Connect with us

News

Why is Nikki Haley still running?

Published

on

Why is Nikki Haley still running?

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

You have to hand it to Nikki Haley, she is tenacious. After her fourth straight loss to Donald Trump, this time in her home state of South Carolina, Haley is still not quitting the Republican race. This ensures that for at least the next 10 days until Super Tuesday, when the most states vote, she will continue to snap at Trump’s heels. With each act of defiance against Trump and her inevitable defeat, Haley shames Trump’s former critics-turned-courtiers.

“I have never seen the Republican Party so unified as it is right now,” said Trump in his Saturday night victory speech. Trump’s verdict is irrefutable in terms of his delegate lead, especially because of winner-takes-all states. He will be the Republican nominee. But the dogged “Never Trump” spirit of roughly a quarter of Republican voters — including the 40 per cent or so who voted for Haley in South Carolina — shows a Republican party that is far from unified.

This is no ordinary party split. The cognitive gap between those who believe the 2020 election was stolen and the minority of Republicans who acknowledge that is a myth is extremely hard to reconcile. It is one thing to say your rival believes in voodoo economics, as George HW Bush did of Ronald Reagan in 1980. Reagan selected Bush as his running mate. It is quite another to say “there is no way America is going to vote for a convicted criminal,” as Haley believes will be the case for Trump by November.

Advertisement

That still leaves the question of why Haley is sticking to a primary battle that can only end in her defeat. She has been far too pointed in her recent attacks on Trump’s character to make it to his shortlist for running mate. If a straw poll at this weekend’s populist Conservative Political Action Conference is any guide, the two most popular names are South Dakota governor Kristi Noem and Vivek Ramaswamy, the entrepreneur who dropped out as a candidate in January after the Iowa caucuses. Unless Haley eventually endorses Trump, which is becoming harder by the day, she would join former Wyoming representative Liz Cheney, outgoing Utah senator Mitt Romney and a handful of others as persona non grata in Trump’s world.

Haley’s goal looks more strategic: to become the long-term standard-bearer of the minority of Republicans who reject Trump. Call it the Reaganite rump of the party. That would put her in a good position either to run in 2028 if Trump loses to Biden this November, or to contest an open convention if Trump drops out before November owing to some black swan event. At this point, a criminal conviction probably would not qualify as one.

There is also a streak of psychological momentum to Haley battling it out. The longer she stands alone as the only Republican willing to take on Trump, the more feeble she renders those who have kissed Trump’s ring after warning that he was a danger. Most of Haley’s former rivals, including Mike Pence, Trump’s former vice-president, and even Ron DeSantis, the once virally popular governor of Florida, are deflating by the day. The boost to her brand profile of standing alone may be reason enough for her to stay in the race.

One final possibility is that Haley could become the candidate of No Labels, the third-party group that wants to break the mould of US politics. Many states have “sore loser” laws that stop a candidate from contesting the same election twice. That could block Haley from switching to the third-party banner. But the longer she stays in, the more pollsters will conduct three-way polls with Joe Biden, Trump and her. If Haley refuses to endorse Trump — a very big “if” given her past pledges to support him — she could yet be his nemesis in November. After a primary such as this one, were Haley eventually to bend the knee to Trump, she would be the loser twice over.

Advertisement

News

Rep. Ilhan Omar rushed by man on stage and sprayed with liquid at town hall event

Published

on

Rep. Ilhan Omar rushed by man on stage and sprayed with liquid at town hall event

A man is tackled after spraying an unknown substance at US Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) during a town hall she was hosting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 27, 2026. (Photo by Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images)

OCTAVIO JONES/AFP via Getty Images/AFP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

OCTAVIO JONES/AFP via Getty Images/AFP

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., was rushed by a man during a town hall event Tuesday night and sprayed with a liquid via a syringe.

Footage from the event shows a man approaching Omar at her lectern as she is delivering remarks and spraying an unknown substance in her direction, before swiftly being tackled by security. Omar called on Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign or face impeachment immediately before the assault.

Noem has faced criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in the aftermath of the fatal shooting of 37-year-old intensive care nurse Alex Pretti by federal officers in Minneapolis Saturday.

Advertisement

Omar’s staff can be heard urging her to step away and get “checked out,” with others nearby saying the substance smelled bad.

“We will continue,” Omar responded. “These f******* a**holes are not going to get away with it.”

A statement from Omar’s office released after the event said the individual who approached and sprayed the congresswoman is now in custody.

“The Congresswoman is okay,” the statement read. “She continued with her town hall because she doesn’t let bullies win.”

A syringe lays on the ground after a man, left, approached Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, during a town hall event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. The man was apprehended after spraying unknown substance according the to Associated Press. Photographer: Angelina Katsanis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

A syringe lays on the ground after a man, left, approached Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, during a town hall event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. The man was apprehended after spraying an unknown substance according to the Associated Press. Photographer: Angelina Katsanis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg

Advertisement

Omar followed up with a statement on social media saying she will not be intimidated.

Advertisement

As Omar continued her remarks at the town hall, she said: “We are Minnesota strong and we will stay resilient in the face of whatever they might throw at us.”

Just three days ago, fellow Democrat Rep. Maxwell Frost of Florida said he was assaulted at the Sundance Festival by a man “who told me that Trump was going to deport me before he punched me in the face.”

Threats against Congressional lawmakers have been rising. Last year, there was an increase in security funding in the wake of growing concerns about political violence in the country.

According to the U.S. Capitol Police, the number of threat assessment cases has increased for the third year in a row. In 2025, the USCP investigated 14,938 “concerning statements, behaviors, and communications” directed towards congressional lawmakers, their families and staff. That figure represents a nearly 58% increase from 2024.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending