Connect with us

Wisconsin

Home energy rebates have arrived. Here’s how you can save money.

Published

on

Home energy rebates have arrived. Here’s how you can save money.


A new federal program launched in Wisconsin last week can help homeowners at all income levels save money on energy efficiency improvements.

Wisconsin was the first state in the country to be approved to administer both of the Home Energy Rebates programs, a nearly $9 billion pair of energy savings initiatives created by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Gov. Tony Evers announced Friday.

Advertisement

Of the roughly $149 million allocated to Wisconsin for the two programs, $74.8 million is now available for whole-home improvements through the Home Efficiency Rebate, or HOMES, program. Another $74.5 million for appliance and equipment upgrades is expected to become available this fall through the Home Electrification and Appliance Rebate, or HEAR, program.

People are also reading…

Advertisement

They will be administered by Focus on Energy, Wisconsin’s statewide efficiency program.

The Wisconsin Public Service Commission decided last year to have Focus on Energy manage the program “because of this existing infrastructure and framework throughout the state that was successful at delivering very similar things already,” said Summer Strand, the commission’s chairperson. “We also were very careful to ensure that the existing Focus programs and money, etc., stayed separate.”

Focus on Energy now allows households to initiate the upgrade process. It will begin accepting rebate requests through the HOMES program by early September.

How to apply for the Home Efficiency Rebate

Wisconsin was the first state to launch the HOMES program, which offers rebates to homeowners and residential property owners for improvements like replacing heating and cooling equipment or increasing insulation.

Advertisement

The program is open to all state residents, no matter how much money they make. Maximum rebates range from $1,500 to $10,000 per household, depending on income level and expected savings. Rebates kick in when efficiency upgrades result in at least 20% energy savings. Households that earn less than 80% of the area median income and can reduce their energy use by at least 35% will be eligible for the largest rebates.

Multifamily buildings will be eligible for up to $10,000 in rebates per unit. They can qualify as low- or moderate-income — and tap into larger rebates — if at least 50% of occupied units meet those criteria.

To earn HOMES rebates, homeowners will need to verify their income through the Focus on Energy website, focusonenergy.com, then select a registered contractor from Focus on Energy’s list to conduct a home energy assessment. The contractor will work with the homeowner to determine the scope of the project, then make the upgrades and submit the rebate application.

The process is similar for owners of single-family rental properties but differs for multifamily buildings.

With or without referendum, Madison has no plan to afford Far East Side 'Imagination Center'

Advertisement

Wisconsin households that have made energy efficiency upgrades since Aug. 16, 2022, may be eligible for retroactive rebates if they can demonstrate that those upgrades met the program requirements.

How to apply for the Home Electrification and Appliance Rebate

A second program set to begin in Wisconsin in the next few months, HEAR, targets a wider range of energy-saving measures, from rewiring to installing electric appliances.

HEAR will only be available to single-family and multifamily households making no more than 150% of the area median income. The program will cover 100% of qualifying project costs up to $14,000 for households making under 80% of the area median income, and 50% of qualifying project costs up to $14,000 for eligible households above that threshold.

It will provide maximum rebates of $1,600 for insulation, air sealing and ventilation, $2,500 for electrical wiring, $4,000 for electrical panel improvements, $840 for electric stoves, cooktops, ranges, ovens and dryers, $1,750 for electric water heaters and $8,000 for heat pumps.

Madison Chamber announces Pressure Chamber finalists

Advertisement

In most cases, homeowners will need to make these purchases through registered contractors or retailers in order to receive HEAR rebates, which will be available as up-front discounts.

New construction will be eligible for HEAR but not HOMES, Strand said. For upgrades that fall under both programs, such as insulation, households will be able to receive a rebate from one or the other, but not both.

Where to begin

Strand recommends starting with Focus on Energy’s Residential Rebate Finder, which can be found at focusonenergy.com/get-started.

“All you have to do is go to the tool, enter your address, whether you own or rent, the size of your family, your income level and your utility providers,” Strand said. “The search results create a menu of incentives, rebates and credits that are available to you, and then you can click on and go through each of those.”

In addition to the new federal programs, the tool includes other federal and state programs that users may be eligible for.

Advertisement

“That’s a really nice way to get that full menu of what’s available, so that you can kind of maximize the opportunities and the savings,” Strand said.



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

New Wisconsin AD Shawn Eichorst: Badgers Need ‘Texas Swagger’ And Less Humility

Published

on

New Wisconsin AD Shawn Eichorst: Badgers Need ‘Texas Swagger’ And Less Humility


New Wisconsin athletic director Shawn Eichorst, who spent the last eight years at Texas, believes his new and old schools have much in common.

Both are well-regarded research universities in state capitals that belong to major conferences and have relatively similar enrollments.

He also pointed out one difference.

Advertisement

“There’s swag at Texas, right?” Eichorst said Tuesday during his introductory news conference. “There’s 30 million people in Texas. We’ve got swag, too, but we have a little humility with that deal. We need to get our shoulders up. We need to feel good about what it is that we’re doing.”

Wisconsin could gain more of that Texas swagger if its football program gets back to winning the way it did the last time Eichorst was employed in Madison. Eichorst, who most recently worked as a deputy athletic director at Texas, received a five-year deal worth $1.6 million annually, with provisions for increases and incentives. He was hired 2½ months after Chris McIntosh left to become the Big Ten’s deputy commissioner for strategy.

Eichorst worked at Wisconsin from 2006-11 when Barry Alvarez was AD and Bret Bielema was leading the football program. He followed that up with stints as an athletic director at Miami (2011-12) and Nebraska (2012-17) before Texas athletic director Chris Del Conte hired him in 2018.

He returns to Wisconsin with the Badgers coming off back-to-back losing seasons in football, a notable fall for a program that had 22 straight winning seasons from 2002-23. Wisconsin coach Luke Fickell has gone 17-21 after posting a 53-10 record with one College Football Playoff appearance in his last five years at Cincinnati.

Eichorst hasn’t worked with Fickell before but said he’s encouraged by their initial conversations.

Advertisement

“Obviously he’s won every place he’s been,” Eichorst said. “My expectation is more of me than him, meaning I need to pour into him, learn more about his program, how he has things set up, how his athletes are taken care of, how we’re supporting that endeavor. And then we can figure out, as we move along, what that might look like.”

Football struggles led to Eichorst’s downfall the last time he was an athletic director.

He fired Nebraska coach Bo Pelini in 2014 and hired Mike Riley, who had gone 93-80 in 14 seasons at Oregon State. Eichorst was dismissed shortly after Nebraska suffered an early-season loss to Northern Illinois in 2017. Riley was fired at the end of that season after going 19-19 in three years.

When Eichorst’s hiring was announced last week, he spoke about how much he had grown from that Nebraska stint. Wisconsin interim chancellor Eric Wilcots led the search and has emphasized Eichorst’s accomplishments at Texas, which has won the Learfield Directors’ Cup all-sports standings five times in the last six years.

Texas ranked anywhere from fifth to ninth in the Directors’ Cup standings in the five years before Wilcots’ arrival. Texas’ football team went a combined 23-27 from 2014-17 but has made two College Football Playoff appearances in the last three years.

Advertisement

“Everybody looks at the end result of what we did at Texas,” Eichorst said. “When we got there in 2018, we weren’t very good in a lot of areas. And that didn’t change overnight.”

Eichorst said one thing that has caught his attention about Wisconsin is the overall quality of its head coaches.

“You’re going to be as good as your coaches,” Eichorst said. “That’s it. If you have an elite group of coaches who are working together and uniting and galvanizing and learning from one another and taking it out to their individual programs, I think you can start to build something special. I go back to Texas. We built a room of really elite head coaches and put them at the top of everything we did to help guide us.”

Eichorst said this job is particularly important to him because of his Wisconsin roots. He was born in Lone Rock, about 45 miles northwest of the Madison campus.

He treasured his previous stint at Wisconsin and says he believes this school “represents everything that is great about higher education and college athletics.”

Advertisement

“Nobody will work harder for Wisconsin athletics,” Eichorst said. “I love this state, and I love everything that it represents. The passion is there. You can see it. I don’t have to make it up. I’ve lived it. It’s in my heart.”

___

AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, officials in standoff with homeowner over year-round skeleton display

Published

on

South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, officials in standoff with homeowner over year-round skeleton display



The city of South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has ordered a homeowner to take down his year-round giant skeleton display or face fines, but the homeowner is standing firm and refusing, even as the deadline to remove the display has passed.

Advertisement

Now there’s a skeleton standoff.

The city cited ordinance violations in their order for Sean Oster to dismantle the lawn decorations. The notice specifically references “large Halloween decorations being displayed not during the appropriate time of year.”

Oster was also ordered to make other improvements to his property.

But Oster has refused to take down the display, which is re-dressed as the year goes on and is currently sporting a Fourth of July theme. The Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm, has come to his aid, saying the city’s actions violate Oster’s First Amendment rights.

City administrators declined to comment, citing a pending investigation. Neighbors have been divided by the display; some say they’re fine with it, and think it brings fun and positivity to the neighborhood, but some others want to see it removed and say the lawn should be kept up better and more consistently.

Advertisement

Oster said he’s hoping to reach an agreement with the city, and said he’s corrected all other violations outside of the display. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Former Wisconsin judge to be sentenced after conviction in obstructing arrest of Mexican immigrant

Published

on

Former Wisconsin judge to be sentenced after conviction in obstructing arrest of Mexican immigrant


Former Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan, who was convicted of felony obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal officers in a case that highlighted President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration crackdown, is scheduled to be sentenced Wednesday in federal court.

Dugan, 67, faces up to five years in prison after a jury convicted her on Dec. 19. She resigned from her position as a Milwaukee County circuit judge two weeks later amid threats of impeachment from Republican state lawmakers. She had been a judge for nine years.

Trump administration tried to make an example out of Milwaukee judge

The Trump administration brought the case against Dugan as the president pressed ahead with his sweeping immigration crackdown. Trump’s administration and his allies branded Dugan as an activist judge, while Dugan’s attorneys said during the trial that the Trump administration was trying to make an example out of Dugan to “crush her.”

Immigrant rights advocates and other Dugan allies argued that the administration was trying to use her case to blunt judicial opposition to Trump’s immigration efforts. The case became a bellwether nationally in the conflict between the judiciary and Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany, a fierce Trump loyalist running for Wisconsin governor, urged authorities to “lock her up” in a social media post following her conviction.

Dugan’s attorneys declined to comment ahead of the sentencing. Dugan did not testify during her trial, but her attorneys said she would be making comments to the court on Wednesday. That would be her first public comments on the case in more than a year.

Advertisement

Prosecutors push for ‘serious sentence’

Dugan’s attorneys argued that as a judge she was immune from prosecution. U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, who will hand down the sentence, has rejected attempts by Dugan to vacate her obstruction conviction.

Prosecutors argued in a sentencing memo filed last week that Dugan violated her oath as a judge and put both law enforcement and the public at risk.

“Judges are entrusted with tremendous discretion, but there is a line they cannot cross,” Executive Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Frohling wrote. “The defendant crossed that line.”

Dugan’s attorneys argued she has “punished enough,” including resigning as a judge and facing threats of violence. They argued in her sentencing memo that she should not be sentenced to any jail time besides the part of one day she already spent in federal custody.

Under federal sentencing guidelines, the presentence report calls for 15 to 21 months behind bars. The judge is not bound by those guidelines.

Advertisement

Prosecutors said the average sentence for obstruction cases is 16 months, but they did not recommend a sentence.

“This was a serious offense, and it warrants a correspondingly serious sentence,” Frohling wrote.

No matter what she is sentenced to, Dugan’s attorneys said they plan to file an appeal.

Dugan’s case was a first for Wisconsin

Dugan’s case marked the first time that a state judge in Wisconsin went to trial on charges of obstructing immigration agents. She was found not guilty of concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor.

On April 18, 2025, immigration officers went to the Milwaukee County courthouse after learning 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz had reentered the country illegally and was scheduled to appear before Dugan for a hearing in a state battery case.

Advertisement

Dugan confronted agents outside her courtroom and directed them to the chief judge’s office because she told them their administrative warrant wasn’t sufficient grounds to arrest Flores-Ruiz.

After the agents left, she led Flores-Ruiz and his attorney out a private jury door. Agents spotted Flores-Ruiz in the corridor, followed him outside and arrested him after a foot chase. A week later, FBI agents arrested Dugan in the courthouse, leading her outside in handcuffs.

Flores-Ruiz was deported in November.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending