Ohio
How could the 2025 high school volleyball postseason shake out for Southwest Ohio’s teams?
McNicholas volleyball captains tell which opponents they respect
Nothing but respect: McNicholas volleyball captains Allie Runte, Sarah Hutchinson and Lauren Radtke share the opponents they respect and why.
It’s hard to believe, but there are just over four weeks left in the Ohio high school volleyball season.
With the release of the statewide postseason brackets on Oct. 5, it’s time to analyze each team’s path to the Nutter Center in Fairborn.
Cincinnati could send as many as six teams to this year’s state tournament and there is the possibility for multiple rematches from the 2024 postseason along the way.
No matter which teams emerge out of each district, region and division, there will surely be some exciting volleyball along the way.
Here are the first-round matchups, analysis and regional semifinal predictions for each division.
Division I
First-round matchups: Springboro vs. Springfield, Hamilton vs. Fairfield, Mason vs. Hamilton/ Fairfield winner; Lakota West vs. Little Miami, Lebanon vs. Oak Hills; Sycamore vs. Milford; Seton vs. Western Hills, Lakota East vs. Princeton; Loveland vs. Middletown; St. Ursula vs. Walnut Hills, Colerain vs. West Clermont
Analysis: Having teams in multiple regions opens up the possibility for an all-Cincinnati state semifinal.
Seton, which has only dropped two sets all season, is the overwhelming favorite in Region 4. The Saints could see a regional final rematch with Mason, which has risen to No. 3 in the state in recent weeks. The Comets recently went on a 14-match winning streak but were swept by Seton on Oct. 7.
What are the odds that St. Ursula and Loveland, which played an epic DII regional final in 2024, could face off on the same stage this season after moving up to DI? It’s looking like a reality since both teams are in fairly weak district brackets. Granted, they’d both have to get past a Central district team in the regional semifinals.
My other two picks to make the regional tournament are Lebanon and Milford. District titles would be a pleasant reward for having to endure this year’s Eastern Cincinnati Conference gauntlet.
Regional semifinal predictions: Lebanon vs. Seton, Mason vs. Milford in Region 4; Loveland vs. Pickerington Central, St. Ursula vs. Olentangy Berlin in Region 3
Division II
First-round matchups: Kings vs. Winton Woods; Mount Notre Dame vs. Edgewood; Anderson vs. Harrison
Analysis: Kings and Mount Notre Dame have inside tracks to the regional tournament, as both are the only teams in their respective district brackets with winning records.
Anderson vs. Harrison could be the best district semifinal. The Raptors did beat the Wildcats in four sets on Sept. 13. The winner of that match will most likely face Northmont, which is the only team with a winning record out of the North.
Regional semifinal predictions: Kings vs. Dublin Scioto, Mount Notre Dame vs. Anderson
Division III
First-round matchups: Hughes vs. New Richmond, Mt. Healthy vs. Ursuline; Turpin vs. Northwest, Western Brown vs. Wilmington; Badin vs. Goshen, Withrow vs. Talawanda; Ross vs. Woodward, Monroe vs. Ross/Woodward winner
Analysis: Before the season, many would have seen Ursuline and Turpin playing in a second straight regional final. Instead, they will most likely meet in the regional semifinal.
Don’t be mistaken, the DIII regional tournament will be incredibly talented. Tippecanoe, which pushed Ursuline to five sets last year, is undefeated this season. Ross won its first outright Southwestern Buckeye League title and set a program record for wins.
The most intriguing bracket in DIII, Region 12 involves Badin and Talawanda. The Rams and Brave face off on Oct. 9 and will most likely see each other again in the district semifinal. Talawanda is 14-6 so far. Badin is 8-11 after graduating a talented senior class.
Regional semifinal predictions: Ursuline vs. Turpin, Ross vs. Tippecanoe
Division IV
First-round matchups: DePaul Cristo-Rey vs. North College Hill, McNicholas vs. DPCR/ NCH winner; Gamble Montessori vs. Clinton-Massie; Waynesville vs. Dunbar; Bethel-Tate vs. Purcell Marian; Indian Hill vs. BT/ PM winner, Fenwick vs. Shroder; Taylor vs. Roger Bacon, Mercy McAuley vs. Taft; Batavia vs. Wyoming, CHCA vs. SCPA
Analysis: Cincinnati has four of the top five teams in the state in Division IV (No. 1 McNicholas, No. 2 Fenwick, No. 3 CHCA, No. 5 Taylor). Add in Roger Bacon and Mercy McAuley, who, even with sub-.500 records, will always be competitive in the postseason. One word to describe the regional tournament: electric. No matter which teams will be featured, those three matches will produce some of the best volleyball in the state.
Taylor, Roger Bacon and Mercy McAuley all being in the same district is tough. Whichever team makes it out alive will earn a berth to the district final and should advance to the regional semifinal.
Regional semifinal predictions: McNicholas vs. CHCA, Fenwick vs. Mercy McAuley
Division V
First-round matchups: Georgetown vs. Blanchester, Madeira vs. Georgetown/ Blanchester winner, Seven Hills vs. Norwood; Clermont Northeastern vs. Mariemont, Deer Park vs. Williamsburg; Summit Country Day vs. Clark Montessori, Reading vs. Finneytown
Analysis: Division V is where we start to see a lot of Cincinnati Hills League, Miami Valley Conference and Southern Buckeye Athletic & Academic Conference teams.
Madeira is the highest seed in its portion of the bracket. The Amazons would face either Norwood or Seven Hills in the district semifinal. Those two are a combined 0-5 against the CHL this season.
As for the Clermont Northeastern/ Mariemont/ Deer Park/ Williamsburg sector, you could pick a name out of hat as to who makes the district final. Mariemont and Deer Park split their season series, as did CNE and Williamsburg.
Once the postseason begins, Summit Country Day will be five wins away from its first-ever state tournament. The regional tournament could be the hardest part of the journey as the Silver Knights would probably face either Milford Center Fairbanks or Versailles, which ended SCD’s 2024 campaign in the district final. Both teams appeared in the 2024 DV regional tournament.
Regional semifinal predictions: Versailles vs. Milford Center Fairbanks, Summit Country Day vs. Miami East
Division VI
First-round matchups: MVCA vs. Oyler, Fayetteville-Perry vs. Cincinnati Christian; Cincinnati Country Day vs. St. Bernard-Elmwood Place, East Clinton vs. CCD/ SBEP winner
Analysis: Two teams from The Enquirer’s coverage area are guaranteed to make the district finals. East Clinton (19-2) and MVCA (15-4) are the top two seeds in the South brackets. East Clinton could face North No. 1 seed Arcanum (17-4), which has won three straight Western Ohio Athletic Conference titles but has also only won three postseason games since 2021.
An intriguing early-round possible matchup is MVCA vs. Cincinnati Christian. The Lions won their third Miami Valley Conference title in the last five years, but the Cougars have arguably played a tougher schedule.
Regional semifinalist predictions: St. Henry vs. MVCA, East Clinton vs. Fort Recovery
Division VII
First-round matchups: Felicity-Franklin vs. Spencer, New Miami vs. Felicity-Franklin. Spencer winner; CCPA vs. Lockland, Middletown Christian vs. CCPA/ Lockland winner;
Analysis: Just like in DVI, Southwest Ohio is guaranteed two district finalists. The only problem is, whichever teams make it that far will most likely face state-ranked Russia and Covington.
Middletown Christian and New Miami are the top two seeds in the South and will each only have to win one game to get to the district final.
Regional semifinalist predictions: Russia vs. Leipsic, Covington vs. Fort Loramie
`
const PAYWALL_HTML2 = `
Subscribe For Unlimited Access
You have exceeded the number of free articles available each month.
Thank you for supporting quality local journalism
Our award-winning coverage would not be possible without you.
Sign in here
if you are already a subscriber for unlimited access to breaking news, sports, photos, videos and our e-edition on your phone, tablet or desktop.
Click here
for our new subscriber specials.
*Read more about digital access.
`.trim();
const PAYWALL_HTML3 = `
Already a subscriber? LOG IN.
`
const PAYWALL_HTML4 = “
function ensureCss() {
if (!document.head) return;
const existing = document.querySelector(‘link[data-paywall-css=”1″]’);
if (existing) return;
const link = document.createElement(‘link’);
link.rel=”stylesheet”;
link.type=”text/css”;
link.href = CSS_HREF;
link.setAttribute(‘data-paywall-css’, ‘1’);
document.head.appendChild(link);
}
function hasSubInfo(el) {
// Only replace once the widget already contains .subInfo
return !!(el && el.querySelector(‘.subInfo’));
}
function applyTo(el) {
if (!el || el.dataset.paywallReplaced === ‘1’) return;
if (!hasSubInfo(el)) return; //
Real estate transfers in Licking County, Ohio, range from $85,000 to $865,000
The following are property transfers recorded in Licking County from June 1-5, 2026.
First name indicates the seller; second name represents the buyer
Buckeye Lake
- 502 Providence Lane; Cohagen, Christopher C and Lori A; Adams, Jeffrey L and Boyce-Adams, Jo Anna; 6/1/2026; $511,000
- 131 Cranberry Lane; Smart, Amy and Kidwell, Kevin K; Sew and Minor, Christian; 6/1/2026; $262,000
Etna Township
- 116 Cameron Drive SW; Ray, Erica L; Darjee, Sanjay and Laxmi and Dil; 6/2/2026; $412,000
- 119 Kraner St. SW; Adkins, Zane and Amy; Culbertson, Brenton Howard; 6/1/2026; $368,500
- 160 Dusky Willow Drive; Willow Reserve LLC; Martin, Alaina K; 6/2/2026; $290,940
Granville
- 119 Derwyn Del Way; Lifer, David C and Julia H; Martin, Michael and Lisa; 6/1/2026; $865,000
- 39 Victoria Drive; Acton, Wendy S and Paul J; Cannon, Matthew Evan and Zywica, Natalie Nicole; 6/2/2026; $835,000
Granville Township
- 49 Alberry Drive; Halliday, Lucas and Breayne; Howe, Jason and Kathryn; 6/2/2026; $570,000
Harrison Township
- 102 Whirlaway Loop; Rice, Dawn (Trustee); Bope, Maria and Shane; 6/2/2026; $420,000
Heath
- 1306 Kacey Court; Fischer Homes Columbus II LLC; Owens, Blake Andrew and Taylor Marie; 6/2/2026; $437,779
- 805 Fieldson Drive; Flowers, Ingrit; Harder, Noah C; 6/2/2026; $250,000
Hebron
- 802 Cumberland Meadows Circle; Lines, Marlene S; Gerhart, Jamie A and Ralph W Jr; 6/2/2026; $232,000
Johnstown
- 101 Bigelow Drive; McGovern, Matthew S and Jennifer L; Sanford, Jessica; 6/2/2026; $442,500
Liberty Township
- 5844 Nichols Lane Road NW; La Jeunesse, Garth E and Debra; Nesselroad, William Heath and Annie; 6/1/2026; $629,000
- 7211 Northridge Road NW; Devault, Robert E Jr and Joann; Esbenshade, Travis M and Lowe, Shelby M; 6/1/2026; $495,000
Newark
- 2110 Overlook Way; D.R. Horton-Indiana LLC; Tarsha, Michele A; 6/1/2026; $433,335
- 1162 Taylor Ave.; Heath Fluid LLC; Anglada, Gabriel P and Salina T; 6/1/2026; $200,000
- 32 Postal Ave. W.; Palmisano, Phil; Moore, Dominic Michael and Miksich, Paige Elizabeth; 6/1/2026; $198,900
- 75 Gay St.; Velez, Marcos A; Camell, Campbell; 6/1/2026; $155,000
- 655 Evans St.; TNL; McRada Properties LLC; 6/1/2026; $145,000
- 63 Wallace St.; FDA Peachtree LLC; Burns, Amber L; 6/2/2026; $86,500
- 404 10th St.; Synergy Group Properties LLC; Busy Boys Restoration LLC; 6/2/2026; $85,000
Reynoldsburg
- 8447 Rodebaugh Road; Collins, Carol J; Thorpe, Kimberley Lynn and Henry, Steven; 6/2/2026; $340,000
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio’s law requiring children under 16 to get parental consent to use social media apps must be restored, a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.
The decision comes as a blow to NetChoice, which has won court victories against identical digital identification laws in other states, including Arkansas, Louisiana and Georgia. The trade group representing TikTok, Snapchat, Meta and other major tech companies said the Ohio decision went against “clear national consensus” and that it intended to keep fighting.
“An unconstitutional law protects no one, and we remain focused on ensuring the First Amendment rights of Ohioans are protected,” said Paul Taske, director of the NetChoice Litigation Center.
Netchoice brought suit against Ohio’s law in 2024, arguing that it was overly broad, vague and represented an unconstitutional impediment to free speech.
The Cincinnati-based Sixth Circuit’s panel disagreed. In a 2-1 decision, it found that the law was not unconstitutional and sent it back to a lower court to have a block on the law’s enforcement vacated.
“At bottom, the Act imposes a parental consent requirement,” Judge Eric Clay wrote in the lead opinion. “That requirement constitutes a marginal burden that precisely targets the multi-faceted problem that Ohio has identified: Children’s unsupervised assent to terms and conditions for use of platforms that take advantage of and harm them.”
Judge Alice Batchelder concurred, writing that “a statute is not vague just because it has a wide berth.”
Known as the Social Media Parental Notification Act, the Ohio law was part of an $86.1 billion state budget bill that Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed into law in July 2023.
The administration pushed the measure as a way to protect children’s mental health, with then-Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, now a U.S. senator, saying at the time that social media was “intentionally addictive” and harmful to kids.
The law requires companies to get parental permission for social media and gaming apps and to provide their privacy guidelines so families know what content would be censored or moderated on their child’s profile.
Republican Ohio Attorney General Andy Wilson called Thursday’s ruling “a win for Ohio families.”
“The court agreed that parents –- not social media companies –- should get a say in what kids see online,” he said in a statement. “We have an obligation to keep our children safe, and today, the most dangerous place for our kids is the internet. This decision gives parents the tools to be involved and provide oversight.”
-
Science2 minutes agoHere’s why the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool went green so fast
-
Sports5 minutes agoShohei Ohtani out of Dodgers’ lineup vs. Orioles for birth of his second child
-
World18 minutes agoLebanese influencer organises World Cup event amid Israel’s attack on Leban
-
News40 minutes agoAir Force One, gifted to Trump from Qatar, arrives at Joint Base Andrews
-
New York2 hours agoVideo: Fans Show Up to the Parade in Their Best Knicks-Themed Attire
-
Los Angeles, Ca2 hours agoVictims sought after man allegedly points gun at passing cars in Santa Clarita Valley
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoBest barbershop in Metro Detroit: Finalists for this year’s Vote 4 The Best
-
San Francisco, CA3 hours agoHow to watch San Francisco Giants vs. Miami Marlins
