Connect with us

Wisconsin

Couch: How Michigan State lost at Wisconsin is proof the Spartans will ultimately fall short

Published

on

Couch: How Michigan State lost at Wisconsin is proof the Spartans will ultimately fall short


MADISON, Wis. – This one felt like an indictment. Proof that the Spartans will ultimately fall short. Pretty good evidence that this Michigan State basketball roster, even with a stellar backcourt and a seasoned power forward, doesn’t have enough.

It doesn’t have a pro like Wisconsin does in AJ Storr. Or a big man that’s a factor in the paint, like the Spartans have faced several times this season, including against the Badgers. That’s on Tom Izzo and his staff. They bet on the centers they had, rather than go after another in the transfer portal. It’s likely to be their downfall this season.

The great Izzo teams have been relatively matchup-proof. This one is matchup-dependent. The Spartans are capable of an NCAA tournament run, as long as they face the right foes — even really good ones. Baylor, for example. But not Wisconsin. Marquette last year. Not Connecticut.

This harsh reaction to Friday night’s 81-66 loss — and some other nights and losses this season — is about expectations. This is an MSU team with lots of quality and qualities. The Spartans might win most — if not all — of their next eight games. They’ll likely be the favorite in each of them. They’ll finish somewhere from third to sixth in the 14-team Big Ten, firmly in the NCAA tournament field, probably still about a 6 or 7 seed.

Advertisement

If the Spartans were Northwestern or Nebraska, that would be more than fine. Thrilling, even. Or if this were a young group, taking its first steps together, Friday’s loss would be no big deal, part of the journey. But MSU’s starting lineup features four 23-year-olds, two fifth-year guys, two fourth-year seniors and a junior. The Spartans hoped this season would be the year their sweat equity and talent and depth put them back atop the conference and among the elites in college basketball.

Instead, the team they hoped they’d be kicked their butt Friday night.

Izzo afterward talked glowingly about Wisconsin’s players, including Storr, the St. John’s transfer from Rockford, Illinois, whose addition made all the sense in the world. He’s elevated the Badgers from a solid, veteran team with size and shooters, to one that could win the Big Ten and, if Wisconsin plays like it has twice against MSU come March, could be around in April.

“He can shoot it from distance,” Izzo began of Storr, who had 28 points Friday. “He’s got a great first step. He’s got great athletic ability. He’s got length, handles the ball pretty well and he doesn’t miss free throws. So that’s a lot of pluses.”

Advertisement

The Spartans have a couple guys with a lot of pluses, too. But they don’t have that guy.

Nor do they have a guy like 7-footer Steven Crowl, who tallied 15 points, seven rebounds, three assists and a blocked shot Friday. He was too much for MSU inside.

“You don’t know whether you double him or not because he is a good passer,” Izzo said.

That’s not something MSU’s opponents have to consider. Maybe Jaxon Kohler will get there. But he doesn’t play a big enough role right now to worry about him yet. When MSU’s other two centers are in the game, opponents are hoping the Spartans throw it into them.

Advertisement

Izzo didn’t do what Wisconsin coach Greg Gard did — not only address a need, but add a player in Storr whose presence makes the Badgers seem complete and menacing.

“They’ve got a full attack,” MSU’s Jaden Akins said.

MSU’s got a partial attack — a capable but not overwhelming post player in Malik Hall, but nobody who’s a problem for teams in the paint. The Spartans have been out-rebounded in six of their nine Big Ten games. They haven’t been a dominant rebounding team since before the pandemic. They’ve lost that part of their identity as a program. And I don’t know whether an Izzo team can win big without it.

While I understand Izzo’s bet-on-his-guys philosophy, that’s not what college basketball is entirely anymore. Nor has Izzo strictly followed it. When he thought he needed a point guard, he went and got Tyson Walker out of Northeastern, not trusting what A.J. Hoggard would become. Adding a grad transfer big man wouldn’t have been giving up on sophomores Carson Cooper or Kohler. It would have been saying you’ve seen three years of Mady Sissoko and you don’t trust there’s another level to him. It doesn’t mean you don’t like Sissoko as a person or value him as a player. But betting on Sissoko as your starter, at this point, is also to risk wasting a backcourt that has a chance to take you places.

Advertisement

Kohler’s injury complicates this analysis. Izzo and Co. thought Kohler was going to be a significant part of things. I think they thought Cooper might take the next step quicker than he has. They thought, between the three of them, they’d be fine. They’d have been better off going after someone like Bradley grad transfer Rienk Mast, who’s manning the middle for Nebraska this season, scoring 18 points in a win over Purdue and 34 last week against Ohio State. Against MSU, Mast had just eight points, but with 14 rebounds and six assists.

This era of MSU — post Cassius Winston and Xavier Tillman — will be defined by MSU’s inconsistencies at the center position, Marcus Bingham Jr. and Julius Marble through Sissoko, and the coaching staff’s inability to fix it.

MSU has lost 13 games each of the last three seasons. At 12-8 (4-5 in the Big Ten), the Spartans are probably headed for about that this season when the postseason is said and done. This is not some anomaly in the Izzo era. MSU lost 12 or 13 games in five of six seasons from 2001 to 2007, interrupted by a 2005 team that I’ve thought compared to this one, even if built differently — not overwhelming, but potentially really good, a 5-seed in the NCAA tournament that went on a run to the Final Four.

It’s getting harder to picture that for this group. Really hard after Friday.

Izzo emerged from those six years — which included four first- and second-round NCAA tournament exits — with the Kalin Lucas-led group that began a 13-year run in which MSU reached eight Sweet 16s, four Final Fours and won six Big Ten championships. Izzo was younger then. The sport has changed. But he’s recruiting just as well now, even if this year’s freshman class hasn’t been the immediate impact group many of us thought it would be. Maybe Jeremy Fears Jr. and Co. will be that Lucas and Co.-type group. Maybe Friday night and this season overall will prompt Izzo to reassess when and how to best use the transfer portal. You can argue that being loyal to your players also means giving them the best chance to win.

Advertisement

This season doesn’t have to define how the final years of the Izzo era are gong to go. But what we saw Friday — the gap between Wisconsin (16-4, 8-1 Big Ten) and MSU for a second time — means that this group is unlikely to be one that hangs a banner.

While the Badgers talked about big goals and playing with an edge, the Spartans talked of going “brain dead” on a couple defensive coverages and needing to make “effort-related plays.”

Quite the contrast.

“We gave up some offensive rebounds tonight,” Akins said. “We really can’t do that against a team like that. You’ve got to play damn near perfect.”

Advertisement

Perhaps the truest words of the night — MSU has to play damn near perfect to beat a team like that.

Couch: 3 quick takes on Michigan State’s 81-66 loss at Wisconsin

Contact Graham Couch at gcouch@lsj.com. Follow him on Twitter @Graham_Couch.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Wisconsin State Fair: Boyz II Men take Main Stage on Aug. 1, 2025

Published

on

Wisconsin State Fair: Boyz II Men take Main Stage on Aug. 1, 2025


Wisconsin State Fair officials announced on Wednesday, Jan. 15 that Boyz II Men will return to the State Fair to headline the Bank Five Nine Main Stage on Friday, Aug. 1, 2025 at 7:30 p.m. 

Advertisement

What we know:

Tickets go on sale Friday, Jan. 17 at 10 a.m. at WiStateFair.com. All seating for this show is reserved, and tickets will be $47 – $62. 

Each ticket includes admission to the 2025 Wisconsin State Fair for the day of the show when purchased prior to entering the State Fair Park.   

Advertisement

Become a Friend of the Fair:

Tickets are available for pre-sale with the Friends of the Fair membership, which benefits the Wisconsin State Fair Park Foundation. This non-profit organization helps support the State Fair and State Fair Park initiatives. 

Advertisement

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Get access to the pre-sale and become a Friend of the Fair by visiting WSFPFoundation.org

Advertisement

The Source: The information in this post was provided by the Wisconsin State Fair.

Wisconsin State FairWest AllisInterviewsFOX 6 WakeUp NewsNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s governor creates new violence-prevention office in wake of school shooting

Published

on

Wisconsin’s governor creates new violence-prevention office in wake of school shooting


Wisconsin’s Democratic governor on Tuesday created a new office dedicated to preventing gun violence, a month after a school shooting not far from the state Capitol and an idea that drew immediate opposition from Republicans who said it was misguided.

Gov. Tony Evers also called on the Republican-controlled Legislature to pass a series of gun control and public safety measures, saying reducing violence should be a “shared priority that transcends politics.”

The Legislature has already rejected numerous gun control measures put forward by Evers, including universal background checks for gun purchases. But Evers said the shooting at Abundant Life Christian School last month demonstrated the need for lawmakers to act.

“Reducing crime and violence should be an issue that receives earnest bipartisan support,” Evers said at a news conference surrounded by gun control advocates, Democratic lawmakers and the mayor and police chief of Madison who responded to last month’s school shooting.

Advertisement

Republicans were not on board.

Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos blasted the proposal as “not well thought out” and said it amounts to “a whole bunch of touchy feely bureaucrats that are going to go around wasting time, wasting money and certainly not putting the effort where it’s deserved.”

“You know what the most effective violence prevention office is? The police,” Vos said at a news conference.

Republican Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu was noncommittal, but he emphasized that GOP lawmakers have supported spending on other initiatives to address violence, including creating a state Office of School Safety.

Evers signed an executive order creating a statewide office of violence prevention, a move that does not require legislative approval. He said the office will work with local partners, including law enforcement agencies, nonprofits, school districts and gun shop owners with the goal of reducing gun violence.

Advertisement

Creating the office was discussed prior to the school shooting, but the shooting “cemented” his plans, Evers said.

Madison Police Chief Shon Barnes, who is leaving next month to become Seattle’s chief of police, called the new anti-violence office a “transformative approach to understanding and addressing the root causes of violence in our society.”

“No city, no matter the size, reputation, or claim to fame, is immune from gun violence,” Barnes said. “We must recognize that to truly safeguard our neighborhoods, we need a comprehensive understanding of violence that goes beyond traditional policing.”

The office will work to develop public education campaigns and promote safer communities, Evers said. It will also award grants to reduce violence, in particular gun violence, to school districts, firearm dealers, law enforcement agencies, nonprofits and government agencies.

Evers announced $10 million in federal funding to create the office. He said his state budget being submitted to the Legislature next month will request more state money to sustain the office over the next two years.

Advertisement

Vos said Assembly Republicans would oppose the request.

Evers also said he would be proposing a sweeping package of gun violence and public safety measures.

Republican majorities in the Legislature shrunk after the November election, leading Evers and Democrats to say they hoped for more bipartisanship and consideration of ideas that have been summarily rejected in the past. But following the Dec. 16 shooting at the Abundant Life Christian School in Madison that left a student, teacher and the 15-year-old shooter dead, Republicans have not voiced support for any gun control measures backed by Democrats.

Wisconsin polls have repeatedly shown high public support for a variety of gun control measures.

Evers in 2019 called a special session of the Legislature to pass a universal gun background check bill and a “red flag” proposal that would allow judges to take guns away from people determined to be a risk to themselves or others. Republicans immediately adjourned without debating the measures. It was the first of a dozen special sessions Evers has called since 2019, none of which have been successful.

Advertisement

Democrats have reintroduced those and more than two dozen other gun safety bills over the past six years, but Republicans have repeatedly refused to take them up. Republicans, instead, have introduced bills that would expand access to guns and discussed arming teachers. Evers in 2022 vetoed Republican bills that would have allowed holders of concealed carry permits to have firearms in vehicles on school grounds and in churches located on the grounds of a private school.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Assembly sends voter ID constitutional amendment question to Wisconsin voters

Published

on

Assembly sends voter ID constitutional amendment question to Wisconsin voters


play

MADISON – Wisconsin voters in April will decide whether to amend the state constitution to include the state law requiring voters to show photo identification while casting ballots — a move Republicans are hoping will protect the law from being overturned by a liberal-controlled state Supreme Court.

Assembly lawmakers on Tuesday approved a resolution 54-45 to ask voters in the April 1 election to approve the photo ID amendment. The vote was the last hurdle in a two-year process to amend the state constitution and will put the question to voters in the same election they will decide partisan control of the state’s highest court.

Advertisement

State laws already require voters to show photo identification, but the measure now moves the question to voters in a statewide referendum on the spring election ballot. If passed, the rule will be included in the Wisconsin Constitution.

Adding the voter ID requirement to the constitution would make it more difficult for the state Supreme Court to declare it unconstitutional. It also would be harder for Democrats to repeal the law if they gain control of the Legislature in future years.

The implementation of the state law that requires voters to show photo identification increased ballot security, Republican authors argue, but the side effects have disproportionately hit Black voters in Milwaukee who are more likely not to have a photo ID and less inclined to seek one than their white peers, experts and advocates say.

Thirty-six states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The remaining 14 states and Washington, D.C., use other methods to verify the identity of voters. 

Advertisement

A national poll conducted by Pew Research Centers in January 2024 showed broad support — 81% — for the idea of requiring voters to show government-issued IDs to vote.

To obtain a state ID card, voters must complete an application at a DMV customer service center, where they are required to provide proof of name and birth (through a birth certificate, passport or certificate of naturalization), Wisconsin residency, U.S. citizenship and their Social Security number.

Advocates have said the difficulty in obtaining a birth certificate can be among the bigger hurdles for some in acquiring an ID.

Since the state’s voter ID law survived legal challenges and went into effect for the 2016 presidential election cycle, a host of advocacy groups have emerged to study and help voters navigate the law.

Their findings show a drop in accessibility that began in 2012, when Republicans took control of state government, and accelerated after the voter ID law became practice.

Advertisement

If approved by Wisconsin voters, the amendment would still let lawmakers decide what types of photo ID are acceptable and create exceptions. Voters who don’t have a photo ID when they go to the polls could still cast a provisional ballot, which is counted after they return to their clerk with their ID.If voters reject the amendment, the state will still require photo ID to vote under existing laws.

Molly Beck can be reached at molly.beck@jrn.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending