money based on their role in litigation.

In total, the news organizations received and publicly posted spending reports for more than 60 counties, the city of Philadelphia, and eight county district attorney offices, as of April 30. Some agencies said they didn’t possess the reports. Bucks County attributed the problem “to an apparent technical glitch.”

Advertisement

Counties had to file these reports by the middle of March with the Pennsylvania Opioid Misuse and Addiction Abatement Trust, a 13-member oversight board with the power to withhold and cut funding if it determines counties spent the money inappropriately. This is the first time counties had to file these reports, which cover spending decisions made in 2022 and 2023.

In order to receive the money, counties had to agree to use it in ways that are consistent with a settlement document called Exhibit E. The exhibit contains a range of recommended and approved strategies for treatment, prevention, and responding to the epidemic.

Cameron and Schuylkill Counties initially denied open records requests from Spotlight PA, saying the trust had yet to determine whether the spending described in their reports complied with the requirements of the opioid settlements. After an appeal to the state Office of Open Records, Cameron provided its report. The news organization’s appeal of Schuylkill’s denial was pending as of April 30.

Earlier this year, members of the oversight board approved a plan to review these spending reports in secret committee meetings, despite a court order requiring that the trust follow the state’s open meetings law. The trust says “additional review” will take place at public meetings scheduled for May 2 and June 20.

Advertisement

The trust recently published a summary of reported spending by category, but that information does not identify specific counties or other local agencies.

While county officials wait to hear if the trust will publicly approve their strategies, people like Cathleen Palm are reviewing the available records to learn about counties’ decisions.

The Berks County resident is the founder of the Center for Children’s Justice, which advocates for child protection and family issues. She said she believes the reports can help advocates with limited resources influence the process going forward.

“Because you guys are doing the hard work, tracking them down, putting them in a central spot, we then have the benefit of being able to look and see where counties are spending money on behalf of children and families,” Palm told Spotlight PA and WESA.

While the news organizations are still analyzing the records, here are some of the interesting uses and issues they have found so far.

Advertisement

Medication in jail

In 2022, officials with the Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project reported people with opioid use disorder face many barriers to accessing treatment if they are arrested and booked at county jails across the state.

Some jails didn’t offer any of the federally approved medications for opioid use disorder, while others limited what they offered or who they offered it to, according to their findings. A lack of access to these medications and the trauma of incarceration for people with opioid use disorder “further increases the likelihood of opioid overdose risk after release,” the group’s report said.

These federally approved medications — methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone — have widespread support in the medical community.

The opioid settlement spending reports obtained by Spotlight PA and WESA show that several counties dedicate their funds to medication-assisted treatment programs at their jails. Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project staff attorney Sarah Bleiberg Bellos sees this as a “really positive step.”

“There’s a huge number of people who are in our state’s jails that have opioid use disorder, and it is a really crucial time to be treating that disease,” Bellos told Spotlight PA and WESA.

Advertisement

Allegheny County also reported funding medication-assisted treatment at its jail, and a spokesperson told Spotlight PA and WESA that it is working on a phased-in expansion.

Last November, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it had reached a three-year agreement with Allegheny County regarding access to these medications. The county agreed to offer any federally approved medication for opioid use disorder to all individuals booked into the jail, if a qualified medical provider determines the treatment is medically appropriate, according to a copy of the agreement made public by the Justice Department.

In the reports for Perry and Cumberland Counties, both said medication-assisted treatment at their respective jails was the first priority for local leaders because of lawsuits and the “high risk for an overdose upon return to the community” for incarcerated people with opioid use disorder. Officials in each county said the lawsuits their reports referred to didn’t involve their county.

Other counties whose reports indicated they dedicated settlement funds to similar treatment programs for people in jail include Butler, Clearfield, Pike, Wayne, and York.

Housing

Some counties have used funds to aid people in recovery who need housing.

Advertisement

In rural Fayette County, officials reported using $100,000 in funds for a housing program for people with substance use disorder.

In nearby Allegheny County, officials reported spending more than $595,000 in settlement funds to support low-barrier homeless shelter services, and $181,000 went to a program to expand recovery housing.

“Stable housing is important for people in early recovery — or at any point in their life,” said Stuart Fisk, director of the Office of Behavioral Health at the Allegheny County Department of Human Services.

Children and families

Exhibit E outlines several ways counties can spend their funds on children and families, such as treatment for pregnant and postpartum women, treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome, and support for children’s services.

Two neighboring counties in Western Pennsylvania, Armstrong and Indiana, plan to jointly hire a case manager for their counties’ child welfare agencies, which are responsible for protecting children from the damages of abuse and neglect. That case manager could talk to kids or parents with a substance use disorder, said Kami Anderson, executive director of the Armstrong-Indiana-Clarion Drug and Alcohol Commission.

Advertisement

“We want it to be somebody that’s nonthreatening to them,” Anderson said.

In Allegheny County, about $453,000 in settlement funds was spent providing child care through Early Head Start for kids whose caregivers have opioid use disorder and are undergoing treatment or job-searching.

Underage drinking

Chester’s County plan to spend settlement funds on Project Sticker Shock didn’t make sense to Jordan Scott, an advocate with the Pennsylvania Harm Reduction Network.

“My thought was just, ‘Why?’” Scott said. “I don’t see how it’s even relevant to what the money’s supposed to be spent on.”

In its spending report, the county said Project Sticker Shock is designed to “capitalize on community activism, cooperative efforts, and collective responsibilities to combat underage drinking and its related problems.” As part of the program, warning stickers are placed on cases of alcohol at participating distributors, according to the county.

Advertisement

In response to questions from Spotlight PA and WESA, the county cited two academic journal articles, said many adults are not aware of the law and the penalties for providing alcohol to anyone under 21, and said the warning stickers have also been placed on pizza boxes.

The county’s response said the program is consistent with Exhibit E, and argued it aligns with multiple approved uses, including for school-based and youth-focused initiatives “that have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing drug misuse and seem likely to be effective in preventing the uptake and use of opioids.”

Chester County’s spending report also describes dedicating funds for other initiatives, including access to opioid overdose reversal medication, expanded toxicology testing in its coroner’s office, and medication-assisted treatment treatment to people who are incarcerated.

BEFORE YOU GO… If you learned something from this article, pay it forward and contribute to Spotlight PA at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.



Source link

Advertisement

Pennsylvania

Western Pa. wine, cheesemakers take top honors at 2026 PA Farm Show

Published

on

Western Pa. wine, cheesemakers take top honors at 2026 PA Farm Show


Couples planning for Valentine’s Day could have themselves quite a fancy evening dining solely on some local wine and cheese, which has been judged among the best in Pennsylvania.

Western Pennsylvania wine and cheesemakers once again came home with a good deal of accolades from the annual Pennsylvania Farm Show, held this month in Harrisburg.

“I brought eight wines, and they all ended up with medals,” said a happy Frank Mazzotta, owner of Mazzotta Winery in Richland.

Mazzotta’s boutique winery has made regular, multiple appearances on the farm show’s awards list the past few years.

Advertisement

“We do it the old-fashioned way, taking fruit, fermenting it and making it into wine,” he said. “There’s no additives, no flavor enhancers. It tastes like what it’s supposed to taste like — juice that’s alcoholic.”

Mazzotta’s 2024 peach wine earned not just a silver medal but a “best fruit wine” designation. He also brought home two silver and five bronze medals.

Just a few miles northeast of Mazzotta, La Vigneta Winery owner Francesca Howden is celebrating another good year at the farm show. Her wines came home with four silver medals and a bronze.

“We definitely take the competition very seriously,” she said. “My team works really hard to make sure our wines are produced to the highest standard.”

Advertisement

And if you’d care for some cheese to pair with those wines?

Look no further than Indiana Township’s Goat Rodeo Farm & Dairy, whose Wild Rosemary took the silver medal in the best of show category. It also earned a first-place finish in the mixed milk category, and the farm’s Cowboy Coffee cheese took third place in the same category. Finally, Goat Rodeo’s chevre cheese took first place in the goat’s milk category.

Mazzotta and Howden said they use feedback from the show in a variety of ways.

“We use those results to determine how much of these wines we want to produce,” Mazzotta said. “We use the awards to know which ones people will like when we go to an off-premise sale. It’s kind of guidance for a winemaker in terms of how much to make.”

Howden said La Vigneta also makes some of its plans for the coming year based on feedback from the farm show.

Advertisement

“For example, when we won the Governor’s Cup in 2023 for our blush, that let us know we needed to produce more of that particular wine,” she said. “But we also get feedback throughout the year on what customers like and what’s popular. That really helps us tweak and refine our wines. The farm show just validates a lot of that and shows whether you’ve produced wine that the public likes and the judges can recognize.”

Howden said she also uses the results to do some research.

“I want to see and taste the wine that won this year’s Governor’s Cup,” she said. “We look at the awards other wineries win, taste each other’s wines and that’s helpful as well, to see what struck the judges’ interest this year.”

Brewers

Western Pennsylvania beer breweries had some stiff competition from their counterparts out east, but Vandergrift-based Allusion Brewing Company, which also has a taproom in Hampton, brought home three third-place finishes.

Advertisement

“We brought back ribbons for our Baker Street Brown Ale, a London-style brown, our Abby Normal, a Munich-style dunkel, and our Christmas ale called Jolly Old Elf,” said co-owner and head brewer John Bieranoski. “We’ve been competing since 2022, and we’ve medaled at least once every year.”

With the farm show taking place in January, Bieranoski said he treats the judges’ feedback as a way to help refine his products for future competitions.

Judges at the farm show have come through the Beer Judge Certification Program, a nonprofit that offers education and certification for competition judges. Those same judges tally the scores at most of the major competitions Allusion enters.

“We do several each year,” he said. “Last year, we brought home a first- and third-place from the farm show, for our traditional Polish ale. And after that, we brought home two national competition wins with it. We used feedback from the judges to bring our product to the next level.”

In addition to Allusion, Mars brewery Stick City earned a third-place finish in the Pale Bitter European Lager category for its Arctos 12 beer. And farther north, the Clarion River Brewing Co. finished first in the same category with its Golden Eagle; second among Strong Belgian Ales (Cacao Cupidon) and British Beer (Premature Burial); and third in the Amber European Lager category (Autumn Leaf Fiest).

Advertisement

Grains

In the grains division, Westmoreland County farmers brought home hardware of their own.

As a matter of fact, New Alexandria farmer Fred Slezak is Pennsylvania’s Grand Champion of Grains for 2026. He took first place for his barley and fourth place for his wheat — not a bad showing for his first time competing at the show.

“It’s a real honor,” said Slezak, who beat out Crabtree’s Vince Mangini in the barley category. Mangini took second place.

Both men grow grains for Allegheny Mountain Malt, which has partnered with local brewers to supply locally grown grains in an effort to shorten the supply chain. In addition, Hempfield farmer Alquin Heinnickel took third place in the oats category.

Advertisement

“We didn’t have things as bad, weatherwise, as the rest of the state,” Mangini said. “We got the right amount of rain at the right time.”

Slezak said growing barley specifically bred for malting probably helped him with the judges.

“It’s got a larger kernel than most other barleys,” Slezak said. “I credit Vince for encouraging me to enter, and my partner Brandon Yeo prepared the barley and did a lot of the planting. Without him, I probably wouldn’t have gotten it entered.”

Mangini said the grains division is also somewhat of a beauty contest.

“Fred did a really good job cleaning his grain, using some special screens to process his barley,” he said. “I told him it’s on now — I’m coming after him now that he beat me.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Why Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro Guesting on Colbert Won’t Trigger the FCC’s “Equal Time” Rule

Published

on

Why Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro Guesting on Colbert Won’t Trigger the FCC’s “Equal Time” Rule


Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro is guesting on Stephen Colbert‘s The Late Show Monday, and there isn’t anything FCC head Brendan Carr can do about it — or as a result of it.

Last week, the Federal Communications Commission released new guidance that could revoke the exemption to its “equal time” rules that daytime and late-night talk shows have enjoyed since the ’90s. Basically, the equal time policy requires TV stations to provide equivalent amounts of air time to political candidates on both sides of the same election. (The onus is not on the specific show or even the broadcast network — it is the individual stations that must balance the scales. It’s also a bit on the campaigns themselves. When free time is provided to a candidate, a record is placed in the station’s political file. Opposing candidates can then submit an equal opportunities request.) Often the discrepancy is resolved with free commercial time to the candidate who was not booked on television.

The equal time rule has not historically applied to news coverage, and in 1996, Jay Leno’s producers won a carveout for talk shows. The Tonight Show performs “bona fide” news interviews, they argued, and thus should be granted the same exemption as a newscast. The FCC agreed, and late-night shows and daytime programs were no longer beholden to the requirement. (And perhaps not coincidentally, the following year, The View was launched.)

Until now.

Advertisement

“Importantly, the FCC has not been presented with any evidence that the interview portion of any late night or daytime television talk show program on air presently would qualify for the bona fide news exemption,” the FCC wrote on Wednesday, Jan. 21. “Moreover, a program that is motivated by partisan purposes, for example, would not be entitled to an exemption under long-standing FCC precedent.”

The Hollywood Reporter reached out to the FCC on Monday with a request for comment on this story, though we did not immediately receive a response.

Carr is targeting programming that leans left; he is President Donald Trump’s FCC chair, after all. Shapiro is a Democrat, and Colbert is among the most outspoken critics of Trump this side of, well, The View.

Shapiro, the sitting governor of Pennsylvania, but the equal time rule does not apply to politicians — it applies to political candidates. And through Shapiro officially launched his reelection campaign on Jan. 8 with events in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia — here comes the technicality — he is not yet legally a candidate for the office he currently holds. Pennsylvania law will not recognize Shapiro (or anyone else) as a gubernatorial candidate until Feb. 17, which is the first day to circulate and file nomination petitions. Then, Shapiro will need 2,000 signatures of support, a $200 check to file his candidacy, and a statement of financial interest to make the ballot.

Until then, Shapiro is on the trail — though not necessarily (or at least entirely) the campaign trail. The first-term governor is doing the talk show circuit pushing his memoir, Where We Keep the Light. Gov. Shapiro will appear on Tuesday’s episode of The View, and like CBS following tonight’s airing of The Late Show, your local ABC station need not set aside any airtime for Shapiro’s Republican opponent, Pennsylvania State Treasurer Stacy Garrity.

Advertisement

FCC chair Brendan Carr

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

The late night TV hosts are laughing off the latest FCC crackdown. On Thursday, the day after Carr targeted the time slot, Colbert feigned shock.

“What? What? A new crackdown on late night TV? That has enormous implications for me for four more months,” Colbert said. Oh yeah, did we mention his show was canceled?

Advertisement

Colbert added, “So, let’s talk about these new crackdown rules that my lawyer warned me not to talk about. The FCC is announcing plans to enforce long-dormant rules on appearances by political candidates on network talk shows. Oh, no. They’ve awakened the long-dormant rules, not seen since the mind-bending horrors of the pre-Euclidian variety show ‘Cthulhu Tonight!’ This is clearly an attempt to silence me, Jimmy [Kimmel and] Seth [Meyers].”

The same night, Jimmy Kimmel told America, “I might need your help again.” Jimmy Kimmel Live! was suspended this past summer for a few nights after Kimmel made a monologue joke that presumed the political leanings of conservative podcaster Charlie Kirk’s assassin. Though Carr certainly inserted himself into that controversy, it was the local ABC affiliates that really got the ball rolling. Jimmy Kimmel Live! returned to the airwaves after a few nights on ice, helping to cool the national temperature down some.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Rare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm

Published

on

Rare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm


Pennsylvania rarely sees true snow avalanches because it lacks the high, open alpine terrain where they typically form.

AccuWeather’s Melissa Constanzer breaks down the details of what comes next as this weekend’s destructive winter storm pummels the Northeast with snow and sleet.

First responders were busy this weekend responding to winter-weather emergencies of all kinds, including a rare report of an “avalanche” in northeastern Pennsylvania.

Duryea police issued an urgent traffic advisory Sunday afternoon after “significant avalanches” blocked Coxton Road beyond the 900 block, leaving the roadway impassable due to snow and debris.

Advertisement

A snow slide or “avalanche”on Coxton Road in Duryea, Pennsylvania, on Jan. 25, 2026 during a snowstorm. (Image: Duryea police and fire/Facebook)

Snow avalanches are extremely rare in Pennsylvania and aren’t a routine hazard for first responders the way they are in the Rockies, Cascades or even parts of New England. Classic avalanches typically require long, steep, largely treeless starting zones where snow can build into a deep, unstable slab—terrain Pennsylvania generally lacks.

In this case, the “avalanche” description likely refers to a snowslide or slide of snow mixed with debris coming off a steep slope or road cut, events that can occur during intense snowfall, especially when wind and accumulating snow overload an embankment.

The winter storm brought widespread heavy snowfall to the region. By late Sunday afternoon, the National Weather Service’s Binghamton office listed reports of around a foot of snow in parts of Lackawanna and Luzerne counties, including 13.0 inches near Dallas and 12.0 inches reported in multiple nearby locations.

Snow continued into Sunday evening across northeastern Pennsylvania and central New York as the storm persisted.

Advertisement

Report a Typo



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending