Maine
Maine is at an impasse with towns that pass aquaculture restrictions
Towns up and down Maine’s coast have grappled for more than a decade with the changes that come with a growing aquaculture industry.
In the last several years, some have gone further, considering local ordinances meant to restrict state-issued leases for large aquaculture projects in their waters.
It has brought to the forefront tensions between traditional uses of Maine’s coast and the growth of aquaculture, an industry that has grown by about 2 percent annually for the last two decades and brings in more than $85 million in sales each year. It has also highlighted disagreements about which entity — the state or the municipality — has the authority over those uses, creating an ongoing impasse.
In Maine, the state Department of Marine Resources issues leases and licenses for various types of aquaculture projects, including oyster, scallop, mussel and fin fish farms. As part of that process, it accepts public comment and holds public hearings on the applications when residents request them, but makes the final decision on whether to grant a permit.
The department says it’s clear that state law gives it exclusive authority to lease coastal waters outside the intertidal zone, although towns can regulate shellfish harvesting inside that zone.
The agency’s website currently lists 149 active standard and experimental leases and 671 small, short-term limited purpose ones. Department data shows it has issued around 200 new limited purpose approvals yearly between 2017 and 2021, up from less than 50 a decade earlier.
But a statewide organization formed in 2020 believes that communities can control aquaculture projects off their shores and has been visiting towns for several years asking select boards to consider ordinances that restrict what it calls large-scale, industrial aquaculture projects.
Protect Maine’s Fishing Heritage Foundation argues that the state’s home rule laws give towns the right to control their coastal waters. It was among the groups that helped push back against the failed proposal by a Norwegian-backed company to start a large salmon farm in Frenchman Bay.
It now promises to cover any legal costs towns face if they enact an aquaculture ordinance provided by the foundation. Towns can also adjust that ordinance’s language to make different restrictions around whether leases are allowed, how big they can be and whether they require a local permit.
No towns have yet faced court challenges over their ordinances, and the state this week said it isn’t planning legal action against municipalities.
The towns of Cutler and Penobscot have approved permanent ordinances, while Waldoboro and Winter Harbor passed moratoriums that could be followed by ordinances.
Others have considered them or put in temporary moratoriums, including Damariscotta, Jonesport, Lubec and South Bristol, but stopped short of a vote. Some were concerned about opening themselves up to legal challenges.
Deer Isle voters were set to decide on such an ordinance at their annual town meeting this year, but local officials reversed course last week.
“This was a kind of roll out-roll back situation,” Town Manager Jim Fisher said.
The town’s legal counsel and the Maine Municipal Association warned Deer Isle about pursuing the rules due to conflicts with state policy, according to Fisher. The local marine resources committee later reversed its support. At a public hearing, some residents pushed back, while aquaculture lease holders said the current process is already lengthy. The Select Board unanimously withdrew the proposal.
Local officials might revisit the idea next year, Fisher said. But neighboring Stonington, which decided not to pursue the same ordinance two years ago, is less likely to, he said. The two towns try to keep the same marine resource policies.
It’s a different story in the nearby town of Penobscot, where aquaculture operations on the Bagaduce River, and the state leasing process for them, have long been controversial.
In 2024, voters approved an ordinance restricting leases, but the debate dates back more than 25 years, when residents formed the Bagaduce Watershed Association in 1999 because of their concerns about state aquaculture leases.
In 2023, the midcoast town of Waldoboro pushed for an even stricter version of the foundation’s ordinance, not allowing leases of any size on the Medomak River. Local officials were motivated by concerns that aquaculture would change conditions on the river and reduce soft shell clam populations or otherwise displace the roughly 150 clammers who make their living on the mudflats.
Advocates of aquaculture say it provides economic opportunity for working waterfronts and local communities. The heritage foundation agrees, Executive Director Crystal Canney said, but it only supports projects on a small, local scale.
“Maine is known for its independent working waterfront,” she said. “Large-scale aquaculture replaces that independent fishing model.”
Her foundation is focusing on individual towns because efforts to change state policy have been unsuccessful, she said. The foundation lists further concerns including department oversight of lease sites, potential environmental consequences of farming operations, sites owned by large, corporate operators outside of the country and what it sees as a lack of a long-term plan for Maine’s aquaculture future.
The Department of Marine Resources said it doesn’t plan legal action against any towns that adopt moratoriums or ordinances.
“State law is clear,” spokesperson Jeff Nichols said this week. “Under state law, the Commissioner of the Department of Marine Resources holds exclusive jurisdiction to lease lands in, on and under the coastal waters.”
The department has sent letters to towns saying as much, and said it’s working to expand its communication with towns about the leasing process. Nichols also said the public can give input on potential aquaculture sites. State decisions may require the lease holder to allow fishing onsite, and law says a lease can’t interfere with fishing or other local uses.
Maine
Maine’s leaders cannot turn the other cheek on gun violence | Opinion
Julie Smith of Readfield is a single parent whose son was in the Principles of Economics class at Brown University during the Dec. 13 shooting that resulted in the deaths of two students.
When classrooms become crime scenes, leadership is no longer measured by intentions or press statements. It is measured by outcomes—and by whether the people responsible for public safety are trusted and empowered to act without hesitation.
On December 13, 2025, a gunman opened fire during a review session for a Principles of Economics class at Brown University. Two students were murdered. Others were wounded. The campus was locked down as parents across the country waited for news no family should ever have to receive.
Maine was not watching from a distance.
My son, a recent graduate of a rural Maine high school, is a freshman at Brown. He was in that Principles of Economics class. He was not in the targeted study group—but students who sat beside him all semester were. These were not abstract victims. They were classmates and friends. Young people who should have been worried about finals, not hiding in lockdown, texting parents to say they were alive.
Despite the fact that the Brown shooting directly affected Maine families, Gov. Janet Mills offered no meaningful public acknowledgment of the tragedy. No recognition that Maine parents were among those grieving, afraid, and desperate for reassurance. In moments like these, acknowledgment matters. Silence is not neutral. It signals whose fear is seen—and whose is ignored. The violence at Brown is a Maine issue: our children are there. Our families are there. The fear, grief, and trauma do not stop at state lines.
The attack and what followed the attack deserve recognition. Law enforcement responded quickly, professionally, and courageously. Campus police, city officers, state police, and federal agents worked together to secure the campus and prevent further loss of life. Officers acted decisively because they understood their mission—and because they knew they would be supported for carrying it out.
That kind of coordination does not happen by accident. It depends on clear authority, mutual trust, and leadership that understands a basic truth: in moments of crisis, law enforcement must be free to work together immediately, without second-guessing.
Even when officers do everything right, the damage does not end when a campus is secured. Students return to classrooms changed—hyper-alert, distracted, scanning exits instead of absorbing ideas. Parents carry a constant, low-level dread, flinching at late-night calls and unknown numbers. Gun violence in schools does not just injure bodies; it fractures trust, rewires behavior, and leaves psychological scars that no statement or reassurance can undo.
That reality makes silence—and policy choices that undermine law enforcement—impossible to ignore.
After the Lewiston massacre in 2023, Governor Mills promised lessons would be learned—that warning signs would be taken seriously, mental-health systems strengthened, and public-safety coordination improved. Those promises mattered because Maine had already paid an unbearable price.
Instead of providing unequivocal support for law enforcement, the governor has taken actions that signal hesitation. Her decision to allow LD 1971 to become law is the latest example. The law introduces technical requirements that complicate inter-agency cooperation by emphasizing legal boundaries and procedural caution. Even when cooperation is technically “allowed,” the message to officers is unmistakable: slow down, worry about liability, protect yourself first.
In emergencies, that hesitation can cost lives. Hesitation by law enforcement in Providence could have cost my son his life. We cannot allow hesitation to become the precedent for Maine policies.
In 2025 alone, hundreds of gun-related incidents have occurred on K–12 and college campuses nationwide. This is not theoretical. This is the environment in which our children are expected to learn—and the reality Maine families carry with them wherever their children go.
My son worked his entire academic life—without wealth or legacy—for the chance to pursue higher education, believing it would allow him to return to Maine rather than leave it behind. Now he is asking a question no 18-year-old should have to ask: why come home to a state whose leaders hesitate to fully stand behind the people responsible for keeping him alive?
Maine’s leaders must decide whose side they are on when crisis strikes: the officers who run toward danger, or the politics that ask them to slow down first.
Parents are done with hollow promises. Students deserve leaders who show their support not with words—but with action.
Maine
Popular food truck grows into a ‘Maine-Mex’ restaurant in Bucksport
Cory LaForge always liked a particular restaurant space on Main Street in Bucksport, which recently housed My Buddy’s Place and the Friar’s Brewhouse Tap Room before that.
So much so that, when it became available two months ago, he decided to open his own restaurant there.
Salsa Shack Maine, which opened in early December, is a physical location for the food truck business he’s operated out of Ellsworth and Orland for the last two years. The new spot carrying tacos, burritos and quesadillas adds to a growing restaurant scene in Bucksport and is meant to be a welcoming community space.
“I just loved the feeling of having a smaller restaurant,” LaForge said. “It feels more intimate. This place is designed where you can have a good conversation or talk to your customers, like they’re not just another number on a ticket.”
After growing up in the midcoast, LaForge eventually moved west to work in restaurants at ski areas, where he was exposed to more cultural diversity and new types of food – including tacos.
“It’s like all these different flavors that we’re not exposed to in Maine, so it’s like, I feel like I’ve been living a lie my whole life,” he said. “It was fun to bring all those things that I learned back here.”
When he realized his goal of opening a food truck in 2023 after returning to Maine, LaForge found the trailer he’d purchased on Facebook Marketplace was too small to fit anything but tortillas – and the Salsa Shack was born.
It opened at the Ellsworth Harbor Park in 2023 and operated out of the Orland Community Center in the winter. What started as an experiment took off in popularity and has been busy ever since.
LaForge calls his style “Maine-Mex:” a mix of authentic street tacos in a build-your-own format with different salsas and protein. Speciality salsas include corn and black bean, roasted poblano, pineapple jalapeno and mango Tajin.
The larger kitchen space in the new restaurant has allowed a menu expansion to include quesadillas, burritos and burrito bowls in addition to the tacos, nachos and taco salad bowls sold from the food truck. Regular specials are also on the menu.

More new menu items are likely ahead, according to LaForge, along with a beer and wine license and expanded hours in the spring.
The food truck will live on for now, too; he’s signed up for a few events in the coming months.
Starting Jan. 6, the restaurant will also offer a buy-two-get-one-free “Taco Tuesday” promotion.
“It’s a really fun vibe here, and I feel like everyone finds it very comfortable and easy to come in and order,” LaForge said, comparing the restaurant’s atmosphere to the television show Cheers. “Even if you have to sit down and wait a little while, we always have some fun conversations going on.”
So far, the welcome has been warm locally, he said, both from residents and the other new restaurant owners who help each other out. LaForge’s sole employee, Connor MacLeod, is also a familiar face from MacLeod’s Restaurant, which closed in March after 45 years on Main Street.
When it shut its doors, people in town weren’t sure where they would go, according to LaForge. But four new establishments opened in 2025, offering a range from Thai food to diner offerings.
“It’s kind of fun to see so [many] culinary changes,” he said.
The Salsa Shack is currently open from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday.
Maine
A new Maine tax will have you paying more for Netflix after Jan. 1
Maine consumers will soon see a new line on their monthly Netflix and Hulu bills. Starting Jan. 1, digital streaming services will be included in the state’s 5.5% sales tax.
The new charge — billed by the state as a way to level the playing field around how cable and satellite services and streaming services are taxed — is among a handful of tax changes coming in the new year.
The sales tax on adult-use cannabis will increase from 10% to 14%, also on Jan. 1. Taxes on cigarettes will increase $1.50 per pack — from $2 to $3.50 — on Jan. 5.
All three changes are part of the $320 million budget package lawmakers approved in June as an addition to the baseline $11.3 billion two-year budget passed in March.
Here are a few things to know about the streaming tax:
1. Why is this new tax taking effect?
Taxes on streaming services have been a long time coming in Maine. Former Republican Gov. Paul LePage proposed the idea in 2017, and it was pitched by Gov. Janet Mills, a Democrat, in 2020 and 2024. The idea was rejected all three times — until this year.
State officials said last spring the change creates fairness in the sales tax as streaming services become more popular and ubiquitous. It’s also expected to generate new revenue for the state.
2. What services are impacted?
Currently, music and movies that are purchased and downloaded from a website are subject to sales tax, but that same music and those same movies are not taxed when streamed online.
The new changes add sales tax to monthly subscriptions for movie, television and audio streaming services, including Netflix, Hulu, Disney Plus, Spotify and Pandora. Podcasts and ringtones or other sound recordings are also included.
3. How much is it likely to cost you?
The new tax would add less than $1 to a standard Netflix subscription without ads priced at $17.99 per month. An $89.99 Hulu live television subscription would increase by about $5 per month.
Beginning Jan. 1, providers will be required to state the amount of sales tax on customers’ receipts or state that their price includes Maine sales tax.
4. How much new revenue is this generating for the state?
The digital streaming tax is expected to bring in $5 million in new revenue in fiscal year 2026, which ends June 30. After that, it’s projected to bring in $12.5 million annually, with that figure expected to increase to $14.3 million by 2029.
The tax increase on cigarettes, which also includes an equivalent hike on other tobacco products, is expected to boost state revenues by about $75 million in the first year.
The cannabis sales tax increase, meanwhile, will be offset in part by a reduction in cannabis excise taxes, which are paid by cultivation facilities on transfers to manufacturers or retailers. The net increase in state revenue will be about $3.9 million in the first full year, the state projects.
-
World1 week agoHamas builds new terror regime in Gaza, recruiting teens amid problematic election
-
Indianapolis, IN1 week agoIndianapolis Colts playoffs: Updated elimination scenario, AFC standings, playoff picture for Week 17
-
Business1 week agoGoogle is at last letting users swap out embarrassing Gmail addresses without losing their data
-
Southeast1 week agoTwo attorneys vanish during Florida fishing trip as ‘heartbroken’ wife pleads for help finding them
-
Politics1 week agoMost shocking examples of Chinese espionage uncovered by the US this year: ‘Just the tip of the iceberg’
-
News1 week agoRoads could remain slick, icy Saturday morning in Philadelphia area, tracking another storm on the way
-
World1 week agoPodcast: The 2025 EU-US relationship explained simply
-
News1 week agoMarijuana rescheduling would bring some immediate changes, but others will take time