Connect with us

News

Sheryl Sandberg to leave Meta’s board of directors

Published

on

Sheryl Sandberg to leave Meta’s board of directors

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Sheryl Sandberg, the former chief operating officer of Meta, said she would stand down from the Facebook and Instagram parent’s board of directors in May after 12 years.

Announcing the departure in a Facebook post, Sandberg wrote: “After I left my role as COO, I remained on the board to help ensure a successful transition.” The Meta business was “strong and well-positioned for the future, so this feels like the right time to step away”, she added.

Although she would not stand for re-election to Meta’s board in May, Sandberg said she would remain as an adviser. In a comment on the Facebook post, Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive of Meta, which was founded as Facebook in 2004, thanked Sandberg for “the extraordinary contributions you have made to our company and community over the years”.

Advertisement

Sandberg stepped down as chief operating officer of Meta in June 2022 after 14 years with the company, in a shock departure that cost Zuckerberg one of his closest lieutenants.

Sandberg, 54, was one of Facebook’s early executives, helping grow it from a start-up with no revenue into a digital advertising behemoth. She became one of the most prominent women in Silicon Valley and positioned herself as an advocate for women in the workplace, writing the feminist call-to-arms Lean In.

But she was a polarising figure due to her role in building Facebook’s ads empire and for various controversies during her tenure, including comments she made minimising the notion that it played a role in the events leading to the January 6, 2021, storming of the US Capitol by a mob of Donald Trump’s supporters.

Her departure came at a difficult time for the company, shortly after it faced multiple scandals, including the Cambridge Analytica data privacy controversy and Russian disinformation campaigns surrounding the 2016 US election. The share price had also slumped due to increasing competition and a slowdown in growth. Zuckerberg had changed the company’s name to Meta less than a year earlier as part of a multibillion-dollar pivot to focus on the “metaverse”, a bet that has since been widely criticised.

Sandberg, a committed Democrat, stirred speculation about a possible entry into politics when she left Meta. Since then, she has fought abortion bans, including making a $3mn contribution to the American Civil Liberties Union, and campaigned alongside Israeli officials against sexual violence in its war with Hamas. She has also spent time on philanthropy including her leadership programme called Lean In Girls.

Advertisement

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending