Connect with us

South Dakota

South Dakota brand, fake meat, property rights bill updates

Published

on

South Dakota brand, fake meat, property rights bill updates


Brand bills

District 28A representative introduced HB 1267, which would have expanded the brand inspection program to cover the entire state. Currently brand inspection is only required on the western half of the state, although registered brands are considered legal proof of ownership anywhere in the state.

1267 was deferred to the 41st day in a vote of 8-4 in the House Ag Committee, which effectively killed the bill.  Yeas (in favor of killing the bill) were: Ladner, Wittman, Overweg, Drew Peterson, Shubeck, Nolz, Van Diepen and Gosch. Nays (opposed to killing the bill) were: Hunt, May, Rice and Ismay.



The Chairman of the House Agricultural committee, at the behest of the Department of Agriculture, brought HB , to increase the brand inspection fee cap to $1.65, up from the current maximum of $1. This give the South Dakota Brand Board the leeway to increase the inspection fee to any amount up to $1.65.

Advertisement

The bill passed the House of Representatives, the Senate Ag Committee, and will be discussed in the Senate probably Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2026.



The vote in the House was as follows:

Yeas: Arlint, Auch, Bahmuller, DeGroot, Derby, Duffy, Emery, Fitzgerald, Fosness, Goodwin, Greenfield, Halverson, Healy, Heermann, Heinemann, Hughes, Jamison, Jorgenson, Kassin,22 Kolbeck (Jack), Kull, Ladner, Lems, Massie, Mortenson, Muckey, Mulder, Nolz, Novstrup, Odenbach, Overweg, Peterson (Drew), Pourier, Rehfeldt, Reimer, Reisch, Rice, Roby, Roe, Shorma, Shubeck, Stevens, Uhre‑Balk, Van Diepen, Walburg, Weems, Weisgram, Wittman, and Speaker Hansen.

Nays: Andera, Aylward, Baxter, Garcia, Gosch, Hunt, Ismay, Jensen (Phil), Jordan, Kayser, Manhart, Moore, Mulally, Randolph, Schaefbauer, Schwans, Sjaarda, and Soye.

Advertisement

Lab-Grown Protein

Representative Julie Auch’s “fake meat” bill, HB 1077, passed the House and Senate but was promptly vetoed by Governor Rhoden. The bill would have changed the status of lab grown protein to “adulterated” which in part deems it “unfit for food” and would effectively ban the sale of lab-grown protein in the state of South Dakota.

The Governor introduced his own bill as a compromise, SB 124, which places a moratorium on the sale of lab grown meat for five years. The South Dakota Cattlemen’s Association, South Dakota Retailers Association, South Dakota Farm Bureau and South Dakota Stockgrowers all voiced support for the governor’s compromise, which is not scheduled for a committee discussion at this time.

Property Rights

The South Dakota Senate approved SB 88 sponsored by Senator Lapka, dubbed the “Bossly bill,” it would prevent private entities from conducting surveys without permission. However, “examinations” without permission would continue to be legal under certain circumstances, including when a citing permit has been granted. House Commerce and Energy will take up the bill soon.

Advertisement

The South Dakota House passed a bill to amend the South Dakota constitution to prevent the use of eminent domain for economic purposes. This bill came as the result of the many attempts of Summit Carbon Solutions to gain legal standing to take property for its pipeline. The constitutional amendment would protect landowners from other private entities using eminent domain to take property for private enterprises. Spencer Gosch, who sponsored HJR 5001, said this subject has been on his mind for a few years. “We’ve got to defend property rights and put a stop to private companies and government taking advantage of private property owners,” he told TSLN. HJR 5001, if approved by both houses, would not go to the governor for a signature, but would go a vote of South Dakota citizens.





Source link

South Dakota

Water hampers growth near Sioux Falls but solution near

Published

on

Water hampers growth near Sioux Falls but solution near


The existing water treatment plant for the Minnehaha Community Water Corp. on June 9, 2026, south of Dell Rapids, S.D. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

Bart Pfankuch

Content Director
605-937-9398
bart.pfankuch@sdnewswatch.org

Advertisement

DELL RAPIDS, S.D. – Scott Buss can only imagine what this town north of Sioux Falls might have looked like – and how many jobs and taxes would have been generated – if there wasn’t a local shortage of available water.

Buss, executive director of the Minnehaha Community Water Corp., sat in the conference room of the rural water system based in Dell Rapids recently and ticked off the industrial and agricultural projects turned away due to a lack of water.

After hitting its limit on how much water it can provide a few years ago, the rural system has had to turn away proposed projects valued at hundreds of millions of dollars that offered an untold number of new jobs, he said.

The rejected projects include the Agropur Cheese plant that eventually opened in Lake Norden. A few proposed hog farms and dairy expansions in northern Minnehaha County were also stalled, Buss said.

Advertisement

Get South Dakota news and information in a free email on weekdays. Cancel any time.

Subscribe

Advertisement

Other proposals, most of which never came to fruition in South Dakota, included the $1.5 billion Gevo corn-based jet fuel plant, the $5oo million Wholestone Farms hog processing plant and a data center that at some point all eyed the Dell Rapids area for development.

“All the water rights are spoken for between Dell Rapids and Sioux Falls, so there was no more water to be had in Minnehaha County,” Buss told News Watch in an interview in June. “With all the (residential) development that was coming in, we realized that our well capacity and our treatment capacity was limiting our ability to take on new high water-use customers.”

Scott Buss is pictured in his office
Scott Buss on June 9, 2026, who manages the Minnehaha Community Water Corp. near Dell Rapids, S.D. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

Buss and the nonprofit corporation’s board of directors aren’t waiting around to potentially miss out on more opportunities.

In a unique arrangement, the corporation is partnering with the neighboring Big Sioux Community Water System to the north on a $170 million expansion project called Shared Resources. The expansion, started three years ago, will use new wells into the Big Sioux Aquifer to generate 8 million gallons of water more per day starting this fall.

“It’s going to be a huge and great benefit for Big Sioux and Minnehaha water,” said Jodi Johanson, director of the Big Sioux system based in Egan. “This project is going to make sure that down the road we have enough water for the future.”

2 systems get stronger together

The Minnehaha water corporation is still able to bring on new residential and retail customers who consume part of the 9.2 million gallons of treated water it can provide on a daily basis.

Advertisement

The system was formed by a group of farmers and landowners in the 1970s but sought a reliable way of providing more and cleaner water to residents of Minnehaha County outside of Sioux Falls who relied exclusively on individual wells. The system started with about 1,200 customers but has grown to more than 5,500 now in seven cities, mostly north of the Sioux Falls metro area.

Given the limits on water from the aquifer, and balancing the water needs of consistent housing and retail growth in northern Minnehaha County, the water system had to say no to developments that request 1 million or more gallons of water per day, Buss said. A million gallons per day is equivalent to the water consumption of about 4,300 homes, he said.

Billions needed to keep South Dakota taps flowing

South Dakota water systems will increasingly turn to the Missouri River to provide water for future population, agricultural and industrial growth. But plans will require billions of dollars and decades of construction to keep taps flowing freely.

As with other rural water systems in South Dakota, the aquifers the systems rely on for their water are either running low or are legally tapped out, or both.

In the case of Minnehaha water corporation, the Big Sioux River Aquifer has gotten drier, but state law is also preventing it from taking more water from the aquifer.

Advertisement

In 1996, the state Water Management Board allocated water rights, or withdrawal limits, to systems that take groundwater from the aquifer, Buss said.

Those limits have now been reached, meaning that Minnehaha water cannot take any more than the 7 million gallons per day it is drawing now.

The system also receives about 2 million gallons per day from the Lewis & Clark Regional Water System, making its daily maximum capacity of about 9.2 million gallons per day, which it sometimes reaches, especially during spring planting season or hot summer months.

The aquifer under the Big Sioux River in Dell Rapids
The aquifer under the Big Sioux River, shown here in Dell Rapids, S.D., on June 9, 2026, is the source of fresh water for much of eastern South Dakota. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

Directly to the north, the Big Sioux Community Water System produces up to 2 million gallons per day for about 2,400 customers in Moody and Lake counties as well as some in Brookings County and in western Minnesota, Johanson said.

The system still has room within its water rights to draw more water, making it an attractive partner for Minnehaha water.

Though Big Sioux Community Water System has not turned away any large projects, it needs more water to serve a boom in residential growth in the region, Johanson said.

Advertisement

In the area around Lake Madison, near Madison, developers are considering projects that could someday bring 500 new homes and a new nine-hole golf course, she said.

Support solutions-focused storytelling. Help South Dakota News Watch tell stories that identify and share solutions to the state’s biggest challenges.

Donate

Advertisement

The system also serves a number of dairies that use significant water and provides water to the Dakota Ethanol plant in Wentworth, which is undergoing an expansion. Farmers in the region are also using greater quantities of water to deliver chemicals onto their land, Johanson said.

“This is our first expansion,” she said. “We’re looking forward and we’re trying to find the solution before we face a problem.”

Federal government and customers pay the way

The biggest Shared Resources ticket item is a new $80 million water treatment plant that is nearly completed on 240th Street a few miles north of Dell Rapids.

A 20-inch pipeline from the plant to the east will end at a 1.5 million gallon water tower, and a 24-inch pipeline to the west will terminate at a ground-level storage tank with a 4 million gallon capacity.

Advertisement

Six new wells will draw the water, and the storage tanks will provide both pressure and the ability to adapt to changing demands without service interruption, Buss said.

A new $80 million water treatment plant under construction on June 9, 2026, north of Dell Rapids
A new $80 million water treatment plant under construction on June 9, 2026, north of Dell Rapids, S.D. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

As with most modern water projects, the costs will be shared by government and end users. The systems are funding the project with $49 million in grants from the Biden-era American Rescue Plan Act and $121 million in low-interest loans from South Dakota’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.

The two systems are sharing the cost of the project loans commensurate with how much water they will receive, meaning Minnehaha will pay 65% of the costs for its 5 million gallons per day while Big Sioux will kick in 35% for its 3 million gallons more per day.

Minnehaha water is assuming $87 million in new debt and Big Sioux will take on $42 million in new debt, Buss said.

The average residential consumer in both systems that uses about 7,000 gallons per month will see their bill rise to $135 a month, roughly double the cost in 2020.

“It’s a big project, and it’s a good example of how two systems can work together to have some economies of scale,” Buss said.

Ratepayers will see a significant increase in their monthly water bills. The average residential consumer in both systems that uses about 7,000 gallons per month will see their bill rise to $135 a month, roughly double the cost in 2020, Buss said.

Advertisement

A big project, but even more water needed

But both systems view the Shared Resources project as a temporary fix and both are looking toward proposed projects that will tap the Missouri River for more water in the future.

Buss said his system has applied for 10 million gallons more water per day from Lewis & Clark, which has two expansion efforts planned.

Minnehaha water has simultaneously applied to receive 10 million gallons per day from the proposed Dakota Mainstem Regional Water System, a potentially $10 billion project to carry Missouri River water to more than 50 communities and organizations across eastern South Dakota and parts of Minnesota and Iowa.

A 1.5 million gallon water tower under construction June, 9, 2026, near Dell Rapids, S.D.
A 1.5 million gallon water tower under construction June, 9, 2026, near Dell Rapids, S.D., as part of the Shared Resources expansion effort by two rural water systems. (Photo: Bart Pfankuch / South Dakota News Watch)

The dual application effort is to make sure Minnehaha water can rely on taking in more water from at least one of the two systems as they come online, Buss said.

Johanson said Big Sioux has also signed on to accept water from Dakota Mainstem, even if it takes 20 to 40 years for the water to begin flowing.

To ensure that steady supply of high-quality drinking water, four major projects are in progress to take more water from the Missouri River – including WEB Water in the northeast, Lewis & Clark and the proposed Dakota Mainstem in the southeast as well as the proposed Western Dakota Regional Water System in western South Dakota and the Black Hills.

Advertisement
A map for the Shared Resources water project shows the proposed watermain lines.

The projects are part of a wide-scale increase in water service capacity now underway in South Dakota, where water managers of several systems are implementing plans to serve the state for the next 40 to 50 years.

Regional rural water systems such as Minnehaha and Big Sioux are critical components of those projects because they provide water to communities and individual customers at the end of the delivery system.

Alicia Deschepper, zoning administrator for Moody County, said the water system expansions should allow for more growth to occur in Moody and Minnehaha counties, which are seeing new single-family housing developed at a rapid rate.

“I think it will be a great thing for our county and hopefully enable us to bring in more bigger businesses as well as more homes,” Deschepper said.

South Dakota News Watch is an independent nonprofit. Read, donate and subscribe for free at sdnewswatch.orgContact content director Bart Pfankuch: 605-937-9398/bart.pfankuch@sdnewswatch.org.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

One child dead following Hughes County fatal crash

Published

on

One child dead following Hughes County fatal crash


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – The South Dakota Department of Public Safety said a nine-year-old girl from Waterloo, Iowa, is dead following a fatal Hughes County crash on Saturday.

This crash happened on Saturday, July 4, near the Spring Creek Recreation Area about 15 miles northwest of Pierre.

Preliminary crash information suggests a utility vehicle driven by a 37-year-old Iowa man was driving south on Spring Creek Drive. He attempted to turn around and rolled the vehicle.

A 16-year-old boy was also in the vehicle and was hurt, while the driver was not hurt.

Advertisement

The South Dakota Highway Patrol is investigating the crash.

Copyright 2026 Dakota News Now. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Rapid City to host South Dakota Little League State Tournament

Published

on

Rapid City to host South Dakota Little League State Tournament


RAPID CITY, S.D. (KOTA) – Beginning July 7, six Little League All-Star teams from across South Dakota will compete at Collins Field during the 2026 South Dakota Little League State Tournament.

For many players, it’s the biggest stage they’ve experienced. Every pitch, hit and catch could help extend their summer and earn a trip to regional competition.

Rapid City will be well represented with both Canyon Lake and Harney Little League taking the field, while teams from Pine Ridge, Pierre, Brandon Valley and Sioux Falls round out the tournament.

The weeklong event also brings families, coaches and fans from across South Dakota to the Black Hills, creating a busy week at the ballpark filled with community support and hometown pride.

Advertisement

When the final out is recorded on July 12, one team will leave Rapid City carrying a state championship trophy—and a chance to keep its postseason journey going.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending