Connect with us

News

Russia has requested military assistance from China in Ukraine, US official says

Published

on

Russia has requested military assistance from China in Ukraine, US official says

Potential help from the Chinese language could be a big growth in Russia’s invasion, and will upend the maintain Ukrainian forces nonetheless have within the nation.

When requested by CNN in regards to the reporting of Russia’s request for navy help, Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese language embassy within the US, mentioned in a press release, “I’ve by no means heard of that.”

Liu expressed concern for “the Ukraine state of affairs” — calling it “certainly disconcerting” — and mentioned China has and can proceed to offer humanitarian help to Ukraine.

Liu mentioned: “The excessive precedence now’s to forestall the tense state of affairs from escalating and even getting uncontrolled. … China requires exercising utmost restraint and stopping a large humanitarian disaster.”

The Russian embassy within the US didn’t instantly reply to CNN’s request for remark.

Advertisement
Information of Russia’s request comes earlier than White Home nationwide safety adviser Jake Sullivan will meet together with his Chinese language counterpart, Yang Jiechi, in Rome on Monday as a part of a follow-up dialog to President Joe Biden and Chinese language President Xi Jinping’s digital assembly final November, in line with Nationwide Safety Council spokesperson Emily Horne.

Sullivan advised Dana Bash on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday that China offering Russia with assist is a “concern.”

“We are also watching carefully to see the extent to which China truly does present any type of assist, materials assist or financial assist, to Russia. It’s a concern of ours. And we’ve communicated to Beijing that we’ll not stand by and permit any nation to compensate Russia for its losses from the financial sanctions,” Sullivan mentioned.

Russia expanded its offensive to western Ukraine on Sunday, firing missiles close to the town of Lviv and hitting a big navy base near the Polish border, reportedly killing dozens of individuals because the warfare attracts nearer to NATO’s territory.

Native authorities say 35 individuals had been killed and 134 injured on the navy base, in what Ukraine’s Minister of Defence Oleksii Reznikov described as a “terrorist assault” on peace and safety “close to the EU-NATO border.”

US officers, together with White Home press secretary Jen Psaki, have been more and more important of Beijing’s response to Russia’s warfare in Ukraine. Whereas Beijing has seemingly tried to strike a impartial tone on the worldwide stage, Chinese language home media protection has promoted Russian disinformation campaigns and described the warfare as a “particular navy operation.” Psaki additionally tweeted Wednesday that Beijing “has seemingly endorsed” false Russian claims that the US is creating chemical weapons in Ukraine.

“Our evaluation proper now’s that (China is) abiding by the necessities which have been put in place, however we might proceed to encourage any nation to assume rather a lot about what place they need to — what function they need to play — in historical past as all of us look again,” Psaki mentioned throughout a information convention Wednesday.

Sullivan advised Bash on Sunday that the US has made it clear to Beijing that there’ll “completely be penalties” for “large-scale” efforts to offer the Kremlin a workaround to US sanctions.

Advertisement

“We is not going to permit that to go ahead and permit there to be a lifeline to Russia from these financial sanctions from any nation anyplace on this planet,” he mentioned.

Nonetheless, Sullivan mentioned that whereas the US believes “China, in truth, was conscious earlier than the invasion occurred that Vladimir Putin was planning one thing, they could not have understood the complete extent of it.”

“As a result of it is very attainable that Putin lied to them the identical approach that he lied to Europeans and others,” Sullivan advised Bash.

Whereas US officers have made word that China has been abiding by the sanctions the US and its allies have imposed towards Russia, Biden mentioned not too long ago he was not ready to debate his efforts to strain China to assist isolate Russia over the Kremlin’s bloody warfare.

“I am not ready to touch upon that for the time being,” Biden advised reporters on the White Home in February.

Biden has usually talked about his conversations with Xi, continuously recalling the handfuls of hours the 2 leaders spent with one another after they had been serving as their nation’s vice presidents. In his speeches, Biden usually likes to recall eating with Xi on the Tibetan Plateau and describing the US in a single phrase: “potentialities.”

Throughout the face-to-face assembly in Rome, Sullivan and Yang will even talk about points that Biden and Xi went over throughout their digital name final yr, sources accustomed to the matter say. The sources added that this assembly has been within the works for a while, they usually do not anticipate any concrete outcomes from it.

Advertisement

Since taking workplace, Biden has pressured he believes the US is at an inflection level in its historical past and should present the world democracies can compete with autocratic regimes like China’s.

“To compete for the most effective jobs of the long run, we additionally must degree the enjoying discipline with China and different rivals,” Biden mentioned at his first State of the Union handle earlier this month.

Throughout the three-hour summit together with his Chinese language counterpart roughly 4 months in the past, Biden raised issues about human rights, Chinese language aggression towards Taiwan and commerce points. The Biden administration has been clear managing competitors with China is a long-term nationwide safety and financial precedence of the US.

“How the US, Europe, and Asia work collectively to safe the peace and defend our shared values and advance our prosperity throughout the Pacific shall be among the many most consequential efforts we undertake,” Biden mentioned on the Munich safety convention final yr.

Whereas in Rome, Sullivan can be anticipated to fulfill with Luigi Mattiolo, diplomatic adviser to the Italian Prime Minister; the 2 males will talk about ongoing efforts to reply to the Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine, in line with Horne’s assertion.

Nuclear escalation menace

Advertisement

In the meantime, Sullivan advised CNN on Sunday that whereas the Biden administration is “involved about the potential of escalation,” with respect to Putin’s nuclear posture, “we’ve not seen something that will require us to alter our nuclear posture at the moment.”

“We’re watching this extraordinarily carefully, and clearly, the escalation danger with a nuclear energy is extreme, and it’s a totally different form of battle than different conflicts the American individuals have seen through the years,” he mentioned on “State of the Union.”

Nonetheless, Sullivan stood by the administration’s determination to reject a Polish provide to switch fighter jets to Ukraine by means of the US and a German air base.

“The President listened to the evaluation of his intelligence group, he listened to the recommendation of his navy commanders, he consulted his NATO allies, and he in the end decided that the risk-benefit evaluation of flying planes from NATO bases into contested airspace over Ukraine didn’t make sense, was not one thing that he would authorize,” he mentioned, including the US is concentrated on offering “different anti-air techniques that would assist the Ukrainians make progress by way of coping with the menace that’s coming from the air from the Russian aspect.”

The nationwide safety adviser additionally reiterated feedback from Biden earlier this week that Russia “would pay a extreme value” in the event that they selected to make use of chemical or organic weapons in Ukraine, including that Russia’s accusations towards Ukraine making ready to deploy chemical weapons “is a inform, a inform that they themselves could also be making ready to take action after which attempting to pin the blame on somebody else– that is a basic web page out of the Russian playbook.”

This story has been up to date with extra response and background info.

CNN’s Donald Judd, Jasmine Wright, Betsy Klein and Kylie Atwood contributed to this report.

Advertisement

News

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

Published

on

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

A British technology start-up which had promised to build the world’s first space plane is in last-ditch talks to secure new financing after two of its backers wrote down the value of their investment.

Reaction Engines, which was founded in 1989, is in detailed talks with the UAE-backed Strategic Development Fund (SDF), one of its existing shareholders, about a new injection of capital, according to two people familiar with the situation. The SDF led a £40mn funding round in January last year. 

The British start-up is also backed by several aerospace giants, including BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce, as well as financial investors Artemis and Schroders.

Reaction has previously raised more than £150mn and grew its commercial revenues by more than 400 per cent last year. The company, however, warned earlier this year that it would need to raise additional financing. It has this weekend lined up PwC, the accountancy firm, to act as administrator if the funding talks collapse.

Sky News first reported that PwC had been put on standby. The accountancy firm, which has not yet been formally appointed, declined to comment on Saturday. Reaction also declined to comment. 

Advertisement

Other existing investors are monitoring the situation, said one of the people close to the talks. 

Artemis and Schroders both announced last week that they had significantly written down the value of their stakes in Reaction. Artemis cut the value of its 2.3 per cent holding by 75 per cent. Artemis Alpha Trust, the fund that manages the London-based fund manager’s stake, now values it at £1.2mn, compared with £6.4mn in April. 

Reaction has in recent years focused on developing a hybrid jet and rocket engine, known as Sabre. The innovative engine was originally planned to power Skylon, a space aircraft also designed by Reaction.

Key to Sabre’s development is Reaction’s groundbreaking pre-cooling technology which prevents engines from overheating and could lead to hypersonic space planes. The company is part of a UK-led military project aiming to make hypersonic flight a reality. At hypersonic speeds, the temperature generated inside a conventional gas turbine would start to melt components unless they were cooled in some way.

More recently the company has focused its attention on developing nearer-term aerospace and commercial applications for its pre-cooling technology. It signed an agreement with US industrial group Honeywell to collaborate on the development of thermal management technologies to help reduce aircraft emissions. 

Advertisement

Reaction is chaired by Philip Dunne, a former UK defence minister. It has been led by Mark Thomas, who was previously at Rolls-Royce. 

Continue Reading

News

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India

Published

on

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India
Former President Trump has suggested he might support a Florida ballot measure to legalise recreational marijuana for adults, known as Amendment 3, reported the Hill.
Trump, a Florida resident, emphasised the importance of this measure being appropriately managed by the state Legislature to avoid public consumption issues.
Emphasis on responsible legislation
“In Florida, like so many other States that have already given their approval, personal amounts of marijuana will be legalised for adults with Amendment 3,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site.“Whether people like it or not, this will happen through the approval of the Voters, so it should be done correctly.”

Trump avoided stating his voting intention or openly backing marijuana legalisation but stressed that responsible legislation is necessary to avoid public nuisances. He pointed to the need for laws that prevent marijuana use in public areas to keep public spaces free from the smell of marijuana, similar to the issues observed in other cities.
“The state Legislature needs to responsibly create laws that prohibit marijuana consumption in public spaces so we do not smell marijuana everywhere we go, like we do in many of the Democrat-run Cities,” said Trump.
Concerns over inconsistent marijuana laws
He also highlighted the inconsistency of criminalising marijuana possession in Florida when it is legal in many other states. Trump emphasised that law enforcement resources and lives should not be wasted on arresting adults for possessing small amounts of marijuana.
“We do not need to ruin lives & waste Taxpayer Dollars arresting adults with personal amounts of it on them, and no one should grieve a loved one because they died from fentanyl-laced marijuana,” he added.
Impact on voter mobilisation and Republican division
Trump’s comments follow recent efforts by Democrats to attract younger voters in Florida, focusing on issues like abortion and marijuana legalisation. These issues have mobilised younger voters in other regions, as seen in Ohio, and Democrats hope for a similar impact in Florida.
Democrats are targeting the fall ballot measures, aiming to increase voter turnout and gain the support of younger voters, a group with which Trump has faced challenges.
Earlier in the year, the Department of Justice made a significant move toward reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. If this reclassification is approved, marijuana will be downgraded to a Schedule III drug.
Despite the trend toward normalisation and Trump’s comments, some Republicans remain opposed to legalising recreational marijuana. Sen Rick Scott has publicly stated his intention to vote against the measure. He cited personal family experience with addiction as a key reason for his opposition.
“My brother, who died at 67 in April, began smoking marijuana as a teenager and led a life of addiction,” Scott said.

Continue Reading

News

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Published

on

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The US oil industry and Republicans are demanding Kamala Harris clarify her energy and climate policy, as the Democratic candidate tries to please her progressive base without alienating voters in shale areas like Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state.

On Thursday, the vice-president said she no longer supported a ban on fracking, the technology that unleashed the shale revolution. But Harris’s reversal has not quelled attacks from Donald Trump or US executives that she would damage the country’s oil and gas sector.

The heads of the US’s two biggest oil lobby groups said the Democratic candidate must also say whether she would keep or end a pause on federal approvals for new liquefied natural gas plants, and whether she supported curbs on drilling imposed by the Biden administration.

Advertisement

“Based on what we know of her past positions, the bills that she has sponsored, and her past statements she’s taken a pretty aggressively anti-energy and anti-oil and gas industry stand,” said Anne Bradbury, head of the American Exploration and Production Council.

“These are significant and major policy questions that impact every American family and business, and which voters deserve to understand better when making their choice in November,” she said.

Mike Sommers, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, Big Oil’s most powerful lobby group, said Harris should say whether she would stick with Biden administration policies that had unleashed “a regulatory onslaught the likes of which this industry has never seen”.

Trump, the Republican candidate, has accused Harris of plotting a “war on American energy” and has repeatedly blamed her and President Joe Biden for high fuel costs in recent years.

On Thursday, he vowed to scrap Biden administration policies that “distort energy markets”. The former president has called climate change a hoax and his advisers have said he would gut Biden’s signature climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act.

Advertisement

The debate over Harris’s energy policy comes as she and Trump court blue-collar workers in Pennsylvania, a huge shale gas producer that employs 72,000 workers — a potentially decisive voting group in a state Biden won narrowly in 2020.

Harris said in 2019 that she supported a fracking ban but told CNN on Thursday she had ditched that position and the US could have “a thriving clean energy economy without banning fracking”.

US oil and gas production has reached a record high under Biden, even as clean energy capacity has expanded rapidly.

But gas executives in particular have been alarmed at a federal pause on building new LNG export plants, which supply customers from Europe to Asia, saying the policy will stymie further US shale output.

Toby Rice, chief executive of Pennsylvania-based EQT, the US’s largest natural gas producer, said Harris should lift the restrictions, which he argued would compromise energy security.

Advertisement

“Ignoring her anti-fracking statement four years ago for a second, can we talk about the recent LNG Pause that was put in place this year?”, he said. “This is a policy that has received massive criticism from all sides — our allies, industry and environmental champions . . . a step backwards for climate and American energy security.”

While Biden put climate at the centre of his and Harris’s 2020 White House campaign, Harris has been largely silent, and made only a passing reference to climate change in her speech at the Democratic convention.

“It looks like the Harris campaign has concluded that it’s safer to avoid antagonising producers or climate activists by skirting these issues entirely,” said Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners.

Climate-focused voters are less vexed than energy executives by the lack of explicit policy from Harris.

“Let’s be clear: the most important climate policy right now is defeating Donald Trump in November,” said Cassidy DiPaola of Fossil Free Media, a non-profit organisation. “All the wonky policy details in the world won’t matter if climate deniers control the White House.”

Advertisement

Last week the political arms of the League of Conservation Voters, Climate Power and the Environmental Defense Fund unveiled a $55mn advertising campaign backing Harris in swing states, focused on economic rather than climate issues.

In contrast, Trump has courted oil bosses who are backing his pledge to slash regulation and scrap clean energy subsidies. His campaign received nearly $14mn from the industry in June, according to OpenSecrets, almost double his oil haul in May.

Additional reporting by Sam Learner

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Advertisement

   

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending