Connect with us

News

PwC to reverse controversial US tax split

Published

on

PwC to reverse controversial US tax split

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

PwC plans to reverse a controversial restructuring of its tax practice in the US after just three years, in a strategy U-turn under its incoming senior partner Paul Griggs.

The Big Four firm will reunify its tax division when Griggs takes over in July, dismantling the business model brought in by the firm’s current boss Tim Ryan, according to a note to partners seen by the Financial Times,

PwC departed from the industry’s historic model of having tax as a standalone business unit in 2021, when Ryan split the almost 1,000 US tax partners between the firm’s accounting and consulting arms.

Advertisement

“Tax is a tremendous brand and I’m a big believer that you never dilute a brand that has meaningful value,” Griggs told the FT.

The move by Griggs marks a reversal of his predecessor’s marquee strategy, which had prompted widespread debate about the Big Four business model when it was implemented.

Ryan described the reorganisation as a “once-in-a-generation change” that grouped PwC’s US audit business together with tax reporting and compliance under the umbrella of “trust solutions”.

Tax consulting activities, which include advising on the structure of merger and acquisition deals or where to locate business operations, were moved into PwC’s advisory arm, which was renamed “consulting solutions”.

However, discontent among tax partners was widespread enough that all the main candidates in this year’s leadership election supported the business being put back together, according to people familiar with the matter.

Advertisement

Griggs will also scrap the “trust solutions” and “consulting solutions” brands in favour of “assurance” and “advisory”. Tax accounted for 26 per cent of the US firm’s revenue before the split.

Griggs said that having tax under one umbrella reflected how clients bought services from PwC. It was also important for the “identity” of partners and staff in the business, and for ensuring investment was directed appropriately, he said.

“Having the tax business connected to assurance and advisory is critical, but structurally I don’t need those businesses to be smashed together for that to happen.”

Outside the firm, Ryan’s reorganisation was seen as a potential precursor to splitting PwC in two via the spin off or sale of its advisory arm — something he and other PwC leaders said was never on the cards.

EY, which pursued its own plan to spin off its consulting arm, feared ceding a first-mover advantage to PwC. EY’s plan ultimately fell apart last year because of disagreements over how to divide tax partners between the two halves of the business.

Advertisement

Deloitte said last month that it had considered and rejected splitting its tax business, deciding that an integrated model was a “significant source of strength and differentiation”.

Ryan’s reorganisation was not adopted by other countries in the PwC network, whose member firms have typically kept tax as a standalone business line.

Ryan had been expected to become global chair of PwC but encountered opposition to his management style. Opponents cited his willingness to take unilateral action in the US business that might be more typically co-ordinated at a global level, where consensus is prized.

Ryan withdrew from the global leadership race in October and will retire from the firm.

Griggs, an auditor, was elected US senior partner in February in a ballot of PwC’s 4,000 US and Mexico partners, beating Kathryn Kaminsky, co-head of trust solutions, and Jenny Koehler, chief investment officer. Another frontrunner, former consulting co-chair Neil Dhar, was excluded from the ballot after allegations he breached election rules.

Advertisement

Griggs announced key members of his leadership team on Thursday, including appointing Krishnan Chandrasekhar, who is at present banking and capital markets tax services leader, as head of the reunified tax business.

The assurance business will be run by Deanna Byrne, head of PwC’s Philadelphia office, and advisory will be led by Tyson Cornell, leader of its cloud and digital practice.

Koehler has been named chief operating officer of advisory and Kaminsky will become chief commercial officer.

News

Rep. Ilhan Omar rushed by man on stage and sprayed with liquid at town hall event

Published

on

Rep. Ilhan Omar rushed by man on stage and sprayed with liquid at town hall event

A man is tackled after spraying an unknown substance at US Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) during a town hall she was hosting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 27, 2026. (Photo by Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images)

OCTAVIO JONES/AFP via Getty Images/AFP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

OCTAVIO JONES/AFP via Getty Images/AFP

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., was rushed by a man during a town hall event Tuesday night and sprayed with a liquid via a syringe.

Footage from the event shows a man approaching Omar at her lectern as she is delivering remarks and spraying an unknown substance in her direction, before swiftly being tackled by security. Omar called on Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign or face impeachment immediately before the assault.

Noem has faced criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in the aftermath of the fatal shooting of 37-year-old intensive care nurse Alex Pretti by federal officers in Minneapolis Saturday.

Advertisement

Omar’s staff can be heard urging her to step away and get “checked out,” with others nearby saying the substance smelled bad.

“We will continue,” Omar responded. “These f******* a**holes are not going to get away with it.”

A statement from Omar’s office released after the event said the individual who approached and sprayed the congresswoman is now in custody.

“The Congresswoman is okay,” the statement read. “She continued with her town hall because she doesn’t let bullies win.”

A syringe lays on the ground after a man, left, approached Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, during a town hall event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. The man was apprehended after spraying unknown substance according the to Associated Press. Photographer: Angelina Katsanis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

A syringe lays on the ground after a man, left, approached Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, during a town hall event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. The man was apprehended after spraying an unknown substance according to the Associated Press. Photographer: Angelina Katsanis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg

Advertisement

Omar followed up with a statement on social media saying she will not be intimidated.

Advertisement

As Omar continued her remarks at the town hall, she said: “We are Minnesota strong and we will stay resilient in the face of whatever they might throw at us.”

Just three days ago, fellow Democrat Rep. Maxwell Frost of Florida said he was assaulted at the Sundance Festival by a man “who told me that Trump was going to deport me before he punched me in the face.”

Threats against Congressional lawmakers have been rising. Last year, there was an increase in security funding in the wake of growing concerns about political violence in the country.

According to the U.S. Capitol Police, the number of threat assessment cases has increased for the third year in a row. In 2025, the USCP investigated 14,938 “concerning statements, behaviors, and communications” directed towards congressional lawmakers, their families and staff. That figure represents a nearly 58% increase from 2024.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending