The group, Lavinson said, will meet quarterly but will also convene in smaller numbers to work on specific issues. The board already faces three big tasks: planning for what to do after the LNG terminal in Everett potentially closes in six years, reducing the reliance on so-called “peaker plants” that are fired by fossil fuels, and recommending ways to finance important grid upgrades. The board is large, she said, in part to get people who don’t normally talk with each other to interact. There’s a pressing need, she added, to meet aggressive emissions mandates, and to craft sustainable solutions that can be replicated elsewhere.
“We are in a race against time when it comes to climate change,” Lavinson said. “It will take all of us working together.”
She’s held numerous positions in the utility industry over the past three decades, including jobs at PG&E and Exelon — but nothing quite like this role.
“It’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity,” Lavinson added. “I can’t think of a better place to be for me right now at this moment, personally or professionally, than here, doing this job.”
Advertisement
Charger debate revs up at Massport hearing
Last week, one Massport executive proposed ending free charging at Massport’s 66 electric vehicle ports, most of which are at Logan Airport. The proposal wasn’t a hit with everyone. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff
Should Massport start charging for charging?
That question seemed to vex the port authority’s board last Thursday. Joel Barrera, Massport’s director of strategic and business planning, proposed ending the free ride at Massport’s 66 electric vehicle charging ports, most of them at Logan Airport.
He suggested charging 25 cents per kilowatt hour plus a connection fee of $2, starting Sept. 1, ostensibly to dissuade travelers from parking their EVs at a port and leaving them there for days while out of town, preventing others from using it. He said it’s about charger availability, not revenue: The change could raise some $60,000 a year, based on last year’s usage patterns, which is not even a rounding error for Massport. And he noted that state energy officials recommend that public agencies charge for charging; several already do.
Advertisement
Normally, by the time a proposal is ready for a board vote at Massport, it sailsthrough to approval. Not this time.
Board member John Nucci objected, saying charging consumers for the electricity would send the wrong message.
“We’re supposed to be incentivizing electric vehicle usage,” he said. “I know it’s small dollars but I think it might be penny wise and pound foolish in the long run. . . . A lot of other airports don’t charge.”
However, another board member, Worcester County Sheriff Lew Evangelidis, called Barrera’s proposal a commonsense approach. “I’m not a big proponent of just giving stuff away for free,” Evangelidis said.
In the end, acting Massport chief executive Ed Freni offered to give the staff more time to come up with data that could show requiring payments would improve usage. Board chair Patricia Jacobs agreed to the delay, adding: “I do appreciate the proposal and the intent behind it. We just want to make sure we’re incentivizing the right behavior.”
Advertisement
If at first you don’t succeed . . .
City Councilor Ed Flynn pictured in June.Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff
Ed Flynn is nothing if not persistent.
The city councilor just sent Arthur Jemison, Mayor Michelle Wu’s planning director, another note calling for a Blue Ribbon Commission to analyze what’s ailing downtown Boston and propose solutions.
At Flynn’s suggestion, the Boston City Council approved a resolution calling for this downtown task force several months ago. No movement from the Wu administration. Then Flynn sent another letter on July 2, after several office buildings were sold at deep discounts. Still, no luck.
So on July 16, Flynn made a third request. He was spurred on, he said, by business leaders who metearlier this month at the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce to talk about how office traffic may never return to prepandemic levels, and the implications for downtown’s future and Boston’s property tax base.
Advertisement
Flynn said the empty offices hurt many small businesses downtown that depend on foot trafficevery weekday. Flynn, in his latest request, also noted how he would like to see all city boards return to in-person meetings, in part to set a good tone for the private sector.
When asked about Flynn’s latest letter, a Wu administration spokesperson rattled off the efforts the administration is pursuing to make downtown Boston “a vibrant place to work and to live” including by engaging with large employers to fill vacancies. Among other things, Wu has launched tax breaks to spur office-residential conversions, and used federal dollars to help fill vacant storefronts with new tenants. Still no word on that Blue Ribbon Commission, though.
Your Chamber of Commerce CEO from Boston
Jim Rooney, CEO of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce.David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
Greenville Chamber of Commerce chief executive Carlos Phillips, the departing chair of the Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives, didn’t make any of his usual jokes about Greater Boston Chamber chief executive Jim Rooney’s Boston accent last week at the ACCE annual convention in Dallas.
He didn’t need to. Rooney, who took the baton from the Greenville, S.C.-based Phillips as the new chair of the ACCE board, made sure to bring up the topic.
Advertisement
Rooney got a few laughs talking about sharing a beer and bowl of chowder with a colleague in Boston.
“It’s probably refreshing to you that you’re hearing something different than from South Carolina, and Oklahoma, and Alabama,” said Rooney, a reference to Phillips and other predecessors. “I’m sure someone in the audience will translate if you need it.”
Andy Freed is out of the office again
Advertisement
It’s that time of the year again. Time for Andy Freed’s out-of-office message.
The chief executive of Virtual Inc., a Wakefield provider of services for business associations, takes his vacation seriously — so seriously that if you email him, you’ll get a link to his latest “out-of-office” video in response. Each year, working with buddy Thomas Pimentel of TNT Ltd. Productions, Freed produces a satirical video with a vacation theme in mind. Think “Vacation is Coming,” the year he spoofed Game of Thrones, or “Back to Vacation” instead of “Back to the Future.” This year, he made a five-minute-plus video styled after political ads, entitled “Say Yes to Vacation.”
Freed and Pimentel, along with a few Virtual colleagues and Freed’s terrier Buster, throw together all the cheap campaign video cliches. Think black-and-white footage of opponents, intense symphonic music, Revolutionary War-era clothing, repeated eagle cries. Former Patriots quarterback Drew Bledsoe makes a cameo appearance, trying to keep a straight face as he explains how he’s not going to be the backup while Freed is away.
“In a time that our nation is more divided than it ever has been, I had to come up with something that we could all unify around [and] what’s a more unifying principle in the summer than the idea of vacation?” Freed said in an interview. “We decided to break the record for eagle screeches [in a] campaign ad. That’s just a stock sound. No eagles were employed or harmed.”
Advertisement
Jon Chesto can be reached at jon.chesto@globe.com. Follow him @jonchesto.
When the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) denied voters the ability to support a popular tax cut this November, it was more than a temporary loss for residents of one of America’s most overtaxed states. Barely a generation removed from its “Taxachusetts” moniker, the Commonwealth’s competitiveness suffered a setback with long-lasting implications.
That is why even if this battle is over, the broader fight must go on.
Recent polling from the Mass Opportunity Alliance (MOA), a nonprofit advocating for state competitiveness, found that 82% of voters supported lowering the state income tax rate from 5% to 4%. Even a poll from the Boston Globe/Suffolk University released days before the SJC decision showed 66% supporting the tax cut.
Terrified by the threat to the status quo, entrenched special interests spearheaded a legal challenge not based on the merits of the tax cut or fiscal policy whatsoever. The issue was a technicality in summary of the question written by the Attorney General. As a retired SJC justice explained, “neither logic nor law” supported removing the tax cut from the ballot.
Advertisement
The Court’s ruling does not change the underlying issue. The same Suffolk survey showed a majority (54%) of respondents had considered leaving the state in the last year. Nearly six in ten cited taxes and high cost of living.
This trend is well underway. Following the Commonwealth’s last tax hike in 2022, roughly 30,000 more people exited Massachusetts than arrived the following year — one of the country’s highest population exoduses. The outflow took $4.2 billion dollars’ worth of taxable income with them.
It’s no mystery as to why we’re losing residents. Survey research from MOA showed high taxes were a key driver. Not coincidentally, the top two states welcoming Massachusetts expatriates, Florida and New Hampshire, both have no income tax.
By contrast, Massachusetts has the second highest effective tax rate in the country. The Commonwealth is ranked in the bottom 10 for competitiveness.
The impact of this tax burden extends far and wide. Businesses are choosing to leave or relocate elsewhere. Iconic brands like Cape Cod Potato Chips have had enough, announcing the closing of their Hyannis facility earlier this year. Even international soccer players are not safe, learning that 90 minutes of participation in this year’s World Cup can subject them to crushing Beacon Hill tax policies.
Advertisement
Massachusetts is not alone in the blue state exodus. Frustrated by high taxes, endless regulation and overall unaffordability, families and businesses are fleeing California, Illinois and New York for friendlier terrain.
What are the consequences of fewer residents? For starters, less people to tax. Smaller tax bases means less resources for schools, roads and public safety – investments that tax hike advocates typically claim to care about.
Smaller populations also mean less national influence. In 2010, the congressional delegation shrank from 10 to 9 members, and only narrowly avoided losing another member in 2020. It’s anyone’s guess what the end of this decade will bring, but current trends are not encouraging.
So what’s next?
Fortunately, a second common sense tax proposal remains on track for the ballot this fall. By reforming the state tax revenue limit, the initiative would put the brakes on spendthrift politicians and return money to the taxpayers who earned it.
Advertisement
To be clear, the court’s ruling does not excuse the role of the legislators. Their constituents were denied the right to make their voices heard. As their elected representatives, members of the Massachusetts legislature should be fighting for families struggling with high taxes and some of the highest costs in the nation.
“Affordability” cannot just be a political buzz word; it must be a governing principle.
Two hundred fifty years ago, Massachusetts started a revolution against an oppressive government that led to the founding of our nation. That spirit lives on today, and so does the need for change. That starts by continuing the fight for common sense tax relief by every available avenue to keep the Commonwealth competitive for the next 250 years and beyond.
Colin Reed is a senior advisor to the Mass Opportunity Alliance
BOSTON (WHDH) – Just over one week after Massachusetts lawmakers announced a new, statewide initiative to combat wrong-way driving and improve roadway safety, law enforcement responded to another deadly wrong-way crash in Northboro Wednesday night.
With all of the recent tragedies, including the death of Massachusetts State Police trooper Kevin Trainor in Lynnfield last month, officials said they have pinpointed 100 locations to put on the priority list to make important safety changes as quickly as possible.
The $75-million detection and prevention program includes advanced detection technology, enhanced roadway signage, infrastructure improvements, and targeted safety upgrades across Massachusetts.
“They’ve been demonstrated to work in other places where they’ve been implemented, and even in Massachusetts the ones that are already in place, there is plenty of documented evidence showing people realizing they’re going the wrong way when those systems are activated,” said Mark Schieldrop of Triple A.
Advertisement
In Barnstable, those changes have already been implemented along Route 6. State Representative Steven Xiarhos said the area can be tricky to navigate.
“Lots of moving parts, a college right down the road, and someone could make the wrong move when they’re confused, and that’s one of those interactions that could be confusing,” Xiarhos said.
Schieldrop said there are many reasons for wrong-way driving, but one stands out above the rest.
“When we look at the typical wrong-way driver who’s causing these crashes, by and large alcohol impairment is a factor in the vast majority of them,” Schieldrop said.
Xiarhos said the prorgam is worth every penny if it will save lives.
Advertisement
“It’s frustrating when a horrible thing happens, you can’t turn back the clock,” he said. “So as an elected offical now, as a former police officer, let’s do everything we can to prevent this.”
The safety installations around the state will continue into 2027.
(Copyright (c) 2026 Sunbeam Television. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)
Join our Newsletter for the latest news right to your inbox
Gas prices dipped below $4 a gallon in Massachusetts Thursday for the first time in exactly two months.
According to AAA, the average price for a gallon of regular gas in Massachusetts is now $3.99, down from $4.02 on Wednesday.
That’s the first time the average fell below the $4 mark since April 25.
Advertisement
The national average on Thursday was $3.92 a gallon, AAA said. That average was above $4 for nearly three months before it fell to $3.99 a week ago on June 18.
Gas prices rose sharply after the war between the U.S. and Iran started on February 28.
A spokesperson for GasBuddy, which also tracks fuel price data, said the national average has been dropping for six weeks as the “recent U.S.-Iran framework agreement has helped ease supply fears.”
The company said the national average should keep falling to $3.75 by July 4.
“Six weeks of declines sounds like good news, and in some ways it is, but the context matters,” Patrick De Haan, a petroleum expert at GasBuddy, said in a statement Thursday.
Advertisement
“At roughly $3.75, this would be the second most expensive July 4 ever recorded, roughly 65 cents higher than last year and nearly $1 above where prices started in 2026. The U.S.-Iran agreement gives markets hope, but it’s being tested, and any breakdown in those talks could reverse the recent relief quickly. Drivers should use every tool available to find the lowest prices near them before filling up.”
A year ago at this time, the average price for a gallon of gas in Massachusetts was $3.10, according to AAA.
The all-time high in the state is $5.05 a gallon, set back in June 2022.