Maine
Opinion: Trump tariffs jeopardize our ability to keep the lights on in northern Maine
The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com
G. Melvin Hovey is a retired Maine Public Service Company executive.
Maine and New Brunswick are not at war with one another. We are friends and neighbors. And until the Trump administration initiated a trade war with Canada, we had no reason to fear a disruption in our electricity supply from New Brunswick. Yet here we are.
The New Brunswick provincial government is seriously considering shutting off the flow of electricity from New Brunswick into northern Maine. Specifically, Canadian officials said they could not rule out this possibility as retaliation for the U.S. imposing tariffs on imports from Canada. This would have a devastating impact on 58,000 Maine consumers who live and work in communities near the Canadian border and depend on New Brunswick to keep their lights on.
These Mainers have done nothing to deserve this. They simply live and work near the Canadian border.
I spent 37 years working for Maine Public Service Company (now part of Versant Power), the last 11 years as its president. We worked hard to keep the lights on in Aroostook County and keep electricity prices affordable. Part of our strategy was developing a mutually beneficial partnership with the Province of New Brunswick to share resources for the benefit of both New Brunswick and Aroostook County consumers.
They would provide us with their surplus electricity when it was cheaper for them to generate than for us to do so. They would also transmit through New Brunswick to Aroostook County our share of electricity from generators we owned in southern Maine and New Hampshire, including Maine Yankee, Wyman 4 and Seabrook. As a result, our need for generating capacity located inside Aroostook County was limited. And we were always ready to supply them with any surplus electricity from our generators, should they ever need it.
Over time, we built up a high level of mutual trust that benefited electricity consumers on both sides of the international boundary. Because of this relationship, Aroostook County was never electrically connected to the rest of Maine; instead, we were connected to New Brunswick. As a result, Aroostook County depends heavily on electricity imported from New Brunswick.
The tariffs imposed by our own federal government risk harming our close working relationship with New Brunswick and, more significantly, the ability to keep the lights on in Aroostook County. In the event New Brunswick stops the flow of electricity into Maine, there is not enough generating capacity in Northern Maine to keep all the lights on; preserve all our food; keep all our heating systems energized; keep our stores open; keep our businesses running; and keep our citizens employed. It may be spring, but it’s still cold in Northern Maine.
As a lifelong Republican, I’m stunned that a Republican administration would initiate federal intervention in local markets. I never thought I would see the day when a Republican president would impose tariffs (taxes) to the detriment of hard-working, innocent Maine consumers. But things have changed.
It boggles the mind that we, as a nation, would turn on our most trusted ally. In border states across the country, we are driving a stake through local economies and even families. Border towns often behave as one large community. Frequently people live on one side of the border and work on the other. Families extend across the border.
In the case of Aroostook County and the Province of New Brunswick, our electric utilities share resources to the benefit of all the ratepayers of both utilities. If the tariffs imposed by Washington lead to New Brunswick retaliating by cutting off electricity to Maine, our northern residents will pay the price of this tariff war.
I urge all my friends and former colleagues to speak up and demand that our congressional delegation use all available resources to stop the president from putting innocent Maine consumers in the middle of his political battle with Ottawa and thereby risk plunging Aroostook County into darkness and a catastrophic black out.
Maine
Maine Commission releases first recommendations to combat growing deed fraud threat
PORTLAND (WGME) — Maine has spent the past two years grappling with a rise in deed fraud schemes.
The CBS13 I-Team first began investigating after an elderly man didn’t receive his tax bill and learned someone had transferred his property without his knowledge.
Since then, multiple landowners have come forward saying something similar almost happened to them. Our reporting has uncovered for-sale signs posted on land, fake driver’s licenses and signed agreements to transfer deeds; all tied to scam attempts.
Maine has spent the past two years grappling with a rise in deed fraud schemes. (The Nathanson family)
The growing pattern prompted a state commission to issue new recommendations aimed at stopping the fraud.
Landowners say scam nearly cost them their property
Two summers ago, Cheryl and Ralph Nathanson learned their land on Little Sebago Lake had been put up for sale online.
“We could have lost our property,” Cheryl Nathanson said.
The Nathansons, who live in Connecticut, were stunned when they discovered a fraudulent listing for their Maine plot.
“We notified the police and they said they can take a report on it but that there’s nothing they could really do,” Ralph Nathanson said.
Police told them it was a classic case of deed fraud: scammers posing as property owners, listing land they don’t own and disappearing with the cash.
The couple was advised to sign up for property alerts through the Cumberland County Registry of Deeds, but quickly learned those alerts offered little protection.
“You can register for the deed fraud but it only informs you, by email, after the deed has been transferred. So it’s basically worthless,” Ralph Nathanson said.
A realtor lists their property…. Again
The following summer, the Nathansons discovered a real estate sign had been placed on their land.
“I was notified by a neighbor that there was a for-sale sign, a realtor for-sale sign, on our land,” Ralph Nathanson said.
A realtor from Old Orchard Beach had unknowingly entered into an agreement with someone impersonating the couple.
“Some of the information was correct, some of it wasn’t. You can get anything off of Google,” Cheryl Nathanson said.
Ralph Nathanson remembers confronting the agent.
“You are selling my property and I’m not selling the property,” Ralph Nathanson said. “The phone went silent.”
Despite the ordeal, the couple believes they were lucky to have seen the sign, knowing how bad these schemes can get.
State commission concludes work on deed fraud
“Currently, you all might be landowners and your land might be at risk, and you might not know right now that somebody has sold your land,” Jane Towle with the Real Estate Commission said, during the final meeting of the Deed Fraud Commission.
This fall, a state commission of stakeholders convened to examine ways to prevent deed fraud in Maine.
The Nathansons urged the commission to go beyond awareness campaigns.
CBS13 I-Team Reporter Stephanie Grindley: “You think the state should act beyond just awareness?”
Cheryl Nathanson: “100%.”
Ralph Nathanson: “Absolutely. I think the state of Maine has a responsibility to protect landowners.
But not everyone in the meeting agreed on the scope of the problem.
Attorney General calls deed fraud a low-priority scam
In the final meeting, Attorney General Aaron Frey remained staunch in his skepticism, saying complaints of deed fraud are still relatively rare.
“What we’re seeing for people getting hurt and losing money, this would probably not be the thing I want to highlight over other scams that are happening right now that are actually costing people their retirement savings,” Frey said.
Sen. Henry Ingwersen of York, who spearheaded the commission, sat down with the I-Team following the final meeting.
Grindley: “During the meeting, I did hear the Attorney General essentially call this a non-issue. His office isn’t getting complaints. He doesn’t see a bunch of consumers loosing money to this. Has that changed your stance?”
Ingwersen: “We’ve had three that have really been highlighted just in southern Maine. We haven’t heard a lot from around the rest of the state, but there has been some, so I think that even though it’s rare, we really need to address it.”
“I was pleased that we did come up with a couple of recommendations that we’re going to put in the report,” Ingwersen said.
Key Recommendation: Verify the seller’s identity
The first area of agreement among most, not all, stakeholders would legally require listing agents to verify a seller’s identity.
“The way it is now, it’s best practice. And a lot of professionals are doing best practice,” Ingwersen said. “The red flags in deed fraud are cash sale, land only, a quick sale at below-market value If we had realtors really paying attention to those red flags but also a policy that would require them to check the identity of the fraudulent seller, or of the seller, thoroughly, I think it would prevent, even if it prevented one instance of deed fraud, I think it would be very helpful.”
The commission did not outline exactly how identification should be verified.
“We didn’t really specify what that identification process was going to be. We’re leaving that up to rule making,” Ingwersen said.
Second Recommendation: Easier path to undo a fraudulent deed
Currently, the only way to reverse a fraudulent deed in Maine is to go to court.
The commission proposes allowing an attorney to file an affidavit with the registry.
“Allow an attorney to file an affidavit with the deed recorder that would allow the deed to be, the fraudulent deed, to be nullified in a way that is a little bit quicker than we currently have,” Ingwersen said.
The recommendations will now head to the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee. Any legislative change likely wouldn’t take effect until 2027, if the proposals make it into a bill and then survive a vote.
“I think we made some good progress, but I don’t think this is going to go away. I think this will continue,” Ingwersen said.
Landowners fear fraud will try until it succeeds
“We were thinking, do we take a loan out on it just to secure it?” Ralph Nathanson said.
As the legislative process begins, the Nathansons say Maine cannot wait. They fear it’s only a matter of time before a sale of their land goes through.
“To lose land like this or to find out that their land is now gone, I just can’t imagine that,” Ralph Nathanson said.
Ideas Left on the Table: Title Freeze and National Guidance
Several proposals failed to gain traction, including a “title freeze.” a concept similar to a credit freeze that would allow a landowner to lock their deed from unauthorized transfers. Maine could have been the first state to pilot it, but members said they lacked enough information.
Instead, they pointed to national group studying deed fraud. The Uniform Law Commission is drafting model legislation that states, including Maine, could adopt to better protect landowners.
Maine
Charter Communications lays off 176 Maine employees
PORTLAND, Maine (WGME) — Charter Communications, which owns Spectrum, is laying off 176 workers in Maine.
A company spokesperson said 176 employees were informed on Wednesday about the layoffs.
Charter Communications said it is transitioning the work done at the Portland call center to other U.S.-based centers effective immediately.
“Employees may relocate in their current role to select customer service locations and are eligible for relocation benefits. They will continue to receive regular pay for 90 days; severance and eligible benefits will begin afterward for those who do not relocate. Impacted employees may also apply for any open role for which they are qualified,” a company spokesperson said.
According to the Press Herald, the layoff is about a quarter of their Maine workforce.
Maine
Recently Elected 26-Year-Old Wilton School-Board Member Dies Unexpectedly
Regional School Unit (RSU) 9 school board member Griffin Mayhew, 26, representing Wilton, died unexpectedly on Monday, just months after he first took office in June.
[ Community Split Over Mt. Blue Principal’s Halloween Costume, But RSU 9 Confirms Black is Back on the Job…]
“Griffin was an exemplary young man whose commitment, kindness, and thoughtfulness were evident throughout his service on the Board along with his support of student activities at Mt. Blue Campus.
RSU 9, also known as the Mt. Blue Regional School, serves Chesterville, Farmington, Industry, New Sharon, New Vineyard, Starks, Temple, Vienna, Weld, and Wilton. Griffin became one of Wilton’s three RSU 9 Board of Directors members after defeating opponent Douglas Hiltz in a 209-146 vote.
The incumbent board member did not run for reelection.
Out of respect for Mayhew’s memory, the school district postponed the meeting scheduled for Tuesday.
“I don’t have many details or any information about services yet, but you should know that he was a thoughtful and decent member of the board. While his tenure on the board was short, it was clear to me that Griffin would become one of our best board members. He was exactly the sort of person you would want to see representing you in local government, and we will miss him,” said the Franklin County Democrats on Facebook.

Mayhew’s cause of death has not been released.

-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire