Connecticut
Judge rules experts can’t say who hired them in CT state trooper’s manslaughter trial
The trial against Connecticut State Police trooper Brian North, who faces a manslaughter charge in the deadly shooting of Mubarak Soulemane in 2020, continued Monday with a ruling that will bar the defense from mentioning that two experts expected to testify Tuesday were initially consulted by the state when they gave opinions that the trooper’s actions were justified.
Inspector General Robert Devlin, Jr. argued that it would be “unfair” to associate the experts with the state at this point, as they were initially consulted by Middlesex State’s Attorney Michael Gailor before the Office of Inspector General was created in 2021, at which time Devlin took over all officer-involved shooting and in-custody death investigations.
“I disagree with that opinion and their conclusion,” Devlin argued, adding that who initially hired the experts is “just not a material fact.”
Following his investigation into the Jan. 15, 2020, shooting on Campbell Avenue in West Haven, Devlin concluded that North’s actions were not justified, going against the opinions of the experts hired by Gailor. North, 33, faces one count of first-degree manslaughter with a firearm.
Monday marked the sixth day of the trial in the Ansonia-Milford Judicial District Courthouse and the second in which North’s attorney, Bridgeport-based Lawyer Frank Riccio, has presented a defense. Riccio called a Connecticut State Police instructor to the stand Monday and told Judge H. Gordon Hall that he made every effort to get his last two witnesses for Monday’s testimony but that their travel made it impossible.
Riccio is expected to rest his defense once the jury hears from two experts who previously said they believe North was justified when he fired seven shots at Soulemane, who was 19 when he led police in Norwalk on a pursuit after displaying a knife in an AT&T store and stealing a Hyundai Sonata from a Lyft driver. Norwalk officers called off their pursuit on Route 7 before state police began pursuing the Sonata on Interstate 95 upon being incorrectly told the driver was involved in a carjacking.
Following a high-speed chase that involved multiple collisions, the Sonata got off I-95 on Exit 43 in West Haven, where Soulemane struck a Chevrolet Trailblazer and was found unresponsive when he was partially boxed in by state police cruisers just after 5 p.m. State police troopers, including North, and an officer from West Haven surrounded the vehicle before the West Haven officer smashed the passenger side window.
Soulemane — whose family testified earlier in the trial that the teen suffered from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and appeared to be undergoing a psychiatric episode — then woke up and began reaching for a serrated kitchen knife in his waistband. North, who was positioned at the driver’s side of the car with his gun drawn, testified Friday that the teen raised the knife and that he believed the West Haven officer had begun entering the vehicle, prompting him to fire his weapon.
CT state trooper takes stand in trial, defends fatal shooting of teen. It escalated to ‘lethal force’
Speaking on the motion to suppress on Tuesday, Riccio argued that it’s always customary when experts are brought in to inquire about who contacted them and if they are being paid to testify.
“That’s standard operating procedure when we speak to any expert,” Riccio argued.
Mentioning that the experts were initially consulted by Gailor speaks to the issue of “credibility and bias” with expert witnesses and would illustrate that, if they had any bias in the matter, it likely would have been skewed toward the prosecutor who initially hired them and not the defense, Riccio added.
“The state of Connecticut hired them,” Riccio said. “Attorney Devlin is a representative of the state of Connecticut.”
“I had nothing to do with hiring these people,” Devlin said.
“There’s a prejudicial aspect to this,” Devlin continued.
In hearing the motion, Hall said a number of things have happened since the experts were initially consulted, including the arrest of his client, and that ultimately it was the decision by the defense to retain them for testimony.
“I don’t see the relevance really of what happened before that,” Hall said.
“I think it’s completely relevant,” Riccio countered.
“I think the relevance is marginal at best,” Hall said, ruling in favor of the state.
Riccio earlier in the day had called Connecticut State Police Trooper Craig Brezniak to the stand to testify about training he had given North. Brezniak has worked as an instructor with the police academy and serves as a coordinator with the Connecticut State Police Tactical Team — which includes troopers with specialized training who respond to potentially hostile situations.
Brezniak began training North for the team in November 2019, after he applied to join. Brezniak testified that firearm instruction was included in the training dealing specifically with, among other things, barriers.
Barriers like windows, doors and walls can affect the trajectory of a bullet, Brezniak testified, adding that tactical team members are generally trained to shoot a hole in barriers before believing that the bullet’s path will be uninterrupted.
During cross-examination, Devlin inquired as to whether state police conduct any firearm training involving one- or two-round drills. Brezniak said yes and was interrupted by Devlin when he attempted to elaborate.
“That’s a yes or no answer, sir,” said Devlin, who has criticized several aspects surrounding the response by police once they found Soulemane unresponsive, including North’s decision not only to fire but to discharge seven rounds.
Brezniak later clarified that low-round drills are usually done for budgetary reasons in instances where the training is focused on something like drawing a weapon and does not require numerous rounds to be fired. Brezniak said he conducted drills with North that included up to 10 rounds being discharged.
The trial is expected to continue Tuesday at 10 a.m. with Riccio’s last two witnesses before he rests his defense.
Connecticut
Police ask for public’s help after deadly pedestrian crash in Newtown
Newtown police are asking for the public’s help and looking for a commercial vehicle that may have been in the area of a deadly pedestrian crash Thursday night.
The police department responded to Hawleyville Road near the exit 9 westbound off-ramp around 6:15 p.m.
Police are looking for anyone who may have seen a commercial vehicle parked on the side of the road in front of Papa Al’s shopping center.
“We appreciate everyone’s assistance by staying clear of the area until the investigation is complete,” police said in a statement.
Authorities said a person died in the crash, but their identity wasn’t immediately made available.
The road is closed until further notice, and the crash remains under investigation.
Anyone who witnessed the crash is asked to contact police at 203-426-5841.
Connecticut
Opinion: Housing vouchers are CT’s strongest housing policy, and best tool vs. Washington dysfunction
While much has been shared about the disastrous consequences of Gov. Ned Lamont’s veto of the housing omnibus bill, H.B. 5002 (see here, here, here, and here for some highlights), there is one area of housing policy where Connecticut is leading the charge: housing vouchers.
Connecticut is one of only a handful of states to have their own state-funded housing voucher program. While most of the country relies solely on the distribution of federal Section 8 housing vouchers (which only one in every four eligible households can access due to underfunding), for the past four decades Connecticut has stepped up to expand rental assistance to our most vulnerable populations through our Rental Assistance Program (RAP). The program is still going strong: in the most recent budget, the General Assembly approved $6.7 million in Fiscal Year 27 to create more than 400 new vouchers. We have a history of taking care of our people when federal dollars fall short.
Now, with federal funding more uncertain than ever, Connecticut is one of the best poised states to step in and step up to keep our families in their homes. As the Trump Administration has threatened housing stability for voucher recipients — through the government shut down, drastic proposed budget cuts, and new proposed work requirements — Connecticut doesn’t need to scramble to implement new emergency programs. We can build out our existing infrastructure to provide a safety net for the casualties of this administration’s cruelty.
What exactly is the Rental Assistance Program? It helps very low-income families afford safe, decent housing in the private market. Participants locate a private rental home — from apartments to single family homes — and arrange for the landlord to accept rental assistance payments. Rental assistance is a subsidy, not a free ride. Families making up to 50% of Area Median Income, or between $35K-$43K for a three-person household, will pay up to 40% of their monthly income in rent (30% for elderly and disabled tenants) and the state makes up the difference between what the family can afford and what the private market charges. (See pschousing.org for an explainer on the differences between federal and state housing vouchers.)
When it comes to housing, other states face a difficult choice: let their residents face eviction and homelessness, or build the plane as they fly it by creating new programs, funding streams, and bureaucracies while in crisis.
Connecticut is prepared and doesn’t need to face this impossible choice. It’s simple: mobilize and fund our existing Rental Assistance Program to keep families safe and stably housed.
Our most urgent first step is to mitigate the impacts of the government shutdown. Current funding for Section 8 vouchers is estimated to last until the end of November – then public housing authorities are on their own. The governor and General Assembly can lead in their upcoming special session by providing funding for the Department of Housing to cover the gaps.
An eviction can follow a family and make it impossible for them to find housing for years to come. Evictions as a result of the federal government reneging on their rental agreement are deeply unfair to voucher holders who have consistently paid 30% of their income in rent. It would be a mistake to allow a wave of evictions and homelessness to move forward during a temporary shutdown when we have the tools and the funds to step in.
Connecticut’s policymakers can plan ahead for how to best deploy our Rental Assistance Program to mitigate a future housing crisis from Washington:
Connecticut has the opportunity to be a housing leader. No one deserves to be evicted because of dysfunctional federal policies, and we can and should stand up for our neighbors. We urge our state leaders to not forget their most powerful tool in this fight — state housing vouchers.
Alysha Gardner of New Haven is senior policy analyst for Hartford-based Partnership for Strong Communities.
Connecticut
CT election night recap: Democrats win big, mirroring national results
Democrats won big in Tuesday’s municipal elections in Connecticut, holding on to mayoral offices in Stamford, New Haven and Danbury and knocking out incumbent Republicans in Ansonia and Stratford, according to unofficial vote tallies.
The results came amid other Democratic wins elsewhere in the country.
In New York City’s closely-watched mayor’s race, Zohran Mamdani beat former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who ran as an independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa. In California, Democrats passed a gerrymandering proposition that would allow them to carve out additional blue seats.
Here’s a look at where some Connecticut’s key municipal races stand Wednesday morning:
Democratic incumbents in Stamford, Danbury and New Haven each fended off Republican mayoral challengers Tuesday night.
Voters also granted a second term to Danbury Mayor Roberto Alves, who scored a win over Republican Emile G Buzaid with 59.06% of the vote.
In New Haven, incumbent Mayor Justin Elicker handily defeated Republican Steven Orosco, a former MMA fighter, with 77.43% of the vote. The win continues Democrats’ control of the city that dates to the Eisenhower administration.
A handful of races remained either too close to call Wednesday morning or lacked results.
In Easton, the secretary of the state’s unofficial results showed Republican Dan Lent leading Democrat Nicholas D’Addario by just six votes in the race for the first selectman’s office.
In East Hartford, where Republican Salema Davis and Connor Martin are vying for the mayor’s office, no results have been reported, according to the secretary of the state.
Tuesday night saw a few upsets with incumbents knocked from their seats.
In Ansonia, Republican Mayor David S. Cassetti lost to Democrat Frank Tyszka, who secured 57.96% of the vote.
In Stratford, incumbent Republican Laura R. Hoydick lost to Democrat David Chess.
Neighboring Milford also saw a Republican incumbent defeated by a Democrat, with voters backing Rich Smith over the incumbent, Tony Giannattasio.
-
Milwaukee, WI1 week agoLongtime anchor Shannon Sims is leaving Milwaukee’s WTMJ-TV (Channel 4)
-
Culture1 week agoVideo: Dissecting Three Stephen King Adaptations
-
Austin, TX1 day agoHalf-naked woman was allegedly tortured and chained in Texas backyard for months by five ‘friends’ who didn’t ‘like her anymore’
-
Seattle, WA1 week agoFOX 13’s Aaron Levine wins back-to-back Jeopardy! episodes
-
Seattle, WA5 days agoESPN scoop adds another intriguing name to Seahawks chatter before NFL trade deadline
-
Education1 week agoOpinion | New York City Mayoral Candidates: Who Would Be Best?
-
San Diego, CA1 week agoAdd Nick Hundley, Ruben Niebla to list of Padres’ managerial finalists
-
Business1 week ago
Disneyland Resort lays off 100 people in Anaheim