Connect with us

New Hampshire

‘It’s very powerful’: New Hampshire ruling protects trans kids from being outed

Published

on

‘It’s very powerful’: New Hampshire ruling protects trans kids from being outed


When Nico Romeri came out as transgender at 14 years old, he first shared the news with his closest friends and a therapist. The private conversations he had outside of the home helped him feel more comfortable to then approach his parents, who supported his transition. If anyone else had revealed his gender identity to his family on his behalf, he said it would have been disruptive to his coming out process.

“I really wanted to have a one-on-one discussion with them, where they knew I trusted them and they trusted me,” Romeri said. “Having that break of trust before you’re confident enough to tell other people is a huge deal.”

A recent ruling helps ensure that other trans students will have the protection to come out to their families when they’re ready. The case came about in May 2022 after a New Hampshire mother inadvertently learned from a teacher that her child used a different name and pronouns in school. The parent argued that the school policy, which advises school personnel not to disclose a student’s transgender status, infringed upon her ability to raise her child as she sees fit. Along with his mother, Heather, Romeri joined an amicus brief in support of the school policy.

In August, the New Hampshire supreme court upheld a lower court’s ruling on the school district policy, affirming trans and gender nonconforming students’ rights to privacy concerning their gender identities and presentation at school. The decision is the first such ruling to come out of a state supreme court, and according to Chris Erchull, senior staff attorney at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, the ruling could set guidance for other states and federal courts fighting similar cases.

Advertisement

“When there’s no US supreme court precedent, federal courts have to look around at what other courts are saying for precedent,” said Erchull. “So it is going to be very powerful and persuasive.”

Erchull, who filed an amicus brief in the case, said it was critical for students to have a supportive framework that allows them to explore their gender identity in school.

“It’s not a public school teacher or administrator’s place to make a decision about how and when to talk to families about these really intimate, sensitive matters,” he said. “It is in the best interest of everyone if the information comes from the student when the student is ready, on the student’s own terms.”

Policies on LGBTQ+ students’ right to privacy varies by school district throughout the nation. In 2015, the New Hampshire school board association issued a model policy to protect the privacy of trans students and to prevent discrimination, which was adopted by 48 of 196 school districts and charter schools, according to a 2020 ACLU New Hampshire report.

Advertisement

The policy was rescinded in 2022 due to conservative pushback, but some school districts, including Manchester, the largest in the state, continue to advise school personnel not to share a trans or gender nonconforming student’s identity to others without the child’s consent. In July, California became the first state to ban school district policies that require staff to notify parents when a child changes their name or pronouns.

Revealing a child’s gender identity or sexual orientation to their family when they’re not ready can lead to suicide and the child getting kicked out of their home, he added. LGBTQ+ youth are 120% more likely to experience homelessness than their cisgender and heterosexual counterparts.

skip past newsletter promotion
Advertisement

For Heather Romeri, it is crucial that students make their own choices about who they disclose their gender identity to and when. “Two of my children are both trans, so they have both been able to come to me at their own time when they were ready to disclose the information they needed to,” she said. “Hearing that from someone else would have been not good for our relationship, not good for … our children [being able to come] out safely and happily.”

Nico Romeri has trans friends who haven’t shared their gender identity with their parents because they fear for their safety, Heather said. “They really believe they will be hurt or they will be kicked out of their house,” she explained. “They have [seen] others who have tried to come out to their parents, and it’s had negative repercussions to them emotionally.” She sees the victory of the New Hampshire ruling as a prime example for other states considering policies for LGBTQ+ students’ rights.

Now 17, Romeri said that he joined the amicus brief to support his friends who don’t have the same supportive environment to transition. “It’s really important to represent the people that can’t voice [their identity fully] and to keep the laws in place.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Hampshire

‘Armed & Dangerous’ New Hampshire Fugitive Wanted On Rockingham County Probation Violation

Published

on

‘Armed & Dangerous’ New Hampshire Fugitive Wanted On Rockingham County Probation Violation


CONCORD, NH — The New Hampshire Department of Corrections is attempting to locate and arrest a possibly “armed and dangerous” fugitive with a lengthy criminal history.

Jaquelle Lamar Anderson is 39, Black, about 5 feet, 7 inches tall, and weighs around 190 pounds. He has brown eyes and is bald. According to investigators, Anderson has been known to use the aliases “Q,” “Quelle,” “Quelly,” and “Guttaboi Goldmouth McDurmutt.”

Rockingham County Superior Court issued the warrant for his arrest after Anderson was accused of absconding from probation supervision on March 19 after receiving suspended sentences on multiple theft convictions. After he was accused of selling drugs to fellow probationers, he failed to appear in court, an alert stated.

“Anderson has previous convictions that include multiple willful concealment charges and numerous theft by unauthorized taking charges that amounted to well over $100K in stolen merchandise, as well as drug convictions,” an alert stated.

Advertisement

Anderson was last known to be living in Portsmouth. Investigators said he has a silver BMW SUV with a New Hampshire registration beginning with the numbers 537.

“Probation has reason to believe that Anderson may be armed,” investigators said, which is why an “armed and dangerous” designation was placed on his fugitive status.

According to superior court records, Anderson’s criminal history dates back about 22 years.

In December 2002, in Salem, he was accused of felony willful concealment. A year later, he pleaded guilty to the charge. Six months later, he violated probation and had a hearing in January 2006.

In Nashua, in April 2007, he was accused of resisting arrest or detention and pleaded guilty to the charge in January 2008. In between, in June 2007, he was accused of felony receiving stolen property and pleaded guilty to the charge four months later. In August 2008, he was accused of violating probation. Anderson had a hearing in May 2009. He also had a hearing on a violation of a court order in September 2010.

Advertisement

In December 2020, the Commonwealth of Virginia requested documents from his criminal case on the stolen property charge.

Anderson was charged acts prohibited and willful concealment, both felonies, in December 2017, after an incident in Salem four months before. He pleaded guilty to the charges in May 2022 and received a 12-month suspended sentence with 12 days of jail time credit and a fine of $434. Anderson was accused of violating probation in November 2022 and received a one-and-a-half to three-year suspended sentence, with 123 days time served, in July 2023.

In between that case, in March 2022, he was charged with four felony theft counts out of Nashua. Anderson pleaded guilty to two of the charges in September 2022. He received two two-and-a-half to five-year sentences, both suspended for five years, and $7,419 in fines.

In February and March 2023, Anderson was charged with willful concealment and theft felonies in Manchester, willful concealment and organized retail crime enterprise felony charges in Merrimack, felony theft in Salem (and later, a probation violation), and felony possession of controlled drugs and resisting arrest or detention charges. He pleaded guilty to all but the Manchester concealment charge. Anderson received several suspended sentences and was fined $6,788.86 accumulatively.

Do not try to apprehend him if you see him or know where he is. Instead, contact local police or the Department of Corrections at 603-271-1804.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Massachusetts couple charged with casting ballots in New Hampshire

Published

on

Massachusetts couple charged with casting ballots in New Hampshire


Crime

According to the indictments, they voted multiple times in Concord despite being domiciled in Massachusetts.

FILE — Voting booths are set up in a high school gymnasium in Hollis, N.H., Monday, Jan. 22, 2024. AP Photo/David Goldman, File

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A Massachusetts couple have been indicted on suspicion of casting ballots in New Hampshire despite living outside the state, according to prosecutors.

The couple, ages 56 and 54, each face three felony counts of wrongful voting, New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella announced last week.

According to the indictments, they voted multiple times in Concord despite being domiciled in Massachusetts.

Specifically, the two are alleged to have voted in the Nov, 3, 2020, general election; the Nov. 8, 2022, general election; and the Nov, 8, 2022, Concord School District election. They are believed to have lived in Ashland, Massachusetts, at the time of each of the elections.

Advertisement

A lawyer representing one of those indicted said he’s submitted a plea of not guilty for his client and looks forward to working with the attorney general’s office to better understand the facts and circumstances surrounding the charges.

The two are scheduled to be arraigned Monday in Merrimack County Superior Court, according to Formella.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Parents sue N.H. school district following wristband protest against transgender girl at soccer game

Published

on

Parents sue N.H. school district following wristband protest against transgender girl at soccer game


Local News

A 15-year-old transgender girl is playing on the Plymouth team as she and another teen challenge a New Hampshire ban in court.

Parents wore pink “XX” wristbands at a soccer match in Bow, N.H., on Sept. 17, 2024, to protest the inclusion of transgender athletes in girls’ school sports. Image via federal court records

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Three parents and a grandparent have sued a New Hampshire school district, saying their rights were violated when they were barred from school grounds for wearing pink wristbands with “XX,” representing the female chromosome pair, in protest of a transgender girl playing in a girls soccer game.

The lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Concord followed a Sept. 17 match at Bow High School against Plymouth Regional High School. A 15-year-old transgender girl is playing on the Plymouth team as she and another teen challenge a New Hampshire ban in court.

Two of the parents whose daughters play for Bow wore the wristbands during the second half of the game to “silently express their opinion about the importance of reserving women’s sports for biological females,” according to their lawsuit filed by attorneys from the Institute for Free Speech.

The lawsuit said school officials and a local police officer confronted the parents during the game, telling them to remove the wristbands or leave. The plaintiffs refused, citing their First Amendment rights, then said they were threatened with arrest for trespassing.

Advertisement

At one point, the referee stopped the game and said that Bow High School would forfeit if the plaintiffs did not remove their wristbands, the lawsuit said. The wristbands were removed and the game resumed.

Following the game, the two parents received “No Trespass Orders” banning them from school grounds and events, the lawsuit said. One was banned for a week, the other for the fall term.

“Parents don’t shed their First Amendment rights at the entrance to a school’s soccer field. We wore pink wristbands to silently support our daughters and their right to fair competition,” Kyle Fellers, one of the plaintiffs who said he received a no-trespass order, said in a statement. “Instead of fostering open dialogue, school officials responded with threats and bans that have a direct impact on our lives and our children’s lives.”

The lawsuit says it seeks to prevent what it describes as the unconstitutional application of several school policies, including those requiring “mutual respect, civility, and orderly conduct” and prohibiting actions that “injure, threaten, harass, or intimidate” or “impede, delay, disrupt, or otherwise interfere with any school activity or function.”

In addition to the school district, the lawsuit names as defendants district Superintendent Marcy Kelley, Bow High School Principal Matt Fisk, school athletic director Michael Desilets, as well as the police officer and referee.

Advertisement

“At this time, we have no comment,” Kelley said in an email Tuesday when asked if she, other members of the school district, or an attorney representing them, wanted to respond to the lawsuit. Emails sent to the police officer and to the organization representing the referee were not immediately answered.

An email seeking comment from the attorney representing the transgender athlete also was not immediately returned.

Bow School Board chairperson Bryce Larrabee mentioned the lawsuit at a meeting Monday night and said the board would not be commenting on it. Kelley, who attended the meeting, also did not comment on the lawsuit.

Audience members spoke in favor and against the protesters during the public comment period.

“You just silenced someone who had a different opinion,” one man said.

Advertisement

Criticizing those who wore the pink wristbands during the game, the parent of a player on the Bow team said, “This is not the right way to go about doing things.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending