Connect with us

Connecticut

Governor sets fiscal line, mayors demand reset

Published

on

Governor sets fiscal line, mayors demand reset


A coalition of five Connecticut mayors, including New Haven’s Justin Elicker, called for more funding for urban schools after Governor Lamont opened the 2025 legislative session in Hartford last week.


Zachary Suri

2:49 am, Jan 15, 2025

Staff Reporter

Advertisement


Olha Yarynich, Contributing Photographer

The 2025 legislative session in Hartford began last week with obvious disagreement over the state’s fiscal guardrails. Governor Ned Lamont made his support for strict adherence to spending limits clear.   

“We have broken the bad habits of the past when we habitually put more and more costs on the taxpayers’ credit card for our children to pay down,” Lamont told legislators in his annual State of the State address. “We have freed up hundreds of millions of dollars in our budget to expand access to affordable childcare, affordable healthcare, and expanded education opportunities. And we are just getting started.”

Advertisement

Last Wednesday, Lamont opened the legislative session praising Connecticut’s steps toward financial stability in the address. Five days later, mayors and superintendents of the state’s five largest cities, including New Haven, demanded a larger state contribution to urban public schools — regardless of fiscal guardrails — in a press conference at the capitol. That same afternoon, leaders of both chambers of the General Assembly held a joint press conference declaring education and affordable housing funds a priority this session.

While Lamont expressed a shared interest in expanding social policy and urged legislators to prioritize early childhood care, gender diversity in teaching and support for public higher education, he did not call for the state to push the limits of its constitutionally imposed fiscal guardrails to provide greater funding for public education. 

On Monday, Mayor Justin Elicker — joined by Superintendent Madeline Negrón and the mayors and superintendents of Bridgeport, Hartford, Waterbury and Stamford — called for the state to do just that. 

At Monday’s press conference, they asked the state to increase education funding by $545 million, an increase which would likely require loosening the state’s spending limits. 

“We’re here to call on an increase in state funding,” Elicker said. “We come together as the mayors of the five largest municipalities and the superintendents of the five largest municipalities to call on the state to loosen the fiscal guardrails to ensure that we can pay for that funding.”

Advertisement

In particular, Elicker asked Connecticut to increase its set amount of $11,525 in state funding per student, a number which has not changed since 2013, even as inflation skyrocketed and municipalities raised taxes to increase their fiscal contribution to public education. New Haven alone has increased its contribution by 50 percent over the last five years, Elicker said.

Urban districts in the state support significantly larger numbers of high-need students, Elicker added, even as they spend less per student than the state average due to lower property tax revenue. 

An hour and a half later in the same legislative office building, another unprecedented press conference took place two rooms over. Senate and House leaders held a joint press conference announcing priority legislation to address education funding needs and support affordable housing in the state. 

Senate Bill 1 this session will address the state’s dire education funding needs, Senate President and New Haven Senator Martin Looney announced at the press conference. 

“We all know that we need to do all that we can to increase resources for our entire education system,” Looney said.

Advertisement

Looney echoed the cities’ call for an increase in the state’s contribution to the Education Cost Sharing program which redistributes tax revenue to high-need districts and emphasized the need to address disparities in special education funding. 

In September, Looney expressed concern that state investments in New Haven Public Schools facilities were being squandered by the district’s failure to complete routine maintenance. On Monday, Looney insisted that increased funding must come with increased oversight.

“We know that taxpayer investments directly benefit students, but the taxpayers need to have confidence that those investments are well placed and well spent in all of the municipalities that are justifiably clamoring for more funds,” Looney said.

House Speaker Matt Ritter insisted that increases in education funding could be made without major adjustments to the state’s fiscal guardrails, but admitted that he and Looney are open to “minor modifications” in the spending limits.

Asked about the mayors and superintendents’ proposal, Ritter made clear that the numbers were likely to change. 

Advertisement

“I look forward to reviewing their proposal,” he told reporters. “They tend to ask on the high end, and we’ll work through it.”

For many, the fiscal guardrails are likely to be the dominant issue in the next year. Vincent Mauro Jr., chair of the New Haven Democratic Town Committee, called it the “biggest issue” of the year. 

Joe DeLong, executive director of the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, told the News that education funding was a top priority of his organization this session. He views an increase in the state’s contribution to the Education Cost Sharing program as essential to preventing property tax increases. Connecticut already has some of the highest property taxes in the country. 

“I’m a supporter of the guardrails,” DeLong said. “I just think they’re not sacrosanct. I don’t think that you should completely get rid of them, but they’re something that you have to analyze and continue to grow with the state.”

While the governor is clearly wary of adjustments to the guardrails, DeLong predicted that the legislature would come to a compromise.

Advertisement

“He’s afraid of opening the door a crack and it turning into the flood waters coming in. But I think ultimately, what’s going to happen through the course of the session is the governor will modify his position on the guardrails a little bit, the legislature will still work to protect them, and we’ll probably come out of the session with still having the fiscal guardrails, but just having some slight adjustments to them that make them more workable,” DeLong said. “The work lies ahead.”

Lamont, a Democrat, was first elected governor of Connecticut in 2018. 

Interested in getting more news about New Haven? Join our newsletter!

Advertisement


ZACHARY SURI


Advertisement

Zachary Suri is a staff reporter covering New Haven City Hall and Education & Youth Services. He previously served as associate beat reporter for state politics. Originally from Austin, TX, he is a sophomore in Morse College majoring in history.





Source link

Advertisement

Connecticut

Ecuadorian national with manslaughter conviction sentenced for illegally reentering United States through Connecticut

Published

on

Ecuadorian national with manslaughter conviction sentenced for illegally reentering United States through Connecticut


NEW HAVEN, CT. (WFSB) – An Ecuadorian national with a manslaughter conviction was sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison for illegally reentering the United States through Connecticut after being deported.

40-year-old Darwin Francisco Quituizaca-Duchitanga was sentenced and had used the aliases Darwin Duchitanga-Quituizaca and Juan Mendez-Gutierrez.

U.S. Border Patrol first encountered Quituizaca in December 2003, when he used the alias Juan Mendez-Gutierrez and claimed to be a Mexican citizen. He was issued a voluntary return to Mexico.

Connecticut State Police arrested him in March 2018 on charges related to a fatal crash on I-91 in North Haven in March 2017. He was using the alias Darwin Duchitanga-Quituizaca at the time.

Advertisement

ICE arrested him on an administrative warrant in Meriden in August 2018 while he was awaiting trial in his state case. An immigration judge ordered his removal to Ecuador in September 2018, but he was transferred to state custody to face pending charges.

Quituizaca was convicted of second-degree manslaughter in January 2019 and sentenced to 30 months in prison.

After his release, ICE arrested him again on an administrative warrant in Meriden in August 2023. He was removed to Ecuador the next month.

ICE arrested Quituizaca again on a warrant in Meriden on June 28th, 2025, after he illegally reentered the United States. He pleaded guilty to unlawful reentry on July 30th.

He has been detained since his arrest. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigated the case.

Advertisement

The case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative by the Department of Justice to combat illegal immigration and transnational criminal organizations.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Justice Department sues Connecticut and Arizona as part of effort to get voter data from the states

Published

on

Justice Department sues Connecticut and Arizona as part of effort to get voter data from the states


HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Officials in Connecticut and Arizona are defending their decision to refuse a request by the U.S. Justice Department for detailed voter information, after their states became the latest to face federal lawsuits over the issue.

“Pound sand,” Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes posted on X, saying the release of the voter records would violate state and federal law.

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division announced this week it was suing Connecticut and Arizona for failing to comply with its requests, bringing to 23 the number of states the department has sued to obtain the data. It also has filed suit against the District of Columbia.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said the department will “continue filing lawsuits to protect American elections,” saying accurate voter rolls are the ”foundation of election integrity.”

Advertisement

Secretaries of state and state attorneys general who have pushed back against the effort say it violates federal privacy law, which protects the sharing of individual data with the government, and would run afoul of their own state laws that restrict what voter information can be released publicly. Some of the data the Justice Department is seeking includes names, dates of birth, residential addresses, driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers.

Other requests included basic questions about the procedures states use to comply with federal voting laws, while some have been more state-specific. They have referenced perceived inconsistencies from a survey from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

Most of the lawsuits target states led by Democrats, who have said they have been unable to get a firm answer about why the Justice Department wants the information and how it plans to use it. Last fall, 10 Democratic secretaries of state sent a letter to the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security expressing concern after DHS said it had received voter data and would enter it into a federal program used to verify citizenship status.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a Democrat, said his state had tried to “work cooperatively” with the Justice Department to understand the basis for its request for voters’ personal information.

“Rather than communicating productively with us, they rushed to sue,” Tong said Tuesday, after the lawsuit was filed.

Advertisement

Connecticut, he said, “takes its obligations under federal laws very seriously.” He pledged to “vigorously defend the state against this meritless and deeply disappointing lawsuit.”

Two Republican state senators in Connecticut said they welcomed the federal lawsuit. They said a recent absentee ballot scandal in the state’s largest city, Bridgeport, had made the state a “national punchline.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

New businesses heading to West Haven’s shoreline

Published

on

New businesses heading to West Haven’s shoreline


New businesses are soon set to replace old, rundown buildings in West Haven.

By the end of the summer, the former Savin Rock conference center is slated to become the Kelsey, a restaurant and banquet facility.

Crews are currently working on the inside, according to Mayor Dorinda Borer.

Next door, Jimmies of Savin Rock sits empty after it closed last month. It was open for a hundred years and is now for sale.

Advertisement

Borer said it’s another opportunity to draw people to the city.

“When there are new developers in town, and they’re making things all bright and shiny, that makes people attracted to our city,” Borer said. “It just seems like everything’s starting to bust loose at once. It’s a lot of work behind the scenes, and then it all starts to come to fruition.”

Thirty new luxury apartments are set to replace the Debonair Beach Motel that fell into disrepair after its last day open more than a decade ago. Demolition began last fall, and it’s expected to continue in March.

Down the street, new condos were built by the same owner of the restaurant and bar Riva. They opened their doors last summer, welcoming eager crowds.

“The turnout’s been unbelievable,” Riva’s owner, Michael Delvecchio, said. “People traveling from other states, New York, Rhode Island, all over Connecticut. It’s something that West Haven been dying for.”

Advertisement

Riva replaced Chick’s Drive-In, a West Haven hot-dog and seafood staple that closed in 2015 after its owner passed away.

Delvecchio doesn’t ignore that history. A sign that says “The Lodge at Riva” will be removed and replaced with “Chick’s” during the summer, with accompanying pictures of Savin Rock amusement park on the walls.

“Everybody in town has been, with all this shoreline and all this beach, waiting for something to happen,” he said. “Riva’s a little bit of everything.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending