Connect with us

News

‘Fight Them!’: the night Iran’s missile spectacle rattled Israel

Published

on

‘Fight Them!’: the night Iran’s missile spectacle rattled Israel

Just after dark on Saturday in Tehran, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards picked up a phone and issued an order to begin “Operation True Promise” — an unprecedented aerial assault by the Islamic republic on the Jewish state.

After Major General Hossein Salami read out the names of the senior Iranian military officials whose killings, in a suspected Israeli air strike on April 1 in Damascus, the guards were seeking to avenge, he chanted a verse from the Koran.

“Fight them!” he said. “Allah will chastise them at your hands, and He will lay them low and give you victory over them.”

Within minutes, the attack began — a swarm of drones took off on a nearly 2,000km, hours-long flight to Israel, soon to be followed by missiles. It was the first direct confrontation between the two most powerful militaries in the Middle East, arch-rivals entangled in a decades-long shadow war marked by Israeli assassinations and Iran’s sprawling Axis of Resistance, which has brought its proxy militias and Iranian soldiers right to Israel’s border.

With Iran’s assault, soon thwarted by Israel’s sophisticated aerial defences, that conflict burst out of the shadows. In Tehran, some rushed to petrol pumps and grocery stores, and others to Palestine Square, draped in Iranian flags. In Isfahan, people cheered as missiles flew over the grave of Mohammad Reza Zahedi, the general killed in Iran’s diplomatic compound in Damascus by the air strike that Israel has not publicly claimed.

Advertisement

In Washington, US President Joe Biden had already cut short a vacation on Saturday and headed back to the White House, worried that this may just be the first volley in an all-out war between Israel and Iran.

In Israel, where the assault had long been anticipated, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plane, the Wing of Zion, took off for safety from Nevatim air base as the missiles approached. Around the same time, dozens of fighter aircraft and defensive systems were deployed to fend off the attack — not just Israeli, but British, Jordanian and American.

At 8pm local time, neighbours saw Netanyahu’s motorcade speed from the Jerusalem home — reportedly fitted with an anti-missile shelter — of a billionaire friend where the Israeli premier and his wife had spent the Sabbath.

What followed was a social media spectacle, perhaps exactly as Iran intended. Across Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon, a macabre parade of drones lit up the night sky, their lethal payloads cheered on by some, including in Beirut, where ravers at a nightclub paused dancing briefly to watch a projectile streak overhead.

What Tehran was banking on, said Holly Dagres, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, was a demonstration of might visible to all.

Advertisement

“In the eyes of the clerical establishment, this mission was a success because they were able to hit Israel directly from Iranian soil [and] demonstrate that [despite] its dated Shah-era fighter jets and air inferiority, it now had command of the sky.”

As the drones began their hours-long journey, Israelis huddled at home, staying close to bomb shelters, and after six months of war in Gaza, a stoic humour kicked in. “First direct flights from Iran to Israel since 1979,” joked one Israeli, referring to the year of the Iranian Revolution.

But the gallows humour masked an existential dread around which Netanyahu has fashioned his own political career over the past decade: that a full-fledged war with Iran was eventually inevitable.

Even now, after Israel escaped almost entirely unscathed from the Iranian assault — a child was injured by shrapnel, a military base was lightly damaged and few of the missiles managed to penetrate Israeli airspace — his response will decide if this remains a single, deadly round of tit-for-tat attacks, or the precursor to the war he has long warned about.

Hours after Salami gave the orders in Tehran, and Israel’s air defences had intercepted 99 per cent of the assault, Iran declared its mission accomplished: “the operation is over”.

Advertisement

Around then, Netanyahu was on the phone to Biden, reportedly being told that Israel’s successful defence was enough of a victory, and that the US would not join in any counter-retaliation.

“The president told the prime minister that Israel really came out far ahead in this exchange,” said a senior US official. “Israel took out the IRGC’s . . . leadership in the Levant [and when] Iran tried to respond, Israel had clearly demonstrated its military superiority.”

Israel has faced barrages of rockets from Hizbollah and Hamas for years, fending them off with its vaunted Iron Dome. The sight of its interceptors chasing threats low over the Tel Aviv skyline are by now a familiar sight.

But this was the first time the Jewish state has been attacked by another country since 1991, when Saddam Hussein fired dozens of Scud missiles at Tel Aviv and Haifa while Iraq was at war with Israel’s closest ally, the US.

Back then, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir was persuaded by George W Bush not to retaliate. This time around, Netanyahu may prove less receptive to that argument, given the scale of Iran’s assault; Iran launched more ballistic missiles at Israel in one hour this weekend than Iraq did during weeks of war.

Advertisement

As Biden watched from the Situation Room at the White House, at least 100 ballistic missiles were streaking through the skies, minutes from Israeli territory.

But in the balance, Iran may have given Biden’s argument a small boost. Having telegraphed the assault for two weeks, and having mostly used slow-moving drones that Israel’s air defences could easily track and eliminate, Tehran lowered the possibility of mass casualties.

Despite Iran’s superior numbers, Israel’s military hardware is far more sophisticated  Graphic comparing Israel and Iran's military might.

Those drones, some of which — the Shahed-136 — are similar to those Russia has unleashed in Ukraine, have proven easy to take down. Even Ukraine’s limited air defences have done so. At the same time, said an Israeli official, the swarm of drones was designed to probe Israel’s responses and track the locations and trajectories of its defensive assets.

“They learned a lot about us, and we learned a little about them,” said the official. “It was an education.”

Iran’s missiles were less easily deflected but, given the advance warning, Israel had placed its most sophisticated, multibillion-dollar missile defences on high alert. The Arrow system took out most of the cruise and ballistic missiles, while Israel’s allies picked off the rest.

“The Iranians took into consideration the fact that Israel has a very, very strong, multi-layered, anti-missile system,” said Sima Shine, a former official at Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency with a focus on Iran. “And they probably took into consideration that there will be not too many casualties.”

Advertisement

Shine said the assault was similar to the one Iran launched after the 2020 assassination of the IRGC’s revered Qassem Soleimani on the orders of then US President Donald Trump. Then, as now, Iran telegraphed the assault on US troops in Iraq, giving them notice to take defensive measures that resulted in zero casualties under a televised attack.

Demonstrators wave Iranian and Palestinian flags as they gather at Palestine Square in Tehran on April 14 after the assault against Israel had been launched © Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty Images

“From Iran’s point of view, it was a show — ‘we have the capability. We have all different missiles and drones. We can do it. We prefer not to escalate it into a war,’” said Shine. “The fact that we can sit now and talk about the waiting and seeing and thinking and not retaliating is because there were no casualties.”

Indeed, almost immediately after the attack ended, Israel returned to a regular, if martial, rhythm. Citizens were told they no longer needed to shelter, and by Monday night all restrictions on public gatherings would be lifted countrywide.

But the country was still at war, with Hamas, if not Iran. And in the north, just as they have almost daily for the past six months, Israeli warplanes pounded Hizbollah targets in retaliation for rocket attacks earlier that night.

“We intercepted. We stopped [the attack]. Together we will win,” declared Netanyahu on X, signalling that, while this barrage may be over, Israel’s war was not.

Advertisement

News

Trump administration can’t block child care, other program money for 5 states: Judge

Published

on

Trump administration can’t block child care, other program money for 5 states: Judge

A federal judge ruled Friday that President Donald Trump’s administration cannot block federal money for child care subsidies and other programs aimed at supporting needy children and their families from flowing to five Democratic-led states for now.

The states of California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York argued that a policy announced Tuesday to freeze funds for three grant programs is having an immediate impact on them and creating “operational chaos.” In court filings and a hearing earlier Friday, the states contended that the government did not have a legal reason for holding back the money from those states.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it was pausing the funding because it had “reason to believe” the states were granting benefits to people in the country illegally, though it did not provide evidence or explain why it was targeting those states and not others.

The programs are the Child Care and Development Fund, which subsidizes child care for children from low-income families; the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, which provides cash assistance and job training; and the Social Services Block Grant, a smaller fund that provides money for a variety of programs.

The five states say they receive a total of more than $10 billion a year from the programs.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, who was nominated to the bench by former President Joe Biden, did not rule on the legality of the funding freeze, but he said the five states had met a legal threshold “to protect the status quo” for at least 14 days while arguments are made in court.

The government had requested reams of data from the five states, including the names and Social Security numbers of everyone who received benefits from some of the programs since 2022.

The states argue that the effort is unconstitutional and is intended to go after Trump’s political adversaries rather than to stamp out fraud in government programs — something the states say they already do.

Jessica Ranucci, a lawyer in the New York Attorney General’s office, said in the Friday hearing, which was conducted by telephone, that at least four of the states had already had money delayed after requesting it. She said that if the states can’t get child care funds, there will be immediate uncertainty for providers and families who rely on the programs.

A lawyer for the federal government, Kamika Shaw, said it was her understanding that the money had not stopped flowing to states.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

National Park Service will void passes with stickers over Trump’s face

Published

on

National Park Service will void passes with stickers over Trump’s face

The Interior Department’s new “America the Beautiful” annual pass for U.S. national parks.

Department of Interior


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Department of Interior

The National Park Service has updated its policy to discourage visitors from defacing a picture of President Trump on this year’s pass.

The use of an image of Trump on the 2026 pass — rather than the usual picture of nature — has sparked a backlash, sticker protests, and a lawsuit from a conservation group.

The $80 annual America the Beautiful pass gives visitors access to more than 2,000 federal recreation sites. Since 2004, the pass has typically showcased sweeping landscapes or iconic wildlife, selected through a public photo contest. Past winners have featured places like Arches National Park in Utah and images of bison roaming the plains.

Advertisement

Instead, of a picture of nature, this year’s design shows side-by-side portraits of Presidents George Washington and Trump. The new design has drawn criticism from parkgoers and ignited a wave of “do-it-yourself” resistance.

Photos circulating online show that many national park cardholders have covered the image of Trump’s face with stickers of wildlife, landscapes, and yellow smiley faces, while some have completely blocked out the whole card. The backlash has also inspired a growing sticker campaign.

Jenny McCarty, a longtime park volunteer and graphic designer, began selling custom stickers meant to fit directly over Trump’s face — with 100% of proceeds going to conservation nonprofits. “We made our first donation of $16,000 in December,” McCarty said. “The power of community is incredible.”

McCarty says the sticker movement is less about politics and more about preserving the neutrality of public lands. “The Interior’s new guidance only shows they continue to disregard how strongly people feel about keeping politics out of national parks,” she said.

Advertisement

The National Park Service card policy was updated this week to say that passes may no longer be valid if they’ve been “defaced or altered.” The change, which was revealed in an internal email to National Park Service staff obtained by SFGATE, comes just as the sticker movement has gained traction across social media.

In a statement to NPR, the Interior Department said there was no new policy. Interagency passes have always been void if altered, as stated on the card itself. The agency said the recent update was meant to clarify that rule and help staff deal with confusion from visitors.

The Park Service has long said passes can be voided if the signature strip is altered, but the updated guidance now explicitly includes stickers or markings on the front of the card.

It will be left to the discretion of park service officials to determine whether a pass has been “defaced” or not. The update means park officials now have the leeway to reject a pass if a sticker leaves behind residue, even if the image underneath is intact.

In December, conservation group the Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit in Washington, D.C., opposing the new pass design.

Advertisement

The group argues that the image violates a federal requirement that the annual America the Beautiful pass display a winning photograph from a national parks photo contest. The 2026 winning image was a picture of Glacier National Park.

“This is part of a larger pattern of Trump branding government materials with his name and image,” Kierán Suckling, the executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, told NPR. “But this kind of cartoonish authoritarianism won’t fly in the United States.”

The lawsuit asks a federal court to pull the current pass design and replace it with the original contest winner — the Glacier National Park image. It also seeks to block the government from featuring a president’s face on future passes.

The America the Beautiful National Parks Annual Pass for 2025, showing one of the natural images which used to adorn the pass. Its picture, of a Roseate Spoonbill taken at Everglades National Park, was taken by Michael Zheng.

The America the Beautiful National Parks Annual Pass for 2025, showing one of the natural images which used to adorn the pass. Its picture, of a Roseate Spoonbill taken at Everglades National Park, was taken by Michael Zheng.

Department of Interior


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Department of Interior

Not everyone sees a problem with the new design. Vince Vanata, the GOP chairman of Park County, Wyoming, told the Cowboy State Daily that Trump detractors should “suck it up” and accept the park passes, saying they are a fitting tribute to America’s 250th birthday this July 4.

Advertisement

“The 250th anniversary of our country only comes once. This pass is showing the first president of the United States and the current president of the United States,” Vanata said.

But for many longtime visitors, the backlash goes beyond design.

Erin Quinn Gery, who buys an annual pass each year, compared the image to “a mug shot slapped onto natural beauty.”

She also likened the decision to self-glorification: “It’s akin to throwing yourself a parade or putting yourself on currency,” she said. “Let someone else tell you you’re great — or worth celebrating and commemorating.”

When asked if she plans to remove her protest sticker, Gery replied: “I’ll take the sticker off my pass after Trump takes his name off the Kennedy Center.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Federal immigration agents shoot 2 people in Portland, Oregon, police say

Published

on

Federal immigration agents shoot 2 people in Portland, Oregon, police say

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Federal immigration officers shot and wounded two people in a vehicle outside a hospital in Portland, Oregon, on Thursday, a day after an officer shot and killed a driver in Minnesota, authorities said.

The Department of Homeland Security described the vehicle’s passenger as “a Venezuelan illegal alien affiliated with the transnational Tren de Aragua prostitution ring” who had been involved in a recent shooting in Portland. When agents identified themselves to the vehicle occupants Thursday afternoon, the driver tried to run them over, the department said in a written statement.

“Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired a defensive shot,” the statement said. “The driver drove off with the passenger, fleeing the scene.”

There was no immediate independent corroboration of those events or of any gang affiliation of the vehicle’s occupants. During prior shootings involving agents involved in President Donald Trump’s surge of immigration enforcement in U.S. cities, including Wednesday’s shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in Minneapolis, video evidence cast doubt on the administration’s initial descriptions of what prompted the shootings.

READ MORE: What we know so far about the ICE shooting in Minneapolis

Advertisement

According to the the Portland Police bureau, officers initially responded to a report of a shooting near a hospital at about 2:18 p.m.

A few minutes later, police received information that a man who had been shot was asking for help in a residential area a couple of miles away. Officers then responded there and found the two people with apparent gunshot wounds. Officers determined they were injured in the shooting with federal agents, police said.

Their conditions were not immediately known. Council President Elana Pirtle-Guiney said during a Portland city council meeting that Thursday’s shooting took place in the eastern part of the city and that two Portlanders were wounded.

“As far as we know both of these individuals are still alive and we are hoping for more positive updates throughout the afternoon,” she said.

The shooting escalates tensions in an city that has long had a contentious relationship with President Donald Trump, including Trump’s recent, failed effort to deploy National Guard troops in the city.

Advertisement

Portland police secured both the scene of the shooting and the area where the wounded people were found pending investigation.

“We are still in the early stages of this incident,” said Chief Bob Day. “We understand the heightened emotion and tension many are feeling in the wake of the shooting in Minneapolis, but I am asking the community to remain calm as we work to learn more.”

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson and the city council called on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to end all operations in Oregon’s largest city until a full investigation is completed.

“We stand united as elected officials in saying that we cannot sit by while constitutional protections erode and bloodshed mounts,” a joint statement said. “Portland is not a ‘training ground’ for militarized agents, and the ‘full force’ threatened by the administration has deadly consequences.”

The city officials said “federal militarization undermines effective, community‑based public safety, and it runs counter to the values that define our region. We’ll use every legal and legislative tool available to protect our residents’ civil and human rights.”

Advertisement

They urged residents to show up with “calm and purpose during this difficult time.”

“We respond with clarity, unity, and a commitment to justice,” the statement said. “We must stand together to protect Portland.”

U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, urged any protesters to remain peaceful.

“Trump wants to generate riots,” he said in a post on the X social media platform. “Don’t take the bait.”

A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

Advertisement

Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.


Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending