Connect with us

Connecticut

How a proposed bill can increase access to diapers in Connecticut

Published

on

How a proposed bill can increase access to diapers in Connecticut



Olha Yarynich, Contributing Photographer

Parents break down in front of pediatricians as they explain how a lack of diapers exacerbates stress. Families travel more than an hour by car to reach a diaper bank in New Haven. A father feels lost about how to supply his daughters’ diapers for the next month. 

These are just some of the effects of the current diaper crisis in Connecticut — even with current initiatives like diaper banks, individuals struggle to provide a consistent supply of diapers for their children. 

Advertisement

However, in late January 2025, Connecticut lawmakers introduced House Bill 6397, aiming to expand Medicaid coverage to include diapers for children from birth to age 3 when deemed medically necessary. The impact this bill has on families across the state, including in New Haven, is transformative.

“Looking at it from a basic needs standpoint, diaper access represents a huge financial burden for many of our families that are on Medicaid,” Dr. Maryallen Flaherty-Hewitt, professor of pediatrics at the School of Medicine, told the News. “This bill will have a long term positive impact on the growth and development of our infants into being healthy toddlers and children. It can also help our families to have some financial freedom to spend money in other ways.”

What is the diaper disparity?

For many families across the country, diapers represent a critical yet overlooked necessity. According to Flaherty-Hewitt, infrequent diaper changes can cause patches of inflamed skin to develop on babies. Additionally, a lack of regular diaper changes increases the risk of urinary tract infections, which affect any part of the urinary system.

The medical ramifications of a lack of diapers affect the mother’s health as well. 

Advertisement

“In 2013, there was a study done that was published in the Journal of Pediatrics that showed the highest correlation between maternal depression and stress in moms and diaper need,” Janet Alfano, the executive director of the Diaper Bank of Connecticut, said. “This is a recurring stressor that’s going to happen every few hours over the first three years of your baby’s life, and it can interfere with what would be normal bonding with one’s child and how you feel about yourself as a parent.”

Diaper disparities also exacerbate economic hardships on a family. Many childcare centers will not accept children whose parents do not provide diapers, even if they rely on subsidized health care. This leads to parents not being able to go to work to care for their children, missing at times four days of work a week. Alfano points out that this leads to an average loss of $6,000 in wages.

To put diaper costs in perspective, most infants need diaper changes every two hours, leading to an average of 10 diapers per day. Most parents need 700 to 1000 diapers a year, waning off each year as the child becomes more independent. That means $60-$100 just for diapers each month. 

For families who earn low incomes or qualify for Medicaid, the cost is a significant barrier for diaper access. Alfano indicates that with costs of the basic needs like diapers rising, the income stagnancy forces families to improvise.

Ella Thomas, a missionary at Mt. Bethel Baptist Church, points out that some individuals are also forced to make harsh economic decisions; some have to decide between buying food and buying diapers or buying gas and buying diapers. 

Advertisement

Across the country, about one in three families struggle with access to diapers. In Connecticut, it’s one in two families. According to Flaherty-Hewitt, the issue of diaper disparity access goes beyond just concerning caregivers and parents.

“I believe this issue is important to everybody, because there’s so many things downstream that diaper disparities can affect,” Flaherty-Hewitt said. “What may seem insignificant, is not insignificant as a lack of access to diapers can have long-term impacts on the growth of that child. It should be, as a group, we want to make sure that our next generation is healthy and developing well. And it may not seem like diapers are associated with that, but they really are.”

How the diaper disparity is currently being addressed

One of the ways New Haven is addressing this need is through the hospital’s diaper distribution programs. Flaherty-Hewitt told the News that pediatricians and nurses at the Yale New Haven Hospital will keep a supply of diapers for patients and their families in their offices. Physicians also hold diaper drives across the hospital and the School of Medicine twice a year to drive up diaper supply.

Another way the city is addressing the growing need is through the expansion of diaper banks. The Diaper Bank of Connecticut partners with over 100 shelters, social service agencies and health clinics to distribute free diapers to families. The Diaper Bank helps nearly 7,000 families access diapers. One of the bank’s partners is Mt. Bethel Missionary Church in New Haven, which serves more than 200 babies every fourth Saturday of the month. 

Advertisement

“It’s the role of the church to do anything that we can,” Thomas said. “That’s one of the things we believe we are commissioned to do, was to help somebody. So if there’s a need, we’re supposed to address it as a church.”

According to Alfano, the bank only serves 7 percent of the diaper needs in the state. In her opinion, the most effective way to address the diaper care disparity is through enacting state-wide policies. Currently though, the only “policy” available is $75,000 from the state budget to an array of organizations, from faith-based to family resource centers, that act as diaper banks for their communities. Also, state Medicaid already provides diapers to children above the age of 3 for medical conditions.

However, Flaherty-Hewitt points out that local initiatives to expand diaper access are only short-term solutions to a systemic problem. According to Thomas, the demand for diapers increases each year, as more and more families come to the church for diapers. Additionally, the cost of other essentials like diaper wipes and creams adds another layer of financial strain for struggling families.

“They’ll look at a baby and say, Oh, she’s cute, or he’s cute, but they don’t think that that baby might be in need. People, to me, don’t see children as people,” Thomas said. “They’re not little people, they’re people within themselves, and they have to be taken care of.”

The bill

Advertisement

In past years, there were bill proposals inspired by community organizations like the Diaper Bank meant to democratize access to diapers. Initially, these organizations tried to allow everyone on Medicaid to receive diapers from the state; however, that was simply too costly for some lawmakers.

The new bill proposal filed by the Human Services Committee is more conservative. The bill states that for families on Medicaid to access diapers, a doctor needs to determine whether or not the diaper is medically necessary. This includes when the child is having a persistent diaper rash or if there’s a neurological condition that inhibits a child’s ability to use the restroom normally. 

“We [The Diaper Bank of Connecticut] had some discussions with the Department of Social Services to get this bill to happen,” Alfano said. “We’re only scratching the surface with this bill but we’re happy we at least get some language from policymakers they’re interested in this issue.”

Alfano is relieved that the diaper disparity in Connecticut is receiving more attention and that there is more support among the bill than last year. Lawmakers in Connecticut and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid are especially interested in enacting this bill. 

However, as Alfano suggests, this bill does not provide preventative care as the state only assumes responsibility if a medical condition already arises. It does not address the root cause of the diaper need itself. Thomas and Flaherty-Hewitt believe there should be no medical necessity requirement for diapers, as the diapers represent a medical necessity on their own. 

Advertisement

“Pediatrics, as a field, has been focused on trying to be less reactionary and more preventative,” Flaherty-Hewitt said. “I would hate for the medical necessity to be, ‘this baby has a really bad diaper rash because they didn’t have enough diapers, and now we can give them more diapers.’”

In addition, with the federal government threatening to make cuts to Medicaid, Alfano is worried that the bill might fail to pass for a third consecutive year. The estimated annual cost for the state is $119.9 million; and with federal reimbursements from Medicaid, the state’s share could be reduced to only $59.9 million.

Alfano told the News that to help move this bill forward, lawmakers may need to understand the specific impacts of diaper disparities in their communities.

“Throughout the legislative session up until June, hearing from folks in the community about why this is critical and what it means to your community, whether you have children or not, is incredibly important,” Alfano said.

The Mt. Bethel Missionary Baptist Church is located at 100 Webster St.

Advertisement


FAREED SALMON

Advertisement


Fareed Salmon covers Community Health & Policy for the SciTech desk. From Richmond, TX, he’s a sophomore in Jonathan Edwards College majoring in History.

Advertisement





Source link

Connecticut

Watch New Canaan vs. Cheshire in Connecticut Class L football championship: Live stream

Published

on

Watch New Canaan vs. Cheshire in Connecticut Class L football championship: Live stream


New Canaan faces Cheshire in the 2025 Connecticut high school Class L football state championship on Saturday afternoon.

The game begins at 4 p.m. EST on Saturday, Dec. 13, at Veterans Stadium in New Britain, Connecticut.

The game will stream live on the NFHS Network.

High school football championships on NFHS Network

Advertisement

Watch high school sports anywhere from wherever you are.

WATCH NOW

What: Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) Class L football championship

Who: New Canaan vs. Cheshire

When: Saturday, Dec. 13, 2025

Advertisement

Where: Veterans Stadium in New Britain, Connecticut

Time: 4 p.m. EST

Stream: NFHS Network

Tickets: $11,50

Record, MaxPrep state rankings: New Canaan 12-0, No. 1; Cheshire 9-3, No. 11

Advertisement

Here’s more information about the game from the Hartford Courant, via the Tribune News Service:

New Canaan is going for its 16th state title and fourth straight under veteran coach Lou Marinelli and New Canaan outscored its playoff opponents, 85-13. Cheshire’s last finals appearance was 2009, when coach Don Drust was an assistant for the Rams’ team, which beat Staples in overtime to win a Class LL title. Cheshire rallied from a 19-point deficit against Fairfield Ludlowe to win the Class L quarterfinal game and beat Ridgefield 21-0 in the semifinals. QB Aiden Gregorich’s pass to Liam Suomala proved to be the game-winning touchdown with 10 seconds left in the quarterfinal.

What is the NFHS Network?

The NFHS Network covers more than 30 sports across the country. NFHS Network costs $13.99 per month or $79.99 per year.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Could mini-liquor bottles be banned in Connecticut?

Published

on

Could mini-liquor bottles be banned in Connecticut?


Have you still seen a lot of mini-liquor bottles, littering the streets in Connecticut?

Members of one environmental group said they still see them, and believe a ban is the best way to solve a multi-tiered problem.

State data shows in the past 12 months, ending September 30, there were more than 93 million mini-liquor bottles sold in our state.

The group supporting local bans says it’s not just the litter, but also the fact mini-liquor bottles are easy to conceal and consume on the job, in the car, or at school.

Advertisement

The group “Connecticut Towns Nixing the Nip” met this week, working on strategies to get a legislative hearing on the issue in the upcoming 2026 session.

Right now, stores collect a 5-cent surcharge for every mini-liquor bottle sold, resulting in about $5 million annually for town and city environmental cleanup efforts.

Town funding from nip sales

Average revenue per year 2021 to 2025.

Advertisement

“Having talked to a number of towns, well a few towns, they like the money, said Tom Metzner, a member of the group. “It’s fairly broad in how it can be used. It’s environmental. It doesn’t have to be used for cleaning up nips. And so the towns have become somewhat silent on the issue of banning nips.”

The group cited Chelsea, Massachusetts, where minis are banned, both litter and alcohol related EMS calls decreased.

The Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of Connecticut, which devised the “nickel per nip” program, said banning the mini-liquor bottles would be unprecedented.

Instead, it said the environmental group should be challenging municipalities to prove they actually use the money for cleanup.

Legislative leaders suggested several years ago the way to really do this is to have a redemption program for mini liquor bottles, and now, that could be possible.

Advertisement

At least one state with the Clynk bottle collection program has redeemed mini-liquor bottles for cash.

The company just announced a major expansion in our state, but it told us it is not aware of a redemption program for mini-liquor bottles here any time soon.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

National trust in the federal government is low. CT residents agree

Published

on

National trust in the federal government is low. CT residents agree


National trust in the federal government is at some of its lowest levels in nearly seven decades, and many Connecticut residents fall in line with that belief, a survey found.

New data from the Pew Research Center found only 17% of Americans believe that what the government does is right either “just about always” or “most of the time,” hitting one of the lowest points Pew has seen since first asking this question in 1958. And according to a DataHaven survey, Connecticut residents trust the federal government less than state or local institutions.

While these are some of the lowest polling numbers seen in American history, national trust in the federal government has been on the decline for decades. Public trust initially dropped in the 1960s and ’70s during the Vietnam War from a near 80% but began rising again in the 1980s into the early ’90s. Trust peaked again after 9/11 before falling.

Advertisement

The DataHaven survey found that of all Connecticut residents surveyed, only 9% trust the federal government “a great deal” to look out for the best interests of them and their family. About 28% trust the federal government “a fair amount.”

Federal government trust among Connecticut residents was at its highest in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the federal stimulus programs and child tax credit were active.

The DataHaven survey also asked about trust in local and state government. Connecticut residents generally trust these institutions more than they trust the federal government, the survey found.

Trust in the local governments was higher than trust in both state and federal, with 67% of residents surveyed trusting their local government “a great deal” or “a fair amount.”

Advertisement

And when it came to state government, 61% of residents trust the state “a great deal” or “a fair amount.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending