North Dakota
North Dakota lawmakers throw out resolution against same-sex marriage: What to know
Consumers to boycott companies retreating from DEI. Here’s what we know.
Consumers are planning to boycott certain companies retreating from diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.
More than nine years have passed since the U.S. Supreme Court made same-sex marriage legal across the country with its ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges case.
But a resolution considered – and ultimately rejected – by North Dakota lawmakers would have urged the court to overturn that decision.
The resolution, sponsored by Rep. Bill Tveit, a Republican from Hazen, was passed in February by the North Dakota House on a 52-40 vote, with one member absent or excused.
On Wednesday, a state Senate committee voted 6-1 to send the resolution to the full Senate, the North Dakota Monitor reported. More than 300 people submitted testimony ahead of a public hearing, with the vast majority in opposition.
Sen. Ryan Braunberger, a Democrat from Fargo, was the lone vote against the motion to advance the resolution to a Senate vote.
“I want my constituents to know that I disagree with this wholeheartedly,” he said. “This bill is coming from a place of hate.”
The state Senate spent less than 10 minutes debating the resolution Thursday before striking it down with a 16-31 vote, The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead reported.
Tveit told The Associated Press that the Obergefell ruling “went totally against the Tenth Amendment, went totally against the North Dakota Constitution and North Dakota Century Code (state laws).”
“Why did I introduce it? Every one of us in this building took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the state,” he said.
Here’s what to know about the resolution and the Supreme Court’s nearly decade-old same-sex marriage ruling.
What did the North Dakota same-sex marriage resolution say?
The text of the resolution began by urging the Supreme Court to “restore the definition of marriage to a union between one man and one woman.”
The court’s ruling, it said, requires states to recognize same-sex marriage and issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in “complete contravention of a state’s own constitution and the will of the state’s voters, thus undermining the civil liberties of those states’ residents and voters.”
It also said the Obergefell decision “arbitrarily and unjustly rejected the definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman,” calling it an “illegitimate overreach.”
It concluded by urging the Supreme Court to overturn its ruling and restore “the issue of marriage and enforcement of all laws pertaining to marriage back to the states and the people.”
Which North Dakota officials supported of the resolution?
Tveit, the resolution’s sponsor, said Wednesday, “It’s past time for North Dakota citizens to speak their displeasure with this Supreme Court decision and call for restoration of the definition of marriage as only of the legal union between a man and a woman.”
Arthur Schaper, a field director for MassResistance, which was labeled an anti-LGBTQ hate group by the GLAAD Accountability Project, also spoke in support of the resolution on Wednesday. He said, “It is a crime against nature to teach anyone that they are born homosexual or transgender. These patterns of behavior are inherently harmful to individuals and they should not be granted a privileged status in marriage.”
Which North Dakota officials opposed the resolution?
Braunberger, the Democratic state senator from Fargo, said after Thursday’s vote, “Hopefully in the future, we don’t have to do these frivolous things and can work on real issues, like making sure everybody can put food on their table.”
On Wednesday, state Rep. Matt Ruby, a Republican from Minot who supported the resolution when it passed the state House, told the Senate committee he regretted his vote.
“I knew before we were done with that floor session that I had made a mistake,” he said. “I’ve regretted a lot of votes over my four sessions. This is the first time I’ve been disappointed with myself over a vote.”
Bradley King, a Bismarck resident, also testified against the resolution on Wednesday. He held up a picture of his daughter, a middle school teacher, and her wife, and said how proud he was to walk her down the aisle, the North Dakota Monitor reported.
“Right now, you are looking at one angry father,” King said. “I personally feel that this is an attack on my daughter.”
What is the Obergefell decision?
The Supreme Court’s decision is named for Jim Obergefell, who started a lawsuit with 30 other plaintiffs after his husband, John, died from ALS and the state of Ohio refused to allow Obergefell’s name to be on his death certificate, USA TODAY reported at the time.
“No American should have to suffer that indignity, that’s why John and I and the 30 plaintiffs who are a part of this lawsuit decided to fight,” Obergefell said.
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision ruled the Constitution does not limit the marriage rights of same-sex couples and effectively legalized same-sex marriages across the country. The decision followed decades of legal battles over the constitutionality of same-sex marriage.
North Dakota
North Dakota leaders unveil enhanced oil recovery plan for Bakken
BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – North Dakota leaders unveiled an initiative aimed at getting more oil out of the Bakken, using enhanced oil recovery and CO₂.
Senator John Hoeven said the effort is getting a boost from $36 million from the Department of Energy for “Crack the Code 2.0,” a $157 million initiative with state and industry funding.
Hoeven said the goal is to use CO₂ for enhanced oil recovery, calling it “an important, usable, valuable commodity” and saying, “We’re linking our coal plants with our oil and gas producing companies to do it.”
Funding will be used to develop technology to make enhanced oil recovery profitable and viable, and then implement it in North Dakota oil fields in a number of pilot projects.
Hoeven said current recovery rates in the Bakken are limited.
“We’re only producing about 10 to 12% of the oil out of that shale,” he said, “But with EOR, advanced oil recovery techniques, we can double it. We can take it from 10 to 12% up to 25% or better.”
Hoeven said the effort is also tied to electricity demand, saying North Dakota will “produce more electricity for a company that wants to do AI, that wants to do data centers, needs more and more electricity,” and that “it isn’t just about oil and gas.”
North Dakota Petroleum Council President Ron Ness said the pilot projects are expected to start soon.
“We hope to see these pilots putting their technologies into the ground sometime late this year, first quarter of next year,” said Ness.
“So I would expect by this time next year, we’re going to maybe potentially begin to see what are some of the results early on,” Ness added. “And again, this is going to take multiple, multiple swings at this thing. It’s not going to just happen. If it was easy, we’d be doing it. Nobody’s done it anywhere in the world. This is where we’re going to crack the code.”
Copyright 2026 KFYR. All rights reserved.
North Dakota
North Memorial and South Dakota-based Sanford Health merging
Three years after a deal with Fairview was called off, South Dakota-based Sanford Health is getting into the Twin Cities market with a new merger.
On Friday, the health system announced that it will combine with North Memorial Health.
Fairview, Sanford call off planned merger
Under the merger, Sanford says the organization will invest $600 million to strengthen the Robbinsdale hospital and double the Maple Grove hospital’s size.
Sanford is the largest rural nonprofit health system in the country, with 58 hospitals and roughly 56,000 employees across the Dakotas, Iowa, Wisconsin, Wyoming and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. North Memorial operates two hospitals in Robbinsdale and Maple Grove, along with several other clinics, employing more than 6,500 people.
If completed, the health systems plan to keep some local leadership in place, including North Memorial CEO Trevor Sawallish, and two North Memorial board members will serve on the combined system’s board. However, the overall company will be led by Sanford CEO Bill Gassen.
The companies say they expect the merger to close later this year, as long as regulatory processes don’t cause delays.
Sanford’s previous attempt to merge with Fairview was called off in 2023, eight months after initially announcing the planned merger. Many Minnesotans raised concerns about that transaction, including Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, although some of that was due to the University of Minnesota’s partnership with Fairview and the possibility of an out-of-state company running the state’s flagship medical school.
As with most mergers, concerns are still likely to arise about possible cutbacks and the impact on the state’s healthcare quality. However, the deal seems more likely to be completed than Sanford’s past attempts.
Reaction
SEIU Healthcare Minnesota & Iowa, who represents over 1,000 workers at North Memorial, called the news “worrisome.”
“At a time when healthcare costs are skyrocketing for Minnesota families and frontline healthcare workers are getting squeezed by short staffing levels, this latest attempt at consolidation brings many concerns. It is especially concerning because previous merger attempts by Sanford Health to come into Minnesota have failed due to their values and corporate behavior,” the union said.
SEIU also called on Ellison “to use all of his office’s powers within the law to provide oversight into this proposed merger and ensure the interests of Minnesota’s workers and patients are protected.”
Ellison’s office is asking the public to submit information through an online Community Input Form.
“As we have done and are currently doing with other healthcare transactions, we are conducting a thorough review of this potential acquisition to ensure it complies with the law and is in the public interest,” Ellison daid. “Proposed health care consolidation requires careful examination. As long as I am Attorney General, I will use the full range of regulatory tools to protect Minnesotans’ access to quality, affordable healthcare.”
The Minnesota Nurses Association released a statement saying it is “deeply concerned” by the merger announcement, warning it “could have far-reaching consequences for patients, healthcare workers, and the communities they serve.”
This is a breaking news story. Follow 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS on social media and on the KSTP app below for more updates.
North Dakota
North Dakota scores third-highest average IQ nationally
BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – Here’s something North Dakotans can take pride in: North Dakota has the third-highest average IQ in the nation, tying with Vermont at 103.8. That is 3.5 points above the national average.
The state with the highest average is Massachusetts at 104.3 and the state with the lowest average is Mississippi at 94.2.
Ninety-four percent of North Dakotans graduate high school, making it the state with the sixth-highest graduation rate in the nation.
Copyright 2026 KFYR. All rights reserved.
-
New York49 minutes agoMan Dies in Subway Attack; Mamdani Orders Inquiry Into Suspect’s Release From Bellevue
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoPatchy dense fog turns to stronger thunderstorms for Metro Detroit to start the weekend
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoWhere to watch Pittsburgh Pirates vs San Francisco Giants: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 9
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoFC Dallas vs Real Salt Lake Preview: Lineups, Storylines & What to Watch
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoMiami Area Gets First New Manufactured Home Community in Decades
-
Boston, MA2 hours ago
What we know about wrong-way driver killed in head-on collision with state trooper in Lynnfield – The Boston Globe
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoA Frontier plane hits a pedestrian during takeoff at Denver airport
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoWhere to watch Seattle Mariners vs Chicago White Sox: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 9