Connect with us

Northeast

On this day in history, February 15, 1903, the first Teddy bear goes on sale

Published

on

On this day in history, February 15, 1903, the first Teddy bear goes on sale

The first “Teddy bear” was put on sale on this day in history, Feb. 15, 1903.

Named after President Theodore Roosevelt, the stuffed bear was first sold by Morris Michtom, a Brooklyn, New York, resident who owned a candy shop, the website for the National Parks Service (NPS) says.

Michtom’s wife, Rose, who made stuffed animal toys, actually created the first teddy bears. 

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY, FEBRUARY 14, 270 AD, VALENTINE BEATEN, BEHEADED FOR DEFYING EMPEROR’S MARRIAGE BAN

Michtom was inspired to call the toys “Teddy’s bear” after reading a political cartoon published in the Washington Post on Nov. 16, 1902, notes the parks service website. 

Advertisement

The cartoon was drawn by artist Clifford Berryman. It satirized an incident on a hunting trip in Mississippi in which Roosevelt refused to shoot and kill a black bear that had been tied to a willow tree. 

The first Teddy bear was put on sale on this day in history, Feb. 15, 1903.  (iStock)

Roosevelt was known to be a skilled hunter. 

He thought it was “extremely unsportsmanlike” to shoot a bear that had been tied up, says the NPS website. 

“I’ve hunted game all over America and I’m proud to be a hunter. But I couldn’t be proud of myself if I shot an old, tired, worn-out bear that was tied to a tree,” Roosevelt reportedly said at the time. 

Advertisement

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY, FEBRUARY 9, 1942, FEDS ENACT DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME IN DARKEST HOURS OF WORLD WAR II

The news of Roosevelt’s refusal to shoot the bear spread quickly around the country, resulting in the cartoon — and, eventually, the stuffed toy. 

“Michtom decided to create a stuffed toy bear and dedicate it to the president who refused to shoot a bear,” says the site. 

President Theodore Roosevelt gave permission to Morris Michtom to use his nickname, “Teddy,” for the new stuffed bear toys.  (Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

Rose Michtom “cut out some pieces of fabric and sewed on some button eyes and put it in the window with the name, ‘Teddy’s Bear.’ It was an overnight hit,” says the website for the Carnegie Museum of Natural History. 

Advertisement

The president later gave Michtom permission to use his nickname for the new product — and the toys quickly became popular, notes the museum. 

QUEEN ELIZABETH AND PADDINGTON BEAR: WHY ARE PEOPLE LEAVING THE BOOK CHARACTER AT TRIBUTE SITES?

The success of the Teddy bear resulted in a career shift for the Michtoms. 

The president later gave Michtom permission to use his nickname for the new product.

In 1907, Michtom and his wife founded the Ideal Novelty and Toy Co. 

Advertisement

Although initially the company focused on Teddy bears, it eventually became known for producing a series of collectible dolls, the website Collector’s Weekly says. 

The success of the Teddy bear resulted in a career shift for the Michtoms, who had previously owned a candy shop. They soon switched to making and selling toys, according to Collector’s Weekly. (iStock)

The Teddy bear’s popularity over traditional dolls also drew concerns from at least one figure, notes the Smithsonian Museum of American History’s website. 

In 1908, five years after the toy was first sold, a minister in Michigan “warned that replacing dolls with toy bears would destroy the maternal instincts in little girls,” said the Smithsonian. 

In 1963, for the Teddy bear’s 60th birthday, Benjamin Michtom — the son of Rose and Morris Michtom — attempted to unite the original bear with a descendant of its namesake. 

Advertisement

“What does a 79-year-old doll want with a 60-year-old bear?” 

“He first contacted Mrs. Alice Roosevelt Longworth, Teddy Roosevelt’s daughter, to offer her one of the original Teddy Bears if she would pose with it,” says the Smithsonian. 

WHO IS ALICE ROOSEVELT LONGWORTH? WHITE HOUSE WILD CHILD AND ORIGINAL ‘WIT OF WASHINGTON,’ SAYS HISTORIAN

Longworth apparently declined the offer, reportedly asking, “What does a 79-year-old doll want with a 60-year-old bear?” 

Undeterred, Benjamin Michtom then reached out to Kermit Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt’s grandson, and asked if he would allow his children to be photographed with the bear, the Smithsonian reported. 

Advertisement

Theodore Roosevelt’s grandchildren participated in a photo shoot with the original Teddy bear and refused to part with it — taking it home, according to the Smithsonian. (iStock; Getty)

Benjamin Michtom intended for the bear to be given to the Smithsonian Institution after the photo shoot, but Mark and Anne Roosevelt had other plans. 

They took a liking to the bear and hid it from their parents. 

“A letter from Mrs. Roosevelt to Mr. Michtom said, ‘I was about to get in touch with the Smithsonian about presenting them with the original bear when the children decided they didn’t want to part with it yet,’” said the Smithsonian.

Advertisement

Eventually, the original Teddy bear was given to the Smithsonian Institution in January 1964, the website notes. 

For more Lifestyle articles, visit www.foxnews.com/lifestyle.

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pittsburg, PA

Pittsburgh area’s low jobless rate beats state, U.S. rates

Published

on

Pittsburgh area’s low jobless rate beats state, U.S. rates






Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

CT poised to invest again in childcare, pay down pension debt

Published

on

CT poised to invest again in childcare, pay down pension debt


Having racked up its ninth hefty budget surplus in a row, Connecticut is poised to expand a record investment in affordable childcare while taking another big chunk out of its legacy pension debt.

The $27.2 billion state budget for the fiscal year that closes Tuesday is on pace for a $412 million operating surplus — all of it earmarked by legislators and Gov. Ned Lamont for a special endowment for early childhood education.

A special savings program outside the formal budget should capture another $1.3 billion in income and business tax receipts. Most of that, roughly $1 billion to $1.1 billion, will go toward shrinking the state’s pension debt. The rest will boost Connecticut’s emergency reserve or “rainy day fund” to almost $4.5 billion — 18% of annual operating expenses, the maximum allowed by law.

Advertisement

“Making Connecticut more affordable means making it easier for families to live, work and raise children here,” Lamont wrote in a statement. “High-quality early childhood education gives children the strongest possible start in life while helping parents pursue careers, grow their incomes and contribute to our economy.”

Connecticut’s early childhood commissioner, Elena Trueworth, added in the statement that “This endowment represents a transformational commitment to Connecticut’s youngest children and the families who depend on high-quality early childhood education.”

Eligible families are expected to begin receiving no-cost childcare or partial assistance subsidized by the endowment starting in the 2027-28 fiscal year.

Saving for childcare was challenging this past year

The governor and his fellow Democrats in the legislature’s majority launched the Early Childhood Education Endowment with $300 million in June 2025. With a goal of adding thousands of affordable childcare program slots by 2030, officials dedicated future operating surpluses toward this effort. Separately, the special savings program outside the formal budget would remain focused on reducing pension debt.

That strategy hit a snag earlier this year.

Advertisement

While officials planned for another $300 million-plus operating surplus, rising Medicaid and fringe benefit costs — and smaller-than-anticipated corporation tax receipts — wiped out the entire projected fiscal cushion.

Lamont and lawmakers responded by raiding the off-budget savings program, moving hundreds of millions of dollars into the General Fund. That transfer, coupled with a last-minute surge in tax receipts, created the $412 million surplus now headed into the childcare endowment.

“We’re making a smart, long-term investment that will lower costs for families, strengthen our workforce, and ensure this support is available for generations to come,” Lamont said. “This is exactly why we have managed the state’s finances responsibly, so that when we have the opportunity to make transformational investments, we can do so without raising taxes or compromising our long-term fiscal stability.”

Officials dedicated $11 billion in surplus since 2020 to pay pension debt

Even with those adjustments to the off-budget program, the administration estimates Connecticut will still have saved $1 billion to $1.1 billion to deposit into its pension funds for state employees and municipal teachers. A final tally won’t be known until the comptroller’s office completes its formal audit of the last budget cycle in September.

Once that’s done, officials will have dedicated a total of about $11 billion from special savings to reduce pension debt since 2020.

Advertisement

Still, analysts project the state won’t have eliminated all unfunded pension liabilities before the 2040s.

Connecticut entered this fiscal year with more than $33 billion in unfunded pension obligations, according to analysts, and the state remains one of the most indebted per capita in the nation.

Most of that debt stems from inadequate saving by legislatures and governors for more than seven decades between 1939 and 2010, according to a 2015 report prepared for the state by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. By not saving properly, the state government severely restricted the potential investment earnings, forfeiting billions of dollars across seven decades.

As a result, mandatory pension contributions continue to place heavy pressure on state finances, drawing resources away from other programs and services.

Watershed debate on CT savings program expected next term

Meanwhile, Lamont’s critics say the savings program he embraces is too aggressive.

Advertisement

Between operating surpluses and off-budget savings programs, Connecticut has left an average of $1.8 billion unspent — roughly 8% of the General Fund — since new budget caps were enacted in 2017. By comparison, the two prior decades of state budgets produced an average annual savings of 0.1% of the General Fund.

In other words, critics say, the new system is forcing a single generation to retire a pension debt problem created by three — and that education, health care, municipal aid and other core programs are suffering as a result.

Many of Lamont’s fellow Democrats in the legislature — including state Rep. Josh Elliott of Hamden, who is challenging the governor for the party’s gubernatorial nomination — say Connecticut could retire debt at a more modest pace and invest far more in programs and direct aid to cities and towns.

The Republican gubernatorial nominee, state Sen. Ryan Fazio of Greenwich, called earlier this year for the state to reduce savings efforts in order to dramatically expand tax cuts for Connecticut’s middle class.

Legislative leaders from both parties have said they expect a debate over state government’s savings habits to dominate the next General Assembly term, which covers the 2027 and 2028 sessions.

Advertisement

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/30/ct-to-invest-surplus-in-childcare-pay-down-pension-debt/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1172734&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/30/ct-to-invest-surplus-in-childcare-pay-down-pension-debt/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine could face $50M in penalties from federal food assistance policy changes

Published

on

Maine could face M in penalties from federal food assistance policy changes


Maine could face up to $50 million in penalties next year due to errors in its payments for federal food benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Newly released data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture find that Maine’s error rate last year was nearly 11%, the bulk of which were overpayments. That’s in line with the U.S. average. But starting in October of next year, states with error rates above 6% must cover a portion of the SNAP benefits.

Anna Korsen, executive director of Full Plates, Full Potential, said the overpayments aren’t fraud — they’re human error. She said this new cost-shifting policy enacted last year under the Trump administration further complicates the SNAP application process.

“Instead, we could make this program more accessible and more efficient,” Korsen said. “And that would reduce the number of errors and also ensure that Mainers who are eligible for SNAP have access to it.”

Advertisement

She’s urging Congress to delay or reverse the policy under the farm bill that’s currently under consideration.

Maine’s Department of Health and Human Services said it’s taking steps to reduce the error rate, including modernizing its systems and hiring an additional 40 eligibility specialists.

This story appears through a media partnership with Maine Public.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending