Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin dispute over hail damage claim headed to court

Published

on

Wisconsin dispute over hail damage claim headed to court


A dispute over a hail damage claim prompted one family to write to Contact 6. Months later, their case is headed to court.

Advertisement

Their attorney is arguing their damage should have been covered by insurance.

Even since the clouds rolled in and the hail beat down, Nicole Maziasz has been riding out the storm with State Farm Insurance.

“Every time I hear, “like a good neighbor,” I think, I would not like neighbors like that,” said Maziasz.

Advertisement

On April 19, 2023, a hailstorm blew through Washington County. In Jackson, Maziasz went out to survey the damage.

“We saw our back patio just peppered with granules,” said Maziasz.

Advertisement

The granules were from her roof’s shingles. Her trusted contractor confirmed hail damage to her roof. A State Farm adjuster who visited the house agreed there was hail damage.

The State Farm adjuster didn’t walk the back half of the roof because he said it was too steep. State Farm sent out a second adjuster who came to a different conclusion about their roof.

Advertisement

“He came down and said there was no damage,” said Maziasz.

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Contact first spoke with Masiasz and her husband in January. They said that State Farm was low-balling their roof damage claim. They have a $31,000 estimate for hail damage repair from one company. Maziasz says State Farm found just $700 in damage.

Advertisement

At the time, State Farm told Contact 6 it “seeks to provide our customers all benefits to which they are entitled within the terms of the insurance policy.”

“They just dug in their heels,” said Maziasz.

Advertisement

After Contact 6’s report aired, Maziasz heard from other people having similar experiences with State Farm. One of them had a lawyer. Maziasz called him.

“He said “you definitely have a case,” said Maziasz.

Ryan Graff is a founding partner at MGW Law in Manitowoc. He’s also a former insurance defense lawyer.

Advertisement

“One of my biggest clients was, you guessed it, State Farm,” Graff told Contact 6.

Graff says he left that job to represent policyholders. Graff says a disproportionate number of his cases are against State Far.

Advertisement

“Since 2020, I have sued State Farm over residential roof claims over 50 times. Probably closer to 75,” said Graff. “All other carriers combined wouldn’t equal that number.”

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX6 News app for iOS or Android

Graff filed a civil suit against State Farm in Washington County on behalf of the Maziasz family. It accuses State Farm of breach of contract and bad faith.

Advertisement

The suit argues a disconnect between what State Farm’s policy says it covers for hail damage and how it trains its staff to identify it. The suit says that State Farm is “wrongfully and improperly using a standard definition of hail damage to asphalt shingles that is not found anywhere in the policy.”

“And, we’re not going to recognize pure granular loss as hail damage covered by the policy,” said Graff. “Some carriers do it infrequently. State Farm does it constantly.”

Advertisement

Graff says it’s an argument that’s helped him win cases before.

“There is this macro trend in insurance. They’re covering less,” said Graff.

Graff is also representing Don and Donia Groves in a civil suit against State Farm. The Groves told Contact 6 in January that their roof was damaged by the same April 19 storm in Hartford. Multiple contractors gave the Groves damage estimates about $20,000 or higher. State Farm sent the Groves a check for $6,087, but later increased  the amount to $9,860.

Advertisement

In response to the Maziasz lawsuit, a State Farm spokesperson told Contact 6:

“State Farm is focused on being there for all our customers and is committed to paying what we owe. We’re prepared to share the facts and bring clarity and context to this matter. Since the matter is now in litigation, the appropriate place to do that is in a court of law.”

Advertisement

The Maziasz family says it paid about $30,000 for a new roof. Then, they switched insurance providers. When Maziasz handed over her case to Graff, you could say, the clouds parted.

“It was a huge relief because I spent so much time over the course of that year. It was just like, “your turn,” said Maziasz.

Maziasz’s case is still in the discovery phase. If a judge decides that granular loss was covered by her policy, her case would go to a jury to decide whether there was granular loss.

Advertisement

Graff says many of his cases result in settlements.



Source link

Wisconsin

New Wisconsin AD Shawn Eichorst: Badgers Need ‘Texas Swagger’ And Less Humility

Published

on

New Wisconsin AD Shawn Eichorst: Badgers Need ‘Texas Swagger’ And Less Humility


New Wisconsin athletic director Shawn Eichorst, who spent the last eight years at Texas, believes his new and old schools have much in common.

Both are well-regarded research universities in state capitals that belong to major conferences and have relatively similar enrollments.

He also pointed out one difference.

Advertisement

“There’s swag at Texas, right?” Eichorst said Tuesday during his introductory news conference. “There’s 30 million people in Texas. We’ve got swag, too, but we have a little humility with that deal. We need to get our shoulders up. We need to feel good about what it is that we’re doing.”

Wisconsin could gain more of that Texas swagger if its football program gets back to winning the way it did the last time Eichorst was employed in Madison. Eichorst, who most recently worked as a deputy athletic director at Texas, received a five-year deal worth $1.6 million annually, with provisions for increases and incentives. He was hired 2½ months after Chris McIntosh left to become the Big Ten’s deputy commissioner for strategy.

Eichorst worked at Wisconsin from 2006-11 when Barry Alvarez was AD and Bret Bielema was leading the football program. He followed that up with stints as an athletic director at Miami (2011-12) and Nebraska (2012-17) before Texas athletic director Chris Del Conte hired him in 2018.

He returns to Wisconsin with the Badgers coming off back-to-back losing seasons in football, a notable fall for a program that had 22 straight winning seasons from 2002-23. Wisconsin coach Luke Fickell has gone 17-21 after posting a 53-10 record with one College Football Playoff appearance in his last five years at Cincinnati.

Eichorst hasn’t worked with Fickell before but said he’s encouraged by their initial conversations.

Advertisement

“Obviously he’s won every place he’s been,” Eichorst said. “My expectation is more of me than him, meaning I need to pour into him, learn more about his program, how he has things set up, how his athletes are taken care of, how we’re supporting that endeavor. And then we can figure out, as we move along, what that might look like.”

Football struggles led to Eichorst’s downfall the last time he was an athletic director.

He fired Nebraska coach Bo Pelini in 2014 and hired Mike Riley, who had gone 93-80 in 14 seasons at Oregon State. Eichorst was dismissed shortly after Nebraska suffered an early-season loss to Northern Illinois in 2017. Riley was fired at the end of that season after going 19-19 in three years.

When Eichorst’s hiring was announced last week, he spoke about how much he had grown from that Nebraska stint. Wisconsin interim chancellor Eric Wilcots led the search and has emphasized Eichorst’s accomplishments at Texas, which has won the Learfield Directors’ Cup all-sports standings five times in the last six years.

Texas ranked anywhere from fifth to ninth in the Directors’ Cup standings in the five years before Wilcots’ arrival. Texas’ football team went a combined 23-27 from 2014-17 but has made two College Football Playoff appearances in the last three years.

Advertisement

“Everybody looks at the end result of what we did at Texas,” Eichorst said. “When we got there in 2018, we weren’t very good in a lot of areas. And that didn’t change overnight.”

Eichorst said one thing that has caught his attention about Wisconsin is the overall quality of its head coaches.

“You’re going to be as good as your coaches,” Eichorst said. “That’s it. If you have an elite group of coaches who are working together and uniting and galvanizing and learning from one another and taking it out to their individual programs, I think you can start to build something special. I go back to Texas. We built a room of really elite head coaches and put them at the top of everything we did to help guide us.”

Eichorst said this job is particularly important to him because of his Wisconsin roots. He was born in Lone Rock, about 45 miles northwest of the Madison campus.

He treasured his previous stint at Wisconsin and says he believes this school “represents everything that is great about higher education and college athletics.”

Advertisement

“Nobody will work harder for Wisconsin athletics,” Eichorst said. “I love this state, and I love everything that it represents. The passion is there. You can see it. I don’t have to make it up. I’ve lived it. It’s in my heart.”

___

AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, officials in standoff with homeowner over year-round skeleton display

Published

on

South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, officials in standoff with homeowner over year-round skeleton display



The city of South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has ordered a homeowner to take down his year-round giant skeleton display or face fines, but the homeowner is standing firm and refusing, even as the deadline to remove the display has passed.

Advertisement

Now there’s a skeleton standoff.

The city cited ordinance violations in their order for Sean Oster to dismantle the lawn decorations. The notice specifically references “large Halloween decorations being displayed not during the appropriate time of year.”

Oster was also ordered to make other improvements to his property.

But Oster has refused to take down the display, which is re-dressed as the year goes on and is currently sporting a Fourth of July theme. The Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm, has come to his aid, saying the city’s actions violate Oster’s First Amendment rights.

City administrators declined to comment, citing a pending investigation. Neighbors have been divided by the display; some say they’re fine with it, and think it brings fun and positivity to the neighborhood, but some others want to see it removed and say the lawn should be kept up better and more consistently.

Advertisement

Oster said he’s hoping to reach an agreement with the city, and said he’s corrected all other violations outside of the display. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Former Wisconsin judge to be sentenced after conviction in obstructing arrest of Mexican immigrant

Published

on

Former Wisconsin judge to be sentenced after conviction in obstructing arrest of Mexican immigrant


Former Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan, who was convicted of felony obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal officers in a case that highlighted President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration crackdown, is scheduled to be sentenced Wednesday in federal court.

Dugan, 67, faces up to five years in prison after a jury convicted her on Dec. 19. She resigned from her position as a Milwaukee County circuit judge two weeks later amid threats of impeachment from Republican state lawmakers. She had been a judge for nine years.

Trump administration tried to make an example out of Milwaukee judge

The Trump administration brought the case against Dugan as the president pressed ahead with his sweeping immigration crackdown. Trump’s administration and his allies branded Dugan as an activist judge, while Dugan’s attorneys said during the trial that the Trump administration was trying to make an example out of Dugan to “crush her.”

Immigrant rights advocates and other Dugan allies argued that the administration was trying to use her case to blunt judicial opposition to Trump’s immigration efforts. The case became a bellwether nationally in the conflict between the judiciary and Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany, a fierce Trump loyalist running for Wisconsin governor, urged authorities to “lock her up” in a social media post following her conviction.

Dugan’s attorneys declined to comment ahead of the sentencing. Dugan did not testify during her trial, but her attorneys said she would be making comments to the court on Wednesday. That would be her first public comments on the case in more than a year.

Advertisement

Prosecutors push for ‘serious sentence’

Dugan’s attorneys argued that as a judge she was immune from prosecution. U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, who will hand down the sentence, has rejected attempts by Dugan to vacate her obstruction conviction.

Prosecutors argued in a sentencing memo filed last week that Dugan violated her oath as a judge and put both law enforcement and the public at risk.

“Judges are entrusted with tremendous discretion, but there is a line they cannot cross,” Executive Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Frohling wrote. “The defendant crossed that line.”

Dugan’s attorneys argued she has “punished enough,” including resigning as a judge and facing threats of violence. They argued in her sentencing memo that she should not be sentenced to any jail time besides the part of one day she already spent in federal custody.

Under federal sentencing guidelines, the presentence report calls for 15 to 21 months behind bars. The judge is not bound by those guidelines.

Advertisement

Prosecutors said the average sentence for obstruction cases is 16 months, but they did not recommend a sentence.

“This was a serious offense, and it warrants a correspondingly serious sentence,” Frohling wrote.

No matter what she is sentenced to, Dugan’s attorneys said they plan to file an appeal.

Dugan’s case was a first for Wisconsin

Dugan’s case marked the first time that a state judge in Wisconsin went to trial on charges of obstructing immigration agents. She was found not guilty of concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor.

On April 18, 2025, immigration officers went to the Milwaukee County courthouse after learning 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz had reentered the country illegally and was scheduled to appear before Dugan for a hearing in a state battery case.

Advertisement

Dugan confronted agents outside her courtroom and directed them to the chief judge’s office because she told them their administrative warrant wasn’t sufficient grounds to arrest Flores-Ruiz.

After the agents left, she led Flores-Ruiz and his attorney out a private jury door. Agents spotted Flores-Ruiz in the corridor, followed him outside and arrested him after a foot chase. A week later, FBI agents arrested Dugan in the courthouse, leading her outside in handcuffs.

Flores-Ruiz was deported in November.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending