Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana Senate votes to outlaw abortion pills by enabling citizen lawsuits

Published

on

Indiana Senate votes to outlaw abortion pills by enabling citizen lawsuits


play

What some are calling a “dangerous” escalation of Indiana’s abortion ban, others are calling a chance to close a gaping loophole.

They’re talking about a bill cracking down on abortion-inducing drugs in Indiana, which passed the state Senate on Jan. 27 by a 35-10 vote and represents the next frontier of the anti-abortion movement.

Advertisement

“In a post-Dobbs era, Indiana has chosen life,” bill author Sen. Tyler Johnson, R-Leo, said on the Senate floor. “This bill reinforces that choice by defining abortion clearly and providing civil tools to enforce our laws.”

Republican lawmakers have been eyeing these drugs in recent years since the felling of Roe v. Wade in 2022 and the abortion ban that immediately followed in Indiana. That law prohibits doctors here from providing abortions except in cases of rape, incest, fatal fetal anomalies or when the pregnant person’s life is at risk, and says all medication abortions must be conducted in-person, not via telehealth.

But federal regulations do allow abortion-inducing drugs to be accessed through telehealth services and mailed to patients ― such as from abortion-allowing states to abortion-restricting states. That’s where the rub is.

“What we’re seeing is an influx, and people breaking the law and mailing these drugs directly to women. God forbid any of you physicians are complicit in that,” Sen. Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne, another author of Senate Bill 236, scolded a handful of doctors who came before the Senate judiciary committee to speak against the bill.

Advertisement

The bill would outlaw the manufacturing, mailing, prescribing or delivering of abortion-inducing drugs to Hoosiers not by making this a criminal act, but a civil one over which any citizen could wage a wrongful-death or whistleblower lawsuit.

In other words, any Hoosier who believes someone ordered a drug to perform an illegal abortion in Indiana could sue a person responsible for doing the manufacturing, mailing, prescribing or delivering. But exempt from liability are the pregnant mother, Indiana doctors and health facilities, internet service providers, transportation network companies and mail carriers. This means, though, that Hoosiers could sue out-of-state doctors.

“In the very rare instances where it is legal to prescribe the abortion bill, you will follow our laws and be licensed here,” Brown said. “You will not be mailing it.”

Those doing the suing can reap relief of at least $100,000 if they win, plus have their attorney’s fees paid by the defendant.

Advertisement

Indianapolis attorney Kathleen DeLaney likened this to bounty hunting.

“What’s really happening here is creating an army of private litigants standing in the name of the government seeking $100k bounties from others,” she said.

Though LaGrange Republican Sen. Sue Glick authored the original abortion ban in 2022, she sympathized with the bill’s opponents, saying the bill would have a “chilling effect” by forcing doctors to second-guess every little circumstance and then allowing non-experts to wage lawsuits.

“We’re sitting here making a decision to allow non-medical people make medical decisions on these issues and then we throw it to non-lawyers to litigate whether or not these were proper medical decisions,” she said during the judiciary committee hearing, before voting no. She voted in favor on the bill on the floor.

But Brown contended the only chilling effect will be on people providing illegal abortions, including via the mail.

Advertisement

“We’re looking for… bad actors obtaining these pills illegally to kill a baby,” she said on the Senate floor Jan. 26. “So yeah, we’re okay with suing them.”

Bill spurs confusion

Doctors who oppose the bill are not only concerned that the lawsuit-enabling language would add fear and confusion to the atmosphere in which they provide care, but they say so would a few other provisions in the bill.

For one, the bill amends slightly the definition of abortion to specifically exempt procedures done to expel a miscarriage, stillbirth or ectopic pregnancy.

But that leaves out a number of other scenarios that they now feel the need to call into question, such as a molar pregnancy, in which fetal body parts and even a heart beat can develop but won’t become an actual baby. Leaving such a pregnancy untreated can lead to cancer or infertility, said Dr. Erin Lips, a gynecologic oncologist at IU Health.

Advertisement

“In my last few years I’ve seen more new moms on death’s door in Indiana than I would have expected,” she said. “Cases like this will become more common.”

They are further concerned about the part of the bill that would add details required in terminated pregnancy reports ― including the name of the person who provided the abortion care ― and require these reports be filed to the office of the inspector general, in addition to the department of health.

At play in the background is an ongoing lawsuit over the question of whether these reports should be public documents subject to Indiana’s public records law. Attorney General Todd Rokita supports making them public, but a Marion County judge has temporarily declared them private medical records.

State lawmakers want additional oversight over the terminated pregnancy reports to make sure Indiana doctors aren’t performing abortions illegally. The doctors are fearful that added confusion over what counts as an illegal abortion will lead to delays in care, and thus risks to the patients’ health.

Advertisement

Those doctors and patients are also uncomfortable with personal patient data, such as their age, race and county that is listed in these reports, being seen by parties outside the department of health.

Danielle Spry, a Hendricks County mother who said she had a second-trimester abortion in 2019 due to a catastrophic disability she learned about 20 weeks along, said the idea that her private medical decision would be examined by people outside the medical field is “violating.”

“How dare any of you look at me and say you would have done anything different,” she said.

How common are medication abortions in Indiana?

Since the abortion ban actually took effect in late 2023, the state health department has reported about 30 to 40 abortions a quarter, compared to pre-ban figures of about 2,000 a quarter, according to the department’s aggregate abortion reporting.

Of those 42 abortions performed in the third quarter of 2025, about a quarter were done using abortion-inducing drugs Misoprostol and Mifepristone. This data only accounts for abortions performed in medical settings that are reported to the state and may not present a complete picture, however.

Advertisement

Abortions provided through telehealth, most likely from out-of-state providers, have been rising since Indiana’s abortion ban took effect, according to a new report by the Society for Family Planning. Where there were virtually none prior to July 2023, the number reported after that has steadily climed from about 200 a month in 2024 to 400 a month in 2025.

Contact IndyStar Statehouse reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on X @kayla_dwyer17.





Source link

Indiana

Indiana targets businesses hiring workers in country without legal permission

Published

on

Indiana targets businesses hiring workers in country without legal permission


INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — Businesses could face fines for knowingly hiring workers living in the country without legal permission under an Indiana law taking effect soon.

That was the message from Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita at a Thursday news conference.

Enforcement of Senate Enrolled Act 76, called the Fairness Act by Republicans, is set to begin July 1. The law will mark the first time in the state’s history that businesses will be financially penalized for employing workers in the country without legal permission.

Rokita said, “We do expect whatever operation you run to have it run fairly, and that means you hire Hoosiers and you at least hire U.S. citizens, and you do not try to exploit cheap labor from people who shouldn’t be here in the first place.”

Advertisement

The Republican attorney general said the goal of the law was to crack down on what he calls “underground economies” and “labor trafficking” in the construction industry.

A Central Midwest Carpenters’ Union representative said both union and nonunion companies are being undercut by competitors who take advantage of low-wage workers living in the country without legal permission. Kyle Gresham said, “There is a right way and a wrong way to do things. This is not a union and nonunion issue. This is about workers. This is about doing what’s right. This is about paying their fair share.”

“I’ve seen workers hanging drywall for as little as 15 cents a square foot, and if you do the math, that’s not a lot. There’s no overtime, no insurance, no workers’ comp insurance. These workers are in a completely exploitive business model.”

Construction workers that News 8 spoke to said they fear losing more coworkers and taking on additional responsibilities.

Senate Enrolled Act 76 goes beyond construction sites. It also requires schools, government agencies, and law enforcement to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Advertisement

Critics say the law could lead to racial profiling, but Rokita said, “I’m not going to worry a thing about that. We’re going where the facts lead. If there’s a certain demographic that’s being trafficked more than others, do you think they care? That we’re profiling them? We wouldn’t be doing that. We wouldn’t be profiling anything, because it’s labor trafficking.”

The attorney general said his office will rely on tips and referrals from the public to begin any investigations.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Indy restaurants have a chance for Michelin recognition as inspectors scour culinary scene

Published

on

Indy restaurants have a chance for Michelin recognition as inspectors scour culinary scene


INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — Indianapolis will be included in the inaugural American Great Lakes Michelin Guide, a move expected to elevate the city’s culinary scene.

The partnership with Michelin will bring inspectors to Indianapolis restaurants, with results of evaluations expected in approximately one year.

The French tire company says restaurants in Indianapolis and five other cities will be featured. On Thursday, Morgan Snyder, Visit Indy’s vice president of communications and community relations, joined Daybreak to discuss what this means for the city.

She says Michelin inspectors are currently evaluating restaurants in Indianapolis after determining the city was a strong contender for recognition. 

Advertisement

The evaluation process reportedly began without the city’s prior knowledge. “So unbeknownst to us, Michelin came into the market and was scouring our culinary scene,” Snyder said. “And then they decided Indianapolis is a strong contender and could put forth some Michelin restaurants.”

Indianapolis was invited to participate alongside five other Midwestern cities in this guide expansion.

“Not every city in the Midwest was invited,” Snyder said. “So, we should be excited about that opportunity that we have a seat at the table.”

Michelin recognition includes categories such as one, two, or three stars, Bib Gourmand distinctions, and Green Stars.

Michelin established a restaurant rating system in 1900, ranking the best with from one to three stars based on anonymous inspections evaluating ingredients, techniques, flavor, chef personalities, and consistency. The company created the guide to encourage more driving — and thus wear out more tires — by providing drivers with maps, hotel information, and dining recommendations.

Advertisement

“We’re humble Hoosiers often, and we don’t brag about our restaurants as much as we should, but there are so many incredible restaurants in our city,” Snyder said.

Aligning with the globally recognized Michelin brand, Snyder said this could enhance the perception of Indianapolis as a culinary destination and boost tourism. Michelin recognition also historically increases revenues for recognized chefs.

“There’s data that proves the (Michelin brand) increases tourism; there’s data that proves that Michelin-recognized chefs see an increase in their revenues if they’re Michelin-recognized.” She added, “So the proof is there that aligning with a Michelin brand can really move the needle in raising the game for an entire destination.”

The inaugural restaurant selection for the Great Lakes region — Cleveland, Detroit, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, and Pittsburgh — will be revealed in 2027.

The Michelin Guide has expanded across North America over several years. Its first North American Guide was for New York in 2005.

Advertisement
(Morgan Snyder, Vice President of Communications and Community Relations for Visit Indy)

This story was formatted for WISHTV.com using AI-assisted tools. Our editorial team reviews and
edits all content published to ensure it meets our journalistic standards for accuracy and fairness.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Committee recommends earlier teen curfew for summer in Indianapolis

Published

on

Committee recommends earlier teen curfew for summer in Indianapolis


INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — In a 9-to-1 vote, the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Committee of the Indianapolis City-County Council on Wednesday night recommended to move forward with a teenage curfew this summer.

Committee members say the curfew would be two hours earlier that once initiated last summer, if the full council approves it. The next council meeting will be 7 p.m. May 4.

Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department thinks teens showing disorderly or disruptive behavior may be stopped. Police Chief Tanya Terry backed the proposal, citing a troubling rise in youth violence. “We need to intervene early in a non-intrusive way and provide support to our young people.”

She said youth shooting victims were up 22% in the first three months of 2026 compared to the same time in 2025. Youth homicides were up by 4%.

Advertisement

“Keeping young people out of situations where they are more likely to be victims or be involved in violence is a priority and a shared responsibility that we all have. This is about safety and awareness for teens and their parents. It’s not about punishment its about partnership and prevention,” Terry said.

Under the proposal, under-15s must be home between 9 p.m. daily and 5 a.m. the next day. Teens age 15-17 must be home between 11 p.m. Sunday-Thursday and 5 a.m. the next day, and between 1 a.m. Fridays and Saturdays and 5 a.m. the next day. Exceptions would be made for youths with their parents, at-school events, or heading to or from work.

The city’s proposal would make the curfew start 2 hours earlier than the state’s curfew.

Teens who are stopped will be taken to a reunification center where they will be linked to community organizations.

If approved, the curfew would last 120 days.

Advertisement

Democratic council member Leroy Robinson, who chairs the public safety committee, said Wednesday, “Will it prevent and stop every single crime by a young person? Absolutely not. But what it will do, it will give enforcement policies to help our young people this summer, give them guardrails to support parents as well to reduce violence in our cities.”

Some councilors say more action is needed. Republican council member Josh Bain suggested Wednesday, “Showing that we take this seriously by putting the curfew fines in effect for parents and guardians of these habitual violators.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending