Connect with us

South Dakota

After pushback, South Dakota Attorney General’s office modifies abortion amendment language

Published

on

After pushback, South Dakota Attorney General’s office modifies abortion amendment language


PIERRE, S.D. – South Dakota voters will greater than probably go to the polls in November 2024 to find out whether or not or not a proper to an abortion must be within the state’s structure.

And whereas the title and the reason for that modification have formally been finalized, it didn’t come with out important enter and scrutiny.

For each poll initiative, state regulation requires the Legal professional Basic to offer a title and an evidence of the initiative, now not than 200 phrases. In keeping with state regulation, the Legal professional Basic’s clarification is supposed to be an “goal, clear, and easy abstract” meant to “educate the voters of the aim and impact of the proposed” measure, in addition to establish the “authorized penalties” of every measure.

A draft title and and clarification for the abortion modification was submitted for evaluation and public remark by Legal professional Basic Mark Vargo on August 4th.

Advertisement

Titled “A Constitutional Modification In regards to the Regulation of Abortion,” the primary paragraph of the unique clarification acknowledged that the proposed modification would “set up a framework for the regulation of abortion.”

Teams against abortion, such because the Household Heritage Alliance and Susan B. Anthony Record, together with many Republican lawmakers, wrote the Legal professional Basic’s workplace in the course of the public remark interval with considerations that the title and clarification have been too broad and never correct.

“Our largest subject was the truth that it didn’t state this is able to create a constitutional proper to an abortion. Which is the primary factor that the modification could be doing,” mentioned State Rep. Bethany Soye (R-Sioux Falls). Soye authored a letter co-signed by 19 different state lawmakers asking Vargo to alter the language. “We have to make it very clear what this modification is doing.”

The brand new clarification of the modification, launched late final week, now says that the modification would “Set up a Proper to Abortion within the State Structure” and “gives a authorized framework for the regulation of abortion.”

“State regulation requires me to offer a ‘clear, and easy abstract’ in order that voters perceive the aim and potential impact of a proposed modification” Vargo mentioned in a press release to Dakota Information Now/KOTA Territory. “After a evaluation of the entire feedback I obtained, I imagine that the ultimate language I submitted higher meets these goals.”

Advertisement

“South Dakotans who’re simply seeing this for the primary time on the poll want to know that this creates a proper to abortion,” mentioned Susan B. Anthony Record State Coverage Director Katie Glenn. “There is no such thing as a proper to an abortion in South Dakota, there isn’t any proper to an abortion in the US Structure. this is able to be an enormous change from state coverage.”

“Dakotans for Well being” founder Rick Weiland, who’s main the cost to get the modification on the poll, says that the change meant little to them and they’re happy shifting ahead.

“For those who take a look at among the public feedback lots of them have been very editorial and I’d argue fairly political, and he (Vargo) didn’t settle for hardly any of it,” Weiland mentioned. “So was there any materials change to what our modification proposes? I don’t actually suppose there was.”

Dakotans for Well being will nonetheless have to gather the required quantity of signatures to ensure that the initiative to get on the poll in 2024.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

Abortion rights initiatives make the ballot in South Dakota and Colorado

Published

on

Abortion rights initiatives make the ballot in South Dakota and Colorado


(AP) – Voters in Colorado and South Dakota will have a say on abortion rights this fall after enough signatures were collected to put measures on the ballots.

South Dakota voters will get a chance at direct democracy on the contentious issue in a conservative state where a trigger law banning nearly all abortions went into effect after Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Colorado’s measure, which made the ballot Friday, would enshrine abortion protections into the state constitution. Colorado already has broad protections for abortion, becoming a haven for those in states that have restricted abortion, particularly Texas.

South Dakota’s top election official announced Thursday that about 85% of the more than 55,000 signatures submitted in support of the ballot initiative are valid, exceeding the required 35,017 signatures.

Advertisement

Voters will vote up or down on prohibiting the state from regulating abortion before the end of the first trimester and allowing the state to regulate abortion after the second trimester, except when necessary to preserve the life or physical or emotional health of a pregnant woman.

Dakotans for Health, which sponsored the amendment, said in a statement Thursday that the signatures’ validation “certified that the people of South Dakota, not the politicians in Pierre, will be the ones to decide whether to restore Roe v. Wade as the law of South Dakota.”

Abortion rights are also on the ballot in Florida and Maryland, and advocates are still working toward that goal in states including Arizona, Montana and Nebraska in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 reversal of Roe.

Voters of seven other states have already approved abortion access in ballot measures, including four that wrote abortion rights into their constitutions.

Supporters for Colorado’s ballot measure said they turned in over 225,000 signatures, nearly double the required number of just over 124,000. Amending the state constitution will require the support of 55% of voters.

Advertisement

“In this time of uncertainty, we need to secure abortion rights and access in the Colorado Constitution, beyond the reach of politics and politicians,” Karen Middleton, president of Cobalt Abortion Fund based in Colorado, said in a statement Friday.

South Dakota outlaws all abortions, except to save the life of the mother.

Despite securing language on the ballot, abortion rights advocates in South Dakota face an uphill battle to success in November. Republican lawmakers strongly oppose the measure, and a major abortion rights advocate has said it doesn’t support it.

The American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota warned when the signatures were submitted that the language as written doesn’t convey the strongest legal standard for courts to evaluate abortion laws and could risk being symbolic only.

Life Defense Fund, a group organized against the initiative, said they will continue to research the signatures.

Advertisement

Opponents still have 30 days — until June 17 — to file a challenge with the secretary of state’s office.

“We are grateful to the many dedicated volunteers who have put in countless hours, and we are resolute in our mission to defend unborn babies,” co-chairs Leslee Unruh and state Rep. Jon Hansen said in a statement.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

OSU Football: South Dakota State Not a Typical Season Opener

Published

on

OSU Football: South Dakota State Not a Typical Season Opener


Oklahoma State’s first game of 2024 will not be an easy one.

The Cowboys have high expectations going into next season, and they might need to realize their potential in game one. Although they are kicking off against an FCS opponent, South Dakota State is not a typical team.

OSU is 17-2 in season openers under Mike Gundy and has won nine straight. However, the team’s most recent loss came against Florida State in 2014.

The Seminoles entered that season No. 1 as the defending national champions. To begin 2024, the Jackrabbits will enter Stillwater as a two-time defending national champion, riding a 29-game winning streak. 

Advertisement

READ MORE: OSU Football: Avoiding Slow Start Imperative for Cowboys in 2024

The Cowboys’ season-opening matchup made ESPN’s list of 10 potential FCS over FBS upsets for next season. Although the game could cause issues for the Cowboys, the team’s position could help it get out of week one with a win.

Perhaps the most important quality for OSU going into next season is the lack of questions surrounding the team. Going into 2023, OSU’s season was filled with unknowns.

The Cowboys had three quarterbacks vying for the starting spot, three running backs looking for an opportunity and a new defensive coordinator for the second straight season. Meanwhile in 2024, Alan Bowman has the starting spot, Ollie Gordon II is a Heisman hopeful and Bryan Nardo’s defense has shown it can be relied on in big moments.

With the third-most returning production, OSU is likely to enter next season ranked. With so much returning talent from a 10-win team, OSU would not be on upset watch against any FCS team other than the most dominant.

Advertisement

The Cowboys have struggled in early season games in recent years, but with an abundance of continuity, they could be ready to hit the ground running against a tough opponent.

READ MORE: OSU Softball: Poullard and Davis Shine; Cowgirls Take Down Northern Colorado

Want to join the discussion? Like AllPokes on Facebook and follow us on Twitter to stay up to date on all the latest Cowboys news. You can also meet the team behind the coverage.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

USD Department of Art Instructor Hosted Arts and Health Program at Mike Durfee State Prison

Published

on

USD Department of Art Instructor Hosted Arts and Health Program at Mike Durfee State Prison


Ariadne Albright, an arts in health adjunct instructor in the University of South Dakota Department of Art, co-directed an arts and health program at the Mike Durfee State Prison in Springfield.

The program, I Believe II / The South Dakota Prison Project, was led by Albright and Suzanne Costello, director of the Stuart Pimsler Dance & Theatre Company. It was a sequel to the successful 2022-2023 initiative at the South Dakota State’s Men’s Penitentiary in Sioux Falls.

Funded by a South Dakota Department of Health Innovation Grant, the intensive two-week residency included four hours of daily workshops in visual arts, writing, movement and theater, exploring personal beliefs and fostering self-expression. The project culminated in an art exhibit and performance.

“The goals of this innovative program are to positively impact barriers prevalent in carceral settings, promote mental wellness through creative expression and provide tools for personal growth,” Albright said. “Further, this initiative seeks to foster connections and empathy among this community, impacting greater prison culture.”

Advertisement

The I Believe I & II projects extend beyond the prisons and into the community. The artwork created during the residencies will be showcased in a touring art exhibit, Arts & Incarceration, to museums and galleries across South Dakota and Minnesota from 2024-2026. These exhibitions will include gallery talks to facilitate dialogue and understanding for audiences outside the prisons.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending