Connect with us

Ohio

How Ohio State’s Defense Could Look Different in 2025 with Matt Patricia As Coordinator, Eight New Starters

Published

on

How Ohio State’s Defense Could Look Different in 2025 with Matt Patricia As Coordinator, Eight New Starters


Ohio State’s 2025 defense could look significantly different than the No. 1-ranked defense that led the Buckeyes to a national championship in 2024.

That would have been the case even if Jim Knowles had stayed at Ohio State for a fourth season as the Buckeyes’ defensive coordinator. Eight of the 11 starters from Ohio State’s 2024 defense were seniors who are now preparing to play in the NFL: defensive ends Jack Sawyer and JT Tuimoloau, defensive tackles Ty Hamilton and Tyleik Williams, linebacker Cody Simon, cornerback Denzel Burke, nickelback Jordan Hancock and safety Lathan Ransom.

Even before Knowles left Ohio State for Penn State, there was talk that the Buckeyes’ defensive scheme could be adjusted in 2025. With the impending departure of the entire starting defensive line from last season, there had been subtle hints that the Buckeyes could mix up their defensive fronts more after using a four-down front almost exclusively for the past two seasons. Different alignments in the secondary were certainly possible, too, especially with the departure of the versatile Hancock, who played both cornerback and safety for the Buckeyes in 2024.

More drastic defensive changes could be on the table now that Ohio State has hired Matt Patricia as its new defensive coordinator.

Advertisement

What exactly Ohio State’s defense will look like with Patricia at the helm is difficult to pinpoint. Patricia’s defenses with the New England Patriots, where he held his only previous full-time defensive coordinator job, were known for their variety and multiplicity, often looking different from one week to the next based on opponent matchups. Those defenses were also heavily influenced by Bill Belichick, who worked closely with the defense throughout his tenure as Patriots head coach.

Changing the scheme throughout the season would likely be a less successful strategy at the collegiate level, as coaches don’t get as much time to meet with their players and install game plans in college football as they do during the NFL season. Given Patricia’s history of using multiple fronts, though, it would come as a surprise if Ohio State’s defense relies solely on four-man fronts in 2025.

Ultimately, Patricia’s job will be to work with Ryan Day and the rest of Ohio State’s assistant coaches to build a defensive scheme that fits the team’s top defensive players, which he says has always been his philosophy as a coordinator.

“We would always morph the defense based on the talent we had,” Patricia said in a recent interview on Julian Edelman’s Games with Names podcast, referencing his time as the Patriots’ defensive coordinator. “Personnel was always the biggest thing: Who do we got? It was always us first, like, who do we have? Who are the best 11 guys we can put on the field to help us win this week, and who do they got?”

Advertisement

As Patricia begins his Ohio State tenure, one of his most important tasks will be determining who the Buckeyes’ best 11 defensive players are. He should already know who Ohio State’s best defender is, and everything the Buckeyes do defensively in 2025 should be built around maximizing the talents of superstar safety Caleb Downs. Ohio State often used Downs as a safety/linebacker hybrid in the middle of its defense last season, particularly in the second half of the year, and Patricia has a history of doing the same when Patrick Chung was the Patriots’ strong safety.

It’s a safe bet that Sonny Styles and Davison Igbinosun will also be starters after starting for Ohio State’s No. 1-ranked defense this past season, but whether they’ll be used the same way they were in 2024 is uncertain. Styles has the versatility to do a lot of different things for the Buckeyes’ defense, having started his career as a safety before moving to linebacker while he has a downhill skill set that could theoretically make him effective coming off the edge in certain situations. While Igbinosun has played exclusively at outside cornerback in his first two years at Ohio State, there’s a school of thought that he could be used in different ways in the secondary too, especially with Jermaine Mathews Jr., Devin Sanchez and Aaron Scott Jr. all being strong candidates to push for more playing time at cornerback.

One of the biggest personnel question marks for Ohio State’s defense is who will step up along the defensive line, which could play a big part in determining which defensive fronts the Buckeyes use primarily. 

While Ohio State eschewed the hybrid outside linebacker/defensive end Jack position that Jim Knowles initially brought to OSU over the past two years, a big reason for that was because all of Sawyer, Tuimoloau, Williams and Hamilton were best suited to play in a four-man front. This year’s projected top group of defensive linemen includes several players who could be well-suited to play in three-man fronts; Eddrick Houston, Logan George and Caden Curry would all be candidates to play the 5-technique defensive end spot, while Kayden McDonald has the body type to be a true nose tackle.

Kenyatta Jackson Jr. should see plenty of playing time as a traditional defensive end, but one of the biggest wild cards in this year’s defensive equation is C.J. Hicks, who’s expected to play primarily on the edge as a senior after being a backup linebacker for the past three years. A pass-rushing outside linebacker role has the potential to unlock his five-star talent, and whether he can establish himself as one of Ohio State’s top pass-rushers could determine how much the Buckeyes use a standup edge defender this season.

Advertisement
Possible Defensive Front Lineups
Pos 4-2-5 Pos 3-3-5
DE KENYATTA JACKSON JR. DE CADEN CURRY/KENYATTA JACKSON JR.
DT EDDRICK HOUSTON NT KAYDEN MCDONALD
NT KAYDEN MCDONALD DE EDDRICK HOUSTON/LOGAN GEORGE
DE CADEN CURRY/LOGAN GEORGE OLB C.J. HICKS

While Patricia’s defenses could include both 4-3 and 3-4 looks in the traditional sense, with Arvell Reese and Payton Pierce projecting as top candidates to play alongside Styles at linebacker, Ohio State’s primary defense will likely still feature five defensive backs in the lineup. And Ohio State will likely continue to use many of the same coverage concepts that made its pass defense the best in the country for the past two years, with Tim Walton and Matt Guerrieri both expected to have a major role in coordinating the back end of the defense with their respective promotions to co-defensive coordinator and passing game coordinator.

That said, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see a little more personnel variation in the secondary in 2025. The Buckeyes relied mostly on their starting five in 2024 except for Mathews rotating in with Burke and Igbinosun, but Hancock’s ability to play multiple positions helped enable that. While Lorenzo Styles Jr. is a potential candidate to play the dual role that Hancock did, Ohio State could also use three true safeties more often with Malik Hartford and Jaylen McClain being candidates to play big roles alongside Downs. If Sanchez proves to be what he’s expected to be as a freshman, Ohio State would also have good reason to put him on the field with Igbinosun and Mathews for three-cornerback looks, as there’s a good chance all three of them will rank among OSU’s best 11 defenders.

Possible Secondary Lineups
Pos Hybrid Nickel Pos Three-CB Pos Three-Safety
CB DAVISON IGBINOSUN CB DAVISON IGBINOSUN CB DAVISON IGBINOSUN
CB JERMAINE MATHEWS JR. CB DEVIN SANCHEZ CB JERMAINE MATHEWS JR.
NB LORENZO STYLES JR. CB JERMAINE MATHEWS JR. S MALIK HARTFORD
FS CALEB DOWNS FS CALEB DOWNS S CALEB DOWNS
SS JAYLEN MCCLAIN/MALIK HARTFORD SS JAYLEN MCCLAIN/MALIK HARTFORD S JAYLEN MCCLAIN

Neither Patricia nor anyone else at Ohio State should be looking to completely reinvent the Buckeyes’ defense after a season in which they had the best defense in the country. But adjustments were always going to be necessary for a defense that’s losing eight starters from last season who will all likely be selected in the 2025 NFL draft. How well Patricia can marry up the defensive concepts he’ll bring to Columbus with the returning talent Ohio State has on defense will determine whether Ohio State has another elite defense in 2025.



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center

Published

on

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center


Thousands of people are expected to head to downtown Columbus for the 23rd annual Home Improvement Show this weekend.

Organizers say visitors can find ideas for everything from small interior design projects to major renovations.

The event is being held at the Ohio Expo Center and includes seminars, exhibits and demonstrations from local and national companies.

The show begins at noon Friday and runs until 6 p.m.

Advertisement

It continues Saturday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Adult tickets cost $5 at the door.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending