Connect with us

Boston, MA

Mayor Wu’s line in the sand on property taxes doesn’t make political or economic sense – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Mayor Wu’s line in the sand on property taxes doesn’t make political or economic sense – The Boston Globe


Apparently not, even with a late-November deadline for legislative approval of her home rule petition fast approaching.

To the bafflement of many on Beacon Hill and in the business community, Wu on Wednesday made clear once again she wasn’t interested in modifying the bill she filed with the Legislature in April to help the city offset the decline in commercial real estate values.

The legislation has stalled amid opposition by business groups and skeptical state senators who think City Hall should share the financial pain of property owners by also reducing spending or tapping reserves to balance its budget.

The news: Such moves “would be very financially irresponsible,” Wu told reporters in a virtual briefing from Moon Island, where she was attending a Boston firefighters event. It’s a message she recently delivered behind closed doors to lawmakers and business leaders.

The mayor also dismissed the idea of using city funds to help homeowners who can least afford to pay higher property taxes, saying it would violate state laws and perhaps the state constitution.

  • Wu said City Hall would need to cut its $4.64 billion budget by $265 million, or nearly 6 percent, to have the same impact as her property tax plan. That would force a layoff of 2,200 city employees and cuts to essential services.

The reaction: Business leaders said they’re not asking the city to come up with the entire $265 million. Instead, they are pushing for a package of changes that would soften the blow on commercial landlords and still provide relief for homeowners.

  • “We need to piece a solution together,” said James Rooney, chief executive of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce. “This was not an unexpected storm,” he said, noting that the city’s budget increased 20 percent over the past three years even as signs emerged that commercial real estate was in trouble.

Marty Walz, interim president of the Boston Municipal Research Bureau, a business-backed watchdog group, said that after boosting spending by 8 percent in the current fiscal year, a trim of 1 or 2 percent was easily manageable without crippling the city.

  • “What manager can’t find that in their budget?” she said.

Recap: High vacancy rates have eroded the value of office buildings and other business properties. Recent data from real estate firm JLL show a slight improvement, but the decline threatens to throw Boston’s operating budget out of whack. Commercial real estate taxes, which are pegged to assessed values, account for about 40 percent of its revenue.

New numbers: At her briefing, Wu said the city’s latest data show that commercial assessments will drop an average of 7 percent, effective in January. The average residential assessment will increase 4 percent.

  • Based on those numbers — which are subject to a final revision — residential tax bills would increase an average of 14 percent compared with the fiscal year ended in July without approval of Wus plan, and 5 percent if she gets the green light from lawmakers.
  • The impact on commercial properties would vary, but Wu said a typical building valued at $5 million would see its tax bill fall 6.7 percent under the new assessments, or 0.5 percent if her plan is in place. (Newer “Class A” properties, which are doing better in attracting and retaining tenants, would likely see an increase in tax bills, the city said previously.)

Final thought: For the average Boston home, which the city said is assessed at $838,000, the tax increase in the third and fourth quarters of 2025 compared with the first two quarters would be a total of $770 if Wu’s bill doesn’t pass, and $275 if it does.

As a possible compromise, the city could kick in enough money to split the difference between those two outcomes, leaving an increase of less than $250 on the average residential tax bill between January and June.

Advertisement

Why is the mayor taking on Spilka — whose approval she also needs to complete the city’s takeover of the Boston Planning and Development Agency — over a change the city could afford?

  • “If you think that the only way forward is to be as uncompromising as possible,” Obama said, “you will feel good about yourself, you will enjoy a certain moral purity, but you’re not going to get what you want.”

Wise words for any politician.


Larry Edelman can be reached at larry.edelman@globe.com.





Source link

Advertisement

Boston, MA

Did you follow the local news this week? Take our Greater Boston news quiz.

Published

on

Did you follow the local news this week? Take our Greater Boston news quiz.






Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston nightclub where woman suffered medical emergency and died has license reinstated

Published

on

Boston nightclub where woman suffered medical emergency and died has license reinstated


Local News

After hearing testimony from club representatives and the loved ones of a woman who died there Dec. 21, regulators found no violations.

ICON, a nightclub in Boston’s Theater District, had its entertainment license reinstated at a hearing Thursday. Lane Turner/The Boston Globe

A Boston nightclub where a woman collapsed on the dance floor and died last month will have its entertainment license reinstated after the Boston Licensing Board found no violations Thursday.

Anastaiya Colon, 27, was at ICON, a nightclub in Boston’s Theater District, in the early hours of Dec. 21 when she suffered a fatal medical episode. Following the incident, her loved ones insisted that the club’s staff did not respond professionally and failed to control crowds.

Advertisement

City regulators suspended ICON’s entertainment license pending an assessment of any potential violations. During a hearing Tuesday, they heard from attorneys representing the club and people who were with Colon the night she died.

Anastaiya Colon, 27, suffered a fatal medical episode Dec. 21 while at ICON.
Anastaiya Colon, 27, suffered a fatal medical episode Dec. 21 while at ICON. – GoFundMe

As EMTs attempted to respond, crowds inside the club failed to comply with demands to give them space, prompting police to shut down the club, according to a police report of the incident. However, the club and its representatives were adamant that staff handled their response and crowd control efforts properly.

Kevin Montgomery, the club’s head of security, testified that the crowd did not impede police or EMTs and that he waited to evacuate the club because doing so would have created a bottleneck at the entrance. Additionally, a bouncer and a bartender both testified that they interacted with Colon, who ordered one drink before collapsing, and did not see any signs of intoxication.

Angelica Morales, Colon’s sister, submitted a video taken on her phone to the board for them to review. Morales testified Tuesday that the video disproves some of the board’s claims and shows that ICON did not immediately respond to the emergency.

“I ran to the DJ booth, literally bombarded everybody that was in my way to get to the DJ booth, told them to cut the music off,” Morales said. “On my way back, the music was cut off for a minute or two, maybe less, and they cut the music back on.”

Shanice Monteiro, a friend who was with Colon and Morales, said she went outside to flag down police officers. She testified that their response, along with the crowd’s, was inadequate.

Advertisement

“I struggled to get outside,” Monteiro said. “Once I got outside, everybody was still partying, there was no type of urgency. Nobody stopped.”

These factors, along with video evidence provided by ICON, did not substantiate any violations on the club’s part, prompting the licensing board to reinstate their entertainment license at a subsequent hearing Thursday.

“Based on the evidence presented at the hearing from the licensed premise and the spoken testimony and video evidence shared with us from Ms. Colon’s family, I’m not able to find a violation in this case,” Kathleen Joyce, the board’s chairwoman, said at the hearing.

However, Joyce further stated that she “was not able to resolve certain questions” about exactly when or why the club turned off the music or turned on the lights. As a result, the board will require ICON to submit an emergency management plan to prevent future incidents and put organized safety measures in place.

“This plan should outline detailed operational procedures in the event of a medical or any other emergency, including protocols for police and ambulance notification, crowd control and dispersal, and procedures regarding lighting and music during an emergency response,” Joyce said.

Advertisement

Though the club will reopen without facing any violations, Joyce noted that there were “lessons left to be learned” from the incident.

“This tragedy has shaken the public confidence in nightlife in this area, and restoring that confidence is a shared obligation,” she said. “People should feel safe going out at night. They should feel safe going to a club in this area, and they should feel safe getting home.”

Keeana Saxon, one of three commissioners on the licensing board, further emphasized the distinction Joyce made between entertainment-related matters and those that pertained to licensing. Essentially, the deciding factor in the board’s decision was the separation of the club’s response from any accountability they may have had by serving Colon liquor.

“I hope that the family does understand that there are separate procedures for both the entertainment and the licensing, just to make sure that on the licensing side, that we understand that she was only served one drink and that it was absolutely unforeseeable for that one drink to then lead to some kind of emergency such as this one,” Saxon said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Battenfeld: Michelle Wu should demand better security after Boston Medical Center rape

Published

on

Battenfeld: Michelle Wu should demand better security after Boston Medical Center rape


In the middle of Michelle Wu’s orchestrated inaugural celebration, prosecutors described a senseless hospital horror that unfolded at Boston Medical Center – a rape of a partially paralyzed patient allegedly by a mentally ill man allowed to freely roam the hospital’s hallways.

It happened in September in what is supposed to be a safe haven but too often is a dangerous campus. Drug addicts with needles frequently openly camp in front of the hospital, and in early December a security guard suffered serious injuries in a stabbing on the BMC campus. The alleged assailant was finally subdued by other security guards after a struggle.

In the September incident, prosecutors described in court this week how the 55-year-old alleged rapist Barry Howze worked his way under the terrified victim’s bed in the BMC emergency room and sexually assaulted her.

“This assault was brutal and brazen, and occurred in a place where people go for help,” Suffolk County prosecutor Kate Fraiman said. “Due to her partial paralysis, she could not reach her phone, which was under her body at the time.”

Advertisement

Howze, who reportedly has a history of violent offenses and mental illness, was able to flee the scene but was arrested two days later at the hospital when he tried to obtain a visitor’s pass and was recognized by security. Howze’s attorney blamed hospital staff for allowing him the opportunity to commit the crime and some city councilors are demanding answers.

“This was a horrific and violent sexual assault on a defenseless patient,” Councilor Ed Flynn said. “The safety and security of patients and staff at the hospital can’t be ignored any longer. The hospital leadership must make immediate and major changes and upgrades to their security department.”

Flynn also sent a letter to BMC CEO Alastair Bell questioning how the assailant was allowed to commit the rape.

Where is Wu? She was too busy celebrating herself with a weeklong inaugural of her second term to deal with the rape at the medical center, which is near the center of drug-ravaged Mass and Cass.

If the rape had happened at a suburban hospital, people would be demanding investigations and accountability.

Advertisement

But in Boston, Wu takes credit for running the “safest major city in the country” while often ignoring crimes.

Wu should intervene and demand better security and safety for the staff and patients at BMC.

Although the hospital is no longer run by the city, it has a historic connection with City Hall. It is used by Boston residents, many of them poor and disabled or from marginalized communities. She should be out front like Flynn demanding accountability from the hospital.

Boston Medical Center, located in the city’s South End, is the largest “safety-net” hospital in New England. It is partially overseen by the Boston Public Health Commission, whose members are appointed by the mayor.

BMC was formed in 1996 by the Thomas Menino administration as a merger between the city-owned Boston City Hospital, which first opened in 1864, and Boston University Medical Center.

Advertisement

Menino called the merger “the most important thing I will do as mayor.”

When he was appointed CEO by the hospital board of trustees in 2023, Bell offered recycled Wu-speak to talk about how BMC was trying to “reshape” how the hospital delivers health care.

“The way we think about the health of our patients and members extends beyond traditional medicine to environmental sustainability and issues such as housing, food insecurity, and economic mobility, as we study the root causes of health inequities and empower all of our patients and communities to thrive,” Bell said.

But the hospital has been plagued by security issues in the last few years, and a contract dispute with the nurses’ union. The nurses at BMC’s Brighton campus authorized a three-day strike late last year over management demands to cut staffing and retirement benefits.

Kirsten Ransom, BMC Brighton RN and Massachusetts Nurses Association co-chair, said, “This vote sends a clear message that our members are united in our commitment to make a stand for our patients, our community and our professional integrity in the wake of this blatant effort to balance BMC’s budget on the backs of those who have the greatest impact on the safety of the patients and the future success of this facility.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending