Connect with us

News

‘Stretched’ US consumers start to pull back on spending

Published

on

‘Stretched’ US consumers start to pull back on spending

Evidence is mounting that many Americans have reached their limit for tolerating higher prices, raising questions about how much consumer expenditures will continue to power US economic growth this year.

After spending freely with savings built up during the coronavirus pandemic and income fuelled by a healthy job market, consumers are becoming more cautious, according to comments from retail and consumer goods executives and official data.

Retail sales increased 0.6 per cent in February from the previous month, missing expectations by economists for a 0.8 per cent gain, according to Census Bureau data released this week. The increase reversed a 1.1 per cent decline from December to January.

“We did not begin the year with healthy robust consumer spending that we had at the end of last year,” said Steve Ricchiuto, chief economist at Mizuho Securities. “The economy is losing some momentum.”

January’s figure was revised lower from a previous estimate, the fourth downward revision in a row.

Advertisement

Jeffrey Roach, chief economist at LPL, said the first half of the year was “certainly” going to be “quite sluggish” but that he expected growth to rebound in the second half, as inflation continues to decelerate and the Federal Reserve loosens monetary policy.

Although inflation is down about two-thirds from its peak in the summer of 2022, consumer price growth unexpectedly rose to 3.2 per cent in February, which was largely driven by price pressures for services.

The University of Michigan’s US consumer sentiment reading edged down in March to a level well above the worst of inflation in the summer of 2022, but below readings that were common before the pandemic.

“Inflation is back down . . . but the compounding of those prices for a year and a half means that prices are higher, so consumers are feeling that much more than they did a year and a half ago,” said Stephanie Cegielski, vice-president of research at ICSC, a shopping centre industry group.

After Kraft Heinz enacted a series of price rises in 2023, the maker of Heinz ketchup and Grey Poupon mustard last month reported declining organic net sales for the first time since 2021, with volumes also sliding, with a crucial driver being weak demand in North America.

Advertisement

Similarly, PepsiCo chief executive Ramon Laguarta said in a statement in February that consumer behaviour had reverted back to pre-pandemic norms.

“We’re seeing a bit of a slowdown in the US, both the food category and the beverage category in [the fourth quarter],” he said on a call with investors. “Part of that is a slowdown due to pricing and disposable income.”

Many retailers had raised prices to pass on higher commodity and operating expenses, causing some companies to report bumper sales growth, but as inflation decelerates and consumers reject higher prices, many of those groups expect sales growth to slow this year.

McDonald’s in February reported softer sales in the US in its most recent quarter as lower-income customers purchased cheaper menu items, and forecast same-store sales growth to return to a historical average between 3-4 per cent, down from 9 per cent last year.

“The days of sales growth being driven by these big price increases, those are probably over,” said Brian Yarbrough, an analyst at Edward Jones.

Advertisement

Big-box retailer Target said last week that it expected consumers to continue to face price pressures this year.

“Consumers say they still feel stretched,” said Christina Hennington, Target’s chief growth officer. “They are balancing a lot and having to make trade-offs to meet the needs of their families . . . We expect consumers will remain highly value conscious.”

Although traffic at Target’s stores improved in the holiday quarter it still declined 1.7 per cent from a year ago, while the average transaction amount slid 2.8 per cent as shoppers sought out deals.

Some consumers have also started to pull back spending on services such as travel. Marriott warned in February of slower revenue growth this year and Expedia last month forecast softer growth in sales and bookings as the post-pandemic travel boom fades.

After gains in real wages and savings boosted consumer spending that helped the economy re-emerge from the depths of the pandemic, Americans have become more cautious, as savings melt away and wage gains moderate.

Advertisement

“Real wages by all measures are below where they were in January 2021 when President [Joe] Biden took office,” said Steve Englander, a strategist at Standard Chartered. “They have been catching up a bit, but there is something to the argument that people are dissatisfied because they have jobs but unsatisfactory purchasing power.”

January’s personal consumption and expenditures report showed that consumer spending, adjusted for inflation, declined 0.1 per cent from December. Although the personal savings rate ticked up to 3.8 per cent, it is still far below pre-pandemic levels. The personal savings rate in January 2020 was 7.9 per cent.

“In the holiday season we saw people start to go through the last amount of savings that they had,” said Katie Thomas, who leads the Kearney Consumer Institute, a management consulting firm.

Although inflation has hit low-income consumers the hardest, some retailers have noticed higher-income consumers feeling the squeeze.

The chief executive of cut-price retailer Dollar Tree, Rick Dreiling, said on a call with investors this week that its fastest-growing customer demographic earns more than $125,000 a year.

Advertisement

Similarly, Walmart’s chief executive John Rainey said in February that one of the biggest contributors to market share gained from other retailers in its fourth quarter was from consumers who make more than $100,000.

“A lot of people want to feel like they’re getting the best bang for their buck,” said Thomas at Kearney Consumer Institute. “People on both sides of the income spectrum are feeling a little bit more stretched than they were a year ago.”

News

Federal judge bars Trump from implementing proof of citizenship requirement to vote

Published

on

Federal judge bars Trump from implementing proof of citizenship requirement to vote

A federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing most of his first executive order on elections, part of which sought to require people to show documentary proof of citizenship when they register to vote.

The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Denise Casper in Boston effectively converts a preliminary injunction she issued a year ago, in which she temporarily blocked many of Trump’s efforts to overhaul elections, into a permanent ban.

Casper rejected the Republican administration’s argument that the lawsuit to block the changes brought by Democratic state attorneys general was premature because the rules had yet to be put in place. Instead, she agreed that the Constitution gives states and Congress the authority to regulate elections, and that Trump’s requirements violated the separation of powers.

The Constitution “does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,” wrote Casper.

Among other proposed changes, Trump’s order would have required people to provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering to vote, prevented mail ballots from being counted if they arrive after Election Day, even if they were postmarked by then, and punished states that failed to comply by withholding certain federal money.

Advertisement

In a statement, New York Attorney General Letitia James said she was grateful the court had blocked Trump’s “unconstitutional attempt to seize control of our elections” and would continue to defend voting rights in this year’s midterm elections.

“Generations of Americans fought tirelessly for the right to vote, and we honor their legacy by protecting that right against anyone who tries to undermine it,” said James, a Democrat.

A voter casts a ballot during New York’s primary election on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, in New York. (AP Photo/Ryan Murphy)

Advertisement

Advertisement

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose state was the lead plaintiff in the case, said the ruling reaffirmed the constitutional principle that it s up to the states and Congress to set election rules.

“While we are proud of this result, we are clear-eyed that President Trump’s attacks on voting rights and our elections show no signs of slowing down,” Bonta, a Democrat, said in a statement. “So let me be clear: we will keep fighting back every step of the way.”

Requests for comment sent to the White House and he U.S. Department of Justice were not immediately returned.

The ruling was the latest in a series against the elections executive order Trump signed just months after taking office for his second term. The Republican president has since signed another executive order on elections that seeks to create a national voter list and limit mail balloting. That directive also faces multiple legal challenges.

Advertisement

Last fall, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., overseeing a separate challenge to the first election executive order by civil rights and Democratic Party-aligned groups blocked the government from taking steps to include the proof-of-citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form. That judge later barred Trump’s defense secretary from requiring documentary proof of citizenship when military personnel register to vote or request ballots.

In an apparent nod to the difficulty of implementing a proof-of-citizen requirement by executive order, Trump is pushing legislation in the Republican-controlled Congress to create such a mandate. The SAVE America Act has passed the House but has stalled in the Senate, leading Trump to advocate for eliminating the filibuster that is blocking the legislation.

On Wednesday, he abruptly canceled the expected signing of a bipartisan housing bill, saying he would not sign legislation until Congress passes his proof of citizenship requirement for voting.

The president and many of his Republican allies have been promoting the narrative that voting by noncitizens is a major problem, when in fact it’s quite rare. The federal voter registration form already requires people to attest that they are U.S. citizens. Violating that is punishable as a felony that can lead to prison or deportation.

In another major voting case, the U.S. Supreme Court is due to issue an opinion soon on whether mail ballots must arrive by Election Day. That could immediately change the rules in 14 states that allow grace periods ranging from days to weeks if the ballots are postmarked by Election Day.

Advertisement

Casper, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama, is the chief judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Mamdani Allies Sweep New York Primaries

Published

on

Video: Mamdani Allies Sweep New York Primaries

new video loaded: Mamdani Allies Sweep New York Primaries

transcript

transcript

Mamdani Allies Sweep New York Primaries

Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s progressive coalition had a big night on Tuesday. Brad Lander, Darializa Avila Chevalier and Claire Valdez won their Democratic House primaries.

“I see a New York that we can all afford. I see a New York that truly invests in its babies, not bombs.” Reporter: “What’s the first thing you’re looking forward to doing in Congress?” “Well, tomorrow — thank you — I mean, tomorrow morning, you know, I’m going to be back at 26 Federal Plaza doing court watching, and we want to carry that into Congress as well.”

Advertisement
Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s progressive coalition had a big night on Tuesday. Brad Lander, Darializa Avila Chevalier and Claire Valdez won their Democratic House primaries.

By Julie Yoon

June 24, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Appeals court allows Trump administration expanded use of speedy deportations

Published

on

Appeals court allows Trump administration expanded use of speedy deportations

A massive 826,780-square-foot warehouse sits illuminated Feb. 12, 2026, in the El Paso suburb of Socorro, Texas, that was recently purchased by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for $122.8 million.

Morgan Lee/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Morgan Lee/AP

A federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to resume carrying out speedy deportations of undocumented migrants throughout the United States, not just near the border.

A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit threw out a lower court decision that temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s expanded use of expedited removal. The ruling was a big victory for the Republican administration, which views the expansion of so-called expedited removal as a key tool for carrying out its mass deportation policy.

Expedited removal — quick deportation without a chance to appear before a judge — has previously been applied to migrants arriving by sea or caught at or near the border shortly after crossing.

Advertisement

In January, Trump expanded its use to undocumented migrants all over the United States. Immigration agents began whisking migrants away from courthouses where they had gone for immigration proceedings and then removing them from the country within days.

“The Trump administration’s push for fast-track deportations will subject people to an unfair and error-prone system,” Anand Balakrishnan, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, said in a statement.

Balakrishnan represented plaintiffs in arguments before the appellate panel and said its ruling “undermines the fundamental principle that people receive due process when the government seeks to deport them.”

DC Circuit Judge Justin R. Walker, one of the judges on the panel, said the plaintiffs had not shown the expanded use of expedited removal violated due process rights. Immigrants received notice of removal proceedings and were given a chance to respond, he wrote in his opinion.

Walker and the second judge in the majority, Neomi Rao, were appointed by Trump. The third judge on the panel was appointed by President Barack Obama, a Democrat.

Advertisement

Walker said there was no requirement that the administration inform immigrants that they can avoid expedited removal if they can show they have been in the United States for more than two years.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending