Connect with us

Maine

Maine Turnpike Authority has 35% of Gorham Connector land in hand

Published

on


The Maine Turnpike Authority has purchased enough land to build 35% of the Gorham Connector along a proposed route announced this week, but some dispute whether adding a highway is the best way to relieve rush-hour traffic congestion west of Portland.

In the works for over a decade, the regional toll road would be constructed from Maine Turnpike Exit 45 in South Portland to the Gorham Bypass at Route 114 in Gorham, just south of the town center. The first of possibly several public meetings on the proposal will be held in March in Gorham. The date and location have yet to be announced.

The project has been endorsed by the Legislature, the Maine Department of Transportation and the municipalities of Gorham, Scarborough, Westbrook and South Portland, said Peter Mills, executive director of the authority.

The 5-mile connector would cost more than $200 million – published estimates run as high as $240 million – and be funded by toll revenue, not taxes, Mills said. The cost of driving on the connector has yet to be determined, but the project won’t cause a toll increase on the turnpike, he said.

Advertisement

Construction could start as early as 2026 and be completed by 2030. When it’s done, Mills and other proponents say the connector will reduce morning and evening traffic congestion that backs up and slows commuter travel to a snail’s pace along Route 22 and beyond.

“The congestion is staggering,” Mills said. “And now all the shortcuts are jammed up as bad as Route 22.”

Mills said the route identified this week has been designed to avoid and mitigate environmental impacts wherever possible in anticipation of community concerns and reviews by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which oversee construction in and near wetlands and waterways.

“We’ve gone to great lengths to minimize impacts to Red Brook, (where) there are brook trout,” he said. Red Brook is a tributary to Clarks Pond in South Portland that begins in a wetland area north of County Road (Route 22) in Scarborough.

The route passes through a small wooded wetland area on the west side of Smiling Hill Farm near the Westbrook-Scarborough line, beyond the farm and the lumber business, Mills said. The farm’s owners, who had voiced opposition to the connector in the past, didn’t respond Tuesday to requests for interviews about the route.

Advertisement

The route also passes through a large parcel owned by Ecomaine, the regional trash-to-energy incinerator, and a 40-acre swath of the former Gorham Country Club that the authority purchased last year for $1.4 million, Mills said.

“We have spent $4.5 million so far on land for the project, including three houses,” he said. “The land acquired occupies about 204 acres. Under the current alignment, there are five other houses that may need to be purchased, but there could be others depending on the final plans.”

MEETING WITH PROPERTY OWNERS

Mills has met with at least 60 property owners who either live near the proposed route or may be affected by the road.

So far, he said, the authority has used eminent domain only once for this project, to acquire a parcel that might otherwise have been developed. All other properties have been purchased by agreement with the owners.

Advertisement

“Nearly all of the nearby owners have been cooperative,” he said. “We don’t anticipate any court challenges.”

Peter Mills, executive director of the Maine Turnpike Authority, shown here in 2021 at the approach to the roundabout at the southern end of the Bernard Rines Bypass on Gorham’s South Street. Robert Lowell/American Journal, file

While Mills and municipal officials described the proposed route as the connector’s “specific location,” public feedback might bring slight changes.

“It could be tweaked a little,” said Tom Poirier, Gorham’s community development director. “We’re happy to be at the point to be getting public input.”

Scarborough Town Manager Tom Hall noted that over the past 18 months, meetings have been held with landowners, municipal officials, government agencies, transportation advocates and environmental stakeholders. Multiple memorandums of understanding have been signed, he said.

Advertisement

“Many good early conversations have taken place, and we now look forward to broadening the dialogue,” Hall said.

Despite previous conversations, opponents dispute the need and stated purpose of the connector, saying it contradicts efforts to encourage mass transit, reduce suburban sprawl and promote transportation with a smaller carbon footprint.

“Building a highway doesn’t solve traffic congestion,” said Jean Sideris, executive director of the Bicycle Coalition of Maine. “Building roads encourages people to drive and to drive more. You’re simply moving vehicles from one road to another.”

Sideris pointed to the work of the Maine Climate Council and its Transportation Working Group, which set a goal to reduce vehicle miles traveled 20% by 2030. In recent years they have increased, from 13.2 billion miles in 2020 to an estimated 14.8 billion in 2022, according to the council’s December report.

Sideris also noted the results of a recent Rapid Transit Study for Gorham, Westbrook and Portland that was issued in January by the Greater Portland Council of Governments. The study recommends a rapid bus service connecting the three communities, primarily via Main Street, Brighton Avenue and Congress Street.

Advertisement

“Investing in a regional rapid transit network is a key part of Greater Portland’s transportation future,” the study concluded. “Rapid transit is competitive with or better than driving, and convenient for many kinds of trips, throughout the day. Statewide, regional and local planning identifies transit investment as a key strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled.”

The Portland City Council passed a unanimous resolution in 2022 calling on the authority to halt work on the connector until the study was completed. The city didn’t respond Tuesday to a request for an update on the council’s position.

FOUR-LANE CONNECTION

Mills said the four-lane connector would allow mass transit to travel where it’s now impossible when two-lane roads are clogged. Two proposed interchanges would allow the connector to pass over County Road (Route 22) and under Running Hill Road before connecting with turnpike Exit 45, he said.

“The creation of this road makes additional public transit possible,” Mills said. “The connector itself would not be the cause of sprawl.”

Advertisement

GrowSmart Maine, an advocacy group that promotes policies and projects that balance economic and environmental interests, issued a board position statement on the connector proposal in 2022 that said traffic congestion requires a multiprong solution to multiple longtime causes.

“The (connector) proposal is a long-term investment, NOT a long-term solution,” the board said in 2022. “Maine can do better.”

The board called for land use planning that directs most new development to walkable districts in targeted growth areas and lays the groundwork for more mass transit options.

Following the route announcement this week, GrowSmart’s board will revisit its position to address many unanswered questions, said Nancy Smith, executive director.

“Will it really result in reduced traffic volumes on other roads or will it simply induce more traffic as often happens?” Smith said in an email. “How does additional roadway investment relate to the state’s climate goals? What about the impacts on groundwater and agricultural lands along that corridor?”

Advertisement

A variety of information about the project is featured on maineturnpike.com, including a background video, FAQs, project updates and an easy-to-access format for the public to comment and ask questions.

The public meeting in March will provide opportunities to learn about the project, ask questions and make comments. It also will be available online for people who cannot attend.


Use the form below to reset your password. When you’ve submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Advertisement

« Previous

Portland residents urge school board to increase resources for the district
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine’s leaders cannot turn the other cheek on gun violence | Opinion

Published

on

Maine’s leaders cannot turn the other cheek on gun violence | Opinion


Julie Smith of Readfield is a single parent whose son was in the Principles of Economics class at Brown University during the Dec. 13 shooting that resulted in the deaths of two students.

When classrooms become crime scenes, leadership is no longer measured by intentions or press statements. It is measured by outcomes—and by whether the people responsible for public safety are trusted and empowered to act without hesitation.

On December 13, 2025, a gunman opened fire during a review session for a Principles of Economics class at Brown University. Two students were murdered. Others were wounded. The campus was locked down as parents across the country waited for news no family should ever have to receive.

Maine was not watching from a distance.

Advertisement

My son, a recent graduate of a rural Maine high school, is a freshman at Brown. He was in that Principles of Economics class. He was not in the targeted study group—but students who sat beside him all semester were. These were not abstract victims. They were classmates and friends. Young people who should have been worried about finals, not hiding in lockdown, texting parents to say they were alive.

Despite the fact that the Brown shooting directly affected Maine families, Gov. Janet Mills offered no meaningful public acknowledgment of the tragedy. No recognition that Maine parents were among those grieving, afraid, and desperate for reassurance. In moments like these, acknowledgment matters. Silence is not neutral. It signals whose fear is seen—and whose is ignored. The violence at Brown is a Maine issue: our children are there. Our families are there. The fear, grief, and trauma do not stop at state lines.

The attack and what followed the attack deserve recognition. Law enforcement responded quickly, professionally, and courageously. Campus police, city officers, state police, and federal agents worked together to secure the campus and prevent further loss of life. Officers acted decisively because they understood their mission—and because they knew they would be supported for carrying it out.

That kind of coordination does not happen by accident. It depends on clear authority, mutual trust, and leadership that understands a basic truth: in moments of crisis, law enforcement must be free to work together immediately, without second-guessing.

Even when officers do everything right, the damage does not end when a campus is secured. Students return to classrooms changed—hyper-alert, distracted, scanning exits instead of absorbing ideas. Parents carry a constant, low-level dread, flinching at late-night calls and unknown numbers. Gun violence in schools does not just injure bodies; it fractures trust, rewires behavior, and leaves psychological scars that no statement or reassurance can undo.

Advertisement

That reality makes silence—and policy choices that undermine law enforcement—impossible to ignore.

After the Lewiston massacre in 2023, Governor Mills promised lessons would be learned—that warning signs would be taken seriously, mental-health systems strengthened, and public-safety coordination improved. Those promises mattered because Maine had already paid an unbearable price.

Instead of providing unequivocal support for law enforcement, the governor has taken actions that signal hesitation. Her decision to allow LD 1971 to become law is the latest example. The law introduces technical requirements that complicate inter-agency cooperation by emphasizing legal boundaries and procedural caution. Even when cooperation is technically “allowed,” the message to officers is unmistakable: slow down, worry about liability, protect yourself first.

In emergencies, that hesitation can cost lives. Hesitation by law enforcement in Providence could have cost my son his life. We cannot allow hesitation to become the precedent for Maine policies.

In 2025 alone, hundreds of gun-related incidents have occurred on K–12 and college campuses nationwide. This is not theoretical. This is the environment in which our children are expected to learn—and the reality Maine families carry with them wherever their children go.

Advertisement

My son worked his entire academic life—without wealth or legacy—for the chance to pursue higher education, believing it would allow him to return to Maine rather than leave it behind. Now he is asking a question no 18-year-old should have to ask: why come home to a state whose leaders hesitate to fully stand behind the people responsible for keeping him alive?

Maine’s leaders must decide whose side they are on when crisis strikes: the officers who run toward danger, or the politics that ask them to slow down first.

Parents are done with hollow promises. Students deserve leaders who show their support not with words—but with action.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Popular food truck grows into a ‘Maine-Mex’ restaurant in Bucksport 

Published

on

Popular food truck grows into a ‘Maine-Mex’ restaurant in Bucksport 


Cory LaForge always liked a particular restaurant space on Main Street in Bucksport, which recently housed My Buddy’s Place and the Friar’s Brewhouse Tap Room before that.

So much so that, when it became available two months ago, he decided to open his own restaurant there.

Salsa Shack Maine, which opened in early December, is a physical location for the food truck business he’s operated out of Ellsworth and Orland for the last two years. The new spot carrying tacos, burritos and quesadillas adds to a growing restaurant scene in Bucksport and is meant to be a welcoming community space.

Advertisement

“I just loved the feeling of having a smaller restaurant,” LaForge said. “It feels more intimate. This place is designed where you can have a good conversation or talk to your customers, like they’re not just another number on a ticket.”

Salsa Shack Maine joins a growing number of new restaurants on Main Street in Bucksport. Credit: Elizabeth Walztoni / BDN

After growing up in the midcoast, LaForge eventually moved west to work in restaurants at ski areas, where he was exposed to more cultural diversity and new types of food – including tacos.

“It’s like all these different flavors that we’re not exposed to in Maine, so it’s like, I feel like I’ve been living a lie my whole life,” he said. “It was fun to bring all those things that I learned back here.”

When he realized his goal of opening a food truck in 2023 after returning to Maine, LaForge found the trailer he’d purchased on Facebook Marketplace was too small to fit anything but tortillas – and the Salsa Shack was born.

It opened at the Ellsworth Harbor Park in 2023 and operated out of the Orland Community Center in the winter. What started as an experiment took off in popularity and has been busy ever since.

Advertisement

LaForge calls his style “Maine-Mex:” a mix of authentic street tacos in a build-your-own format with different salsas and protein. Speciality salsas include corn and black bean, roasted poblano, pineapple jalapeno and mango Tajin.

The larger kitchen space in the new restaurant has allowed a menu expansion to include quesadillas, burritos and burrito bowls in addition to the tacos, nachos and taco salad bowls sold from the food truck. Regular specials are also on the menu.

Salsa Shack’s new Bucksport kitchen means room for owner Cory LaForge to experiment. He’s added quesadillas, burritos and burrito bowls to the menu alongside regular specials, such as this shrimp taco. Credit: Elizabeth Walztoni / BDN

More new menu items are likely ahead, according to LaForge, along with a beer and wine license and expanded hours in the spring.

The food truck will live on for now, too; he’s signed up for a few events in the coming months.

Starting Jan. 6, the restaurant will also offer a buy-two-get-one-free “Taco Tuesday” promotion.

“It’s a really fun vibe here, and I feel like everyone finds it very comfortable and easy to come in and order,” LaForge said, comparing the restaurant’s atmosphere to the television show Cheers. “Even if you have to sit down and wait a little while, we always have some fun conversations going on.”

Advertisement

So far, the welcome has been warm locally, he said, both from residents and the other new restaurant owners who help each other out. LaForge’s sole employee, Connor MacLeod, is also a familiar face from MacLeod’s Restaurant, which closed in March after 45 years on Main Street.

When it shut its doors, people in town weren’t sure where they would go, according to LaForge. But four new establishments opened in 2025, offering a range from Thai food to diner offerings.

“It’s kind of fun to see so [many] culinary changes,” he said.

The Salsa Shack is currently open from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

A new Maine tax will have you paying more for Netflix after Jan. 1

Published

on

A new Maine tax will have you paying more for Netflix after Jan. 1


The logos for streaming services Netflix, Hulu, Disney Plus and Sling TV are pictured on a remote control on Aug. 13, 2020, in Portland, Ore. (Jenny Kane/Associated Press)

Maine consumers will soon see a new line on their monthly Netflix and Hulu bills. Starting Jan. 1, digital streaming services will be included in the state’s 5.5% sales tax.

The new charge — billed by the state as a way to level the playing field around how cable and satellite services and streaming services are taxed — is among a handful of tax changes coming in the new year.

The sales tax on adult-use cannabis will increase from 10% to 14%, also on Jan. 1. Taxes on cigarettes will increase $1.50 per pack — from $2 to $3.50 — on Jan. 5.

Advertisement

All three changes are part of the $320 million budget package lawmakers approved in June as an addition to the baseline $11.3 billion two-year budget passed in March.

Here are a few things to know about the streaming tax:

1. Why is this new tax taking effect?

Taxes on streaming services have been a long time coming in Maine. Former Republican Gov. Paul LePage proposed the idea in 2017, and it was pitched by Gov. Janet Mills, a Democrat, in 2020 and 2024. The idea was rejected all three times — until this year.

State officials said last spring the change creates fairness in the sales tax as streaming services become more popular and ubiquitous. It’s also expected to generate new revenue for the state.

Advertisement

2. What services are impacted?

Currently, music and movies that are purchased and downloaded from a website are subject to sales tax, but that same music and those same movies are not taxed when streamed online.

The new changes add sales tax to monthly subscriptions for movie, television and audio streaming services, including Netflix, Hulu, Disney Plus, Spotify and Pandora. Podcasts and ringtones or other sound recordings are also included.

3. How much is it likely to cost you?

The new tax would add less than $1 to a standard Netflix subscription without ads priced at $17.99 per month. An $89.99 Hulu live television subscription would increase by about $5 per month.

Advertisement

Beginning Jan. 1, providers will be required to state the amount of sales tax on customers’ receipts or state that their price includes Maine sales tax.

4. How much new revenue is this generating for the state?

The digital streaming tax is expected to bring in $5 million in new revenue in fiscal year 2026, which ends June 30. After that, it’s projected to bring in $12.5 million annually, with that figure expected to increase to $14.3 million by 2029.

The tax increase on cigarettes, which also includes an equivalent hike on other tobacco products, is expected to boost state revenues by about $75 million in the first year.

The cannabis sales tax increase, meanwhile, will be offset in part by a reduction in cannabis excise taxes, which are paid by cultivation facilities on transfers to manufacturers or retailers. The net increase in state revenue will be about $3.9 million in the first full year, the state projects.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending