Connect with us

News

Musk’s X to shut Brazilian operation in escalating clash with country’s supreme court

Published

on

Musk’s X to shut Brazilian operation in escalating clash with country’s supreme court

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Elon Musk’s X on Saturday escalated its war of words with Brazil’s supreme court over alleged censorship and vowed to shut down its local operation “immediately”, in the billionaire’s latest intervention on the global stage.

In a post on X, the social media company alleged that on Friday Justice Alexandre de Moraes threatened its legal representative in the country with arrest for not complying with a “secret order” to take down certain accounts. 

A letter attached to the post, which X said was the court order, instructs the individual to implement the measures within 24 hours or risk a fine and imprisonment.

Advertisement

The court said neither it nor the judge would comment on the matter. 

“Despite our numerous appeals to the Supreme Court not being heard, the Brazilian public not being informed about these orders and our Brazilian staff having no responsibility or control over whether content is blocked on our platform, Moraes has chosen to threaten our staff in Brazil rather than respect the law or due process,” X’s global government affairs account wrote. 

“As a result, to protect the safety of our staff, we have made the decision to close our operation in Brazil, effective immediately.”

X remains accessible in Brazil, the company said. It was unclear how many staff it had in the region. 

Musk posted on X: “No question that Moraes needs to leave. Having a ‘justice’ who repeatedly and egregiously violates the law is no justice at all.”

Advertisement

The high-profile intervention ratchets up the tension between the supreme court and Musk, a clash that has become emblematic of the billionaire entrepreneur’s recent weigh-ins on foreign politics through the platform he bought for $44bn.

In recent years, Musk, a self-declared free speech absolutist, has increasingly sided with rightwing politicians globally, throwing his support behind Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and championing Argentina’s populist leader Javier Milei. 

This has intensified recently, with Musk attacking the UK government for its handling of anti-immigrant rioting, and trading barbs with Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro, resulting in the platform being blocked in the country by the authoritarian socialist for 10 days. 

While Musk’s commentary has won him fans among Brazil’s conservatives, some lawmakers and analysts fear his interventions could stoke unrest. 

The Tesla and SpaceX chief first took aim at de Moraes earlier this year over the supreme court’s request to take down what are believed to be rightwing accounts, and called on the judge to “resign or be impeached”. 

Advertisement

In response, de Moraes ordered an investigation into Musk — who threatened to disobey the court orders — for suspected obstruction of justice. Musk reignited the spat this week by repeating claims of censorship, after X’s government affairs account posted a document purportedly sent by de Moraes ordering the platform to block certain users.

De Moraes has spearheaded a judicial crackdown against online disinformation, but is a controversial figure who divides opinion in Latin America’s largest democracy. 

Supporters say he helped secure democracy in the face of attacks on the reliability of the country’s electronic voting system by former president Jair Bolsonaro, ahead of his unsuccessful re-election campaign in 2022. However, followers of the hard-right populist allege the judge has curbed freedom of expression and unfairly targeted conservatives.  

Brazil’s supreme court has faced discontent from the far-right movement and been accused of over-reach by critics. Its premises were among the government buildings ransacked in January 2023 by radical Bolsonaro backers who claimed, without evidence, that the election result was rigged in favour of winner Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. 

“We are deeply saddened that we have been forced to make this decision. The responsibility lies solely with Alexandre de Moraes,” X said on Saturday. “His actions are incompatible with democratic government. The people of Brazil have a choice to make — democracy, or Alexandre de Moraes.”

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Beatriz Langella

News

Amazon accused of listing products from independent shops without permission

Published

on

Amazon accused of listing products from independent shops without permission

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Amazon has been accused of listing products from independent retailers without their consent, even as the ecommerce giant sues start-up Perplexity over its AI software shopping without permission.

The $2.5tn online retailer has listed some independent shops’ full inventory on its platform without seeking permission, four business owners told the Financial Times, enabling customers to shop through Amazon rather than buy directly.

Two independent retailers told the FT that they had also received orders for products that were either out of stock or were mispriced and mislabelled by Amazon leading to customer complaints.

Advertisement

“Nobody opted into this,” said Angie Chua, owner of Bobo Design Studio, a stationery store based in Los Angeles.

Tech companies are experimenting with artificial intelligence “agents” that can perform tasks like shopping autonomously based on user instructions.

Amazon has blocked agents from Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and a host of other AI start-ups from its website.

It filed a lawsuit in November against Perplexity, whose Comet browser was making purchases on Amazon on behalf of users, alleging that the company’s actions risked undermining user privacy and violated its terms of service.

In its complaint, Amazon said Perplexity had taken steps “without prior notice to Amazon and without authorisation” and that it degraded a customer shopping experience it had invested in over several decades.

Advertisement

Perplexity in a statement at the time said that the lawsuit was a “bully tactic” aimed at scaring “disruptive companies like Perplexity” from improving customers’ experience.

The recent complaints against Amazon relate to its “Buy for Me” function, launched last April, which lets some customers purchase items that are not listed with Amazon but on other retailers’ sites.

Retailers said Amazon did not seek their permission before sending them orders that were placed on the ecommerce site. They do not receive the user’s email address or other information that might be helpful for generating future sales, several sellers told the FT.

“We consciously avoid Amazon because our business is rooted in community and building a relationship with customers,” Chua said. “I don’t know who these customers are.”

Several of the independent retailers said Amazon’s move had led to poor experiences for customers, or hurt their business.

Advertisement

Sarah Hitchcock Burzio, the owner of Hitchcock Paper Co. in Virginia, said that Amazon had mislabelled items leading to a surge in orders as customers believed they were receiving more expensive versions of a product at a much lower price.

“There were no guardrails set up so when there were issues there was nobody I could go to,” she said.

Product returns and complaints for the “Buy for Me” function are handled by sellers rather than Amazon, even when errors are produced by the Seattle-based group.

Amazon enables sellers to opt out of the service by contacting the company on a specific email address.

Amazon said: “Shop Direct and Buy for Me are programmes we’re testing that help customers discover brands and products not currently sold in Amazon’s store, while helping businesses reach new customers and drive incremental sales.

Advertisement

“We have received positive feedback on these programmes. Businesses can opt out at any time.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump says Venezuela will turn over 30 million to 50 million barrels of oil to US | CNN Business

Published

on

Trump says Venezuela will turn over 30 million to 50 million barrels of oil to US | CNN Business

President Donald Trump said Tuesday night that Venezuela will turn over 30 million to 50 million barrels of oil to the United States, to be sold at market value and with the proceeds controlled by the US.

Interim authorities in Venezuela will turn over “sanctioned oil” Trump said on Truth Social.

The US will use the proceeds “to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States!” he wrote.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright has been directed to “execute this plan, immediately,” and the barrels “will be taken by storage ships, and brought directly to unloading docks in the United States.”

CNN has reached out to the White House for more information.

Advertisement

A senior administration official, speaking under condition of anonymity, told CNN that the oil has already been produced and put in barrels. The majority of it is currently on boats and will now go to US facilities in the Gulf to be refined.

Although 30 to 50 million barrels of oil sounds like a lot, the United States consumed just over 20 million barrels of oil per day over the past month.

That amount may lower oil prices a bit, but it probably won’t lower Americans’ gas prices that much: Former President Joe Biden released about four to six times as much — 180 million barrels of oil — from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve in 2022, which lowered gas prices by only between 13 cents and 31 cents a gallon over the course of four months, according to a Treasury Department analysis.

US oil fell about $1 a barrel, or just under 2%, to $56, immediately after Trump made his announcement on Truth Social.

Selling up to 50 million barrels could raise quite a bit of revenue: Venezuelan oil is currently trading at $55 per barrel, so if the United States can find buyers willing to pay market price, it could raise between $1.65 billion and $2.75 billion from the sale.

Advertisement

Venezuela has built up significant stockpiles of crude over since the United States began its oil embargo late last year. But handing over that much oil to the United States may deplete Venezuela’s own oil reserves.

The oil is almost certainly coming from both its onshore storage and some of the seized tankers that were transporting oil: The country has about 48 million barrels of storage capacity and was nearly full, according to Phil Flynn, senior market analyst at the Price Futures Group. The tankers were transporting about 15 million to 22 million barrels of oil, according to industry estimates.

It’s unclear over what time period Venezuela will hand over the oil to the United States.

The senior administration official said the transfer would happen quickly because Venezuela’s crude is very heavy, which means it can’t be stored for long.

But crude does not go bad if it is not refined in a certain amount of time, said Andrew Lipow, the president of Lipow Oil Associates, in a note. “It has sat underground for hundreds of millions of years. In fact, much of the oil in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve has been around for decades,” he wrote.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: Nvidia Shows Off New A.I. Chip at CES

Published

on

Video: Nvidia Shows Off New A.I. Chip at CES

new video loaded: Nvidia Shows Off New A.I. Chip at CES

transcript

transcript

Nvidia Shows Off New A.I. Chip at CES

At the annual tech conference, CES, Nvidia showed off a new A.I. chip, known as Vera Rubin, which is more efficient and powerful than previous generations of chips.

This is the Vera CPU. This is one CPU. This is groundbreaking work. I would not be surprised if the industry would like us to make this format and this structure an industry standard in the future. Today, we’re announcing Alpamayo, the world’s first thinking, reasoning autonomous vehicle A.I.

Advertisement
At the annual tech conference, CES, Nvidia showed off a new A.I. chip, known as Vera Rubin, which is more efficient and powerful than previous generations of chips.

By Jiawei Wang

January 6, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending