Connect with us

South Dakota

Trio of South Dakota politicians set to have bigger roles on cybersecurity

Published

on

Trio of South Dakota politicians set to have bigger roles on cybersecurity


Cybersecurity is set to get a decidedly South Dakotan bent in 2025.

Three Republican South Dakota politicians are in line to take on more prominent roles to influence cyber policy next year: Gov. Kristi Noem is president-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Homeland Security Department, Sen. Mike Rounds is poised to seize the gavel of a key cybersecurity subcommittee and John Thune will become Senate majority leader.

As president of Dakota State University, a school that has put a big focus on cybersecurity and tech, José-Marie Griffiths has worked with all three of them closely on cyber issues — testifying before their committees, consulting them on legislation, being appointed to national commissions by them and more.

She has a sense, then, of how the trio will approach their newly elevated roles. In an interview with CyberScoop, she said she expects China to get more attention from the South Dakota politicians, as well as agriculture, a more proactive approach to cybersecurity and a recognition of the need for cyber talent in the center of the country.

Advertisement

Thune and Rounds have sponsored cyber legislation in the Senate in the past, and as majority leader, Thune will be able to play a major role in what bills make it to the floor.

“Senator Thune is a little bit quieter and calmer than most,” Griffith said. “He doesn’t give an awful lot away. I think he will initially be focused on all of the Senate.”

But, she said, “I can imagine that with Governor Noem, if she’s confirmed, and with [Thune’s] position and with Senator Rounds and his role in cybersecurity, I would find it unusual if they didn’t see something emerge, some of those bills come up to the forefront.” 

Thune’s past tenure as chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee gave him jurisdiction over and oversight of privacy and tech bills, making it a legislative focus of his. He was part of the long-stalled push to pass a data privacy measure, and sponsored a bill on artificial intelligence standards. 

“His Commerce [Committee] side was very much involved when we had the 5G issues that we were talking about,” Griffiths said. Thune this year discussed how that topic is a national security challenge amid competition with China.

Advertisement

Thune has also sponsored or co-sponsored cybersecurity-specific bills, including ones to boost the cyber defense of drones, create a cyber public awareness campaign, develop voluntary cyber guidelines, bolster the cyber workforce and aid small businesses on cybersecurity.

As the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Rounds has emphasized threats from China, Russia and new technologies, and has spoken about the need to improve both cyber offense and defense. He was the first senator to serve as chairman of that subcommittee.

He touted language he got into the annual defense policy bill last year, such as a provision authorizing the Defense Department to conduct cyber operations against Mexican drug cartels. Rounds also fought to keep the National Defense University’s College of Information and Cyberspace open. Separate from his subcommittee role, Rounds has sponsored or co-sponsored legislation on the cyber workforce and agricultural cybersecurity.

Given his background, Rounds tends to approach cyber as a national security and defense issue, Griffiths said.

Spokespeople for Rounds and Thune did not respond to requests for comment about their cybersecurity-focused priorities in the coming years.

Advertisement

Noem’s record on cybersecurity includes rejecting DHS grants, hyping the industry in her state and signing cyber legislation into law. Griffiths said Noem got up to speed on cyber during her time in Congress as a member of the House Armed Services Committee.

One problem Griffiths has talked about is the tendency for cyber professionals to flock to the coasts — Silicon Valley in the private sector, and Washington, D.C. to work for the government. Noem’s aware of that too, Griffiths said.

“She recognizes that we need to see more capabilities, or leverage more capabilities, in the center of the country,” Griffiths said. “I think that’s going to be interesting.”

South Dakota’s House representative, Republican Dusty Johnson, also sits on the United States House Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.

“All four of them are very interested in the role of China,” Griffiths said. 

Advertisement

With agriculture being South Dakota’s top industry, cybersecurity in that area could also get more emphasis from the state’s elevated trio. “Agriculture is probably the one critical infrastructure that came rather late to the game of cybersecurity,” she said.

And they could emphasize “a more proactive approach to cybersecurity,” Griffiths said, rather than reacting to the big headlines about the most recent cyberattacks.

Written by Tim Starks

Tim Starks is senior reporter at CyberScoop. His previous stops include working at The Washington Post, POLITICO and Congressional Quarterly. An Evansville, Ind. native, he’s covered cybersecurity since 2003. Email Tim here: tim.starks@cyberscoop.com.



Source link

Advertisement

South Dakota

With discretion left to agencies, police video releases rare

Published

on

With discretion left to agencies, police video releases rare


Bart Pfankuch

Content director
605-937-9398
bart.pfankuch@sdnewswatch.org

Advertisement

Part 2 of a 3-part series.

South Dakota’s weak open records law gives police agencies full discretion on whether to release footage from body or dashboard cameras, and in most cases, the videos of officer conduct are never shown to the public.

South Dakota News Watch made formal public records requests to obtain video footage of use of deadly force incidents from eight separate law enforcement agencies in November, and all of the requests were quickly denied.

On a few occasions, South Dakota law enforcement agencies have released video footage of their own accord but not necessarily in cases where officer conduct is in question.

The Watertown Police Department released a video on Facebook in early November showing officers responding to a possible break-in with their guns drawn only to find a whitetail buck that had made it into a bedroom.

Advertisement

In 2016, the Rapid City Police Department posted a dash cam video to its public Facebook page showing the chief’s nephew proposing to his girlfriend in a mock traffic stop. “This one is too good not to share,” the Facebook post noted.

The Rapid City Police Department rejected News Watch’s request for videos of a May 30, 2023, incident in which an officer fatally shot 25-year-old Kyle
Whiting, who brandished a fake gun during a foot chase. A bystander inside a nearby home was also shot in the abdomen by the officer and survived. The state ruled the shooting was justified.

Still images tend to clear officers

Some police agencies will occasionally release still images from body or dashboard camera videos, typically when the screenshots show an officer facing a clear threat that appears to justify use of deadly force.

This screenshot is from a video released publicly in November 2025 by the Watertown (S.D.) Police Department.
This screenshot is from a video released publicly in November 2025 by the Watertown (S.D.) Police Department. An officer, right, can be seen holding a chair to protect himself from a deer that broke into a home. (Photo: Watertown Police Department Facebook page)

In August, the state released an image from video of a July 5 chase in which a Sioux Falls police officer shot and wounded 24-year-old Deondre Gene Black Hawk in the 100 block of Garfield Avenue.

One still image released to the public shows the gun Black Hawk fired at police. Another image shows Black Hawk pointing the gun toward a pursuing officer prior to the shooting, which was ruled justified by state investigators.

In 2022, the Rapid City Police Department took the unusual step of inviting local media to privately view body camera footage showing the shooting of Barney Leroy Peoples Jr., who was killed after pointing a rifle at officers. The video was not released to the public, and the shooting was ruled justified by the state.

“This was done for public interest and public safety to dispel a false narrative circulating on social media that could have led to civil unrest,” spokesman Brendyn Medina wrote in an email to News Watch.

In a move that appeared to have political overtones, videos were released in 2021 showing former South Dakota Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg being pulled over by officers for suspected traffic violations. The videos and audio showed Ravnsborg informing officers of his status as attorney general during the traffic stops, some of which did not result in tickets.

Advertisement
In an unprecedented move, videos were released of former Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg being pulled over by police. This image is a screenshot of a traffic stop from 2021. The video releases came as Ravnsborg was facing possible impeachment after Ravnsborg struck and killed pedestrian Joe Boever with his vehicle. (Photo: Screenshot of 2021 state video)

The videos were released during a period when Ravnsborg was facing possible removal from office for striking and killing a pedestrian in September 2020.

Ravnsborg was eventually impeached, an action supported by then-Gov. Kristi Noem, whose office also made the unprecedented move of releasing videos of Ravnsborg being interviewed by detectives during the investigation into the 2020 fatal accident.

Federal agency released SD shooting video

In general, the federal government provides more public access to police videos than states like South Dakota, and that access was expanded in a May 2022 executive order from President Joe Biden.

That order included a requirement to expedite public release of videos from officers’ body-worn cameras. As a result, in October 2022, the U.S. Department of Interior issued a new policy that required federal officers to wear body cameras and sought to make it easier and faster for the media and public to obtain videos captured by federal authorities.

Due in part to that policy, video of a June 2023 police-involved shooting in South Dakota was released by the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs. In that incident, 39-year-old James Schneider of Watauga fired a weapon and then led authorities on a vehicle chase that ended at the Bullhead Community Center parking lot.

According to the dashboard video, Schneider was waving his arms and holding a handgun in an area where people were present. After he turned to flee into a residential neighborhood, he was shot in the back by an officer. Schneider was found guilty in August of assault and weapons charges after a jury trial and is awaiting sentencing.

Advertisement

In releasing the video, the BIA said it was doing so to be transparent in its operations. To protect the privacy of all involved, faces were blurred in the video.

“The community briefing video is intended to help members of the community gain a better understanding of what occurred,” the BIA said in a release. “We are committed to being transparent with our community.”

Privacy a top concern for agencies

Rapid City police do not routinely release department videos, largely due to privacy concerns of anyone captured in the footage, said Medina, the department spokesman.

“Much of the information collected by (body-worn cameras) is confidential and involves personal information, including that of victims, juveniles, and vulnerable individuals involved in critical and traumatic incidents,” Medina wrote in an email. “It’s important to note that we have had requests from victims and families specifically not to release photos or videos of their encounters with police.  Additionally, juvenile and victim information is protected by state statute.”

Almost all states that allow for public video releases do so with caveats that privacy issues and often concerns over protecting prosecutions are met prior to release.

Advertisement
This photo shows a body camera worn on the uniform of a Pennington County Sheriff's Office deputy in December 2025.
This photo shows a body camera worn on the uniform of a Pennington County (S.D.) Sheriff’s Office deputy in December 2025. (Photo: Courtesy Pennington County Sheriff’s Office)

Rapid City shares the management of its video program with the Pennington County Sheriff’s Office, which recently spent about $48,000 to buy 68 Axon body cameras, said sheriff’s spokeswoman Helene Duhamel.

The Sioux Falls Police Department has an extensive video policy that does not typically allow for public release of videos, said Sgt. Aaron Benson.

“Granting public access to dash and body camera video potentially involves numerous issues relating to the rights of all persons in those videos. These rights include but are not limited to general privacy concerns of victims, suspects, witnesses and others, to statutory and constitutional rights of those same individuals,” Benson wrote in an email. “Additionally, release of video can detrimentally affect ongoing investigations, prosecutions and other legal matters related to those videos.”

McPherson County Sheriff David Ackerman, president of the South Dakota Sheriff’s Association, said body and dash cameras are important tools for police agencies in both urban and rural areas, even though his camera program costs about $60,000 a year, roughly 10% of the overall departmental budget.

“These are very valuable tools, and it’s something that in this day and age, every office and agency needs to have,” Ackerman said. “I’m glad where we are today because they’re for the protection of the public as well as the officers.”

Assistant police chief on body cam: ‘I enjoy wearing it’

Monty Rothenberger, assistant police chief in Yankton, said he supports the use of dash and body cameras as a way to increase accountability for officers and to aid in resolving public complaints.

Advertisement

“I wouldn’t do this job without a body camera, and I enjoy wearing it,” Rothenberger said. “I don’t have anything to hide. And because everything is on video, I feel like Big Brother is watching and I support that.”

The Yankton Police Department bought new cameras last year at a cost of about $80,000, he said.

Rothenberger said that while he is aware of South Dakota public records laws that do not require the department to release videos to the public, he said he personally would support the release of videos in a high-profile or controversial case.

“I’m only speaking for myself, but I would never hide anything like that,” Rothenberger said. “That’s not up to me. … (But) releasing that stuff, it’s good that agencies release things when something has gone wrong and they are being transparent.”


Read part 1 of the 3-part series:

Police videos in SD: Public pays costs but cannot see footage

Advertisement

As more states begin to provide public access to videos captured by law enforcement agencies, South Dakota continues to keep a tight lid on them.

Publishing Friday, Dec. 19, part 3: A 2020 legislative effort to regulate body camera videos never made it to a vote, maintaining South Dakota’s national reputation for law enforcement secrecy

This story was produced by South Dakota News Watch, an independent, nonprofit organization. Read more stories and donate at sdnewswatch.org and sign up for an email to get stories when they’re published. Contact content director Bart Pfankuch at bart.pfankuch@sdnewswatch.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

DOC officials touch on state of prison reform in South Dakota

Published

on

DOC officials touch on state of prison reform in South Dakota


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – The governor’s Correctional Rehabilitation Task Force, which aims to determine the best path forward for expanding services, will hold its second meeting on Wednesday.

The meeting will continue the dive into what programming should look like for the new prison. Officials in the Department of Corrections say they appreciate the attention to the issue shown over the year.

“The focus is in the right place. I think people are asking the right questions. I think that it’s being noticed that reentry in totality is a group effort,” Justin Elkins, DOC Chief of Behavioral Health, said.

Sitting at 43%, lawmakers and the Rhoden administration have dedicated a substantial amount of time to addressing recidivism in the state.

Advertisement

“I think people are starting to see that reentry is something our department needs help within terms of collaboration and relationships. Because we only determine part of the equation when it comes to reentry,” Elkins said.

Corrections Reentry Program Manager Scott Day says this change in perspective regarding inmates is needed.

“95% of these individuals are going to come back into your community. They’re going to be your neighbors. They’re going to work at your local fast-food restaurant or at your local store. You’re going to see them walk down the street. We just need to see as a culture that these aren’t bad people; these are just people who need an opportunity to show that they can succeed.”

The prison reset task force, which focused on the structure of the new prison, ensured that programming space increased from what is currently available, even when the location changed from Lincoln County to Sioux Falls.

“There’s not a day that goes by that I don’t constantly think about what we could do more. And the new prison is needed. We need the space, we need the opportunity to get more programming in there,” Day said.

Advertisement

Day says the investment into programming space is not a matter of being soft on crime but rather smart on public safety.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Recent Farmland Sales in Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, South Dakota

Published

on

Recent Farmland Sales in Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, South Dakota


Link to the listing: https://www.frrmail.com/…

For more information, contact: Cory Busse, Farm & Ranch Realty, Inc., at 785-332-8345 or frr@frrmail.com

KENTUCKY, Hopkins County. Five tracts of river-bottom cropland totaling 597.9 acres sold at auction for $5.39 million, or $9,015 per acre. Tracts ranged from 16 to 255 acres, with much containing drainage tile. Soil types were primarily Karnak silty clay and loam with some Belknap and Robbs silty loam. Structures included a tool shed and a 5,000-bushel grain bin. Tracts ranged in price from $7,800 to $11,500 per acre.

Link to the listing: https://www.kurtzauction.com/…

Advertisement

For more information, contact: Joseph Mills, Kurtz Auction & Realty Co., at 800-262-1204 or jmills@kurtzauction.com.

SOUTH DAKOTA, Dewey County. A contiguous, 1,529-acre farm sold to a single bidder at auction for $2,600 per acre, or $3.98 million. The property was offered in four parcels, two of which were historically in crop production (wheat, oats, corn and sunflowers) and boasted Soil Productivity Indexes of 70 or higher. Another highly productive parcel was planted in grass and alfalfa but could be converted to row crops. The remaining parcel included a blend of cropland, pasture and an updated home with a steel barn, shop, two Quonset-style buildings, continuous panel corrals and water tank.

Link to the listing: https://glcland.com/…

For more information, contact: Kristen Gill, Gill Land Company, at 701.934.2732 or 605.848.4502 or kristen@glcland.com.

**

Advertisement

— These sales figures are provided by the sources and may not be exact because of rounding.

— Submit recent land sales to landwatch@dtn.com

Katie Dehlinger can be reached at katie.dehlinger@dtn.com

Follow Katie on social platform X at @KatieD_DTN

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending