Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s top industries rely on immigrant labor and call for reform of ‘broken’ system

Published

on

Wisconsin’s top industries rely on immigrant labor and call for reform of ‘broken’ system



A decade-long labor shortage has created a reliance on immigrant labor in Wisconsin. Industry leaders are calling for reform of the state’s legal immigration system.

Over the last decade Wisconsin has experienced a labor shortage paired with a below national average unemployment rate and a decreasing birth rate. These conflicting trends have resulted in an increased reliance on immigrant labor for the state’s most economically significant industries.

“We absolutely have a shortage of workers in Wisconsin and part of the solution has to be bringing in people from outside of the country,” Kurt Bauer, president and CEO of Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce (WMC), the state’s largest business and manufacturing lobbyist, told a USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin reporter.

Revisions to the United States’ guest worker program, often referred to as different types of visas such as H-1B or H-2A, is necessary for a statewide workforce solution, Bauer added.

Advertisement

Latinos often make up a significant portion of the workforce of Wisconsin’s most important industries despite accounting for only 7.6% of the state’s total population, according to U.S. Census data compiled by the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s School for Workers in a 2023 study. The state’s Latino population more than quadrupled from 1990 to 2020, from 93,000 to 447,290, and surpassed African Americans as the state’s largest minority population in 2014.

Years of slowing growth in the labor supply and few signs of a native-born worker rebound have led to demands from both industry lobbyists and immigrant advocates to reform federal immigration laws to ensure both the continued productivity of the state’s important industries and the safety of both visiting workers and native residents.

Immigrants fill jobs that are unappealing to native workers

A 2024 Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development labor supply study pointed at the increasing number of retirements by members of the “Baby Boomer Generation” as a main cause of the labor shortage. The number of new workers entering the workforce is only slightly higher than the number of workers exiting the labor market and the study’s authors noted a negative effect on employers in the state.

“Many businesses report that the lack of available workers has hindered expansion, even curtailing the ability to meet current business needs in some cases,” the study’s authors wrote.

Advertisement

Immigrants fill jobs that are unappealing to native workers, according to Pew Research, often for reasons such as low wages, long hours, dangerous working conditions, or insufficient transportation and housing options close to the workplace. These unappealing jobs are essential in almost all of Wisconsin’s most economically significant industries including manufacturing, agriculture, hospitality, health care, and building and grounds maintenance.

The UW School for Workers study found Wisconsin’s most celebrated industry, dairy farming, likely relies on between 46% and 90% undocumented immigrant labor, with common estimates settling near 70%, to fill the unappealing jobs on medium to large farms in the state. The study surveyed dairy workers across the state and found a majority of its participants to be undocumented.

The long hours and low wages of jobs typically filled by immigrant laborers in Wisconsin may be unappealing to native-born laborers but are seen as an opportunity for building wealth for natives of Latin American countries where wages and working conditions are often worse.

Immigrant laborers often send a large portion of their earnings to family in their home country, called a remittance. Families use the funds to take care of themselves and manage the construction of houses for their family member to reside in when they return from years of working in the United States.

Another key finding of the UW School for Workers study was that housing can be difficult for immigrant workers to obtain, especially if they lack official identifying documents, so employers often offer housing as a “recruitment tool,” according to the study’s authors.

Advertisement

“Immigration status is rarely discussed at work and is treated as an open secret by employers and employees alike,” the study found.

‘Employers need to be held to a larger accountability’

Healthy Opportunities for Latin Americans (HOLA) is an organization that provides outreach services to Latin Americans living in Central Wisconsin, regardless of their documentation status. The organization provides legal information, pop-up clinics, translation services, community-building events and more. Part of the organization’s mission is to promote “economic advancement and civic engagement for workers and families from Latin American countries.”

Mark Bradley, HOLA board secretary/treasurer, has heard from various stakeholders in his years with the organization in an effort to learn about Wisconsin’s immigrant laborer population and the various strategies employers and laborers use to keep the state’s essential industries operating despite a declining qualified or interested native workforce population.

He explained several strategies Wisconsin employers use to find workers, which include paying cash to laborers or paying dubious limited liability corporations in exchange for the work that is completed in these unappealing workplaces.

Advertisement

“If we want to talk about dealing with the criminals in the immigration situation, we should be honest and we should talk about all of the criminals,” Bradley said. Wisconsin employers continue to recruit workers with questionable documentation despite likely tax law violations. Inadequate employment reporting requirements allow these unlawful practices to continue unchecked year after year.

Tony Gonzalez, who has worked as an advocate for immigrants in Central Wisconsin for over a decade and is well-connected with area court systems, employers, public officials and others relevant to his work, said there have not been any major workplace raids in Central Wisconsin since the start of the Trump administration in January.

“Has immigration come? Oh, hell yeah, a lot. But they come with specific warrants and specifically with orders to get particular people. Nobody in a group,” Gonzalez told a USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin reporter. “These employers need to be held to a larger accountability because they know what they’re doing. They know who they’re hiring. … The government is focusing more on the immigrant that is just working than the employers that are illegally employing people without even an electronic verification or anything like that.”

Gonzalez said the current arrangement with immigrant laborers is accepted by employers because the laborers are easily replaced if one is deported or injured on the job and is forced to leave the area.

Wisconsin’s largest industry advocates are calling for immigration reform

Statewide trade organizations such as WMC and Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation, the state’s largest farm lobbyist, have found strong support in surveys of their members for both strong border crossing enforcement and reforms to the country’s guest worker program, particularly the H-2A visa program that covers temporary agricultural workers.

Advertisement

“A critical step in addressing labor shortages is modernizing immigration laws. It’s unrealistic to expect workers to enter legally when the current system is broken,” Tyler Wenzlaff, Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation’s director of national affairs, said in an email to a USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin reporter. “Expanding the H-2A visa program to include dairy workers would be a meaningful step in ensuring Wisconsin farmers have access to a stable workforce.”

WMC’s Bauer said his organization’s members desire to secure the border, and reforming the state’s legal immigration system is “an economic imperative.”

A December survey of WMC’s members, conducted by the organization, revealed 92% did not believe the Trump administration’s immigration policies would impact their workforce, according to Bauer. The survey included responses from 153 employers “of all sizes, industries and geographic locations in Wisconsin.”

“I think their statement of no concern is dismissive of the role that they need to take,” Gonzalez said. “If any industry is dependent on that labor, you need to step up and tell your legislators because otherwise things won’t change.”

HOLA’s Bradley asked a similar question of voters, activists and employers in the state in comments to a USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin reporter.

Advertisement

“What’s the business plan to help employers in farming, meat processing, construction, manufacturing or hospitality? What’s the strategy? Nobody wants dairy farming to collapse in the state of Wisconsin. Nobody is saying that’s a good thing,” Bradley said.

Industry advocates tread a careful line between honoring the real need for immigration reforms and the majority of votes in the state’s rural areas where many of their members and their employees reside in support of President Donald Trump and the anti-immigrant rhetoric used in his campaign.

“There is often a gap between campaign rhetoric and the realities of implementing policy,” Wenzlaff said. “WFBF supports securing the border but believes the labor challenges facing Wisconsin farmers should be addressed separately. It is possible to enforce border security while also ensuring agriculture at a local level has the workforce it needs to thrive.”

WFBF’s Dairy Committee’s 2024 Agricultural Labor Report lists 17 policy reforms including several specifically for the H-2A visa program including reducing paperwork, streamlining application systems, allowing flexibility in compensation rates, reducing housing rules and increasing funding to the Department of Labor to reduce delays in their work to support employers.

Advertisement

Bauer similarly shared the results of a survey of WMC’s members and further work by himself and his staff to understand Wisconsin’s population of laborers. He summed up the results of the work with the statement, “We need workers, but we need them to be legal.”

Bauer’s opinion on the topic, informed by WMC’s work to understand the issue, is that potential immigrants should be vetted for national security, public safety, public health and skillset before being issued a visa.

“It really doesn’t need to be much more complicated than that,” Bauer concluded.

Erik Pfantz covers local government and education in central Wisconsin for USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin and values his background as a rural Wisconsinite. Contact him at epfantz@gannett.com.



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes

Published

on

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes


The Wisconsin Department of Health Services on Thursday reaffirmed its recommended childhood vaccine schedule after recent changes at the federal level.

Wisconsin vaccine guidance

Local perspective:

Advertisement

On Monday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control announced changes to its childhood vaccine schedule. The DHS said those modifications further stray “from alignment with America’s leading medical associations and organizations.”

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

Advertisement

At this time, the DHS said it is not making changes to its vaccine recommendations – including no changes to Wisconsin’s school or child care vaccine recommendations.

The DHS said it continues to endorse the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule and has issued guidance to Wisconsin health care providers reaffirming that recommendation.

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

“The CDC’s new recommendations were based on a brief review of other countries’ practices and not based on data or evidence regarding disease risks to children in the United States,” DHS Secretary Kirsten Johnson said in a statement. “This upends our longstanding, evidence-based approach of protecting our children from the viruses that pose a risk in our country.

“Copying another country’s schedule without its health and social infrastructure will not produce the same health outcomes. It creates chaos and confusion and risks the health of Wisconsin’s youngest and most vulnerable citizens.”

Advertisement

Big picture view:

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said the CDC will continue to recommend that all children are immunized against 10 diseases for which there is international consensus, as well as chickenpox.

The updated schedule is in contrast to the CDC child and adolescent schedule at the end of 2024, which recommended 17 immunizations for all children. On the new schedule, vaccines – such as those for hepatitis A and B, meningitis, rotavirus and seasonal flu – are now more restricted. They are recommended only for those at high risk or after consultation with a health care provider. 

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

“President Trump directed us to examine how other developed nations protect their children and to take action if they are doing better,” Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent. This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.”

Advertisement

The Source: The Wisconsin DHS released information about its childhood vaccine recommendations. Information about the CDC changes is from LiveNOW from FOX with contributions from The Associated Press.

HealthWisconsinNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal

Published

on

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin man accused of killing his parents and stealing their money to fund a plan to assassinate President Donald Trump is set to enter a plea deal resolving the case Thursday.

Nikita Casap, 18, is expected to agree to the deal during a morning hearing in Waukesha County Circuit Court in suburban Milwaukee. He goes into the hearing facing multiple charges, including two homicide counts, two counts of hiding a corpse and theft, with a trial scheduled to begin March 2.

Online court records did not list the terms of the plea agreement. Harm Venhuizen, a spokesperson for the state public defender’s office, which is representing Casap, said state Supreme Court ethics rules prevent the office from commenting on cases. The Waukesha County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to questions about the deal.

According to a criminal complaint, investigators believe Casap shot his mother, Tatiana Casap, and his stepfather, Donald Mayer, at their home in the village of Waukesha on or around Feb. 11.

Advertisement

He lived with the decomposing bodies for weeks before fleeing across the country in his stepfather’s SUV with $14,000 in cash, jewelry, passports, his stepfather’s gun and the family dog, according to the complaint. He was eventually arrested during a traffic stop in Kansas on Feb. 28.

Federal authorities have accused Casap of planning his parents’ murders, buying a drone and explosives and sharing his plans with others, including a Russian speaker. They said in a federal search warrant that he wrote a manifest calling for Trump’s assassination and was in touch with others about his plan to kill Trump and overthrow the U.S. government.

Stay up to date with the news and the best of AP by following our WhatsApp channel.

Follow on

Advertisement

“The killing of his parents appeared to be an effort to obtain the financial means and autonomy necessary to carrying out his plan,” that warrant said.

Detectives found several messages on Casap’s cellphone from January 2025 in which Casap asks how long he will have to hide before he is moved to Ukraine. An unknown individual responded in Russian, the complaint said, but the document doesn’t say what that person told Casap. In another message Casap asks: “So while in Ukraine, I’ll be able to live a normal life? Even if it’s found out I did it?”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy

Published

on

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy


A Republican-authored bill would require Wisconsin school boards to adopt a policy that would inform a parent or guardian if a student requests to be called by names and pronouns not aligned with their gender assigned at birth.

The bill would require legal documentation, parental approval and a principal to approve changes to a student’s name and pronouns. The bill makes exceptions for nicknames or students going by their middle names.

Although the bill has no chance of being signed into law by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, it reflects the continuing political energy of two issues: parental authority in schools, and the treatment of trans youths.

Notably, hundreds of trans-related bills were introduced at multiple levels of government across the country in the last year.

Advertisement

The lawmakers who introduced the bill, Rep. Barbara Dittrich (R-Oconomowoc) and state Sen. Andre Jacque (R-Franken), said it is about parental rights and transparency. At a Capitol public hearing Jan. 6, Jacque cited a ruling from October 2023 in which a Waukesha judge sided with parents who sued the Kettle Moraine School District after staff at the middle school used a child’s chosen name and pronouns. The parents did not support their child’s transition.

But the Senate Committee on Education hearing grew heated as LGBTQ+ youth, parents of transgender children, Democratic lawmakers and other advocates called the bill unnecessary and potentially violence-inducing. They said it makes life worse for a vulnerable population that makes up less than 1% of Wisconsin pupils.

Jacque argued that without the bill, educators can make decisions about children’s health and well-being in secrecy.

Advertisement

“Hiding from us important things that are going on in their lives is not only disrespectful to parents, it is harmful to our children and deliberately sabotaging the ability for vital communication to take place,” Jacque said.

Sen. Sarah Keyeski (D-Lodi) questioned why the Legislature should be involved when school boards already have the ability to approve such policies.

“I think it’s interesting how much you lean on local control for certain things, but then all of a sudden, you want government control,” she said.

Abigail Swetz, executive director of Fair Wisconsin, said such a bill would prevent educators from “engaging in the best practice” for using names and pronouns. Swetz, a former middle school teacher who advised a Gender and Sexuality Alliance club, said she’s seen firsthand the positive impact of affirming trans and nonbinary students.

Advertisement

“The mental health struggles that trans youth face are not a self-fulfilling prophecy. They’re entirely pressured outcomes, and bills like SB120 add to that pressure,” Swetz said.

Jenna Gormal, the public policy director at End Abuse Wisconsin, said forcing students to come out to parents before they’re ready reinforces power and control while stripping students of their autonomy.

Alison Selje, who uses they/them pronouns, spoke of the seismic shift in their well-being and academic performance when someone used their correct pronouns. Selje was a student at Madison West High School at the time. The Madison Metropolitan School District has a policy – which has survived a court challenge – protecting the use of names and pronouns of trans students.

“I remember the first time I heard someone use the right pronoun for me. This was during the pandemic so I was still wearing a mask, but underneath it, I was smiling ear to ear,” Selje said. “The use of my pronouns was a confidence boost, but it was also a lifesaver.”

Advertisement

Support for the bill came from two women representing Moms for Liberty. Laura Ackman and Amber Infusimo shared stories of parents finding out about their children’s new gender identity through school playbills and yearbooks.

“This bill rightly affirms schools shouldn’t be making significant decisions without parental knowledge or involvement,” Ackman said. “It does not prevent kindness, respect or compassion.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending