Connect with us

South Dakota

South Dakota brand, fake meat, property rights bill updates

Published

on

South Dakota brand, fake meat, property rights bill updates


Brand bills

District 28A representative introduced HB 1267, which would have expanded the brand inspection program to cover the entire state. Currently brand inspection is only required on the western half of the state, although registered brands are considered legal proof of ownership anywhere in the state.

1267 was deferred to the 41st day in a vote of 8-4 in the House Ag Committee, which effectively killed the bill.  Yeas (in favor of killing the bill) were: Ladner, Wittman, Overweg, Drew Peterson, Shubeck, Nolz, Van Diepen and Gosch. Nays (opposed to killing the bill) were: Hunt, May, Rice and Ismay.



The Chairman of the House Agricultural committee, at the behest of the Department of Agriculture, brought HB , to increase the brand inspection fee cap to $1.65, up from the current maximum of $1. This give the South Dakota Brand Board the leeway to increase the inspection fee to any amount up to $1.65.

Advertisement

The bill passed the House of Representatives, the Senate Ag Committee, and will be discussed in the Senate probably Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2026.



The vote in the House was as follows:

Yeas: Arlint, Auch, Bahmuller, DeGroot, Derby, Duffy, Emery, Fitzgerald, Fosness, Goodwin, Greenfield, Halverson, Healy, Heermann, Heinemann, Hughes, Jamison, Jorgenson, Kassin,22 Kolbeck (Jack), Kull, Ladner, Lems, Massie, Mortenson, Muckey, Mulder, Nolz, Novstrup, Odenbach, Overweg, Peterson (Drew), Pourier, Rehfeldt, Reimer, Reisch, Rice, Roby, Roe, Shorma, Shubeck, Stevens, Uhre‑Balk, Van Diepen, Walburg, Weems, Weisgram, Wittman, and Speaker Hansen.

Nays: Andera, Aylward, Baxter, Garcia, Gosch, Hunt, Ismay, Jensen (Phil), Jordan, Kayser, Manhart, Moore, Mulally, Randolph, Schaefbauer, Schwans, Sjaarda, and Soye.

Advertisement

Lab-Grown Protein

Representative Julie Auch’s “fake meat” bill, HB 1077, passed the House and Senate but was promptly vetoed by Governor Rhoden. The bill would have changed the status of lab grown protein to “adulterated” which in part deems it “unfit for food” and would effectively ban the sale of lab-grown protein in the state of South Dakota.

The Governor introduced his own bill as a compromise, SB 124, which places a moratorium on the sale of lab grown meat for five years. The South Dakota Cattlemen’s Association, South Dakota Retailers Association, South Dakota Farm Bureau and South Dakota Stockgrowers all voiced support for the governor’s compromise, which is not scheduled for a committee discussion at this time.

Property Rights

The South Dakota Senate approved SB 88 sponsored by Senator Lapka, dubbed the “Bossly bill,” it would prevent private entities from conducting surveys without permission. However, “examinations” without permission would continue to be legal under certain circumstances, including when a citing permit has been granted. House Commerce and Energy will take up the bill soon.

Advertisement

The South Dakota House passed a bill to amend the South Dakota constitution to prevent the use of eminent domain for economic purposes. This bill came as the result of the many attempts of Summit Carbon Solutions to gain legal standing to take property for its pipeline. The constitutional amendment would protect landowners from other private entities using eminent domain to take property for private enterprises. Spencer Gosch, who sponsored HJR 5001, said this subject has been on his mind for a few years. “We’ve got to defend property rights and put a stop to private companies and government taking advantage of private property owners,” he told TSLN. HJR 5001, if approved by both houses, would not go to the governor for a signature, but would go a vote of South Dakota citizens.





Source link

South Dakota

Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota

Published

on

Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota




Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota – CBS News

Advertisement














Advertisement



























Advertisement

Watch CBS News


We leave you this Sunday morning with prairie chickens and sharp tail grouse near Ft. Pierre, South Dakota. Videographer: Kevin Kjergaard.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Democrats fail to field candidates for a majority of South Dakota legislative seats

Published

on

Democrats fail to field candidates for a majority of South Dakota legislative seats


(SOUTH DAKOTA SEARCHLIGHT) – Democrats are running for 46 of South Dakota’s 105 legislative seats — leaving 56% of seats without a Democratic candidate.

That doesn’t bode well for the party ahead of November, said Michael Card, professor emeritus of political science at the University of South Dakota.

“It doesn’t put them in a position to actually put forward their ideological policy preferences and have much of a success at getting those enacted,” Card said.

In the state Senate alone, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 22 seats, which is nearly two-thirds of the chamber. In the House, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 38 seats, which is 54% of the chamber.

Advertisement

There is only one Democratic legislative primary in the state: a state Senate race in District 26, which includes the Rosebud Reservation.

There are no statewide Democratic primaries, after announced candidates for governor and U.S. House dropped out or failed to gather enough petition signatures to make the ballot, leaving one Democrat in each of those races.

Statewide candidates will have less name recognition than Republican candidates ahead of the general election, since they didn’t have primaries, Card said. In the Legislature, Card said Democrats “are guaranteeing they won’t get a majority.”

In contrast, Republicans have primary races for governor, U.S. House and U.S. Senate. Five legislative districts do not have Republican primaries, but do have Republican candidates. There is a Republican candidate running for every legislative seat, except for one House seat in District 27, which includes the Pine Ridge Reservation.

Card said there are several factors leading to poor candidate turnout among Democrats, including a self-fulfilling cycle of failure.

Advertisement

“A lack of winning makes fewer people willing to take a chance on running for office,” Card said. “Why run if I think I’m going to lose?”

Democrats haven’t held a statewide office since 2015, and they haven’t held a majority of either legislative chamber since 1994.

Joe Zweifel, deputy executive director of the South Dakota Democratic Party, said the organization worked “really, really hard” to convince Democrats to run for office.

“But you can’t force people to run for office,” said Zweifel, of Sioux Falls, who’s running for a legislative seat himself in District 12.

He’s heard the open seats called a “failure.” But he disagrees, choosing to focus on the Democrats who did step forward.

Advertisement

“We’re running quality, good candidates in those races,” Zweifel said.

The South Dakota Democratic Party hopes to build on legislative successes, such as a new law from Rep. Kadyn Wittman, D-Sioux Falls, that commits state funding to cover the family portion of reduced-price school meals.

“That specifically is a return on investment for our donors, and it shows that Democrats are doing good things for the people of South Dakota,” Zweifel said.

Wittman’s success helped inspire Democratic District 13 House of Representatives candidate Ali Rae Horsted, of Sioux Falls, to take a second run at the Legislature. Horsted ran unsuccessfully for the Senate against Sen. Sue Peterson in 2024, garnering 42% of the vote.

Horsted plans to build on that success and the name recognition she already has in the district. She hopes she’ll have “better odds” in this election, since there are two House seats for every district.

Advertisement

Horsted said it would better serve South Dakota if the state had a more balanced Legislature. While the latest Legislature was 92% Republican, 52% of voters in South Dakota are Republican. South Dakota has the lowest percentage of Democrats, 7.6%, in the Legislature nationwide.

“I think it’s important that people have options on the ballot,” Horsted said, “and people are able to vote for candidates that represent their values and their vision for the future of South Dakota.”

Makenzie Huber is a lifelong South Dakotan who regularly reports on the intersection of politics and policy with health, education, social services and Indigenous affairs. Her work with South Dakota Searchlight earned her the title of South Dakota’s Outstanding Young Journalist in 2024, and she was a 2024 finalist for the national Livingston Awards.

South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Advertisement

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

From Big Ideas to Better Places: Building Livable Communities Across South Dakota

Published

on

From Big Ideas to Better Places: Building Livable Communities Across South Dakota


From East River to West River, South Dakota communities share a common goal: creating places where people of all ages can live, work and thrive. AARP’s Domains of Livability provide a framework to help communities do just that. Through the AARP Community Challenge grant program—designed to spark quick, impactful local projects—South Dakota communities are turning big ideas into visible, people-centered improvements.

Read the South Dakota Community Challenge Grant Report, which showcases grant-funded projects across the state designed to build more livable communities.

What Are AARP’s Domains of Livability?

AARP’s approach to livable communities is rooted in eight interconnected domains that together support quality of life at every age:

  1. Outdoor Spaces and Buildings – Safe, accessible parks, streets and public buildings
  2. Transportation – Affordable, accessible options for getting around
  3. Housing – A range of choices that support independence
  4. Social Participation – Opportunities to connect, learn and have fun
  5. Respect and Social Inclusion – Communities that value people of all backgrounds and ages
  6. Civic Participation and Employment – Meaningful ways to engage and contribute
  7. Communication and Information – Clear, accessible ways to stay informed
  8. Community Support and Health Services – Access to services that support well-being

These domains work best when addressed together—something South Dakota communities are embracing.

bike lane in neighborhood being separated by wire

Advertisement

Turning Vision into Action with Community Challenge Grants

AARP Community Challenge grants fund short-term, “quick-action” projects that can ignite long-term change. Across South Dakota, these grants have helped communities pilot ideas, build momentum and demonstrate what’s possible when residents put people first.

Here’s how local projects are bringing the Domains of Livability to life:

  • Outdoor Spaces and Buildings: Communities have used grants to enhance parks, create pop-up public spaces, add benches and shade and install wayfinding signs. These improvements invite people to linger, gather, and enjoy shared spaces—supporting both physical activity and social connection.
  • Transportation: Small, thoughtful transportation projects can make a big difference. Community Challenge grants have supported safer crossings, improved walkability and bikeability around key destinations and the planning or installation of transit amenities like shelters and seating—especially important for older adults and people with mobility challenges.
  • Housing and Community Support: Some projects focus on helping residents age in place by improving access to information about home modification resources or by testing neighborhood-level solutions that connect people to services. These efforts strengthen independence and peace of mind.
  • Social Participation and Inclusion: Murals, community events and creative placemaking projects funded by AARP grants have sparked community pride and social connection. By involving residents in design and implementation, these projects foster respect, inclusion and a strong sense of belonging across generations.
  • Communication, Civic Participation and Opportunity: From hosting community conversations to creating new tools for sharing local information, South Dakota communities are using grants to engage residents in shaping their future. These efforts elevate local voices and encourage ongoing civic participation.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending