Connect with us

Ohio

Ohio State football projected 2025 offensive depth chart ahead of spring ball

Published

on

Ohio State football projected 2025 offensive depth chart ahead of spring ball


It’s been less than two months since Ohio State took home the first-ever 12-team College Football Playoff with four straight wins over top ten teams, the last of which vs. Notre Dame in the CFP Championship Game. But … believe it or not, spring ball is just around the corner and will begin on Monday. It’ll run through Saturday, April 17, in some form of a spring showcase that isn’t being called a spring game, so we’ll see what that’s all about.

Nevertheless, it means the building blocks of this year’s team will begin to take shape next week and there are plenty of holes to fill from a team that had a ton of veteran talent now off to a little known league known as the — NFL.

We often like to project what the depth chart will be for the Buckeyes as we head through the offseason. Just before spring kicks off feels like a pretty good time to peer into the crystal ball and make some somewhat educated guesses on how things might look with the two-deep when the defending national champions run out of the tunnel of the Horseshoe against the Texas Longhorns on August 30.

Sometimes these exercises are easy (ahem, last year), and sometimes it’s like putting a puzzle together that’s missing several border pieces. With all of the change afoot with new coaches in place and several players competing for starting spots, this is most certainly the latter.

Advertisement

But hey, we get paid to try and sort these type of things out, so off we go starting with the offensive side of the ball. The defensive side and special teams will follow on the heels of our projected two-deep Ohio State football offensive depth chart for the 2025 season.

Quarterback

Starter | Julian SayinBackup | Lincoln Kienholz

Head coach Ryan Day has said that the quarterback battle is an open competition, but it would be a mild shock if Sayin doesn’t take the baton and run with it. He’s the former 5-star top quarterback in the 2024 class and has drawn rave reviews from players in the program. Kienholz has multiple years of experience in the system and will probably have a leg up on 5-star Tavien St. Clair — at least for now.

Running Back

Starter | CJ DonaldsonBackup | James Peoples

Advertisement

Peoples felt like the next man up as the guy that’s been waiting his turn in the program, but then the coaching staff went out and got West Virginia transfer, CJ Donaldson. Ryan Day loves what he saw from a pretty equal two-back approach last year and that’s probably the plan here. There’s a little more proof in the pudding here with the durable experience of Donaldson, so we’ll give him the 1A distinction for now.

Wide Receiver (x)

Starter | Jeremiah SmithBackup | Quincy Porter

Smith will be the best wide receiver in college football and arguably the best player in the game. You can put him down as the starter here in permanent ink. Behind him is a little more unknown than we’ve seen in past years, but where there’s a lack of experience comes no lack of talent. Porter is a highly-regarded prospect that can fill in when needed with still some significant skill to throw at opposing defenses.

Wide Receiver (z)

Advertisement

Starter | Carnell TateBackup | Mylan Graham

Like Smith, Tate would seem to have this spot locked down as a proven commodity and returning starter. Graham might be a breakout candidate and could also see significant time anywhere in the receiving corps but his skill set would seem to make sense right behind Tate, but don’t count him out of backing up Smith on the outside No. 1 slot as well.

Wide Receiver (slot)

Starter | Brandon InnissBackup | Bryson Rodgers

Again, it would seem on the surface that the No. 1 starters at each spot should be pretty locked in, and that’s the case with Innis as well. This is the most likely to go another route though with Graham and potentially Rodgers pushing for time. All three of the backups could shuffle somewhere else, so we’ll see how things play out initially in the spring and what the coaches are thinking early on.

Advertisement

Tight End

Starter | Max KlareBackup | Will Kacmarek

It sure looks like Ohio State’s top two safeties will be former transfers. Kacmarek would have likely nailed down the starting spot, and he’ll still get plenty of time as a great blocking tight end, but Klare was a huge win in the portal. He’s a difference maker and nightmare matchup in the passing game that could add an extra dimension to the OSU offense. Bennett Christian will also get some time, but he feels like a distant third at this point.

Left Tackle

Starter | Ethan OnianwaBackup | Deontae Armstrong

Advertisement

Ohio State went out and got Onianwa out of the transfer portal from Rice for a reason. His experience will be counted on to be penciled in as the starter to protect the quarterback’s blind side. Behind him, the highly-touted Carter Lowe will get a look, but the call is for Deontae Armstrong to get the early nod because of his time in the program.

Right Tackle

Starter | Phillip DanielsBackup | Ian Moore

It’ll be a close competition between the experience of Minnesota transfer Phillip Daniels and Ian Moore, but again, the coaching staff wouldn’t have dipped into the portal to grab Daniels if it didn’t think he’d have a very good chance of nailing down a starting spot. Moore will push though and has shown flashes of being the answer at the right tackle spot. Don’t be surprised if you see this be one of the toughest competitions in the spring.

Left Guard

Advertisement

Starter | Luke MontgomeryBackup | Devontae Armstrong

Montgomery got thrust into the spotlight because of a couple of injuries last season and impressed through the magical run. That means he has the experience and confidence of the coaches from performing when the bright lights were on. Expect him to be the starter here with the backup spot up for grabs and a bit unknown. The other Armstrong twin will compete most likely with Gabe VanSickle to be the next man up. There also could be some shuffling as there almost always is to get the best two-deep possible.

Right Guard

Starter | Tegra TshabolaBackup | Austin Siereveld

This feels like a weak link of the offensive line. Tshabola has the most experience and will likely get the first crack here, but he struggled at times last season. Siereveld was also inconsistent but could develop and push for playing time in what could turn out to be a competition to watch. Also, to get the best five out there, don’t be surprised if another interior offensive lineman finds his way over in this spot.

Advertisement

Center

Starter | Carson HinzmanBackup | Joshua Padilla

Hinzman was the starter here before Alabama transfer Seth McLaughlin showed up and took the spot over to start last season. Karma was kind to Hinzman after perhaps being in the doghouse though when McLaughlin was lost for the year because of injury. He stepped back in and was an anchor on a line that got better and better. There’s little doubt that he’ll be the man in the middle again in 2025. Padilla is a talent waiting his turn and he will be ready to provide relief when needed. It gets pretty then beyond that without shuffling the deck.

Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Phil Harrison on X.



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center

Published

on

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center


Thousands of people are expected to head to downtown Columbus for the 23rd annual Home Improvement Show this weekend.

Organizers say visitors can find ideas for everything from small interior design projects to major renovations.

The event is being held at the Ohio Expo Center and includes seminars, exhibits and demonstrations from local and national companies.

The show begins at noon Friday and runs until 6 p.m.

Advertisement

It continues Saturday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Adult tickets cost $5 at the door.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending