Connect with us

Massachusetts

When will Massachusetts allow cannabis lounges? It’s anyone’s guess

Published

on

When will Massachusetts allow cannabis lounges? It’s anyone’s guess


There was a time when it might have been considered surprising: In a state where cannabis lounges were not yet licensed, a Worcester lounge was open for business.

Cannabis connoisseurs could arrive, get high, and hang out, just as if they were nursing a beer at a bar down the street.

But to call the Summit Lounge an open secret would be the wrong designation.

The lounge, which operates as a private club, has 12,000 members. Everyone — Worcester city councilors, police, public health officials, and even the state’s Cannabis Control Commission — knows about it.

Advertisement

“You can come down there, you can rent a bong, you can smoke a 2-gram dab if you want,” owner Kyle Moon said, referring to concentrated marijuana. “And then you can put your stuff in your pocket and you can leave the building.”

The Summit Lounge is one of an unknown number of establishments operating in a gray area of Massachusetts’ cannabis law.

The lounge isn’t selling drugs, placing it out of reach of state cannabis regulators.

Members pay $10 per visit, self-supply their weed, and can smoke it as they please while unwinding in a dimly-lit back room blocks from Polar Park, home of the Worcester Red Sox. If not for the lack of a fluorescent “Samuel Adams” sign and a back bar stocked with liquor, the Summit Lounge could pass as another local pub.

A look into the The Summit Lounge and its owner Kyle Moon at 116 Water St Worcester, MA on Wednesday May 1, 2024.Sebastian Restrepo

Advertisement

Moon has operated the lounge for more than six years while waiting, he said, for the commission to issue licenses for social consumption businesses — commercial establishments where cannabis can be consumed on-site.

In Massachusetts, where people who publicly smoke pot risk a $100 fine, advocates say cannabis cafes or similar businesses would be a haven for tourists and residents of apartments or public housing where the drug is not allowed — not to mention a popular new draw and expansion of the booming regional cannabis industry.

Even as retail marijuana prices sunk last year to their lowest point since pot shops opened in 2018, the state’s cannabis sellers notched a record $1.56 billion in sales. Nearly 100,000 medical marijuana patients accounted for another $225 million.

Of the 24 states that have legalized marijuana, half allow pot lounges or some other form of on-site use. Massachusetts is not one of them.

Bay State voters allowed such businesses when they legalized recreational weed in 2016. But for several reasons, and to the irritation of hopeful business owners, the commission is still drafting regulations for social consumption.

Advertisement
Michigan Marijuana Lounges

Hot Box Social was the first licensed cannabis consumption lounge to open in Michigan. (Photo provided to MLive.com by Hot Box Social)

Cannabis Commissioner Bruce Stebbins, who is helping lead efforts to regulate social consumption, said work is progressing toward a regulatory “framework.”

He said commission officials have studied social consumption in other states and hope to write regulations that keep the public safe while allowing businesses to turn a profit.

“A colleague has referred to regulatory agencies sometimes as ‘sloths on Ambien,’” he remarked earlier this spring. “I’ve said we’re a regulatory agency trying to keep up with an industry that really wants to be innovative and entrepreneurial.”

Absent official regulations, business owners have taken it upon themselves to operate as they are able.

Similar to Moon, Samantha Kanter operates a social consumption business, Dinner at Mary’s, in the murky void left open by the lack of state guidelines.

Advertisement

Her Boston-based business caters private meals using a cannabis-infused olive oil and hosts cannabis-friendly yoga sessions and other events.

But where Moon sells memberships to cannabis consumers who “BYOC,” Kanter uses a “gifting model,” she said. Customers pay for a yoga lesson or catered meal; the weed is a bonus.

Dinner at Mary's

A cannabis yoga event hosted by Samantha Kanter’s businesses, Dinner at Mary’s, in Boston’s Charlestown neighborhood on March 13, 2024.Courtesy of Samantha Kanter

For many, the default image of social consumption is akin to a cigar lounge or bar, but for marijuana — similar to the Summit Lounge, or Amsterdam’s famed cannabis coffeeshops.

But prospective business owners also envision outdoor hangouts akin to beer gardens, pot-friendly music venues, spas where customers can toke up before a massage, cannabis festivals with legal on-site consumption, and much more.

The Boston Globe recently told the story of a Somerville dispensary hosting weekly stoned knitting circles. Since the shop lacks a social consumption license, any smoking occurs offsite beforehand.

Advertisement

Kanter has even higher dreams: “At Fenway [Park], you should be able to get a seltzer infused with cannabis and a seltzer with booze in it.”

Both she and Moon have been open about their businesses — and their concerns that the Cannabis Control Commission has been too slow to regulate social consumption.

The board drafted regulations in 2017. But it held off on issuing licenses amid concerns from then-Gov. Charlie Baker and others about how lounges would avoid over-serving patrons and how they would account for other safety issues.

a

Bruce Stebbins, a member of the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission, at a May 2019 meeting in Springfield of the state Gaming Commission, which he formerly sat on. (Hoang ‘Leon’ Nguyen / The Republican)

Social consumption was further delayed by an issue with state law that left unclear how municipalities could decide to allow on-site cannabis consumption businesses. The state Legislature corrected that problem in 2022.

The commission also had planned to introduce social consumption with a pilot program limited to 12 communities.

Advertisement

The board scuttled that idea last year. Stebbins, who co-chairs the working group developing social consumption regulations, said keeping the pilot program could have delayed the rollout of social consumption by “easily at least two years.”

Last year the commission held three public meetings and sent a survey to 1,000 cannabis businesses statewide to gather input on social consumption.

Stebbins said the working group plans to release a framework for social consumption regulations this year, though a lengthy process would remain before the commission finalized the regulations themselves.

To some hopeful business owners, it sounds like a bureaucratic nightmare.

In March, at the New England Cannabis Convention in Boston, Stebbins sat on a panel titled, “What’s Taking So Long? Social Consumption in Massachusetts.”

Advertisement
Michigan Marijuana Lounges

A customer plays cards and smokes a joint at Kalkushka, a licensed marijuana lounge in Kalkaska, Michigan. (Photo provided to MLive.com by Chris Atteberry)

Indeed, eight months had passed since Stebbins and fellow commissioner Nurys Camargo said their working group would unveil a “regulatory proposal to the full commission in the near future.”

When the panel took questions, Kanter, Moon, and others chastised the commission’s regulatory pace.

“We want the license. We want the regulations. We want to be good corporate citizens. So why isn’t there a license?” Moon asked. “I don’t understand it and I’ve been struggling with it for six years.”

“I know the message is, ‘What’s taking so long?’” Stebbins responded. He remains optimistic about the possibility for the regulations to be written by the end of this year.

But licensed cannabis lounges open for business are likely far off.

Advertisement

“I don’t see an actual establishment opening for at least three to four years,” Moon said.

Dinner at Mary's

A cannabis-infused dish prepared for a Dinner at Mary’s tasting dinner.Courtesy of Samantha Kanter

Even with commission regulations in writing, individual towns must choose to allow consumption venues. Then local zoning and health boards will have their say. Only then, once business owners understand how they can operate, will they begin the state licensing process. And that could take years to complete.

“It’s very difficult to find a space if I’m not sure what we’ll be allowed to do,” Kanter said.

Until the regulations are in place, she said many property owners are unwilling to discuss leasing space to a future social consumption business.

“I’ve talked to 50 landlords and 49 of them were like, ‘We’re not touching it,’” Kanter said. And she doesn’t blame them.

Advertisement

A myriad of questions remain for regulators to address, including how business operators will monitor customers to prevent over-serving.

The Summit Lounge

The Summit Lounge, a private cannabis consumption club in Worcester, is one of an uncertain number of establishments operating in the gray area of Massachusetts’ cannabis law.Sebastian Restrepo

Newton Police Chief John Carmichael Jr., who sits on the commission’s Cannabis Advisory Board, said he believes social consumption businesses can be opened safely, just as other cannabis businesses have been — “as long as they’re following the regulations.”

“It comes down to individual responsibility — the establishment being responsible and the individual being responsible as they come and go,” Carmichael said.

The Summit Lounge “has not been the cause of any major issues,” a Worcester Police Department spokesperson said.

Though no roadside test exists to detect whether a driver is impaired by marijuana, Carmichael said police officers are trained to recognize the signs of a high driver. The arrival of pot lounges will not greatly affect how police operate, he said.

Advertisement

Other questions remain.

If a patron doesn’t finish a pot-infused brownie, for example, could they take it home to finish later?

In the variable New England climate, will smoking or vaping be permitted indoors? As a private club, the Summit Lounge allows smoking. But regular businesses face far stricter rules.

Only Alien

An ashtray fills up inside the consumption lounge of Only Alien Cannabis Co. in Kalamazoo, Mich. on Thursday, Feb. 22, 2024.Devin Anderson-Torrez | MLive.com

“My concern is they’ll regulate it into an unprofitable state,” Blake Mensing, an attorney who has represented both cannabis companies and municipalities, said.

He and his business partners are now opening Firebrand Cannabis, a dispensary near Boston’s South Station, though Mensing also hopes to one day open a cannabis lounge.

Advertisement

Stebbins believes the state’s cannabis industry is better positioned now to adopt social consumption than it was a year ago.

He points to the removal of the pilot program, the recent introduction of grants to support businesses in the state’s cannabis social equity program, and reforms that reeled in the conditions municipalities can place on cannabis businesses.

But the pace of the commission’s work still confounds business owners like Kanter, who have spent years operating in a legal gray area.

“I just don’t understand what’s taking so long,” she said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell: A Reproductive Justice Champion

Published

on

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell: A Reproductive Justice Champion


During her time in office, the AG has helped create an abortion legal hotline for the state, helped implement the state’s abortion provider shield law, and more.

Andrea Joy Campbell (Mass.Gov)

Shortly after taking office last year, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell created a Reproductive Justice Unit that has worked tirelessly to protect and expand reproductive health, rights and justice. This Unit has focused on eliminating disparities in maternal health, combatting anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers, working across state lines to respond to national attacks on reproductive health care, and defending and enforcing Massachusetts’ strong legal protections for reproductive rights.

“We are doing this work with a hands-on and expert-led approach,” said AG Campbell, the first Black woman to hold statewide office in Massachusetts. Upon taking office, she pledged to “be a national leader in protecting reproductive rights and gender affirming care.”

On June 18, AG Campbell and her Reproductive Justice Unit (headed by Sapna Khatri) convened more than 120 reproductive justice experts at Western New England Law School in Springfield, Massachusetts.

Participants included community organizations, healthcare providers, legal advocates and academics. During a listening session, Campbell heard how her office could better champion reproductive justice on a local, state and national level, particularly with national efforts to roll back these rights. 

Advertisement

“As bodily autonomy is under relentless attack nationwide, Massachusetts is doubling down on its efforts to champion, defend and expand access to sexual and reproductive health care,” said AG Campbell.

Before the convening, Campbell toured Seven Sisters Midwifery and Community Birthing Center in Florence, Massachusetts—the state’s only midwife-owned and operated independent birth center. 

At the convening, Campbell announced the release of five new “Know Your Rights” guides focused on abortion, gender affirming care, contraception, the state shield law and anti-abortion clinics.

“To help ensure that people in Massachusetts know their rights in the confusing and evolving post-Dobbs world, I am glad to release new resources to help people navigate common issues associated with reproductive care,” said AG Campbell.

As one of her first actions in office, AG Campbell worked with Reproductive Equity Now to create the Abortion Legal Hotline—a free and confidential hotline that assists Massachusetts healthcare providers and patients by providing legal advice related to abortion access and care. 

Advertisement

The AG has also led efforts to fully implement and operationalize the state’s abortion provider shield law, including Massachusetts’ first-of-its-kind telehealth provider shield provision, which protects clinicians in the state who serve patients living in states banning abortion. Seven other states have since passed similar telehealth provider shield laws (WA, CO, VT, NY, CA, ME, RI) and four practices—Aid Access, Abuzz, The MAP, and Armadillo Clinic—are now serving over 12,000 women living in ban states each month with telehealth abortion and FDA-approved pills by mail.

AG Campbell has filed amicus briefs with the Supreme Court of the United States to protect access to medication abortion and emergency abortion care, fought to defend access to gender affirming care on behalf of trans youth, and leveraged the tools of her office to address the maternal health crisis in Massachusetts. This is evident in her launching and distributing a $1.5 million maternal health equity grant. AG Campbell’s predecessor, now-Governor Maura Healey, issued a consumer advisory on anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers in July 2022, and the AG has aggressively pursued complaints filed against these centers. 

AG Andrea Campbell and Loretta Ross speak at Smith College. (@MassAGO / Twitter)

The reproductive justice convening concluded with a fireside chat between AG Campbell and the nationally renowned reproductive justice activist Loretta J. Ross, now a professor of women’s and gender studies at Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts. Campbell and Ross discussed the history of the reproductive justice movement, the state of reproductive care access today and the government’s role in sustaining long-term systemic change.

“True reproductive justice is all-encompassing and accounts for liberties such as the right to have or not have a child, along with the opportunity to raise children in environments where they can thrive,” said Ross. “Attorney General Campbell is one of few leaders nationwide to use a truly comprehensive and expert-based approach to championing reproductive justice, and it is my deep honor to support her in this work.” 

Read more:

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts emergency shelter spending topped $700M last month, report says

Published

on

Massachusetts emergency shelter spending topped $700M last month, report says


Massachusetts spending on the emergency shelter system housing migrant families and local residents has crossed the $700 million threshold, according to data released Monday.

Government budget writers have projected the state will shell out approximately $932 million on the emergency shelter system in fiscal year 2024 and another $915 million in fiscal year 2025, which began on Monday. The massive costs were spurred by an influx of migrants over the past year.

Gov. Maura Healey’s finance and housing offices said the state had spent $715 million on the emergency shelter program as of June 27, though the figure is largely representative of costs through mid-March.

“March invoices are currently being received and processed,” the report said.

Advertisement

As migrants arrived in droves to Massachusetts, the state turned to a network of hotels and motels to increase state-run shelter capacity for families with children and pregnant women. Housing people in those locations can often prove costly, sometimes running $300 a night.

Healey over the past year has approved restrictions on the shelter system, including a nine-month time limit on families’ stay, a 7,500 family cap, a monthly requirement for people in overflow sites to reapply for services, and just last week a prohibition on sleeping overnight at Logan Airport.

At an unrelated event in Lowell Tuesday, Healey said while the state is required to provide families with children and pregnant women with shelter, there is only so much room.

“It’s why I took action this fall to announce the cap and to establish a waiver,” she told reporters. “My position has been, we simply cannot shoulder this. It’s why I also demanded time and time again that Congress step up and act and provide relief to the state.”

Boston, Worcester, Springfield, and Lynn are playing host to the most families in shelters, hotels, and motels of the 351 cities and towns in Massachusetts, according to the report.

Advertisement

About $210 million, or one third of the total money spent, has been paid to shelter providers who run traditional locations as well as the hotels, motels, and overflow sites, according to the report.

Another $24 million has gone to municipalities to help alleviate costs associated with an increased number of students from shelters, the report said. The state has also spent $2.7 million for “additional educational supports” like student transportation and multilingual faculty.

After Healey put a capacity limit on the emergency shelter system, those who applied for services were directed to overflow sites, including at state-owned facilities in Lexington, Roxbury, Chelsea, Cambridge, and Norfolk.

The locations were oftentimes unsuited to house families immediately and the state had to spend money to upgrade the sites. The report released Monday shows officials have spent $1.1 million to make “life safety improvements” at overflow sites.

There were 7,463 families in the emergency shelter system, another 417 at overflow sites, and 699 on the waitlist for placement as of June 27, according to state data and the report.

Advertisement

A separate report released Monday provides an update on an effort to move 400 migrant families out of state-run shelters and into stable housing by the end of the year.

Healey and the state’s eight resettlement agencies inked $10.5 million worth of contracts to stand up the program, which takes a well-known resettlement strategy used at the federal level with humanitarian parolees from Afghanistan and Ukraine and applies it to those in local emergency shelters.

Ascentria Care Alliance committed to helping 75 families in the Worcester and Greater Springfield area move into long-term housing and is expected to receive $1.5 million to do so, the most of the eight organizations, according to the report.

Five other groups contracted to help 50 families and are in line to receive $1 million while Jewish Family Service of Metrowest agreed to assist 25 families and is expected to receive $500,000 to do so, the report said.

Gov. Maura Healey (Photo By Matt Stone/Boston Herald, File)



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts may help homeowners whose foundations are crumbling

Published

on

Massachusetts may help homeowners whose foundations are crumbling


BOSTON – Homeowners across the state who rallied on Beacon Hill asking for help to pay for their crumbling foundations may soon see some relief.

Why are foundations crumbling?

Thursday night, state senators approved an amendment to the Affordable Housing Act that will create a fund for Massachusetts residents whose foundations are failing. The problem is a natural mineral called pyrrhotite, which eventually causes concrete foundations to crumble – and insurance doesn’t cover the costs. The state now mandates quarries to test their product for pyrrhotite.

“The next step is finding the best methods for funding this effort,” State Sen. Peter Durant, R-Spencer, said. “This is a long-term problem that will require us to be creative so as not to place a large burden on taxpayers while also helping residents to repair their homes which, in turn, helps their local economy.”    

Members of Massachusetts Residents Against Crumbling Concrete gathered outside the Statehouse again on Thursday to call for help fixing their foundations.

Advertisement
crumbling-foundations-5p-vo-transfer-frame-802.jpg
Massachusetts Residents Against Crumbling Concrete are asking the state to help fix their crumbling foundations.

CBS Boston


Homeowners face financial hardship

“This slow-moving mineral has created a financial hardship for thousands of families in my district and across our state, is not covered by homeowners’ insurance and costs hundreds of thousands of dollars out of pocket to fix,” said State Sen. Ryan Fattman, R-Sutton.  

The problem is expected to hit more than 40 cities and towns, which have identified homeowners with crumbling foundations due to pyrrhorite. Replacing the foundation in a home can cause a homeowner as much as $250,000.  

“Faulty foundations are putting the homes and life savings of thousands of Massachusetts families across the Commonwealth at risk, through no fault of their own,” said Sen. Michael Moore, D-Millbury.  

Advertisement

The amendment is now before a conference committee. 

“This is essentially a natural disaster,” Durant said. “It is caused by the failing of a natural element and it was unforeseen by the concrete industry, builders and homeowners.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending