Can US natural gas relieve Europe from Russian supply dependency?

The US and EU final week introduced a breakthrough deal to wean Europe off Russian pure fuel. The “groundbreaking” pact, mentioned Joe Biden, would strip Vladimir Putin of the flexibility to “coerce and manipulate” the continent’s vitality shoppers.

The “joint recreation plan” includes three steps. First, the US will assist the EU safe short-term liquefied pure fuel provides to start displacing Russian fuel. Second, Europe will work “towards the purpose of guaranteeing” an even bigger marketplace for US fuel by 2030. Third, the US would assist Europe speed up its transition to wash vitality, ultimately decreasing its fuel demand.

How way more fuel has the US supplied?

The US mentioned it will attempt so as to add 15bn cubic metres of liquefied pure fuel to the EU this 12 months, with extra in years to return. It didn’t specify the origins of the fuel, noting it will “work with worldwide companions”.

By comparability, Russia at present exports 155bn cubic metres a 12 months of fuel to the EU.

The baseline for the pledged 15bn just isn’t clear. However the US shipped about 22bn cubic metres of fuel to Europe in 2021 and has already despatched 10bn within the first quarter of this 12 months, based on Refinitiv. All of it’s within the type of LNG, fuel that has been condensed so it may be carried on a ship.

Some further US provides will come from a just lately opened export venture in Louisiana, the Calcasieu Move plant. However these volumes have been already anticipated out there, and crops elsewhere alongside the shoreline are working at most capability.

So for now, any further LNG should be coaxed to Europe through greater costs, diverting ships initially sure elsewhere. That would show painful for shoppers.

“Any incremental LNG cargoes despatched from the US to Europe are extra probably a redirection of current US LNG cargoes — and therefore will do little when it comes to materials ‘worth aid’,” mentioned Financial institution of America.

How can the US get different LNG provides to Europe?

Most US LNG contracts are usually not essentially restricted to a specific vacation spot. So if costs stay excessive sufficient in Europe, shippers might preserve redirecting cargoes there.

And if the EU succeeds in changing the roughly 15bn cubic metres of LNG that it at present imports from Russia — a a lot smaller quantity than is imported by way of pipelines — these seaborne Russian cargoes may in flip circulation to different locations.

“A giant reshuffling is about to occur,” mentioned one business government, referring to this risk.

That is a part of the Biden plan. Jake Sullivan, the president’s nationwide safety adviser, mentioned the administration would depend on a “cargo diversion technique”.

However business phrases nonetheless make this plan difficult.

“I feel within the shorter time period, it’s going to be pretty powerful,” mentioned Inosi Nyatta, a associate at legislation agency Sullivan & Cromwell. “Possibly they’ll have some kind of incentive regime the place they incentivise the sellers to renegotiate.”

The US tack thus far has been to lean on governments — in huge importing international locations corresponding to Japan or South Korea, but additionally in Qatar, which sits with the US and Australia within the prime tier of LNG exporters. Releasing up but extra cargoes will “contain plenty of diplomacy”, mentioned a senior administration official.

Does Europe have infrastructure to obtain extra seaborne fuel?

Sure, however not in the fitting place. Jap Europe and Germany are most depending on Russian fuel. However a lot of the obtainable LNG regasification infrastructure is in southern Europe.

Germany has proposed constructing new terminals to obtain LNG, or renting regasification vessels that may float offshore. Both means, the shift from pipeline dependency to LNG dependency might be costly and take time.

Traders in pricey new import terminals — whether or not taxpayers or capital markets — will want assurances {that a} transition to cleaner vitality gained’t merely render these fossil gasoline property nugatory in a decade’s time.

Does the LNG pact compromise US local weather commitments?

The White Home’s promotion of LNG has been welcomed by American fossil gasoline producers, which even earlier than Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have been touting these exports as a “inexperienced initiative” that may permit Asian importers to burn pure fuel as a substitute of coal to make electrical energy.

It is usually an enormous shift for the EU, which was rising extra hostile to fuel even earlier than the invasion.

“It is a U-turn from earlier EU buying selections as many patrons had stopped negotiating with US builders for LNG as a consequence of ESG [environmental, social and governance] considerations,” mentioned Sindre Knutsson at Rystad Vitality, a consultancy.

Environmentalists have been scathing. “Permitting for the growth of latest and expanded fuel export services would lock in many years of reliance on dangerous, risky fossil fuels and spell catastrophe for our local weather,” mentioned Kelly Sheehan on the Sierra Membership.

What concerning the longer run?

Biden and Ursula von der Leyen, European Fee president, additionally mentioned an even bigger plan for the US to ship 50bn cubic metres a 12 months of extra LNG to Europe by 2030.

That is possible on paper. In line with the funding financial institution Cowen, the US authorities has authorized a dozen export tasks with a complete capability of 206bn cubic metres a 12 months — about twice present US capability.

However LNG crops price billions of {dollars} and take years to construct, and nobody expects all 12 of the tasks to go forward. Builders and their monetary backers usually need contracts with purchasers — some lasting 20 years or extra — earlier than they begin ploughing money into tasks.

Twice weekly publication

Vitality is the world’s indispensable enterprise and Vitality Source is its publication. Each Tuesday and Thursday, direct to your inbox, Vitality Source brings you important information, forward-thinking evaluation and insider intelligence. Enroll right here.

In its assertion with the White Home, the European Fee mentioned it will work “towards the purpose of guaranteeing” demand for 50bn cubic metres of US fuel — an obvious concession to the LNG business’s anxieties about future demand.

On the similar time, US officers have been clear that the longer-term intention was nonetheless to cease utilizing fossil fuels, together with LNG.

“The true path to vitality safety runs by way of clear vitality,” mentioned a senior administration official. “The primary half is getting Europe off Russian fuel. The second half is getting Europe off fuel altogether.”

Further reporting by Amanda Chu in Washington