Connect with us

Massachusetts

Week in Review: Massachusetts Governor to Pardon Thousands of Cannabis Convictions

Published

on

Week in Review: Massachusetts Governor to Pardon Thousands of Cannabis Convictions


In this week’s cannabis news round-up, Massachusetts governor grants pardons for misdemeanor cannabis convictions; Minnesota takes aim at illegal cannabis sales ahead of adult-use market launch; and a new study reveals cannabis offers hope for migraine patients.

Massachusetts State House, Boston. PHOTO King of Hearts

Massachusetts Governor to Pardon Misdemeanor Cannabis Convictions

Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey has announced her intention to issue pardons for tens of thousands of individuals convicted of misdemeanor cannabis possession charges spanning back decades. This initiative marks another significant step by a state toward rectifying the injustices faced by low-level drug offenders.

“Massachusetts decriminalized possession for personal use back in 2008, legalized it in 2016, yet thousands of people are still living with a conviction on their records—a conviction that may be a barrier to jobs, getting housing, even getting an education,” the governor said on her reasoning to grant the cannabis pardons.

According to data from the Cannabis Control Commission, Massachusetts issued nearly 69,000 civil or criminal violations for cannabis possession from 2000 through 2013. The administration estimates that the pardons could potentially benefit hundreds of thousands of individuals, offering a chance to overcome the barriers imposed by past convictions.

Advertisement

If ratified, the pardons will extend to all adult Massachusetts state court misdemeanor convictions for possession of cannabis or a “Class D substance” predating March 13, 2024. Gov. Healey, a Democrat and former state attorney general, emphasized that most individuals affected would not need to take any action to have their criminal records updated.

The pardons hinge on the approval of the Governor’s Council. If approved, they will take immediate effect, albeit requiring time to update criminal records. Gov. Healey highlighted the historic nature of these pardons, likening them to President Joe Biden’s pardoning of federal cannabis possession convictions and urging other governors to follow suit. She underscored the importance of rectifying past injustices, particularly in light of Massachusetts’ decriminalization and subsequent legalization of cannabis.

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, echoing Healey’s sentiments, emphasized the lifelong consequences of convictions for simple cannabis possession, especially for marginalized communities— a stark reminder of the systemic inequalities ingrained in the criminal justice system.

“These consequences are only compounded when you consider that a disproportionate number of those who have been arrested and convicted for cannabis possession are Black and brown people,” Campbell said.

However, pardons don’t extend to other cannabis-related convictions, such as possession with intent to distribute or distribution. Additionally, convictions from jurisdictions outside Massachusetts, including federal court, are not covered by the pardons.

Advertisement
PHOTO Adam

Minnesota Takes Aim at Illegal Cannabis Sales Ahead of Adult-Use Market Launch

Minnesota regulators have taken a firm stance against retailers engaging in the sale of illegal cannabis flower, signaling a crackdown ahead of the anticipated launch of the state’s adult-use cannabis market.

Amidst complaints about the sale of illegal cannabis flower falsely labeled as hemp, the Office of Cannabis Management has initiated robust measures to combat this practice. State health inspectors, previously tasked with monitoring hemp-derived edible products, will now extend their scrutiny to raw flower to ensure compliance with THC potency limits distinguishing hemp from cannabis.

While Minnesota residents aged 21 and above are now legally permitted to use and cultivate cannabis for personal use, commercial sales without a cannabis business license remain strictly prohibited. With the Office of Cannabis Management still in the process of establishing a licensing framework, the sale of cannabis flower without proper authorization is deemed unlawful.

Immediate state inspections of raw cannabis flower are slated to commence, with retailers mandated to furnish lab testing certificates validating THC levels below the legal threshold of 0.3% for hemp products. To improve regulatory oversight, Minnesota is expanding its testing infrastructure for cannabis products, including deploying a mobile field unit.

Interim Director Charlene Briner reaffirmed the office’s unwavering commitment to upholding legal standards within the industry. She emphasized the importance of clear guidance to encourage operator compliance and reiterated that products lacking proper certification would be deemed illegal for sale. 

“While this is a temporary issue that will no longer exist once businesses are licensed to sell cannabis flower, OCM’s commitment to ensuring an industry that abides by all legal requirements is steadfast and ongoing,” said Briner. “We’re confident that by providing clear expectations and guidance to businesses, the majority of operators will choose to follow the law.”

Advertisement

Retailers found violating the law face severe penalties, including the seizure of products and fines of up to $1 million. Such infractions could jeopardize an entrepreneur’s prospects of obtaining a cannabis business license, underscoring the significance of adherence to regulatory requirements.

PHOTO Karolina Grabowska

Study: Cannabis Offers Hope for Migraine Sufferers

Recent research published in the journal Neurology Clinical Practice sheds light on the growing trend of migraine patients turning to cannabis for relief.

Conducted by investigators from Yale University’s School of Medicine, the study, titled “Characterizing cannabis use and perceived benefit in a tertiary headache center patient sample,” surveyed responses from 1,373 patients from a tertiary headache center, revealing intriguing insights into the potential benefits of cannabis for migraine management.

According to the study’s findings, just under one-third of respondents admitted to being current cannabis consumers. Among this group, a significant majority reported that cannabis either improved their migraine symptoms or reduced their frequency. More strikingly, 63% of cannabis users noted that their use of the plant allowed them to decrease or even eliminate their reliance on other prescription medications.

 “This is the largest study to date to document cannabis product usage patterns and perceived benefits for migraine management in a clinical headache patient sample,” the study’s lead author said. They concluded that a majority of patients surveyed reported positive outcomes from using cannabis products, citing improvements in migraine characteristics, clinical features and associated risk factors.

These findings echo previous research highlighting the potential efficacy of cannabis in treating migraines. A comprehensive literature review in 2002, encompassing nine studies and over 5,600 subjects, revealed that medical cannabis exhibited a significant clinical response by reducing the length and frequency of migraines. The review suggested that medical cannabis therapy could be a valuable option for migraine sufferers due to its effectiveness and convenience.

Advertisement



Source link

Massachusetts

Knife-wielding man shot and killed by police in Springfield

Published

on

Knife-wielding man shot and killed by police in Springfield


A man armed with a knife was shot and killed by police in Springfield, Massachusetts, Saturday evening.

Springfield police and the Hampden District Attorney’s Office are investigating the police shooting that occurred after officers responded to a 911 call around 4:40 p.m. for a man exhibiting psychiatric behavior while carrying a knife in the 1100 block of Worcester Street in Indian Orchard.

Due to circumstances that remain under investigation, police say one officer fired their service pistol, striking the armed man. Medical aid was rendered on scene immediately, according to the police department, but the man died from his injuries on scene.

The Hampden District Attorney’s Office will determine the propriety of the shooting and whether or not the use of force was justified.

Advertisement

Police haven’t identified the officer who fired their weapon, or released the name of the man who died.

The investigation remains ongoing at this time, and police say additional information will be released when the it has concluded.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

After lawsuits, Mass. drops gender ideology mandate for foster parents

Published

on

After lawsuits, Mass. drops gender ideology mandate for foster parents


Local News

Massachusetts will no longer require prospective foster parents to affirm foster children’s gender identity.

Massachusetts will no longer require prospective foster parents to affirm the sexual orientation and gender identity of the children they foster, following legal challenges and criticism from religious groups.

The change comes after the conservative legal group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) filed a federal lawsuit in September on behalf of two Massachusetts families, who claimed the requirement conflicted with their religious beliefs, according to a Fox News report. One couple had its foster care license revoked, while the other was threatened with revocation.

Advertisement

That same month, federal regulators with the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) sent a letter to Massachusetts criticizing the mandate as discriminatory and a violation of the First Amendment. The agency said it would open an investigation into the matter.

On Dec. 12, the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families (DCF) updated its regulations, replacing language that required foster parents to affirm a child’s “sexual orientation and gender identity” with a requirement that they support a child’s “individual identity and needs.”

The shift comes amid a broader national debate, as states grapple with whether foster parents should be required to support children’s gender identity even when it conflicts with their personal or religious beliefs.

In a statement to GBH News, DCF Commissioner Staverne Miller said the agency’s top priority is ensuring children in foster care are placed in safe and supportive homes.

“We are also committed to ensuring that no one is prevented from applying or reapplying to be a foster parent because of their religious beliefs,” Miller said.

Advertisement

ADF lauded the change in a statement released Wednesday. 

“Massachusetts has told us that this new regulation will no longer exclude Christian and other religious families from foster care because of their commonly held beliefs that boys are boys and girls are girls,” said ADF Senior Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse. 

“Our clients—loving, caring foster families who have welcomed vulnerable children into their homes—as well as many other families affected by this policy, are eager to reapply for their licenses,” Widmalm-Delphonse continued. “This amendment is a step in the right direction and we commend Massachusetts officials for changing course. But this case will not end until we are positive that Massachusetts is committed to respecting religious persons and ideological diversity among foster parents.”

Morgan Rousseau is a freelance writer for Boston.com, where she reports on a variety of local and regional news.





Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts Removes LGBT Ideology Requirements for Foster-Care Parents

Published

on

Massachusetts Removes LGBT Ideology Requirements for Foster-Care Parents


Massachusetts will no longer require prospective foster parents to affirm gender ideology in order to qualify for fostering children, with the move coming after a federal lawsuit from a religious-liberty group. 

Alliance Defending Freedom said Dec. 17 that the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families “will no longer exclude Christian and other religious families from foster care” because of their “commonly held beliefs that boys are boys and girls are girls.”

The legal group announced in September that it had filed a lawsuit in U.S. district court over the state policy, which required prospective parents to agree to affirm a child’s “sexual orientation and gender identity” before being permitted to foster. 

Attorney Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse said at the time that the state’s foster system was “in crisis” with more than 1,400 children awaiting placement in foster homes. 

Advertisement

Yet the state was “putting its ideological agenda ahead of the needs of these suffering kids,” Widmalm-Delphonse said.

The suit had been filed on behalf of two Massachusetts families who had been licensed to serve as foster parents in the state. They had provided homes for nearly three dozen foster children between them and were “in good standing” at the time of the policy change. 

Yet the state policy required them to “promise to use a child’s chosen pronouns, verbally affirm a child’s gender identity contrary to biological sex, and even encourage a child to medically transition, forcing these families to speak against their core religious beliefs,” the lawsuit said. 

With its policy change, Massachusetts will instead require foster parents to affirm a child’s “individual identity and needs,” with the LGBT-related language having been removed from the state code. 

The amended language comes after President Donald Trump signed an executive order last month that aims to improve the nation’s foster care system by modernizing the current child welfare system, developing partnerships with private sector organizations, and prioritizing the participation of those with sincerely held religious beliefs. 

Advertisement

Families previously excluded by the state rule are “eager to reapply for their licenses,” Widmalm-Delphonse said on Dec. 17.

The lawyer commended Massachusetts for taking a “step in the right direction,” though he said the legal group will continue its efforts until it is “positive that Massachusetts is committed to respecting religious persons and ideological diversity among foster parents.”

Other authorities have made efforts in recent years to exclude parents from state child care programs on the basis of gender ideology.

In July a federal appeals court ruled in a 2-1 decision that Oregon likely violated a Christian mother’s First Amendment rights by demanding that she embrace gender ideology and homosexuality in order to adopt children.

In April, meanwhile, Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed legislation that would have prohibited the government from requiring parents to affirm support for gender ideology and homosexuality if they want to qualify to adopt or foster children.

Advertisement

In contrast, Arkansas in April enacted a law to prevent adoptive agencies and foster care providers from discriminating against potential parents on account of their religious beliefs. 

The Arkansas law specifically prohibits the government from discriminating against parents over their refusal to accept “any government policy regarding sexual orientation or gender identity that conflicts with the person’s sincerely held religious beliefs.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending