Connect with us

News

F1’s master of aerodynamics Adrian Newey puts his reputation on the line

Published

on

F1’s master of aerodynamics Adrian Newey puts his reputation on the line

During a career spanning more than 40 years and 25 world championships, Formula One engineer Adrian Newey has shown his talent for turning “mad ideas into reality” in building elite racing cars.

In a sport known for technical precision, Newey’s approach has been to repeatedly ask the same four questions. “How can we increase performance? How can we improve efficiency? How can we do this differently? How can I do this better?” he wrote in his 2017 memoir.

A master of aerodynamics, Newey is a rare car designer celebrated in a sport where gladiatorial drivers dominate screen time. When the 65-year-old revealed his intention to leave reigning champions Red Bull this year, the speculation quickly went into overdrive. However, nobody thought retirement would appeal to a man once described by F1 legend Frank Williams as “more competitive than his drivers”.

In joining the Aston Martin F1 team as its managing technical partner, Newey is putting his reputation back on the line. All eyes are on whether he can repeat his success at a fourth team and to further justify his status as an industry legend as well as his annual pay package north of £20mn.

“He had alternatives. He could be sailing. He has taken the opportunity to join with Lawrence Stroll to try and repeat [his success],” said Eddie Jordan, the former F1 team owner and Newey’s manager. 

Advertisement
Adrian Newey, left, with Christian Horner, who was accused of inappropriate behaviour earlier this year but cleared after an investigation © Mark Thompson/Getty Images

By hiring Newey, billionaire Stroll has signalled his determination to win championships in historical British racing green.

“I can tell you, Adrian is a bargain,” Stroll said. “I’ve been in business for over 40 years now, and I’ve never been more certain. It’s not an investment. He’s a shareholder and a partner.”

Newey, who will officially start at Aston Martin next year, has also been given some equity in the F1 team in a move that he describes as having “skin in the game”.

However, his price tag, which is more than what many drivers and even some top football players earn, has raised eyebrows among some F1 insiders. Others question his recent contribution to the Red Bull’s recent success, pointing to the strength of the team, including its technical director Pierre Waché.

The matter of credit for Red Bull’s success reared its head last year, when Newey’s wife Amanda posted: “What a load of hogwash” on social media in response to an article in industry publication Motorsport that touched on how Red Bull’s technical prowess had evolved.

Advertisement

Growing up in Stratford-upon-Avon, Newey picked up a passion for four wheels — and engineering — from his veterinarian father, who worked on cars in his garage. Newey would sketch out his own race car designs. By 12 he knew he wanted to design race cars for a living.

Mechanics work on the car of Aston Martin’s Spanish driver Fernando Alonso at the Singapore Grand Prix last year
Mechanics work on the car of Aston Martin’s Spanish driver Fernando Alonso at the Singapore Grand Prix last year © Caroline Chia/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

Attracted by a wind tunnel used by F1 teams, he studied aeronautics at the University of Southampton, reasoning that race cars are more like aircraft.

Newey was a pivotal influence as the sport embraced the importance of aerodynamics in performance, with the “downforce”, the vertical air that pushes cars downwards, increasing grip and speed around corners.

He wrote his name into F1 lore at Williams and McLaren for his role in championship-winning cars in the 1990s. He also experienced tragedy with the crash that resulted in the death of legendary Brazilian driver Ayrton Senna in a Williams car in 1994.

Newey was hired by the late Dietrich Mateschitz, billionaire co-founder of Red Bull from McLaren soon after he bought the old Jaguar F1 team in 2004. The team went on to win both championships — drivers and constructors — four years running from 2010 to 2013. 

After seven years of Mercedes domination, Red Bull returned to the front of the grid in 2021, when Max Verstappen controversially won the drivers’ championship from Lewis Hamilton. The team’s RB19 last year was one of the most dominant F1 cars ever, winning 21 of 22 races.

Advertisement

Newey’s potential at Aston Martin is not the only reason the sport has been gripped by his move. F1 supporters will also be watching how Red Bull will adjust following disruption this year when a female employee accused team boss Christian Horner of inappropriate behaviour. Horner denied the allegations and was cleared after an investigation.

The engineer, who still uses a pencil to sketch instead of a computer, will lead Aston Martin’s drivers — double world champion Fernando Alonso and Stroll’s son Lance — in turning a middling outfit into champions. Since Stroll rebranded the team, Aston Martin has finished seventh, seventh and fifth in the championship.

He will also need to tackle the next F1 regulatory overhaul in 2026, which requires the construction of an all-new generation of F1 car, more agile with revamped aerodynamics.

The designer will have the freedom of a newly built F1 factory and wind tunnel. Honda, which helped to drive Red Bull’s recent championships, has signed up to supply the engine.

Damon Hill, who drove a Newey-designed Williams to championship victory in 1996, says the designer has a special understanding of what drivers need.

Advertisement

“He understands the car is a tool for the driver and it’s no good creating a beast nobody can drive,” Hill told the Financial Times. “He actually understands your bum is in that seat and if it spooks you, it’s not going to be good.”

While Hill likens F1 to an “unexploded bomb” that can “explode in your face”, he says Newey’s experience means he is ready. “If he can’t get [Aston Martin] out of the midfield to the front end, I’d be astonished,” he said.

News

Video: At Least Two Killed in Shooting at Brown University

Published

on

Video: At Least Two Killed in Shooting at Brown University

new video loaded: At Least Two Killed in Shooting at Brown University

transcript

transcript

At Least Two Killed in Shooting at Brown University

Students remained locked in their dorms and classrooms as the police searched for the shooter, who was described as a man wearing black. At least two people are dead, and eight are in critical condition.

At 4:00 in the afternoon, we received a call. 4:05 was when the initial call came in to Brown University of a report of an active shooter. I can confirm that there are two individuals who have died this afternoon, and there are another eight in critical status. We do not have a shooter in custody at this time. There is a shelter in place in effect for the greater Brown University area. If you live on or near Brown’s campus, we are encouraging you to stay home and stay inside. This is a sad state of our country right now where you have to plan for these things. And hopefully the community takes some comfort to know that their Providence leadership has planned for this occurrence, including very recently.

Advertisement
Students remained locked in their dorms and classrooms as the police searched for the shooter, who was described as a man wearing black. At least two people are dead, and eight are in critical condition.

By McKinnon de Kuyper

December 13, 2025

Continue Reading

News

Multiple people shot near Brown University, police say

Published

on

Multiple people shot near Brown University, police say

In this image from video, law enforcement officials gather outside the Brown University campus in Providence, R.I., on Saturday, Dec. 13, 2025.

Kimberlee Kruesi/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kimberlee Kruesi/AP

Multiple people have been shot near Brown University in Providence, R.I., on Saturday, police said.

The Providence Police Department said it is actively investigating the situation and is encouraging the public to shelter in place until further notice.

There is no suspect in custody, the university said on X, adding that it’s coordinating with multiple law enforcement agencies to search for a suspect.

Advertisement

The university  issued an alert Saturday afternoon that the shooter was spotted near the Barus and Holley building, which houses the School of Engineering and Physics Department.

“Continue to shelter in place. Remain away from Barus & Holley area. Police do not have a suspect in custody and continue to search for suspect(s). Brown coordinating with multiple law enforcement agencies on site,” the university said.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Continue Reading

News

What to know about Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s release from immigration custody

Published

on

What to know about Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s release from immigration custody

BALTIMORE — Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose mistaken deportation helped galvanize opposition to President Donald Trump’s immigration policies, was released from immigration detention on Thursday, and a judge has temporarily blocked any further efforts to detain him.

Abrego Garcia currently can’t be deported to his home country of El Salvador thanks to a 2019 immigration court order that found he had a “well founded fear” of danger there. However, the Trump administration has said he cannot stay in the U.S. Over the past few months, government officials have said they would deport him to Uganda, Eswatini, Ghana and, most recently, Liberia.

Abrego Garcia is fighting his deportation in federal court in Maryland, where his attorneys claim the administration is manipulating the immigration system to punish him for successfully challenging his earlier deportation.

Here’s what to know about the latest developments in the case:

Abrego Garcia is a Salvadoran citizen with an American wife and child who has lived in Maryland for years. He immigrated to the U.S. illegally as a teenager to join his brother, who had become a U.S. citizen. In 2019, an immigration judge granted him protection from being deported back to his home country.

Advertisement

While he was allowed to live and work in the U.S. under Immigration and Customs Enforcement supervision, he was not given residency status. Earlier this year, he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, despite the earlier court ruling.

When Abrego Garcia was deported in March, he was held in a notoriously brutal Salvadoran prison despite having no criminal record.

The Trump administration initially fought efforts to bring him back to the U.S. but eventually complied after the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in. He returned to the U.S. in June, only to face an arrest warrant on human smuggling charges in Tennessee. Abrego Garcia was held in a Tennessee jail for more than two months before he was released on Friday, Aug. 22, to await trial in Maryland under home detention.

His freedom lasted a weekend. On the following Monday, he reported to the Baltimore immigration office for a check-in and was immediately taken into immigration custody. Officials announced plans to deport him to a series of African countries, but they were blocked by an order from U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland.

On Thursday, after months of legal filings and hearings, Xinis ruled that Abrego Garcia should be released immediately. Her ruling hinged on what was likely a procedural error by the immigration judge who heard his case in 2019.

Advertisement

Normally, in a case like this, an immigration judge will first issue an order of removal. Then the judge will essentially freeze that order by issuing a “withholding of removal” order, according to Memphis immigration attorney Andrew Rankin.

In Abrego Garcia’s case, the judge granted withholding of removal to El Salvador because he found Abrego Garcia’s life could be in danger there. However, the judge never took the first step of issuing the order of removal. The government argued in Xinis’ court that the order of removal could be inferred, but the judge disagreed.

Without a final order of removal, Abrego Garcia can’t be deported, Xinis ruled.

The only way to get an order of removal is to go back to immigration court and ask for one, Rankin said. But reopening the immigration case is a gamble because Abrego Garcia’s attorneys would likely seek protection from deportation in the form of asylum or some other type of relief.

One wrinkle is that immigration courts are officially part of the executive branch, and the judges there are not generally viewed as being as independent as federal judges.

Advertisement

“There might be independence in some areas, but if the administration wants a certain result, by all accounts it seems they’re going to exert the pressure on the individuals to get that result,” Rankin said. “I hope he gets a fair shake, and two lawyers make arguments — somebody wins, somebody loses — instead of giving it to an immigration judge with a 95% denial rate, where everybody in the world knows how it’s gonna go down.”

Alternatively, the government could appeal Xinis’ order to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and try to get her ruling overturned, Rankin said. If the appeals court agreed with the government that the final order of removal was implied, there could be no need to reopen the immigration case.

In compliance with Xinis’ order, Abrego Garcia was released from immigration detention in Pennsylvania on Thursday evening and allowed to return home for the first time in months. However, he was also told to report to an immigration officer in Baltimore early the next morning.

Fearing that he would be detained again, his attorneys asked Xinis for a temporary restraining order. Xinis filed that order early Friday morning. It prohibits immigration officials from taking Abrego Garcia back into custody, at least for the time being. A hearing on the issue could happen as early as next week.

Meanwhile, in Tennessee, Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty in the criminal case where he is charged with human smuggling and conspiracy to commit human smuggling.

Advertisement

Prosecutors claim he accepted money to transport, within the United States, people who were in the country illegally. The charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee for speeding. Body camera footage from a Tennessee Highway Patrol officer shows a calm exchange with Abrego Garcia. There were nine passengers in the car, and the officers discussed among themselves their suspicions of smuggling. However, Abrego Garcia was eventually allowed to continue driving with only a warning.

Abrego Garcia has asked U.S. District Court Judge Waverly Crenshaw to dismiss the smuggling charges on the grounds of “selective or vindictive prosecution.”

Crenshaw earlier found “some evidence that the prosecution against him may be vindictive” and said many statements by Trump administration officials “raise cause for concern.” Crenshaw specifically cited a statement by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on a Fox News Channel program that seemed to suggest the Justice Department charged Abrego Garcia because he won his wrongful-deportation case.

The two sides have been sparring over whether senior Justice Department officials, including Blanche, can be required to testify in the case.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending