Connect with us

News

5 things that could happen in Ukraine next | CNN

Published

on

5 things that could happen in Ukraine next | CNN



CNN
 — 

Russia’s warfare in Ukraine is approaching the one-month mark, and its troops’ development on some key cities, together with the capital of Kyiv, seems to have slowed.

Whereas there’s a rising image that Russia’s assault on Ukraine has not gone to plan, the nation continues to make use of its air energy to obliterate cities and goal civilians to push Ukraine into submission.

So the place is that this warfare going? Listed below are 5 issues to be careful for in coming weeks.

Specialists are warning that the extra Russia takes successful on the bottom, the extra seemingly it’s to accentuate its aerial bombing marketing campaign and using different “standoff” weapons that put Russian troopers in much less hazard.

Advertisement

There’s little dependable data popping out of both Ukraine or Russia on dying tolls, however a report in a Russian tabloid on Monday urged that the Russian facet had misplaced almost 10,000 troopers and that one other 16,000 had been injured.

The Komsomolskaya Pravda web site eliminated the numbers later within the day, claiming the numbers solely appeared within the first place as a result of it had been hacked. CNN couldn’t confirm the numbers, however the dying toll is nearer to what US intelligence businesses have been reporting.

Such losses, if confirmed to be true, would clarify each the stall in floor motion and the uptick in aerial bombing of key cities and different standoff assaults.

A senior US protection official stated Russia has begun firing on the southern metropolis of Mariupol from ships within the Sea of Azov.

“Russia nonetheless has capabilities and reserves, and there’s going to be an uptick in depth because it makes an effort to usher in extra troops,” Jeffrey Mankoff, a distinguished analysis fellow on the US Nationwide Protection College’s Institute for Nationwide Strategic Research, instructed CNN.

Advertisement

A current UK Protection Ministry replace stated that Russia was pulling in troops from throughout the nation, and as distant as its Pacific Fleet. It is usually pulling fighters from Armenia and personal army corporations, Syrians and different mercenaries, it stated.

The query is how lengthy Russia can proceed with excessive losses of personnel.

“There’s going to be extra troops and different tools and assist, in fact, however there’s a level the place it’s going to be arduous to maintain this type of an operational tempo, notably the figures that we’ve been listening to about each by way of males and materials losses, when it outstrips the flexibility to resupply,” Mankoff stated.

A Ukranian serviceman walks among debris outside the destroyed Retroville shopping mall in in the capital of Kyiv on March 21.

There’s plenty of speak in regards to the Russian warfare effort stalling, however whether or not or not that’s true comes all the way down to what Moscow’s targets had been within the first place. Even that’s arduous to know for certain, because the nation’s public justification for its invasion is obvious propaganda – the “denazification of Ukraine,” for instance.

It’s seemingly that Russia is, on the very least, attempting to soak up components of japanese Ukraine. Areas like Donetsk and Luhansk, which make up the Donbas area, have been managed by Russian-backed separatists since 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea, and whereas Russia’s ambitions might stretch past Donbas, it’s nonetheless seemingly a central focus, specialists say.

Advertisement

Whereas there may be plenty of consideration on Russia’s push towards Kyiv, a lot of the Ukrainian military stays close to Donetsk and Luhansk, the place they’re grouped because the Joint Forces Operation (JFO). The motion of Russian troops recommend they’re attempting to encircle the JFO on three axes, and that is more likely to be Russia’s predominant focus. That’s clear by wanting on the sophistication of the sort of troops being despatched there, stated Sam Cranny-Evans, a analysis analyst with the Royal United Providers Institute.

“The Southern Navy District – in Donetsk, Luhansk, Mariupol, Berdyansk, Melitopol – these are the most effective troops within the Russian military. They usually all the time work. They’re designed to struggle NATO,” Cranny-Evans instructed CNN.

“So the forces that had been dedicated to the Kyiv encirclement means that it was a aim that both Russia thought could be simply achieved, or they overestimated the capabilities of these forces. In order that leads, partially, to the conclusion that an encirclement of the Ukrainian troops within the JFO is a part of the aim that Russia is trying to obtain. And the actions of Russian forces do appear to recommend that that’s the case.”

He added that the Western media was so targeted on Russia’s losses and Ukraine’s defiance that it was giving a false sense of the dynamics of the warfare.

“If we have a look at these maps, it’s clear that Russian forces have really superior a great distance into a really large nation. They’ve taken fairly just a few cities, so there are actually much more Ukrainian residents residing below Russian rule than there have been three weeks in the past,” Cranny-Evans stated.

Advertisement

“No matter what number of Russian autos have blown up, or what number of Russian troopers are killed, there’s additionally more likely to be a really excessive variety of Ukrainians which have suffered an analogous destiny.”

Russian officals, left, and Ukrainian officials, right, during talks on February 27 in the Gomel region of Belarus.

One state of affairs is that the Ukraine warfare might change into a protracted battle. It’s seemingly that Russia has misplaced a big variety of troopers, weapons and tools within the warfare, and whereas it has engaged in long-running conflicts prior to now, it gained’t need to go away this one with its army completely destroyed.

“The negotiations are the one space the place issues are wanting a little bit promising as a result of each Russia and Ukraine have stated within the final week that they’re shifting in direction of an precise substantive dialogue, as a substitute of Russia simply laying down an ultimatum,” Keir Giles, a Russian skilled on the UK-based suppose tank Chatham Home, instructed CNN.

Russian officers have stated that their calls for embrace Ukraine dropping its pitch to affix NATO and to demilitarize and undertake a “impartial” standing, like Austria and Sweden have. However the situations for what which means for Ukraine must be negotiated.

President Vladimir Putin’s chief spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, instructed CNN in an interview Tuesday that Russia additionally needed Ukraine to just accept that Crimea – which Russia annexed in 2014 – is formally a part of Russia and that the breakaway statelets of Luhansk and Donetsk “are already unbiased states.”

Advertisement

Quite a few specialists have speculated that Russia will look to carve off components of japanese Ukraine.

“It’s going to be painful to deliberate, until it turns into potential for Western support, each army and humanitarian, to be absorbed in Ukraine at enough charges that they will genuinely flip the tide in opposition to the Russian development,” Giles stated.

“If it’s a query of who can pour within the better assets and take the better ache with a view to prevail, Russia has a monitor file for inflicting substantial financial injury on itself and struggling by itself inhabitants, with a view to prosecute wars,” stated Giles, referring to sanctions which might be beginning to chunk the Russian economic system.

However US officers usually are not so optimistic talks will go nicely. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated at a press convention final week {that a} diplomatic resolution to the warfare was unlikely, saying that Russia’s actions “are in complete distinction to any severe diplomatic effort to finish the warfare.”

He additionally urged that Russia would escalate the warfare through the use of chemical weapons.

Advertisement
Refugees carrying their personal belongings leave Mariupol. While some have been able to leave, Ukrainian officials say others have been involuntarily taken to Russia.

Russia has been telling residents of the southern metropolis of Mariupol to go away because it carries on an aggressive aerial bombardment that has torn town to items. It forces have opened what they name “humanitarian corridors” to permit civilians to flee, however tens of hundreds of them have been transported to Russia.

Russian state media group RIA Novosti reported that almost 60,000 residents of Mariupol had reached Russian territory “in full security.” Russian media has proven strains of autos apparently heading east to the border, some 40 kilometers from Mariupol.

However Mariupol council accused Russia of forcing residents to go to Russia in opposition to their will. “Over the previous week, a number of thousand Mariupol residents have been taken to Russian territory,” town stated in a press release.

Mariupol mayor Vadym Boichenko stated Saturday that “what the occupiers are doing right now is acquainted to the older era, who noticed the horrific occasions of World Battle II, when the Nazis forcibly captured individuals.”

Giles stated there was a priority of a reprise of that darkish historical past within the coming weeks.

Advertisement

“Russia has a historical past of vicious and savage reprisals in opposition to civilians in any space when any sort of resistance motion is going down. It’s moved already to deport individuals from Mariupol to the distant components of Russia, which is straight out of Russia’s twentieth century script for coping with these issues,” he stated.

Giles referred to the “deportations” of a whole bunch of hundreds of individuals from the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which Russia annexed into the Soviet Union firstly of World Battle II.

“‘Deportation’ is a euphemism. It’s been used as a reasonably innocuous time period for what occurred to those individuals, which was successfully enslavement and hunger. is delivery off the ladies, the youngsters, the individuals that you just need to take away from societies with a view to neutralize them,” Giles stated.

“They’re typically met with fairly horrific fates. In the event that they survived in any respect, they didn’t return for years or a long time.”

Ukrainian refugees arriving at Przemysl train station in Poland on March 20, 2022.

The destiny of the warfare is one factor, however the destiny of Ukraine is one other. Simply as Russian air energy left a few of Syria’s cities and cities in rubble, components of Ukraine are starting to look the identical.

Advertisement

Already, greater than 3.5 million Ukrainians have left the nation. Most are girls and youngsters, that means households are additionally being torn aside. The warfare has triggered the most important motion of refugees Europe has seen since World Battle II. These numbers are rising at a price of round 100,000 individuals a day.

When you embrace the variety of individuals internally displaced, 10 million Ukrainians have now left their houses. That’s almost 1 / 4 of the nation’s inhabitants.

And what previous wars present is that refugees usually by no means return to their residence international locations. So usually there may be little to return to. Generally the specter of one more warfare is sufficient to maintain refugees away.

It’s one thing that negotiators will want to consider in any talks on the horizon. Even when a diplomatic resolution might be discovered to finish this warfare, a query that may stay is whether or not it’s sufficient to forestall the subsequent one, Cranny-Evans stated.

“If we glance, traditionally, at authoritarian regimes that carry out poorly in a army setting, the don’t have a tendency to alter their habits in a optimistic path afterwards. So the query could be that if the Ukrainians say, ‘OK, we will probably be impartial, simply get out,’ the Russians may say ‘No, you must give us Donetsk and Luhansk. That could be bearable for Ukraine, maybe, with a view to cease the warfare,” he stated.

Advertisement

“However what if, as an example, 10 years down the road, Ukraine has superior on a big army modernization? Or the subsequent Russian president desires to show his value, they usually conduct one other warfare? There are plenty of situations to suppose by way of by way of what ending this warfare might result in.”

News

Map: Minor Earthquake Strikes Southern California

Published

on

Map: Minor Earthquake Strikes Southern California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 4 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “light,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.3 struck in Southern California on Thursday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 8:12 p.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northeast of Yucaipa, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Aftershocks in the region

An aftershock is usually a smaller earthquake that follows a larger one in the same general area. Aftershocks are typically minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.

Advertisement

Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles

Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.

When quakes and aftershocks occurred

Advertisement

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Thursday, Oct. 23 at 11:16 p.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Friday, Oct. 24 at 1:12 a.m. Eastern.

Maps: Daylight (urban areas); MapLibre (map rendering); Natural Earth (roads, labels, terrain); Protomaps (map tiles)

Continue Reading

News

Trump backs away from sending federal agents to San Francisco | CBC News

Published

on

Trump backs away from sending federal agents to San Francisco | CBC News

Donald Trump will not deploy federal agents to San Francisco, the U.S. president and the city’s mayor said in separate social media posts on Thursday, a surprising stand-down as Trump pressures Democratic-led cities around the country to step up enforcement against crime and illegal immigration.

San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie, a Democrat, said in a post on X that Trump called him Wednesday night to tell him he was calling off any plans for a federal deployment.

Lurie said the city would continue to partner with federal agencies to combat drug crime, but that “militarized immigration enforcement” would not help.

“We appreciate that the president understands that we are the global hub for technology, and when San Francisco is strong, our country is strong,” Lurie said.

Trump confirmed the agreement in a post on Truth Social, saying the federal government had been preparing a surge in San Francisco but would cancel it.

Advertisement

“I spoke to Mayor Lurie last night and he asked, very nicely, that I give him a chance to see if he can turn it around,” Trump said. “The people of San Francisco have come together on fighting Crime, especially since we began to take charge of that very nasty subject.”

The Republican president said two major tech executives — Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff — had called him “saying that the future of San Francisco is great.”

Trump had indicated San Francisco would be a next stop for National Guard troops he was sending to various U.S. Democratic-led cities, moves that have been challenged in courts.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported on Wednesday that the Trump administration would send more than 100 federal agents to the city to ramp up immigration enforcement.

WATCH | Trump threatens ‘dangerous’ U.S. cities:
Advertisement

Trump decries ‘enemy from within,’ threatens to train military in U.S. cities

U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to use ‘dangerous’ U.S. cities as training grounds for the military at a rare meeting of top military officials where he and U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth took aim at what they called ‘woke’ military standards.

Protest against federal deployment

Despite the apparent stand-down, a handful of U.S. Border Patrol vehicles arrived at a U.S. Coast Guard base in the Bay Area on Thursday morning and were met with several hundred protesters.

Demonstrators carried signs reading “Stop the kidnappings” and “Protect our neighbours,” with one protester smacking the window of a truck as it passed by.

Federal agents eventually used less-lethal rounds to disperse the crowd, with protesters saying one person was injured by a projectile and that another had their foot run over.

Two uniformed law enforcement officers hold a man, wearing a black hoodie, face covering and sunglasses, on the ground.
Police officers detain a demonstrator as people protested against the arrival of federal agents at the Coast Guard base in Alameda on Thursday. (Manuel Orbegozo/Reuters)

Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee, the former member of Congress and civil rights activist, said in televised remarks that a federal deployment would divide and intimidate.

“We will not allow outsiders to create chaos or exploit our city,” said Lee, a Democrat.

Advertisement

Trump aims to deport record numbers of immigrants in the U.S. illegally, portraying them as criminals and a drain on U.S. communities.

Democrats in major U.S. cities have criticized the crackdown, saying it has terrorized law-abiding residents, separated families and hurt businesses.

Trump has long highlighted what he views as rampant crime in San Francisco and had signalled in recent weeks that he would send federal agents there.

“We’re going to San Francisco and we’ll make it great,” Trump told Fox News on Sunday.

WATCH | National Guard in Portland:
Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: Inside Our Reporter’s Collection of Guantánamo Portraits

Published

on

Video: Inside Our Reporter’s Collection of Guantánamo Portraits

new video loaded: Inside Our Reporter’s Collection of Guantánamo Portraits

Carol Rosenberg, a reporter who has covered the U.S. military prison at Guantánamo Bay since it opened in 2002, describes a collection of stylized portraits of its detainees in the war against terrorism. The photos were taken as part of a Red Cross program for the detainees to communicate with their families.

By Carol Rosenberg, Laura Bult, Coleman Lowndes, Stephanie Swart, June Kim and Zach Caldwell

October 23, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending