Maine
Opinion: Right whale, wrong decision: Maine lobstermen are leaders in conservation
The BDN Opinion part operates independently and doesn’t set newsroom insurance policies or contribute to reporting or enhancing articles elsewhere within the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com.
Marge Kilkelly of Dresden is a former member of Maine Home and Senate.
In 1872, 150 years in the past, when my nice, nice grandfather Martin Brewer was fishing out of Boothbay Harbor, the Maine Legislature handed the primary legislation banning taking of egg-bearing feminine lobster, a conservation measure already practiced by many Maine lobstermen on the time. A brief two years later Maine handed the primary legal guidelines regulating the minimal dimension of lobster. The primary minimal dimension was 10 ½ inches total dimension. This doomed the canners who principally went out of enterprise by 1885.
Again and again, the state of Maine and the lobstering trade have stepped as much as the plate to maintain the lobstering trade.
In 1917, further safety of egg-bearing feminine lobsters started when Maine handed a legislation permitting the wardens to buy lobsters that had extruded eggs, mark them with a spherical gap and launch them. Later, in 1948, the legislation was modified in order that fishermen marked feminine, egg-bearing lobsters with a V-shaped notch within the tail fairly than a spherical gap and launched them, assuring they might by no means be harvested.
The Nineteen Fifties noticed the event of co-ops, the Maine Lobstermen’s Affiliation and in 1987 the Lobster Institute was fashioned by trade associations in partnership with the College of Maine to give attention to communications, outreach, analysis and academic programming.
Maine has not solely been steward of the lobster useful resource however a frontrunner in North Atlantic proper whale conservation efforts, although the Maine lobster fishery has not been definitively linked to the entanglement of a proper whale in virtually 20 years.
Maine fishermen eliminated floating rope on the floor in 1997, and in 2009 changed 27,000 miles of floating line with whale-safe sinking line.
Extra adjustments have included rising the variety of traps per buoy to scale back the variety of vertical strains within the water and changing all gear to weak hyperlinks/weak rope, making hurt from entanglement much less probably.
100 and 50 years of arduous work and difficult, pricey choices by lawmakers and the lobster fishing trade have resulted in a fishery that contributes over $1 billion and helps over 4,000 jobs within the economic system of Maine, whereas working to scale back any hazard to proper whales.
The Maine lobster trade has achieved all they’ve been regulated to do. Possibly if Seafood Watch had checked out all of the historical past and info they may have decided that Maine was the mannequin of sustainability and conservation, not the issue.
Ultimately, focusing on and penalizing the 4,500 lobstermen and girls and the 1000’s of different small companies in Maine benefitting from the lobster fishery will damage these companies, households, communities and the economic system of Maine however probably not enhance the outlook for the North Atlantic proper whale.
I’ll proudly proceed to purchase Maine lobster and crabs and put up photos on social media ( #redmainelobster4me) whereas telling the story of a profitable fishery that is aware of the which means of sustainability and conservation.