Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
The Issue: Donald Trump’s landslide victory in the New Hampshire GOP primary on Tuesday.
There were no surprises from the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday (“Trump train is rolling on,” Jan. 24).
Former President Donald Trump had a solid victory over Nikki Haley. It’s time for her to put her campaign to rest, as she’s not even predicted to win her home state, South Carolina. She came in third in Iowa, where Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis quickly folded, sensing the presidency wasn’t in the cards this time around.
Indictments of Trump have only helped to solidify support in his base. Even many who are not Trump fans take issue with the fact that he is being politically targeted by the current administration.
Putting Trump back in the White House, however distasteful, is the only way to straighten the ship’s course and undo the damage done by bumbling Joe.
Betsy Flor
Putnam Valley
It has become increasingly clear that whether or not you like Trump, he will be the Republican nominee.
Haley asked for a two-person race and she got that in New Hampshire. She doesn’t have support in her home state of South Carolina, so why continue?
There is no path forward, unless she’s intending to launch a third-party run. At this point, her campaign is just wasting money.
Mindy Rader
New City
On Tuesday, Trump did his candidacy a great disservice when he failed to control his ego and, instead of commending Haley for giving him a better battle than expected, he found it necessary to belittle her.
The man has a reputation for bullying and nastiness. It will take the application of an industrial-strength clothespin to my nose to allow me to vote for Trump come Election Day.
I’m afraid I would have to vote for the Republican nominee, whoever that may be, to prevent clueless Joe from destroying America. Still, Trump lost any remaining respect I had for him after his unsportsmanlike performance.
Rick Meyer
Pinehurst, NC
The current president’s policies have led America in the wrong direction.
We need a strong president like Trump to fix this country. Even with all the legal problems Trump comes with, he’s our best bet.
Frederick R. Bedell Jr.
Bellerose
Haley’s concession speech was optimistic, despite Trump prevailing by double digits, as was widely predicted (“Nikki: It’s far from over,” Jan. 24).
Haley boldly proclaimed that she was going to stay in the race. Polling shows her losing in her home state of South Carolina, where Republican primary will be held Feb. 24. What can she do in the interim to improve her standing? Very little, I would say.
The people have spoken. It is clear that they want the “disrupter” to be the GOP’s nominee for president.
After the events of Jan. 6, 2021, there briefly was the sentiment in Congress that Trump was finished. Yet he has survived — and thrived — thanks to the unwavering support of the Republican base.
Those who founded the United States would hardly recognize it today.
Oren Spiegler
Peters Township, Pa.
I hope that Haley isn’t intimidated by Trump’s threats. We live in a democracy, and everyone deserves the right to run for office, no matter what her chances are of winning.
Contested elections provide voters with a choice, and the opportunity to discuss and debate issues. We don’t live in Russia or China, where opponents of government officials are jailed for disagreeing with them.
How will Trump treat his critics and opponents if he is elected president in November? How will he “get even?” I’m scared to find out.
Paul Feiner
Greenburgh
With an eye toward the South Carolina primary next month, one way Haley could distinguish herself from Trump would be to name several people she would select to serve in her administration.
Haley’s people likely would be distinctly different from Trump’s picks. So let’s find out.
Denny Freidenrich
Laguna Beach, Calif.
Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
Local News
After nearly four decades, a man whose skull was discovered in the New Hampshire woods has been identified.
Warren Kuchinsky was born in 1952 and was last known to be alive in the mid-1970s, New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella and New Hampshire State Police Colonel Mark Hall said in a statement. In 1986, his skull was found in a wooded area in the town of Bristol.
At the time, investigators weren’t able to identify whose skull it was, according to officials. Last year, however, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner partnered with the DNA Doe Project, a nonprofit organization, to solve the case using forensic genetic genealogy techniques.
Kuchinsky’s identity was confirmed through DNA testing of a surviving family member, according to officials. There is no evidence that his death was caused by foul play, according to the statement.
Founded in 2017, the DNA Doe Project partners with law enforcement, medical examiners, and volunteer genealogists to apply investigative genealogy to John and Jane Doe cases. By analyzing DNA profiles and building family trees from publicly available genetic databases and historical records, the organization has helped solve more than 250 cases nationwide.
“We are honored to have partnered with the State of New Hampshire on this case,” DNA Doe Project Team Leader Lisa Ivany said in the statement. “Through the power of investigative genetic genealogy and the dedication of our volunteer genealogists, we were able to develop a critical lead in less than 24 hours. We truly hope that this identification brings long-awaited answers to Mr. Kuchinsky’s family.”
Initial DNA testing turned up only distant matches, so the DNA Doe Project selected the case to be worked on at a virtual retreat in May 2025, according to the organization’s case profile. Over the course of a weekend, more than 40 genealogists from the U.S., Canada, England, and Scotland collaborated virtually to work on the case.
Within hours, the team discovered that the unidentified man had roots in New Hampshire and Quebec, according to the profile. They later zeroed in on Kuchinsky, who had attended school in Plymouth, N.H., but had no official proof of life past 1970.
“This identification reflects the power of partnership and scientific advancement,” Formella said in the statement. “The dedication of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, the investigative support of the New Hampshire State Police, and the extraordinary work of the DNA Doe Project have restored a name to an individual who had been unidentified for nearly 40 years. We are grateful for their professionalism and commitment.”
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
The proposal would fine transgender people up to $5,000 for using bathrooms aligned with their gender identity.
Truthout is an indispensable resource for activists, movement leaders and workers everywhere. Please make this work possible with a quick donation.
Bathroom bans targeting transgender people have been spreading rapidly across the United States. In previous years, adult bathroom bans in public buildings were limited to a handful of states with extreme laws. This year, they have become one of the primary vehicles for anti-trans legislation nationwide. Kansas was the first to act, passing a bathroom bounty hunter system and invalidating transgender people’s IDs. Idaho and Missouri began advancing their own bills. Now, the New Hampshire House of Representatives has passed its own version — one of the most extreme in the United States, which states that a trans person using the bathroom of their gender identity is a crime under the state civil rights act, violations of which carries hefty penalties. The bill passed 181-164 on Wednesday night, just weeks after Governor Kelly Ayotte vetoed a separate bathroom ban. Republicans are now sending her something far more aggressive — raising the question of whether they are trying to move the goalposts or simply daring her to veto again.
“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with the exception of RSA 21:3, RSA 21:54, and paragraph II below, all multi-user facilities, including bathrooms, restrooms, and locker rooms located in buildings owned, leased, or operated by any municipality shall be used based on the individual’s biological sex,” reads the new bill. This prohibition is expansive: it applies to parks, rest stops, airports, civic buildings, and more, and could leave transgender people struggling to find a public place to use the restroom across the state.
The bill contains a novel enforcement mechanism not seen in any other state. It declares that a transgender person “asserting” that their gender identity allows them to use the bathroom is against the law under the state civil rights act, turning civil rights protections that were meant to be protective of transgender people into a weapon against them. “It shall be unlawful for any person to assert that their gender identity is a sex other than that defined in RSA 21:3 for the purposes of accessing places or services restricted on the basis of sex,” reads the bill. Such violations could result in fines of up to $5,000 per incident and even jail time if a person violates a resulting court injunction by continuing to use the restroom.
The bill also contains provisions for private businesses. It permits any owner or operator of a “place of public accommodation” — a category that under New Hampshire law includes hotels, restaurants, theaters, retail stores, bars, and concert venues — to restrict bathrooms by assigned sex at birth. The bill then immunizes those businesses from discrimination claims: “Adoption or enforcement of a policy pursuant to this section shall not be deemed discrimination under RSA 354-A or any other state law,” it reads.
A separate bill, HB 1217, also passed on Wednesday. That bill permits governmental buildings and businesses to classify bathrooms and locker rooms by assigned sex at birth — similar to the bathroom bans Ayotte has already vetoed. It passed by an even wider margin, 187-163. It contains no enforcement mechanism, but rather, states that bathroom bans and sports bans are not discriminatory towards transgender people under New Hampshire law.
The bills are part of a larger movement towards bathroom bans for transgender people. Just last month, Kansas passed a bathroom ban that allows every citizen in the state to become a bounty hunter, where reporting transgender people in bathrooms can net them $1,000 per trans person caught. This law also invalidated trans people’s drivers licenses in the state. Meanwhile, Idaho and Missouri are both advancing extreme anti-trans bathroom bans of their own, with Idaho’s ban even applying to private businesses, making it against the law for a private business to allow a trans person to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity.
The bills are substantially more extreme than the one vetoed by Governor Ayotte just weeks ago. In a veto statement of a bathroom ban last month, Ayotte stated, “I believe there are important and legitimate privacy and safety concerns raised by biological males using places such as female locker rooms and being placed in female correctional facilities… At the same time, I see that House Bill 148 is overly broad and impractical to enforce, potentially creating an exclusionary environment for some of our citizens.”
It remains unclear why Republicans are pushing an even more extreme version of a bill their own governor has already vetoed three times. The bill still needs to pass the New Hampshire Senate and be signed by Ayotte to become law. One possibility is that the more extreme HB 1442 is designed as cover for HB 1217 — making that bill appear moderate by comparison and improving its chances of earning a signature. Another is that Republicans believe they can pressure Ayotte into signing, or are simply laying the groundwork for an override attempt down the line. Regardless, HB 1442 is one of the most extreme bathroom bans moving through any state legislature in the country, and transgender people across New England will be watching closely as it advances to the Senate.
Truthout is funded almost entirely by readers — that’s why we can speak truth to power and cut against the mainstream narrative. But independent journalists at Truthout face mounting political repression under Trump.
We rely on your support to survive McCarthyist censorship. Please make a tax-deductible one-time or monthly donation.
CONCORD, NH — Here are the Top 10 most popular stories and posts from around New Hampshire Patch sites last week.
Here are some other posts readers may have missed:
Identity Of 1986 Human Remains Found In Bristol Confirmed Via DNA Investigation
Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
Massachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
AM showers Sunday in Maryland
Florida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
Pa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
2 Survivors Describe the Terror and Tragedy of the Tahoe Avalanche
Keith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death