Connect with us

Wisconsin

Meet the candidates running for Wisconsin’s 69th Assembly District seat

Published

on

Meet the candidates running for Wisconsin’s 69th Assembly District seat



Republican Karen Hurd, Democrat Roger Halls and Independent Joshua Kelly are running in the Nov. 5 election to represent Wisconsin’s 69th Assembly District.

The 69th Assembly District will elect a new representative as Republican Karen Hurd, Democrat Roger Halls and Independent Joshua Kelly compete for votes in the Nov. 5 general election.

The 69th Assembly District covers the cities of Medford, Neillsville, Abbotsford and Colby and the village Weston. The district lost the cities of Marshfield and Black River Falls and portions of Marathon and Jackson counties following the 2023 redistricting process.

Wisconsin State Assembly representatives serve two-year terms. Republican Donna Rozar has represented the district in two terms since 2021 but filed for noncandidacy as her residence is no longer in the district.

Advertisement

To learn more about registering to vote and to find your polling place, visit the My Vote Wisconsin website.

USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin asked each of the candidates to address important issues in the district and why they are running for the position.

Roger Halls

Residence: Stanley

Age: 45

Occupation and education: I work in information technology for a medium-sized business. I have some college experience and currently attend Fox Valley Technical College for cyber security

Advertisement

Relevant experience: I sat on the City Council of Stanley for six years. I served four years active duty in the U.S. Army. I strongly believe in giving back to the community by working with Children’s Miracle Network, Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northwestern Wisconsin, and Wisconsin Father’s for Children and Families.

Campaign website/Facebook page: hallsforwi.com and Halls for Wisconsin on Facebook

Karen Hurd

Residence: Town of Withee

Advertisement

Age: 66

Occupation and education: Nutritionist. Truman State University, Kirksville, Missouri, bachelor’s degree in Spanish, May 1980; Huntington’s College of Health Sciences, Knoxville, Kentucky, diploma of comprehensive nutrition, May 1994 and reaffirmed through testing September 2014; University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, certificate in Grant Writing and Management, June 2007; University of Saint Joseph, West Hartford, Connecticut, master’s degree in biochemistry, December 2017; The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., Master of Public Health degree, August 2024.

Relevant experience: Representative to the Wisconsin State Assembly 68th District, elected in 2022 and currently serving. Village of Fall Creek Trustee from 2021-2024.

Campaign website: www.karenhurdforassembly.com

Joshua Kelly

Advertisement

Residence: Greenwood

Age: 42

Occupation and education: Stainless pipefitter, computer information systems

Relevant experience: I have no relevant experience besides being a voter myself. That being said, with my business I work with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Farm Service Agency and work hand in hand with other state agencies.

Why are you running for office?

Halls: As a father of three girls, and with family in the LGBTQ+ community, I believe their rights are being stripped away. With the Dobbs decision and 24 anti-LGBTQ bills brought up, I want those communities and my family to know they have people fighting for them. I would also like to see our communities flourish and our small businesses succeed, to do that, we need to expand child care, fully fund our schools, expand education, expand on rural broadband, and keep health care in our rural communities. All of these areas are either under attack, not appropriately funded or just ignored.

Advertisement

Hurd: To serve the people of Wisconsin by lowering taxes, prohibiting illegal immigrants from invading our country, making government smaller, giving local control back to the towns, villages and cities, making government fiscally responsible, reducing regulations, bringing down inflation and fixing the economy. I have seen the need for proven conservative leadership in our government.

Kelly: I would never let anyone do for me what I cannot do for myself, and if no one is going to fix these issues then I will just run and do what needs to be done myself.

What makes you the better candidate in this race?

Halls: I moved to Stanley after leaving the Army as a decorated two-tour Afghanistan/Iraq veteran with a Bronze Star. I’ve seen many places, but Wisconsin has always been my favorite. I want my home to thrive and succeed. I realize not everyone has the same story, life experiences and beliefs, but that is what makes us special. All I want is for people to have a happy, fulfilling life and even if that is currently out of reach for many Wisconsinites, I hope to change that. I will bring my open mind, empathy, compassion and humanity to the Wisconsin Assembly.

Hurd: My experience in local and state government, my work experience as a small business owner, as well as the time I spent in the U.S. Army. My ability to communicate both with constituents so that I might represent their thoughts on issues as well as fellow lawmakers in accomplishing my constituents’ desires.

Kelly: I am from where I run from and did not have to change my residency or change where I vote to do so just because I thought I might have a better chance of winning. I feel that I have the best interests in mind for my community. I feel that I am a good representation of the people who live here and would work tirelessly. Move heaven and earth to get done what is needed to get done. For the people and by the people.

Advertisement

What is the most pressing issue facing Wisconsin, and how would you address it?

Halls: There are many pressing issues facing Wisconsin today. From price gouging in almost every market, rural and mental health, education costs, cost of living, child care and many more. With farmers at the very heart of Wisconsin, I think the biggest issue is our chemical contamination, PFAS or forever chemicals. Cancer is more prevalent in areas of high contamination, and plant and animal contamination or death is more frequent. A healthy Wisconsin is more prosperous. There are companies that knew their product was dangerous and continued to push it for profit; they should be footing the bill for cleaning it up.

Hurd: The economy. Lowering taxes is one of the best ways to help the economy. The less taxes a person pays allows them more money to spend as they choose. That money will be spent on purchasing products or services, which then creates more demand for the product or service, which then stimulates the business to supply that demand, which means the business can grow − and compensate employees more/hire additional employees to facilitate that growth, which then gives those employees more money in their pocket so that they can purchase products or services − and the circle repeats thereby creating a healthy economy.

Kelly: The most pressing issue facing Wisconsin is the economy, and what I would do is lay the groundwork for a whole new industry in Wisconsin. One that brings new wealth to our state and our dying small towns. I would make all cannabis sold in the state of Wisconsin grown in the state of Wisconsin. I would mandate that it was grown in municipalities of less than 7,500 people. Unionize the whole industry and put a negative 2% tax on anything sold out of state. Anything sold here must be made here by Wisconsin-owned companies.  

What are residents telling you are their most important issues, and how would you address them?

Halls: This varies from community to community. All have grocery prices in the top 5. During COVID-19, supply lines got shut down. Demand was still high, but supply was low, so prices went up. Most supply lines have fully recovered, but prices have not gone down. Prices are still almost 21% higher than they were at the start of the pandemic; that is not how supply and demand work, that is how greed works. I would support legislation to stop price gouging and raise the minimum wage in Wisconsin.

Hurd: The economy, inflation, illegal immigration and high crime. These issues have to be addressed by lowering taxes, stopping illegal immigration and being tougher on crime.

Advertisement

Kelly: Residents are telling me about a wide array of issues that concern them from child care to lack of action in our government. What I would do to address these issues is to work both sides of the aisle. Get people to come together and work on what really needs to be done by compromise. Though we may be divided on how to solve problems. We should not be divided on the fact they still need to be solved, and if we cannot have a common discourse then we have all lost.

Residents of central Wisconsin are seeing increasing costs in necessary and everyday expenses such as housing, child care, groceries, health care and transportation. If elected, what will you do to help residents who are struggling to make ends meet?

Halls: I will work to expand affordable housing initiatives, promote zoning reforms and offer incentives for developers to build more affordable homes and apartments in central Wisconsin. I will advocate for increased state funding for child care subsidies and support the expansion of child care centers to make care more accessible and affordable for working families. I will push for Medicaid expansion and work to lower prescription drug costs, making health care more affordable and accessible for everyone. I will support policies that reduce price gouging on food and essential goods, including subsidies for local agriculture and supporting small businesses to keep costs down.

Hurd: Lower taxes. See answer above for how lowering taxes helps. Also, reducing government spending reduces inflation.

Kelly: I would like to bring good-paying jobs to our state, in the form of the cannabis industry. With no more than a 5% sales tax. Take .2% off the top and send it straight to the schools. Then take 2% and give it directly to the local municipalities from were it was grown or manufactured. A 2% portion would go to the state and the last .8% would go into a fund that would be distributed monthly to the people of Wisconsin. Anyone who makes less then $70,000 a year, with the people on the lower end receiving more than the top end on a bell curve model.

As costs have increased for individuals, so have the costs for our local units of government. Our local schools and technical colleges, municipalities and counties are limited in how much local tax levies can be raised. These limits were set decades ago and adjustments to them are rare and inadequate for matching increases in cost of living and inflation. If elected, what would you do at the state level to reduce the burden on local residents who have to consider levy limit referendums for school districts, public safety workers or large transportation projects so frequently in elections?

Halls: We can tie levy limits to inflation, allowing municipalities, counties and school districts to increase revenue as costs rise, reducing frequent referendums. Push for more funding for public education, transportation and public safety. Restoring support can ease the burden on taxpayers while maintaining essential services. Advocate for local control, allowing communities to decide their tax and spending without excessive state restrictions, ensuring resources are directed where they are most needed. Addressing these issues at the state level, we can reduce the reliance on levy limit referendums, help local governments better manage rising costs and ease the financial pressure on residents.

Advertisement

Hurd: In this last budget, we dramatically helped by increasing the shared revenue for all municipalities in the state. We also provided the municipalities with more general transportation aid (except for the towns as Governor Evers vetoed that increase using his partial veto power). We also made available $150 million for agricultural road improvement as well as continuing to fund the Local Road Improvement Program. We raised the per student cap by $325 per child for each year of the budget as well as increased funding substantially for categorical spending by schools. We will continue to work on funding for our roads, our municipalities and the students of Wisconsin.

Kelly: My answer for the last question addressed this.

Erik Pfantz covers local government and education in central Wisconsin for USA TODAY NETWORK – Wisconsin and values his background as a rural Wisconsinite. Contact him at epfantz@gannett.com.



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees

Published

on

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees


Nearly all artificial Christmas trees in the world today are made in China. And with that comes an up to 30 percent tariff rate on imported Christmas products — including artificial trees. 

Kris Reisdorf is co-president of the Racine- and Sturtevant-based home and garden store Milaeger’s. On WPR’s “Wisconsin Today,” Reisdorf said tariffs are affecting their prices on artificial trees, but she’s mitigating most of the rate hike through negotiations with manufacturers and by taking on lower profit margins herself. 

“We are doing our fair share in making Christmas affordable,” Reisdorf said. “When the average person is thinking 30 percent (tariffs), that’s not by any means what they’re really paying.”

News with a little more humanity

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

Milaeger’s “almost real” trees range from under $100 to well over $3,000. Reisdorff said she’s raised prices for all artificial trees by only around $20 compared to last year.

Residorf said tree sales are largely stable despite the uptick in tariff pricing.

An ABC News/Washington Post poll last year found that 58 percent of Americans were buying artificial trees instead of real ones. That’s up from 40 percent in 2010. 

Advertisement

Greg Hann owns Hann’s Christmas Farm in Oregon. Hann also sits on the Wisconsin Christmas Tree Producers Association Board and is president-elect of the National Christmas Tree Association. 

Hann told “Wisconsin Today” the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 created a surge in business for real evergreen trees and that demand has been holding relatively steady ever since. That said, Hann acknowledged real Christmas tree sales are up for him and fellow growers this year. He attributed the increase in sales to the tariffs and the fact that farmers’ supplies are finally catching up to the higher demand brought on by COVID-19. Nearly all real trees come from the United States or Canada, according to Hann. 

Hann said a recent survey by the National Christmas Tree Association found 84 percent of Christmas tree growers nationwide have kept prices the same over the last two years, and that includes his own farm. Being grown locally in Wisconsin, Hann said his business is largely unaffected by tariffs.

“It’s kind of nice to have a good supply with a stable price in this economy,” he said. 

Reisdorf said that some artificial tree manufacturers are moving operations outside of China to places like Cambodia. But most other countries in the east are also facing tariff threats. 

Advertisement

Instead, Reisdorf said artificial tree importers are lobbying President Donald Trump to lower his 30 percent tariffs on Christmas products like trees and ornaments, because those kinds of goods aren’t coming back to be made in the U.S.

Meanwhile, Hann said his organization is lobbying to have tariffs on artificial trees increased to 300 percent. He said the added tariff costs help create an “even playing field” between real and artificial trees, since farmers have to pay farm staff and cover fertilizer costs. 

But it isn’t always about the cost. Reisdorf said artificial trees have the benefit of lasting “forever,” essentially.

Hann said many of his customers come to the farm looking to keep up the Christmas tradition of picking out their own family tree. 

“They’re looking for that fragrance of a real tree,” he said. “They want to start that tradition of the family together. They pick the tree, they take it into their house.” 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal

Published

on

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal


In a bit of a surprise, Wisconsin Badgers starting center Jake Renfro is using a medical hardship year and entering the transfer portal for his final season of eligibility.

Renfro, a sixth-year senior in 2024, battled numerous injuries this season, limiting him to only four games after having season-ending surgery. He was a full-time starter for Wisconsin in 2024 after missing the entire 2023 season except for the team’s bowl game due to injury.

Prior to his time at Wisconsin, Renfro had played for head coach Luke Fickell at Cincinnati for three seasons. He played in seven games as a freshman in 2020, making six starts at center. He then was the full-time starter as a sophomore in 2021, earning All-AAC honors before missing the entire 2022 season due to injury.

Now, he’s set to come back to college football for a seventh year, rather than turn pro, and will look to do so at another school.

Advertisement

“I want to thank Coach Fickell, the entire coaching and training staff, my teammates, and the University of Wisconsin for everything over the past three seasons,” Renfro wrote. “I am grateful for the support, development, friendships, and memories I have made during my time in Madison. After much prayer and consideration, I have decided to enter the transfer portal and use a medical hardship year to continue my college football journey. I will always appreciate my time as a Badger.”

Renfro was one of the biggest supporters of Fickell publicly, being a vocal leader on the team as the starting center.

With his departure, Wisconsin could need a new starting left tackle, left guard, and center next season, depending on whether Joe Brunner heads to the NFL or returns for another season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister

Published

on

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister


play

  • Sisters Alicia and Lizzy Andrew will face each other in the NCAA volleyball tournament regional semifinals.
  • Alicia is a redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin, while Lizzy is a sophomore middle blocker for Stanford.
  • Alicia and Lizzy Andrew have similarities on and off the court as they each contribute to college volleyball powerhouses.

MADISON — It did not take long for Alicia Andrew to text her younger sister after watching the NCAA volleyball selection show with her Wisconsin teammates in a lounge area in the south end zone of Camp Randall Stadium.

“I was like, ‘Girl!’” Andrew said. “She’s like, ‘I know! I’ll see you in Texas! And I was like, ‘I’m so excited!’”

Advertisement

Andrew will not see her younger sister in the Gregory Gym stands like any other family members, but rather on the court as an opposing player in the Badgers’ NCAA tournament regional semifinal match against Stanford.

Alicia Andrew is a 6-foot-3 redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin. Lizzy Andrew is a 6-foot-5 sophomore middle blocker for Stanford. The sisters will play against each other for the first time with a spot in the NCAA regional finals on the line.

“Certainly when you’re having two high-level Division I starters on teams that are top five, top 10 in the country playing the same position, that’s pretty unique,” Wisconsin coach Kelly Sheffield said. “They’re both talented and competitive. But I also know that the players aren’t going to make it about themselves or the person that’s on the other side of the net. They’re parts of teams that are trying to move on and move forward and play great volley.”

Alicia has naturally fielded questions about the sibling rivalry, but she is “not reading too much into rivalry stuff and just playing this sport.”

Advertisement

“It’s another game,” she said after a recent UW practice. “Yes, it’s her across the net. But it’s a business. We both want to move on to the next round.”

Both players have played key parts in their respective teams’ path to this stage.

Alicia, after transferring from Baylor, is the only UW player to appear in all 98 sets this season and one of five to appear in all 30 matches. She is second on the team with 111 blocks, barely trailing fellow middle blocker Carter Booth’s 119.

“Really wants to be good for the people around her,” Sheffield said of Alicia. “Wants to do her job. Takes pride in her job. There’s a maturity, but yet there’s a playfulness that is a really good balance for her. Love coaching her. She’s wired the right way. She really is.”

Advertisement

Lizzy, meanwhile, ranks seventh in the country with a .441 hitting percentage in 2025 after earning a spot on the all-ACC freshman team in 2024. She also has experience playing with the U.S. U21 national team.

“I’m so proud of how hard she worked and her journey to Stanford,” Alicia said. “She puts in so much work, and she just loves the sport of volleyball. And I have loved watching her grow. It’s been fun to see her get better and better every year. And this past season, she’s been playing lights out.”

That pride has turned Alicia into a frequent viewer of ACC volleyball, of course whenever it has not conflicted with the Badgers’ own matches.

“We try to watch as many of each other’s games as we can, and I always just love watching her play,” she said. “I’m so proud of her. She’s just worked her tail off at Stanford, so to see her excel has been so fun.”

The Andrew sisters — Alicia, Lizzy and Natalie, who is on the rowing team at the U.S. Naval Academy — competed together in high school. (They also have a younger brother, William.) Competing against each other is a new concept for them, though.

Advertisement

“We’re not huge trash talkers, neither one of us,” Alicia said. “So I think that she’s going to play her game. I’m going to play my game. We’re going to have our heads down. There might be some looking across and smiling because we make the exact same expressions and quirky faces and reactions.”

The sisters don’t look the same – Lizzy has blonde hair and Alicia has brown hair. But Alicia quickly sees the resemblance with those on-court mannerisms.

“If there’s a silly play or if there is like a really unexpected dump or something, she’ll turn around and make the exact same face that I will,” Alicia said. “And it’s funny watching her on TV because I’m like, ‘Wow, that looks scary familiar.’”

Advertisement

They have some similarities off the court, too.

“We’re just goobers,” Alicia said. “We just like to have a good time together. Obviously she’s my little sister, but we have always been a close family — like all the siblings — so I feel like we’ve done all the things together growing up in all the sports.”

The Andrew parents are perhaps the biggest winners of the NCAA tournament bracket.

“My parents were super excited,” Alicia said. “They don’t have to split the travel plan, so they can save some frequent flyer miles there and both be in Texas. … They’re always trying to coordinate all the schedules.”

The Andrew family made T-shirts for the unique sisterly matchup. (Alicia thinks she is getting one considering they asked her and Lizzy for their shirt sizes in the family group chat.) The shirts are black, too, so there is no favoritism between Wisconsin and Stanford’s variations of cardinal red.

Advertisement

“They have a Stanford ‘S’ and a tree on it and then a Wisconsin ‘W’ and a little Badger on it, too,” Andrew said. “They’re really excited about these shirts. They’re being non-biased; they’re repping both daughters.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending