Connect with us

Wisconsin

The Trump administration issued its plan on PFAS. Here’s why Wisconsin environmental groups have doubts

Published

on

The Trump administration issued its plan on PFAS. Here’s why Wisconsin environmental groups have doubts


play

MADISON – The Trump administration has issued its plan for addressing “forever chemicals” across the country, but environmental groups warn that the actions outlined could be disingenuous and fail to protect people from the toxic chemicals.

The Environmental Protection Agency on April 28 issued its plan to address PFAS, saying it would work with states to ensure that drinking water is protected and cleaned up from the toxic chemicals.

Advertisement

But Wisconsin environmental advocates worry that President Donald Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin are only trying to give the appearance of taking hard actions against polluters who release the compounds into the environment.

Here’s what you should know.

EPA lists steps in addressing PFAS

The agency listed areas researchers and scientists hope to work to address PFAS, including:

  • Designating an agency lead for PFAS.
  • Implementing a testing strategy.
  • Launching efforts to collect air-related PFAS information.
  • Ramping up testing methods.
  • Developing wastewater standards.
  • Investigating immediate PFAS dangers using the Safe Drinking Water Act.
  • Working with Congress to establish a liability framework.
  • Advancing remediation and cleanup for public water systems.
  • Assisting states and tribes with enforcement action.
  • Supporting investigations into violations to hold polluters accountable.

The list shows a robust desire to address PFAS, without harming industry or small businesses that may utilize the contaminants, the EPA says.

Advertisement

“…we are tackling PFAS from all of EPA’s program offices, advancing research and testing, stopping PFAS from getting into drinking water systems, holding polluters accountable, and providing certainty for passive receivers,” Zeldin said in a news release. “This is just a start of the work we will do on PFAS to ensure Americans have the cleanest air, land, and water.” 

Trump’s EPA has already rolled back some protections

Some are already skeptical of the suggestions the agency proposed.

In particular, the desire to address PFAS in wastewater is puzzling, given that the Trump administration halted the rule proposed by the Biden administration in the first few days after Trump took office.

Tony Wilkin Gibart, the executive director for Midwest Environmental Advocates, said he sees the new guidance as an attempt to be perceived as an administration responding to the issue.

Advertisement

“But the wild and the chaotic actions of the administration show that the Trump EPA is not serious about governing or about addressing this issue or taking responsibility for the enormous challenges that we face with issues like PFAS contamination,” he said.

The administration has also cast doubt on whether it will defend the drinking water standards that were put into place by the Biden administration. According to a report from the New York Times, industry groups sued over the rules, calling them “unattainable” and “onerous.” The EPA has until May 12 to decide on the lawsuit and whether it wants to defend the rules.

“I think the change in tone is interesting,” Wilkin Gibart said of the PFAS action announcement.

Advertisement

Wisconsin environmental advocates worry

Wilkin Gibart highlighted the Trump administration’s recent layoffs of thousands of staff members at federal agencies, including the EPA.

“If the EPA is burnt to the ground and there are fewer scientists to do the work of understanding the risk from PFAS compounds or future emerging contaminants, we in Wisconsin and everywhere across the country will be worse off,” he said.

Amy Barrilleaux, the communications director for Clean Wisconsin, shared similar concerns. In particular, she is worried that scientific research on PFAS may not be independent after the mass layoffs.

“The big fear is that it’s not going to be independent research,” she said. “Whoever is going to replace the scientists who’ve been fired from these boards may not be independent.”

Wilkin Gibart also pointed out that many actions listed are already required under law, like adding PFAS to the Toxic Release Inventory.

Advertisement

“In some cases, the bullet points say that the administration will restart efforts that they abruptly ended over the last few months,” he said. “But they’re going to be restarting with far fewer staff and a decreased ability to move any of these things forward.”

What about the paper straw ban?

Another move Trump made quickly after taking office was to ban paper straws, saying they were a “pulpy, soggy mess that torments too many of our citizens.” The document also pointed to PFAS as an issue in paper straws, according to the New York Times.

Though Zeldin has said the science on PFAS is “not yet settled,” the paper straw ban documents outlined how the chemicals are harmful to human health, taking a much firmer stance.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of health and human services, has pledged to work toward removing PFAS in the food system, another potentially proactive step.

Advertisement

Wisconsin is uniquely positioned to handle PFAS even without federal standards

If the EPA and Zeldin decide not to defend the PFAS standards at the federal level, Wisconsin will be uniquely situated to continue its work on protecting residents from the chemicals.

The state implemented standards at 70 parts per trillion in drinking water in 2022 and a requirement for routine testing of public water systems. Surface water and fish are regularly tested throughout the state to ensure safety for those who harvest and consume fish.

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has also proposed groundwater standards and is working to update the drinking water standards to lower numbers, based on new science showing that even small amounts of PFAS can impact humans.

Advertisement

Those updated standards should be moved forward in the process of setting new rules, Barrilleaux said, because they will help protect Wisconsinites, no matter what happens at the federal level.

“We want the most protective standard that we can have,” she said.

Advertisement

Laura Schulte can be reached at leschulte@jrn.com and on X @SchulteLaura.





Source link

Wisconsin

Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin

Published

on

Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin




Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin – CBS News

Advertisement













Advertisement




























Advertisement

Watch CBS News


CBS News’ Noel Brennan hits a frozen lake in Wisconsin to go ice sailing.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Senate must pass bill so WI athletics can stay in the game | Opinion

Published

on

Senate must pass bill so WI athletics can stay in the game | Opinion



AB 1034 provides clarity around NIL policies, offers limited financial flexibility tied to existing athletic facility obligations, and ensures that Wisconsin Athletics can compete on equal footing.

Advertisement
play

  • Wisconsin’s Assembly Bill 1034 aims to modernize state law to reflect new NCAA rules on athlete compensation.
  • The bill would relieve several state universities of $15 million in athletic facility debt to reinvest in athletic programs.
  • Proponents argue the legislation is necessary for Wisconsin universities to compete with peer institutions in other states.
  • Wisconsin athletics reportedly generate over $750 million in statewide economic impact annually.

Let me put my bias, or experience up front. I was a student athlete at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and was fortunate to have one of my sons graduate as a far better student athlete.

I am writing in support of Assembly Bill 1034, which modernizes Wisconsin law to reflect the realities of today’s college athletic landscape, not because of those past “glory days,” but because college athletics has changed more in the past three years than in the previous three decades.  

New national rules now see universities sharing millions of dollars annually with student-athletes through revenue sharing and name, image, and likeness (NIL) opportunities. Other states have responded quickly, updating their laws to ensure they can compete in this new environment.

Advertisement

Making sure Wisconsin doesn’t fall behind

The State Assembly, with overwhelming bipartisan support, passed AB 1034, now it’s up to the Wisconsin State Senate to pass this legislation and send it quickly to Gov. Tony Evers to ensure Wisconsin doesn’t fall behind.

AB 1034 provides clarity around NIL policies, offers limited financial flexibility tied to existing athletic facility obligations, and ensures that Wisconsin Athletics can compete on equal footing with peer institutions across the country. In a measured way, the bill would relieve UW-Madison, UW-Milwaukee, and UW-Green Bay of $15 million of debt related to athletic facilities with the expressed purpose that those dollars would instead be used to invest in athletic programs.

This legislation is critical for two inter-connected reasons, competition and economic impact.

At a recent capitol hearing, UW-Madison Director of Athletics Chris McIntosh explained that 80 percent of the entire athletic department budget is generated by the football program. That revenue underwrites the competitive commitment to the other 11 men’s and 12 women’s varsity teams, supporting some 600 student athletes.

Advertisement

The capacity for this to continue is threatened by $20 million in new annual name and likeness costs that impact all NCAA schools. An expense that will continue to rise.  In addition, peer institutions in the Big Ten and across the country are committing substantial additional resources to these NIL efforts. In short, without this debt support, the university and its athletes will not only lose an even playing field, they may lose the ability to get on the field.  

This threat from the changing nature of NCAA athletics also poses a threat to the economic impact from college athletics. A recent study found that nearly 2 million visitors came to campus events annually, generating more than $750M in statewide economic impact from Wisconsin athletics. Case in point, each home football game produces a $19M economic impact, with 5,600 jobs in the state tied directly or indirectly to the department’s activities.  

This bipartisan legislation is not about propping up a single sport. It’s about protecting broad based opportunities for all our student-athletes, some of whom we just watched win a gold medal for the U.S. women’s’ hockey team.

Advertisement

Athletics are often noted as the front door to the university, but I would broaden that opening to the State of Wisconsin. Our public university system success strengthens enrollment, attracts the talent that drives our prosperity, and serves as a sustaining way forward for our economy.

Bill provides measured and responsible investment

As the former head of one of our state’s largest business groups, I have spent much of my career engaged in economic development. I know what generates “return on investment.” AB 1034 provides a measured and responsible investment that will generate a positive impact for Wisconsin taxpayers, citizens, and employers.

NCAA athletics has changed, and Wisconsin must change with it, or sit on the sidelines. So let’s encourage the Wisconsin State Senate to pass AB 1034 and put Wisconsin in position to compete on the field which provides a win for our student athletes and all of us who benefit from a world class university system.

Tim Sheehy is a UW-Madison graduate and former student athlete. Sheehy served as the president of the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce for more than 30 years where he oversaw economic development and business attraction for the region.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

NE Wisconsin community, politicians react to US airstrikes in Iran

Published

on

NE Wisconsin community, politicians react to US airstrikes in Iran


GREEN BAY, Wis. (WBAY) – The United States launched airstrikes in Iran on Wednesday, killing Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and prompting fast reactions from across northeast Wisconsin.

In Appleton, over a dozen of protesters came together at Houdini Plaza, protesting the strikes and calling for peace, and in Green Bay, protesters lined the streets with signs condemning the strikes.

One protester we spoke with said the strikes were not about the nuclear protest, but for a regime change.

“All I could think of is WMDs that got us the last war in the Middle East, and it was just a lot of bunk, and the other thing is he said is he’s trying to overthrow the current regime,” said John Cuff of Appleton.

Advertisement

Area lawmakers are also reacting to the attacks in Iran.

Senator Tammy Baldwin released a statement following President Trump’s announcement of the strikes, saying: “My whole career, I have been steadfast in the belief that doing the hard work of diplomacy is the answer, not war. I believed that when I voted against a war in Iraq and I believe it today. Iran poses a real threat and one we need to take head on, but getting into another endless war is not the answer.

“President Trump illegally bombed Iran, totally disregarding the Constitution, putting American troops in harm’s way, and starting another war in the Middle East with no end in sight. The Constitution is clear: if the President wants to start a war, Congress – elected by the people – needs to sign off on it. The Senate needs to come back immediately to vote on this President’s senseless and illegal bombings– I know where I stand.

“Have we learned nothing from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Doubling down with another open-ended war without realistic goals or a strategy to win is not only foolish, but also recklessly puts Wisconsin’s sons and daughters at risk.

“President Trump pledged to the American people that he would not get involved in another foreign war, and this is yet another broken promise from this President. The President needs to listen to the people he represents: Americans want fewer foreign wars and more focus on them and their everyday struggles.”

Advertisement

Representative Tom Tiffany also released a statement on X, formerly Twitter, saying: “My thoughts are with the brave U.S. forces carrying out these precision strikes and with the safety of American personnel in the region.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending